Printer Friendly

Stringing together a unified story.

Stringing together a unified theory

Physicists are eagerly pursuing a unified field theory that will explain everything in physics, even though the search has frustrated Albert Einstein and a number of other intellects over the years.

The latest approach, which promises to overcome some of the difficulties of the others and to be unique where they are troublesomely multiple, leads to what are called superstring theories. They get their name from the change they make in the basic mathematical way in which fundamental particles are represented. The fundamental particles in all these unified theory attempts are the quarks (out of which neutrons, protons and a host of others are built) and the leptons (building blocks of electrons, muons and neutrinos). It has been customary to represent them as geometrical points, dimensionless objects without any spatial extension. That simplifies the mathematical operations. The superstring theories, however, represent them as strings, geometrical objects that extend in one dimension.

Such a change is necessary to provide a theory that will include gravity and subatomic phenomena and be consistent with the quantum mechanics that govern the subatomic domain, according to Michael B. Green of Queen Mary College of the University of London (now temporarily at California Institute of Technology). Such a union of gravity and subatomic phenomena has been the sticking point of other approaches.

Superstrings are no longer than 10(-35) of a meter, as Green pointed out at last week's meeting in Crystal City, Va., of the American Physical Society. But that is enough to give theorists "the hope . . . that this will provide a realistic unified theory that will explain observations with few or no free parameters,' he writes in the April 4 NATURE. Free parameters are mathematical terms that can be adjusted more or less at will to make predictions of experimental values come out correctly. Theorists don't like free parameters. A good theory should predict correct experimental values without any such fiddling.

Superstrings are so short that they almost look like points. But choosing them yields a mathematical derivation that determines almost uniquely the mathematical group that can be used to represent the symmetries of physics. Superstrings also specify uniquely the number of dimensions in which to calculate. These two features get rid of a lot of free parameters.

Symmetry is a basic principle on which physical explanations or theories are built. Physicists notice symmetries in the properties of subatomic particles and in the processes and interactions they engage in. They try to represent symmetries with mathematical groups. Mathematically, a group is a collection of related objects with a rule that allows one member to be generated out of other members. For instance, the real numbers are a group, with the ordinary rules of arithmetic. Other groups come from geometric operations, such as the possible rotations of an equilateral triangle or those of a regular hexagon (with appropriate combining rules.)

These geometrically derived groups are particularly useful for representing physical symmetries. In general, the larger the group, the more physical symmetries can be included in a given formulation. Theorists have tried quite a variety of them. Superstring theory limits the choices to two, thereby chucking a lot of free parameters.

The two allowed groups, Green says, have the advantage of being huge. They start out with the ability to contain very many symmetries, so, as the theory is broken to subtheories of different classes of phenomena, the smaller groups into which these two can be broken have more than enough symmetries to accommodate any needs. They also contain nature's one notorious asymmetry, known as chirality (from the Greek would for hand). In some phenomena, nature distinguishes between left-handed and right-handed things. Other approaches to unified field theory do not successfully explain chirality, Green says.

Superstring also determines that 10 dimensions should be used. Frustrated in attempts to derive a consistent theory in the four dimensions we experience (three of space and one of time), theorists have gone into more dimensions, hoping that when they were finished they could return the theory to our experienced four dimensions by "compacting' the extra dimensions. That is, the extra dimensions are so tightly curved that an object moving along them comes back to its starting point after no more than 10(-35) meter; we are not able to notice such tightly curled dimensions. In other approaches, various numbers of dimensions from five to 26 have been tried. By specifying 10, superstring gets rid of many important free parameters.

Superstring theories have a long way to go, however, before they reveal the mass of a top quark or of a tau neutrino or other similar things they are supposed to tell us, but NATURE's editor, John Maddox, writing in the April 4 issue, calls them ". . . the best hope yet that theories of particle physics will be united with gravitation. . . .'
COPYRIGHT 1985 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1985, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:superstring theories in physics
Author:Thomsen, Dietrick E.
Publication:Science News
Date:May 4, 1985
Previous Article:Standby storage for nuclear waste.
Next Article:Oxidized lipids: a key to heart disease?

Related Articles
'Ptarmigans wheeling over the gorse'; surely such things don't happen with mathematics ... but, au contraire, they do.
Unconventional physics: 'quite crazy' after all these years.
Steps to a grand unified superstring theory.
Physics rule of thumb gets thumbs down.
Old data yield new signs of extra force.
Hunting for Higher Dimensions.
Muon orbits may defy main physics theory.
Constant Changes.
The Trouble with Physics: The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next.
Degrees of quantumness: shades of gray in particle-wave duality.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters