Printer Friendly

Sunbeds: A burning issue needing attention in South Africa.

To the Editor: There is scientific evidence demonstrating an association between sunbed (tanning bed) use and subsequent development of melanoma. [1,2] The risk of melanoma skin cancer for individuals who 'ever used' sunbeds has been reported to increase by 20%, and by 40% if sunbeds were used before the age of 35 years. [1,2] In South Africa (SA), skin cancer is among the top 10 cancers and causes ~300 deaths per year. [3] The cost of diagnosis and treatment of skin cancers in SA public and private healthcare settings is estimated at >ZAR90 million per year. [4]

Prevalence data from surveys and data from GLOBOCAN were used to estimate that, in 2008, 3 438 cases of melanoma could be attributable to sunbed use, most (n=2 341) occurring among women, in 15 member countries of the European Community (plus three member countries of the European Free Trade Association). [1] While we do not have such figures for SA, we identified one South African who had used a sunbed prior to the development of an invasive amelanotic melanoma on her left leg. Fig. 1 presents a timeline of her sun exposure history and melanoma diagnosis and treatment up to 2 October 2018.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer classified ultraviolet (UV)-emitting tanning devices, i.e. sunbeds, as carcinogenic in 2009 and concluded that there is no safe limit for UV from such devices. [5] The World Health Organization [6] stated that countries need to educate the public about the health risks of UV exposure from sunbeds and apply regulations to restrict their use, [7] such as banning use of sunbeds by people with sensitive skin, banning unsupervised operations, banning hire/sale of sunbeds, enforcing registration of sunbeds and sunbed premises, periodic inspections of sunbed premises, and fines for any infringements of proclaimed restrictions. Recent legislation in several countries around the world bans commercial sunbeds (Appendix 1; available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2018.v108i12.13715). [8]

In SA, sunbeds are widely available [9] for use in beauty salons, fitness gyms and hair salons, and for sale, both new and second hand. We postulate that trying to regulate sunbed operators in SA will be challenging. There is lack of compliance of sunbed operators with the South African Consumer Protection Act No. 68 of 2008 [10] (that restricts false advertising) to not overstate the perceived 'benefits' of sunbed use including that 'sunbeds condition skin before going outdoors in summer'. The cost of regulation and compliance is prohibitive. Local authorities would be mandated to oversee sunbed regulation, and their scope of work is already burdensome. Sunbeds are geographically dispersed throughout the country, [9] so ongoing efforts to ensure compliance would be costly. Second-hand, ex-commercial sunbeds may be disposed of in the second-hand market, possibly to private residences, making regulation challenging. In some countries that have banned sunbeds, sunbeds were removed from premises, and sunbed operators were compensated.

A ban on sunbeds is probably the best way forward for SA, although it will not be a simple process. We could also consider additional taxes for tanning sessions, such as those placed on tobacco and recently sugar, to drive down demand, as an example of possible regulatory action by government, but this would still require compliance monitoring. Embarking on a nationwide education campaign in SA to educate the public on risks associated with using sunbeds will require prolonged and ongoing commitment by the National Department of Health, the Cancer Association of South Africa and others working for primary and secondary prevention of skin cancer.

DOI: 10.7196/SAMJ.2018.v108i12.13715

[1.] Boniol M, Autier P, Boyle P, Gandini S. Cutaneous melanoma attributable to sunbed use: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2012;345:e4757. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4757

[2.] Wehner MR, Shive ML, Chren M-M, Han J, Qureshi AA, Linos E. Indoor tanning and nonmelanoma skin cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2012;345:e5909. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmj.e5909

[3.] Norval M, Kellet P, Wright CY. The incidence and body site of skin cancers in the population groups of South Africa. Photoderm Photoimmunol Photomed 2014;30(5):262-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/ phpp.12106

[4.] Gordon L, Elliott T, Wright CY, Deghaye N, Visser W. Modelling the healthcare costs of skin cancer in South Africa. BMC Public Health 2016;16:113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1364-z

[5.] International Agency for Research on Cancer. Sunbeds and UV radiation. https://www.iarc.fr/en/ media-centre/iarcnews/2009/sunbeds_uvradiation.php (accessed 8 January 2018).

[6.] World Health Organization. Artificial tanning devices: Public health interventions to manage sunbeds. http://www.who.int/uv/publications/artificial-tanning-devices/en/ (accessed 8 January 2018).

[7.] World Health Organization. Artificial tanning sunbeds: Risks and guidance. http://www.who.int/uv/ publications/sunbedpubl/en/ (accessed 8 January 2018).

[8.] Global Health Observatory Data Repository of the World Health Organization. http://apps.who.int/ gho/data/node.main.SUNBEDSEXISTENCE?lang=en (accessed 13 November 2018).

[9.] Wright CY, Albers PN, Reeder AI, Mathee A. Sunbeds and skin cancer risk: Quantifying a baseline estimate of sunbed facilities in South Africa prior to implementation of sunbed regulations. Pan Afr Med J 2017;26:188. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2017.26.188.10176.

[10.] South Africa. Consumer Protection Act No. 68 of 2008. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/ 32186_467_0.pdf (accessed 9 October 2018).

C Y Wright

Environment and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council; and Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa

cwright@mrc.ac.za

Z Kunene

Environment and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Johannesburg, South Africa

W Visser

Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

A Mathee

Environment and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Johannesburg, South Africa; Environmental Health Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, South Africa; and School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Caption: Fig. 1. Timeline of a melanoma patient who used a sunbed during her teenage years and again during her 30s, and developed an invasive amelanotic melanoma 2 years after experiencing a bad sunburn from a sunbed. While sunbed use is only one of many risk factors, it is a modifiable risk factor, since one can choose not to use a sunbed. (FST II = Fitzpatrick skin type II; CT = computed tomography; PET = positron emission tomography.)
Appendix 1

Countries that have banned sunbeds (World Health
Organization [8])

                          Existence of    Year of
Country                   national        national
                          regulation      implementation
                                          of regulation

Argentina                 No
Australia                 No
Austria                   Yes             1995
Bahrain                   No
Belgium                   Yes             2017
Bolivia                   No
Brazil                    Yes             2009
Bulgaria                  No
Canada                    Yes             2014
Chile                     Yes             2013
China                     No
Colombia                  Yes             2005
Cuba                      No
Cyprus                    No
Denmark                   Yes             2014
Egypt                     No
Finland                   Yes             2012
France                    Yes             2014
Germany                   Yes             2012
Greece                    No
Iceland                   Yes             2003
Iran                      No
Iraq                      No
Ireland                   Yes             2015
Israel                    Yes             2014
Italy                     Yes             2011
Latvia                    Yes             2010
Luxembourg                No
Malaysia                  No
Morocco                   No
Netherlands               Yes             2015
New Zealand               Yes             2017
Norway                    Yes             2016
Philippines               No
Qatar                     No
Saudi Arabia              No
Slovakia                  Yes             2014
Slovenia                  Yes             2009
Spain                     Yes             2002
Sweden                    Yes             2012
Switzerland               Yes             2013
United Arab Emirates      No
UK                        No
USA                       Yes

                          Existence of
Country                   subnational
                          regulation

Argentina                 Yes
Australia                 Yes
Austria                   No
Bahrain                   No
Belgium                   No
Bolivia                   No
Brazil                    No
Bulgaria                  No
Canada                    Yes
Chile                     No
China                     No
Colombia                  No
Cuba                      No
Cyprus                    No
Denmark                   No
Egypt                     No
Finland                   No
France                    No
Germany                   No
Greece                    No
Iceland                   No
Iran                      No
Iraq                      No
Ireland                   Yes
Israel                    No
Italy                     Yes
Latvia                    No
Luxembourg                No
Malaysia                  No
Morocco                   No
Netherlands               No
New Zealand               Yes
Norway                    No
Philippines               No
Qatar                     No
Saudi Arabia              No
Slovakia                  No
Slovenia                  No
Spain                     Yes
Sweden                    No
Switzerland               Yes
United Arab Emirates      Yes
UK                        Yes
USA                       Yes
COPYRIGHT 2018 Health & Medical Publishing Group
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:CORRESPONDENCE
Author:Wright, C.Y.; Kunene, Z.; Visser, W.; Mathee, A.
Publication:SAMJ South African Medical Journal
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:Dec 1, 2018
Words:1338
Previous Article:Strengthening our health system.
Next Article:Genomic characterisation of Staphylococcus aureus ST121 isolated from hospitalised patients in South Africa.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters