Printer Friendly

Stopping recoupment of Medicare overpayments.

Byline: Barry Rosen

Under federal law, health care providers that want to contest the government's recoupment of Medicare overpayments, or a termination of their Medicare provider agreement, must exhaust their administrative remedies within the Medicare bureaucracy before going to court.

Unfortunately, due to delay in the administrative review process, many providers are forced to discontinue their operations for lack of income before administrative remedies can be exhausted. The result is that even if the provider eventually prevails against the government, that victory is often hollow.

Some providers have actually gone into bankruptcy hoping that a federal bankruptcy court would stop a termination of a Medicare provider agreement before administrative remedies are exhausted. While the case law on a bankruptcy court's power to do just that is continuing to develop, the most recent appellate decision on that issue held that a bankruptcy court does not have that power, Fla. Agency for Health Care Admin. et al. v. Bayou Shores SNF, LLC (In re Bayou Shores SNF, LLC, 828 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir. 2016), cert denied, 137 S. Ct. 2214 (2017).

However, a March 2018 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has given providers a new legal basis to stop recoupment of Medicare overpayments pending the exhaustion of administrative remedies.

Family Rehabilitation, Inc. v. Azar

In Family Rehabilitation, Inc. v. Azar, 886 F.3d 496 (5th Cir. 2018), a Medicare services provider contested the government's assessment of a $7.6 million overpayment. Before the provider could exhaust its administrative remedies, the government began to recoup the alleged overpayment amounts.

The provider filed suit to stop the government's recoupment action pending the provider's exhaustion of its administrative remedies. The provider introduced undisputed evidence that it would take three to five years before remedies are exhausted as a result of the backlog of Medicare appeals, and that recoupment of the overpayments during this time would force the provider to shut down its business.

While the trial court held that it did not have the power to stop the government's collection effort, on appeal, the Fifth Circuit concluded otherwise.

The Fifth Circuit held that the federal law barring a court from exercising jurisdiction over a Medicare dispute until after administrative remedies are exhausted is subject to the "collateral claim" exception. Under that exception, a federal court has jurisdiction over a claim that is "entirely collateral" to a substantive agency decision.

The court ruled that the government should be enjoined from recouping the alleged overpayments pending the provider's exhaustion of its administrative remedies because (1) it was not necessary for the trial court to decide the merits of the overpayment dispute, and (2) the evidence showed that the provider's Constitutional due process rights were being violated.

Subsequent to the Family Rehabilitation decision, two lower court decisions divided on the issue of whether the government should be enjoined from recouping payments pending exhaustion of administrative remedies, though both decisions agreed as to application of the "collateral claim" exception. Compare Accident, Injury and Rehabilitation, PC v. Azar, 2018 WL 4625791 (D.S.C. September 27, 2018) (preliminary injunction granted) with PHHC, LLC v. Azar, 2018 WL 5754393 (N.D. Ohio November 2, 2018) (preliminary injunction denied).

A new door opening

The Family Rehabilitation decision opens the door for other health care providers to stall a government action involving a Medicare dispute that cannot be administratively resolved in a timely manner. While the extent to which the Family Rehabilitation decision will be followed by other courts is unknown, the decision potentially eliminates the Hobson's choice faced by a Medicare provider who wants to pursue the administrative process to dispute an assessment of an overpayment, or a termination of its provider agreement, without filing for bankruptcy or shutting down its business.

Barry F. Rosen is the chairman & CEO of the law firm of Gordon Feinblatt LLC, heads the firm's health care practice group, and can be reached at 410-576-4224 or brosen@gfrlaw.com. Lawrence D. Coppel is the chairperson of the firm's bankruptcy & restructuring practice group and can be reached at 410-576-4238 or lcoppel@gfrlaw.com.

Copyright {c} 2018 BridgeTower Media. All Rights Reserved.
COPYRIGHT 2018 BridgeTower Media Holding Company, LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily Record (Baltimore, MD)
Date:Dec 6, 2018
Words:691
Previous Article:Judge denies Pratt library's request to stay EEOC lawsuit.
Next Article:Christ Spiers / Womble Bond.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters