Printer Friendly

Subha Mukherji. Law and Representation in Early Modern Drama.

Subha Mukherji. Law and Representation in Early Modern Drama. Cambridge University Press, 2006. xii + 286 pp. + 4 illus.+ 3 maps. $95.00. Review by NANCY M. BUNKER, MACON STATE COLLEGE.

Law and Representation in Early Modern Drama convincingly argues for the "nature and extent of the engagement" between legal and dramatic "cultural practices" (2), focusing on the "nature of the interaction" more than "either of the two disciplines per se" (15). Subha Mukherji concentrates on links between dramatic and legal evidence and highlights the unique devices drama employs to represent the legal experience. Her study, she notes, is the "first book of literary criticism or interdisciplinary enquiry that attempts to reconstruct the physical realities of courtroom interaction and experience" (16). She points out that this method uses "drama itself as historical evidence-implying the larger argument about historical method and the place of literary evidence in it" (12).

Chapter one interrogates early modern marriage law through grounding in legal records, Henry Swinburne's seminal text, A Treatise of Spousals (c1600), and Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice and All's Well That Ends Well. Exposing legal skepticism, Mukherji addresses this often overlooked uncertainty located within the legal evidentiary patterns. Her examination sheds new light on both de futuro and de praesenti oral marriage contracts and calls attention to the instability of verbal intent, the ring accepted as a non-verbal token, and the misappropriation of signs as legal proof, all of which further complicate adequate dramatic representation.

In a carefully studied unpacking of Thomas Heywood's A Woman Killed With Kindness (1607) and a 1596 Cambridge University employee's court case, Mukheri's second chapter explores the judicial attitudes that accompany adultery and characterize infidelity. Her investigation explains ways that the "ascertainment of adultery as a legal fact provides a historical basis to the metaphor of public spectatorship and helps us to understand key aspects of early modern mental life, such as privacy, intimacy, and experience of domestic space" (11). Mukherji's analysis reveals investigative practices in dramatic fictional communities and the contemporary legal environment exhibit remarkable consistency; further, she shows that the "dirty business of ferreting out adultery" casts respectable evidence collection into an undignified space (80).

Contemporary materials such as Protestant judgment books, moral tracts, popular news pamphlets, broadsides, and ballads underpin the exploitation of evidence and legitimate representation in chapter three. Mukherji explores A Warning for Fair Women (c. 1590s), an anonymous play that both aligns itself with anti-theatrical sentiment and attempts to "forge a generic identity legitimate by the moralists' own standards" (96). Linking Warning with well-known providentialist history in The Theatre of God's Judgments (1597), she argues the play "serves a legal agenda" (112). Her focus on the dumb show as performance within representational strategies demonstrates drama's attitude toward evidentiary issues. Mukherji's chapter closes with an analytical look at drama's ability to "cast doubt on the project of theatrical providentialism itself " (134).

John Webster's The White Devil provides the focal point of Mukherji's chapter four, as she examines the word "colour" in relationship to image-making, evidence, and judgment. A systematic treatment demonstrates Webster's understanding of colour as a "hermeneutic tool," one scrupulously marshaled in order to interrogate evidence (135). She attends to issues of spectatorship and suggests diligent study of "white" and "black" exposes the potential for misreading signs. Her reading offers multiple rhetorical interpretations of "colour" and the legal implication of giving "colour"--"a practice known to be a sham, pure fiction" (149); she contends the play's judicial self-reflexivity distinguishes it within the context of the early modern legal framework.

Chapter five, "Locations of Law: Spaces, People, Play," looks at the physical, lived interrelated spheres of legal and theatrical cultures (12). Set in the legally entrenched Whitefriar's district, with its urban, specifically metropolitan identity, Lording Barry's Ram Case (1608) represents the city, "where law's centrality was often social rather than technically pertaining to law courts" (179). Her reading of this play's legal plots exposes the law's trickiness as well as its malleability. A 1623 Star Chamber litigation against playwrights Webster, Ford, Dekker, Rowley and company involving a real-life alehouse story (now lost) furnishes the backdrop for the second strand of Mukherji's analysis. She explores the connections between the era's present-day scandals and entertainment venues. Of special interest are the discussions of common law courts and their workings within and without London, the trial tracts written by those who witnessed proceedings, and the issues of 'open court' that came to signify jurisprudence.

Focusing on law and gender, chapter six examines Webster's The Devil's Law Case, a play whose female adulterous protagonist "outperforms" her accusers and disrupts court proceedings (206). Female litigants were accommodated by the court, but the court operated from an established "patriarchal position" and was underpinned by "severely limiting" female "legal agency" (214). Utilizing Shakespeare's Measure for Measure, she shows ways the law itself makes space for contradictions that can then be exploited by women; these situations take the form of "double-speak, contradictions, law-trick, stratagems, and sexual intrigue" (208). Historical background, multiple law cases, and an emerging model for women at court support Mukherji's claims. The "fictional component itself as a historically meaningful phenomenon," she maintains, and the "living art of dramatists resides in the middle ground between literal reality and pure invention" (232).

Mukherji's "Epilogue: The Hydra Head, the Labyrinth and the Waxen Nose: Discursive Metaphors for Law" analyzes the multiplicity of dramatic signification and legal application through a rereading of Ram Alley and Swinburne's Spousals. "The threat of multiplicity implicit in legal discourse," she suggests, is "also the threat of uncertainty" that the hydra, labyrinth, and waxen nose make concrete in drama. She integrates Bacon's remarks on the labyrinth of uncertainties that common law had become. Further, she suggests that the image of "error, confusion, and incertitude that occupied theology, science, and philosophy" indisputably points to legal mazes. Although Swinburne recognized these mazes, they have been largely overlooked in examinations of common and canon law (242).

Subha Mukherji has produced an illuminating examination of the relation between drama and law in Renaissance England. With well-researched and solid investigation, her book makes a valuable contribution to cultural studies, gender representation, legal history, and seventeenth-century theatre. A focus on evidence foregrounds the resemblances between the formal structures; however, her argument, she says, is for "salutary caution against an overgeneralising model of the drama's critique of law" (228). Mukherji succeeds by exposing the complex interaction between these two vital cultural forces.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Texas A&M University, Department of English
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Bunker, Nancy M.
Publication:Seventeenth-Century News
Article Type:Book review
Date:Sep 22, 2007
Words:1068
Previous Article:Julie Campbell. Literary Circles and Gender in Early Modern Europe: A Cross-Cultural Approach.
Next Article:Curtis Perry. Literature and Favoritism in Early Modern England.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters