Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin: ready for prime time?
A 52-year-old nurse with a history of breast cancer treated with mastectomy presents to you with a 3-day history of leg pain and swelling. She has calf tenderness and edema, and an ultrasound obtained that day shows an acute thrombus in the deep femoral vein. You plan to start her on low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) as an outpatient. One of her own patients recently received subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UH), and she asks you to prescribe that for her because the copayment for the LMWH is prohibitive. You were not aware of this option and do an online, real-time search for the information.
In patients with deep vein thrombosis, does treatment with subcutaneous UH have comparable safety and efficacy to LMWH?
You go to PubMed (www.pubmed.gov) and enter "subcutaneous heparin" AND "pulmonary embolism," limiting the search to randomized controlled trials.
This study is an exciting and well-conducted clinical trial that is potentially ground-breaking for providing data on the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous UH for the outpatient treatment of venous thromboembolism. We have used this approach in our practice in appropriate situations (nursing home resident with advanced dementia and a no-hospitalization order), and it remains to be seen whether clinicians will adopt this practice. Because the trial's sample size was small, clinicians may want to wait for further studies before adopting this approach for widespread clinical practice.
You discuss the findings with your patient and express your lack of comfort with this approach at this time. You refer her to the physician in your area who prescribed UH for her patient.
C. Kearon, et al.
Fixed-Dose Heparin (FIDO) Investigators. Comparison of fixed-dose weight-adjusted unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin for acute treatment of venous thromboembolism (JAMA 2006;296:935-42.)
* Design and Setting: This randomized, open-label, outcome adjudicator-blinded, noninferiority trial was conducted at university-affiliated clinical centers in Canada and New Zealand.
* Subjects: Potential subjects were 18 years of age or older with newly diagnosed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the leg or pulmonary embolism (PE). Symptomatic DVTs were diagnosed by compression ultrasonography or venography. Those symptomatic DVTs confined to the calf veins and asymptomatic DVTs required venographic diagnosis. PE was symptomatic and diagnosed by either high-probability ventilation/perfusion scan, nondiagnostic VQ scan associated with diagnostic findings for DVT, or CT scan. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant; were unable to complete follow-up assessments; or had contraindication to subcutaneous therapy, active bleeding, life expectancy less than 3 months, treatment for venous thromboemoblism (VTE) for more than 48 hours, long-term anticoagulation therapy, a contraindication to heparin or radiographic contrast, or creatinine greater than 2.3 mg/dL.
* Intervention: Patients received weight-adjusted, fixed-dose, twice-daily dosing of UH (intervention) or LMWH (control). Coagulation tests were not allowed, but a sample was obtained for each UH patient on the third day UH was given in a dose of 333 U/kg followed by a second dose of 250 U/kg. LMWH was either dalteparin or enoxaparin and was given at 100 IU/kg for all doses. The LMWH or UH was given for at least 5 days and until the international normalized ratio was 2.0 or higher.
* Outcomes: The trial was designed to determine whether initial treatment with fixed-dose UH was as effective as LMWH. Subjects were assessed at 3 days, 1 month, and 3 months after initiation of treatment. They were told to report if they had symptoms of VTE or bleeding. To diagnose recurrent VTE, the same criteria used to establish the initial diagnosis had to be met in segments of deep veins or pulmonary arteries previously unaffected with thrombosis. Bleeding was defined as major if it was clinically overt and associated with a decrease in Hg of at least 2.0 g/dL, involved a need for transfusion of two or more units, or involved a critical site such as the retroperitoneum or intracranium. All outcomes were evaluated by a central adjudication committee.
* Results: In this trial, 708 patients were randomized (355 to UH; 353 to LMWH). Patients were similar at baseline. No differences were observed between the UH and LMWH groups in the rates of recurrent VTE (3.8% and 3.4%, respectively) and major bleeding in the first 10 days (1.1% and 1.4%, respectively). During 3 months of follow-up, no UH subjects with an APTT (activated partial thromboplastin time) of less than 60 seconds had recurrent VTE, vs. 3.2% of those with an APTT equal to 60 seconds; this difference was not statistically significant. No major bleeding occurred within 10 days of enrollment among patients with APTTs greater than 85 seconds or less than 85 seconds.
BY JON O. EBBERT, M.D., AND ERIC G. TANGALOS, M.D.
DR. EBBERT and DR. TANGALOS are with the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. To respond to this column or suggest topics for consideration, write to Dr. Ebbert and Dr. Tangalos at our editorial offices or e-mail them at firstname.lastname@example.org.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||MINDFUL PRACTICE|
|Author:||Ebbert, Jon O.; Tangalos, Eric G.|
|Publication:||Internal Medicine News|
|Date:||Nov 15, 2006|
|Previous Article:||In CHD, type 'D' personality stands for distress.|
|Next Article:||Testosterone impresses in heart failure trial.|