Printer Friendly

Study on the Electrochemical Performance of Sacrificial Anode Interfered by Alternating Current Voltage.

1. Introduction

It has been known that the AC stray current has a great influence on the potential and current of the buried metallic pipeline when it is close to high voltage AC transmission lines or rail transit systems [1, 2]. Moreover, the presence of AC has caused serious damage on interfered metallic structures even when cathodic protection is applied [2-5]. L. Y. Xu [6] found that the presence of AC interference decreased the CP effectiveness to protect the steel from corrosion. Only when CP potential was sufficiently negative, the steel was under a complete protection even when the AC current density was 400 A/[m.sup.2]. The cathodic protection system of airport apron pipe network generally adopts magnesium alloy sacrificial anode cathodic protection [7], and it also inevitably has an adverse effect on the sacrificial anode performance [8, 9].

As early as 1978, Pookote [10] pointed out that AC could lead to the potential shift of Mg sacrificial anode and accelerate its dissolution. Freiman [11] found that the potential of Mg sacrificial anode shifted positively under AC and the current efficiency of Mg was decreased significantly. For pipelines protected by sacrificial anodes, excessive AC interference voltage could degrade the performance of the sacrificial anode, shorten its service life, and even "polarity reversal" which could accelerate the corrosion of the pipeline [12]. Bruchner [13] found that the polarity of pipeline-Mg sacrificial anode turned to be the cathode while the protected pipeline turned to be the anode when the applied AC current density reached 39A/[m.sup.2]. Dezhi Tang [14] found that the output cathodic protection current of the Mg sacrificial anode decreased at alternating current density of 50 A/[m.sup.2]. Polarity reversal occurred to Mg sacrificial anode as soon as alternating current interference of 100 A/[m.sup.2] (or larger) was applied. Yin Kehua et al. [15] studied the effects of AC interference on the properties of Mg, Al, and Zn sacrificial anodes in soil. The results showed that with the increase of AC interference, the output negative current density of Mg and Al would decrease continuously, while output current density of Zn was relatively stable. At the same time, the "polar reversal" behavior of Mg anode under AC interference was also observed.

In summary, AC voltage can interfere in the normal operation of cathodic protection system [9, 16-21], or cause polarity reversal in pipelines with the sacrificial anode, leading to the pipeline lack of effective protection. Therefore, it is very necessary to study the influence of AC stray current on the cathodic protection system.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Specimen and Solution. Sacrificial anode specimens used in this work were magnesium alloy rods with diameter of 10mm. The chemical composition of magnesium alloy rods is as follows: 6.5 wt% Al, 3.5 wt% Zn, 0.6 wt% Mn, 0.005 wt% Fe, 0.003 wt% Ni, 0.02 wt% Cu, 0.1 wt% Si, and bal. wt% Mg. The magnesium alloy sacrificial anode rods were welded with wires and put into the electrician tubes. We used epoxy resin and curing agent mixture with the ratio of 3:1 to pour magnesium alloy sacrificial anode rods, leaving an exposure area as the working face. The electrode was ground sequentially to 2000grit emery paper and then cleaned by acetone, absolute ethanol, and distilled water.

The test solution was brought from the soil along the apron with the chemical composition of [Na.sub.2]C[O.sub.3] 0.1599g/L, NaCl 0.5124 g/L, [Na.sub.2]S[O.sub.4] 0.1712g/L, NaHC[O.sub.3] 0.0864g/L. All measurements were conducted at ambient temperature of 20[degrees]C and open to air.

2.2. Electrochemical Equivalent Circuit for the Experimental. Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of the experimental set-up for studies of AC interference corrosion under different chloride ion concentration or test temperature. The experimental device uses a three-electrode system. The magnesium alloy sacrificial anode rod was used as the working electrode (WE), the platinum electrode was used as the counter electrode (CE), and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) was used as a reference electrode (RE). The distance between WE and RE was about 2mm, in order to reduce the ohmic drop in potential measurements. The electric circuit was specially designed to supply and measure AC and DC signals independently. Working electrode, AC power source, capacitor, and carbon rod form an AC interference system. Reference electrode, high resistance voltmeter, and working electrode compose voltage test system. Auxiliary electrode, reference electrode, working electrode, and electrochemical workstation consist of electrochemical test system. In this work, the sinusoidal AC signal with a frequency of 50 Hz was supplied between two graphite electrodes. Within the AC mesh, an electrolytic capacitor (50V, 470 [micro]F) [1] in series was used to prevent DC circulation. And within the DC mesh, an inductor [2] was used to prevent the flow of AC current into the electrochemical measurement system.

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements. The electrochemical workstation (CHI660D) used a three-electrode cell system. Specimens used for electrochemical measurements were coated with epoxy resin, leaving an exposure area of 3.925 [cm.sup.2] as the working surface. The electrode was ground sequentially to 2000 grit emery paper and then cleaned by acetone, anhydrous alcohol, and distilled water.

The stable open potential, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and polarization curves of magnesium alloy sacrificial anode were measured by the electrochemical workstation every day. The frequency range of EIS was 100 kHz to 0.1Hz while the amplification of sinusoidal AC signal was 3mV. The data analysis software was ZSimpWin3.21. According to the test results of open circuit potential, it was determined that the range of polarization curve was from -0.8V to -0.3V, and the scanning rate was 0.1667mV/s.

3. Results

Figure 2 shows the open circuit potential of sacrificial anode under various AC voltages at an ambient temperature of 20[degrees]C in the test solution for eight days. The corrosion potential of the magnesium sacrificial anode was observed to shift positively under all experimental conditions. It indicated that the activity in the sacrificial anode surface decreased as time went by with or without AC interference. The open circuit potential's positive migration under AC interference of 5V voltage was the maximum while that of 0V voltage was the minimum.

Table 1 shows the corrosion electrochemical parameters fitted by polarization curves of the sacrificed anode under different AC interference voltages of 0V, 1V, 3V, or 5V. The polarization resistance increased gradually and the corrosion current decreased with the progress of the experiment. It indicated that the corrosion tendency and rate of the sacrificial anode decreased with the increasing of the experimental time. Compared with the polarization resistance and corrosion current at the same experiment time, it could be seen that the polarization resistance was smaller under AC interference than that without AC interference, and the corrosion current was larger than that without AC interference. It indicated that AC interference voltage could reduce the corrosion tendency of the sacrificial anode while it would accelerate the dissolution rate of magnesium anodic. The larger the AC interference voltage was, the stronger the promotion effect was.

Sacrificial anode control could be observed by the slope trend of the cathode and anode polarization curves. At the beginning of the experiment, the slope of cathodic polarization curve was larger than that of anodic polarization curve. After a certain period of experiment, the slope of anodic polarization curve was gradually higher than that of cathodic polarization curve. It indicated that the cathode control gradually transformed into anode control. It showed that AC played an important role in anodic polarization of magnesium alloy sacrificial anode.

Figure 3 shows the EIS under different AC in the original soil simulation solution and at ambient temperature. It could be seen that there were two impedance arcs in the shape of EIS under the four environments of 0V, 1V, 3V, and 5V AC interference voltages. The change of the impedance arc was the largest on the second day of experiment. The variation of impedance arc became smaller with the lapse of time. We could find that the radius of impedance arc represented by the sacrificial anode surface corrosion products was the largest with no AC. And the larger the AC interference was, the larger the radius of impedance arc was. It indicated that AC interference accelerated the corrosion of the sacrificial anode and promoted the corrosion products on the surface of sacrificial anode. The greater the AC interference was, the faster the rate of corrosion was.

In order to analyze the sacrificial anodic corrosion process, the EIS of Figure 2 is fitted with the equivalent circuits. Figure 4 shows the equivalent circuit of the EIS of the magnesium alloy sacrificial anode during the experiment. The elements represented different physical meanings: Rs represented the resistance of the solution, CPEdl represented the electric double layer capacitor of the metal oxide film and the solution, CPE represented the capacitance due to the ion through surface oxide film, Rt represented the charge transfer resistance, and Rc represented the oxidation resistance. When the experiment started, the oxide film on the surface of the sacrificial anode was destroyed, and the exposing metal reacted with oxygen. The corrosion products began to accumulate on the surface of the sacrificial anode. The physical meaning of the element representation changed: Rs still represented the resistance of the solution and CPEdl still represented the electric double layer capacitor of the metal oxide film and the solution, and CPE no longer expressed the capacitance due to the ion through surface oxide film, but on behalf of the capacitance due to the ion through corrosion scale. Rt still represented the charge transfer resistance. Rc represented the corrosion product film resistance.

Figure 5 shows the process of the change of corrosion product film resistance Rc under different AC interference voltages. It could be seen that the value of Rc increased gradually as experiment time went by. The larger the AC voltage was, the greater the change of Rc was.

4. Discussion

During the corrosion of magnesium alloy sacrificial anode in the soil simulated solution, the anodic and cathodic reactions include Mg oxidation and the reduction of hydrogen ions, respectively:

Mg [right arrow] [Mg.sup.2+] + 2e (1)

2[H.sup.+] + 2e [right arrow] [H.sub.2] (2)

Generally, the presence of alternating current in the soil around the buried pipelines is prevalent. And it has been acknowledged that buried pipelines corrode at an accelerated rate in the presence of AC interference. Magnesium alloy is a more reactive metal than carbon steel, and AC should have a greater impact on the sacrificial anode. So when AC interference is applied (on the 0th day), the potential is negatively shifted. And the greater the AC interference voltage is, the greater the potential offset is. Because of the AC interference, magnesium dissolution is accelerated. The corrosion product [Mg.sup.2+] does not diffuse in time; this would cause a local saturation of [Mg.sup.2+] ions and OH- to exceed the solubility of magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2), favoring the formation of Mg[(OH).sub.2] scale:

[Mg.sup.2+] + 2O[H.sup.-] [right arrow] Mg [(OH).sub.2] (3)

Then the open circuit potential of magnesium alloy has a sudden increase in the initial experiment stage, the potential offset is the largest under AC interference voltage of 5V, and the potential offset is the least under no AC interference. Then the open circuit potential continues to shift in a positive migration, although the degree of the offset is small. It indicates that the surface corrosion is serious and the sacrificial anode surface has the largest changes because of the rapid generating of corrosion product in the first two days of the experiment. And the inclination of sacrificial anode corrosion is smaller relatively after two days of the experiment because the sacrificial anode surface is covered with corrosion products. And then the influence of the corrosion inclination of AC voltage becomes small after two days of the experiment.

In the process of corrosion and dissolution, the cathodic reaction of magnesium sacrificial anode is the oxygen absorption reaction which is mainly due to the reaction between [O.sub.2] and the surface of magnesium alloy sacrificial anode. The corrosion of magnesium sacrificial anode with AC interference is biased towards cathodic control in the first two days because the Cathodic Tafel Slope is bigger than the Anode Tafel Slope. So the diffusion rate of oxygen affects the rate of corrosion. And the stray current accelerates the transmission and diffusion of oxygen, so the corrosion rate under AC interference is bigger than that with no AC interference; the bigger the AC interference voltage is, the faster the corrosion rate is. In the process of experiment, the longer the time of the oxygen absorption reaction on the surface of the anode is, the more the surface corrosion products accumulate. It would be difficult for [O.sub.2] to contact with the sacrificial anode surface, the reaction speed would gradually reduce and converge in all the experiments (as shown in Table 1), and the change tendency of impedance arc would be smaller (as shown in Figure 4). It indicates that the corrosion of sacrificial anode surface is relatively serious in the initial period. After that, although the corrosion is still aggravated, the rate of corrosion gradually slows down. The corrosion products on the sacrificial anode surface have accumulated very seriously, which hinders the reaction rate between [O.sub.2] and sacrificial anode surface.

In the process of experiment, the corrosion products of magnesium alloy sacrificial anode would drop a little and most of the rest is attached to the surface of sacrificial anode. The corrosion products gradually accumulated and became thicker. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was the same mode shown in Figure 3. The corrosion products attached to the sacrificial anode surface accumulates and the resistance of the corrosion reaction becomes larger. With no AC interference and 1V AC interference, the increasing rate of Rc becomes slower during the experiment. It indicates that the earlier corrosion products hinder the oxygen reaction of sacrificial anode surface seriously, which makes the corrosion products increase fewer. However, the increasing rate of Rc becomes slower and then becomes faster during the experiment when the AC interference voltages are 3V and 5V. It indicates that the larger AC stray current changes the corrosion state of magnesium sacrificial anode surface. There is still a great corrosion rate although the reaction resistance caused by corrosion products increases.

5. Conclusion

Effects of AC on the performance of Mg sacrificial anode were studied in the simulated soil solution along the apron pipeline at ambient temperature (20[degrees]C). The analysis of the experimental results led to the following conclusions:

(1) AC interference is critical to the corrosion of magnesium alloy sacrificial anode. AC accelerated the dissolution of Mg sacrificial anode.

(2) The DC potential of Mg sacrificial shifted positively under AC at the same time. With the passage of time, the DC potential of the Mg sacrificial anode shifted positively in the presence or absence of AC interference, and the positive shift was more obvious in the case of AC interference than that in the absence of AC interference.

(3) As the AC interference voltage increases in the range of 0~5V, the corrosion rate of the sacrificial anode is faster and faster, but the corrosion inclination is weakened. Moreover, the corrosion products accumulate in the magnesium alloy sacrificial anode surface, and it affects the releasing of quantity of electric charge.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1523626

Data Availability

The research data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The research work was supported by the Central College Foundation of CAUC (3122017038) and Airport Engineering Research Base Open Fund (study on the optimization of cathodic protection model in the apron area based on BEASY).

References

[1] D. Kuang and Y. F. Cheng, "AC corrosion at coating defect on pipelines," Corrosion, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 267-276, 2015.

[2] L. Wang, L. Cheng, J. Li, Z. Zhu, S. Bai, and Z. Cui, "Combined effect of alternating current interference and cathodic protection on pitting corrosion and stress corrosion cracking behavior of X70 Pipeline Steel in near-neutral pH environment," Materials, vol. 11, no. 4, 2018.

[3] S. Goidanich, L. Lazzari, and M. Ormellese, "AC corrosion. Part 2: Parameters influencing corrosion rate," Corrosion Science, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 916-922, 2010.

[4] L. Y. Xu, X. Su, and Y. F. Cheng, "Effect of alternating current on cathodic protection on pipelines," Corrosion Science, vol. 66, pp. 263-268, 2013.

[5] D.-K. Kim, S. Muralidharan, T.-H. Ha et al., "Electrochemical studies on the alternating current corrosion of mild steel under cathodic protection condition in marine environments," Electrochimica Acta, vol. 51, no. 25, pp. 5259-5267, 2006.

[6] A. Q. Fu and Y. F. Cheng, "Effect of alternating current on corrosion and effectiveness of cathodic protection of pipelines," Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 81-90, 2012.

[7] H. Zhao, P. Bian, and D. Ju, "Electrochemical performance of magnesium alloy and its application on the sea water battery," Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. S88-S91, 2009.

[8] I. A. Metwally, H. M. Al-Mandhari, A. Gastli, and Z. Nadir, "Factors affecting cathodic-protection interference," Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 485-493, 2007.

[9] N. Kouloumbi, G. Batis, N. Kioupis, and P. Asteridis, "Study of the effect of AC-interference on the cathodic protection of a gas pipeline," Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 335-345, 2002.

[10] S. R. Pookote and D.-T. Chin, "Effect of alternating current on the underground corrosion of steels," Materials Performance, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 9-15, 1978.

[11] L. l. Freiman and M. Yunovich, "Special behavior of steel cathode in soil and protection assessment of underground pipe with a buried coupon," Protection of Metals, vol. 27, pp. 437-447, 1991.

[12] D. Tang, Y. Du, M. Lu, L. Dong, and Z. Jiang, "Progress in the mutual effects between AC interference and the cathodic protection of buried pipelines," Journal of the Chinese Society of Corrosion and Protection, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 351-356, 2013.

[13] H. Bruckner W, "Electrochemical methods for the study of corrosion lead- encased water pipe and cables," Corrosion, vol. 8, pp. 135-136, 1965.

[14] D. Tang, Y. Du, X. Li, Y. Liang, and M. Lu, "Effect of alternating current on the performance of magnesium sacrificial anode," Materials and Corrosion, vol. 93, pp. 133-145, 2016.

[15] K. Yin H, M. Tang H, and J. Xiong X, "Corrosion of buried steel structure under effect of electrical field with industry frequency," Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and protection, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 33-41, 1982.

[16] X. Wang, G. Yang, H. Huang, Z. Chen, and L. Wang, "Study on AC stray current corrosion law of buried steel pipelines," Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 263-266, no. 1, pp. 448-451, 2013.

[17] M. Ormellese, S. Goidanich, and L. Lazzari, "Effect of AC interference on cathodic protection monitoring," Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 618-623, 2011.

[18] Y. T. Li, X. Li, G. W. Cai, and L. H. Yang, "Influence of AC interference to corrosion of Q235 carbon steel," Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 322-326, 2013.

[19] A. Q. Fu and Y. F. Cheng, "Effects of alternating current on corrosion of a coated pipeline steel in a chloride-containing carbonate/bicarbonate solution," Corrosion Science, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 612-619, 2010.

[20] D. Kuang and Y. F. Cheng, "Effects of alternating current interference on cathodic protection potential and its effectiveness for corrosion protection of pipelines," Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 22-28, 2017.

[21] M. Buchler and H.-G. Schoneich, "Investigation of alternating current corrosion of cathodically protected pipelines: Development of a detection method, mitigation measures, and a model for the mechanism," Corrosion, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 578-586, 2009.

Qingmiao Ding (ID), Xiao Chu (ID), Tao Shen (ID), and Xiaoxiao Yu

Airport College, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Xiao Chu; xchu@cauc.edu.cn

Received 4 July 2018; Revised 21 September 2018; Accepted 14 October 2018; Published 5 November 2018

Academic Editor: Ramazan Solmaz

Caption: Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the experimental.

Caption: Figure 2: The open circuit potential of magnesium sacrificial anode under different AC interference voltages at an ambient temperature of 20[degrees]C in the test solution.

Caption: Figure 3: The EIS of magnesium sacrificial anode under different AC interference voltages at an ambient temperature of 20[degrees]C in the test solution.

Caption: Figure 4: Equivalent circuit of the EIS.

Caption: Figure 5: The Rc value of the sacrificial anode under different AC interference voltages at an ambient temperature of 20[degrees]C in the test solution.
Table 1: The corrosion electrochemical parameters from
polarization curves of the sacrificed anode under different
AC voltages.

AC          Electrochemical             0d
voltage       parameters

0V           Polarization              659.3
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        6.530 x [10.sup.-5]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             6.340
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              3.760
                 slope

1V           Polarization              243.2
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        1.814 x [10.sup.-4]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             5.021
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              4.834
                 slope

3V           Polarization              331.7
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        1.254 x [10.sup.-4]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             5.376
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              4.894
                 slope

5V           Polarization              228.5
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        1.914 x [10.sup.-4]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             5.238
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              4.708
                 slope

AC          Electrochemical             2d
voltage       parameters

0V           Polarization              731.1
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        5.825 x [10.sup.-5]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             5.813
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              4.396
                 slope

1V           Polarization              346.4
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        1.279 x [10.sup.-4]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             4.788
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              5.027
                 slope

3V           Polarization              488.8
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        8.871 x [10.sup.-5]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             4.775
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              5.211
                 slope

5V           Polarization              245.3
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        1.818 x [10.sup.-4]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             4.694
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              5.052
                 slope

AC          Electrochemical             4d
voltage       parameters

0V           Polarization              820.4
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        5.167 x [10.sup.-5]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             5.082
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              5.175
                 slope

1V           Polarization              592.4
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        7.558 x [10.sup.-5]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             4.621
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              5.091
                 slope

3V           Polarization              510.3
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        7.968 x [10.sup.-5]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             4.829
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              5.864
                 slope

5V           Polarization              298.7
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        1.476 x [10.sup.-4]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             4.701
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              5.222
                 slope

AC          Electrochemical             6d
voltage       parameters

0V           Polarization              940.8
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        4.072 x [10.sup.-5]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             4.458
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              5.174
                 slope

1V           Polarization              724.8
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        5.858 x [10.sup.-5]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             4.413
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              5.826
                 slope

3V           Polarization              595.8
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion         7.5 x [10.sup.-5]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             4.027
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              5.703
                 slope

5V           Polarization              378.2
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        1.178 x [10.sup.-4]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             4.814
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              4.951
                 slope

AC          Electrochemical             8d
voltage       parameters

0V           Polarization             1018.2
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        3.876 x [10.sup.-5]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             5.049
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              5.97
                 slope

1V           Polarization               785
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        5.602 x [10.sup.-5]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             4.774
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              5.113
                 slope

3V           Polarization              623.5
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        7.253 x [10.sup.-5]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             4.017
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              5.597
                 slope

5V           Polarization              431.6
              resistance
                ([ohm])

               Corrosion        9.838 x [10.sup.-5]
              current (A)

            Cathodic Tafel             3.880
                 slope

             Anodic Tafel              6.359
                 slope
COPYRIGHT 2018 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Ding, Qingmiao; Chu, Xiao; Shen, Tao; Yu, Xiaoxiao
Publication:International Journal of Corrosion
Date:Jan 1, 2018
Words:4061
Previous Article:The Analysis of the Influence of Various Factors on the Development of Stress Corrosion Defects in the Main Gas Pipeline Walls in the Conditions of...
Next Article:A Comparative Study of Hydrogen-Induced Cracking Resistances of API 5L B and X52MS Carbon Steels.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters