Stomach content analysis of cobia, Rachycentron canadum, from lower Chesapeake Bay *.
Recent feeding studies in the northern Gulf of Mexico and off North Carolina have reported geographic differences in cobia diet and have indicated that the relative importance of fishes versus crustaceans is variable and that cephalopods constitute the least significant prey items. In the northern Gulf of Mexico, Franks et al. (1996) reported that fish (primarily anchovies, Anchoa sp.) dominated (% index of relative importance [IRI], Pinkas et al., 1971) the diet of juvenile cobia (236-440 mm FL). Meyer and Franks (1996) reported crustaceans (primarily portunid crabs) occurred in 79.1% of stomachs and represented 77.6% of total prey items consumed by cobia (373-1,530 mm FL) in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fish (primarily hardhead catfish, Arius felis, and American eel, Anguilla rostrata) increased in importance with increasing cobia size. Fish were found in 58.5% of all cobia stomachs (20.3% of total prey) but occurred in 84.4% of stomachs of cobia 1150-1530 mm FL (Meyer and Franks, 1996). In contrast, Smith (1995) observed decreased importance of teleosts in the diet of cobia (39-142 cm FL) in North Carolina. Elasmobranch fishes and portunid crabs dominated the diet of cobia >9 kg (Smith, 1995).
Tag-recapture data collected between 1995 and 1999 document localized movement of cobia within lower Chesapeake Bay during summer, as well as the return of individual cobia to specific locations or general regions of the lower Bay in subsequent summers. (1) Although Chesapeake Bay is an important destination for migrating cobia, feeding habits of cobia in the Bay have never been thoroughly examined. Our study documents cobia feeding habits in Chesapeake Bay and compares findings with similar cobia studies from North Carolina and the northern Gulf of Mexico.
Cobia were sampled opportunistically at marinas and fishing tournaments in lower Chesapeake Bay between June and July 1997. Intact stomachs were removed by cutting above the cardiac sphincter (esophagus) and below the pyloric sphincter (large intestine). Stomachs were labeled, bagged, transported on ice to the VA Institute of Marine Science, and examined in relatively fresh condition. An incision was made along the longitudinal axis and the contents of stomachs were emptied onto a 500-[micro]m mesh sieve for rinsing and sorting. Contents were blotted dry on paper towels before counts, displaced volumes (1-L graduated cylinder), and identifications to the lowest possible taxon were made. When possible, carapace widths (mm) of crabs were measured with calipers. An index of relative importance (IRI) for all prey items combined was calculated with the formula (% Number + % Volume) x (% Frequency), as described by Pinkas et al. (1971) and subsequently used by Smith (1995), Meyer and Franks (1996), and Franks et al. (1996). Frequency (%F) was the percent of all stomachs that contained food.
Results and discussion
Stomach contents from 114 adult cobia (37-141 cm FL) were examined. Seventy-eight stomachs (68%) contained at least one identifable, nonbait prey item. One species of bivalve, one species of hydroid, six species of crustacean, one elasmobranch, and 16 species of teleost were observed (Table 1). Mean volume of prey per stomach was 150.6 mL (range: 2-680 mL). Mean number of different prey per stomach was 1.9 species (range, 1-5 species). Blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) and lady crab (Ovalipes ocellatus) dominated the diet of cobia.
Index of relative importance (IRI) values for blue crab (5257) and lady crab (3665) were two orders of magnitude higher than IRI values for other prey items. Larger cobia consumed greater volumes of crab (Fig. 1). Additionally, larger cobia consumed larger (sublegal, <13 cm) blue crabs, although similar-size lady crabs were consumed by all sizes of cobia (Table 2). Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus), hogchoker (Trinectus maculatus), and fish and crab remains constituted the top food items volumetrically after portunid crabs. Although relatively high volumes were observed, IRI values for Atlantic croaker and hog-choker were low owing to infrequent occurrence of these items. High volume of crab remains was consistent with high volumes, counts, and frequency of occurrence of portunid crabs in cobia stomachs. Fish remains likely resulted from finfish bait (predominantly menhaden, Brevoortia tyrannus, and Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus). Crab and fish remains not identifiable to family and finfish bait were excluded from IRI calculations.
Consumption of blue crab was greatest along the western shore of the Bay and least at the mouth of the Bay. Conversely, consumption of lady crab was greatest at the mouth of the Bay and least along the eastern shore of the Bay (Fig. 2A). A greater percentage of lady crabs were consumed by male cobia than by female cobia, whereas a greater percentage of blue crabs were consumed by female cobia (Fig. 2B). IRIs for blue crab and lady crab were similar in June, but dramatically different in July. In July, IRI for blue crab was twice as high as that for lady crab. Prey availability and habitat utilization were likely responsible for determining location, sex, and within-season differences in composition of portunid crabs consumed by cobia. June samples were predominantly male cobia collected from the Bay mouth and eastern shore of the Bay, whereas July samples were predominantly female cobia collected from the western Bay shore.
Cobia feeding habits in lower Chesapeake Bay were more similar to feeding habits reported for cobia from North Carolina (Smith, 1995) than to feeding habits of cobia from the northern Gulf of Mexico (Franks et al., 1996; Meyer and Franks, 1996). Portunid crabs dominated the diet of cobia in Chesapeake Bay and North Carolina (Smith, 1995). Elasmobranch fishes were consumed exclusively by large cobia in Chesapeake Bay and North Carolina (Smith, 1995). In North Carolina (Smith, 1995), cobia fed on stingrays (Dasyatis sp.) and smooth dogfish (Mustelus canis). Cownose ray (Rhinoptera bonasus), previously unreported as a food item of cobia, was the only elasmo-branch consumed by cobia in Chesapeake Bay. Cownose ray was observed from eight cobia stomachs; however, only the jaw plates (22-49 mm width) remained; thus, the IRI for cownose ray is likely underestimated. Flatfishes and syngnathids represented the teleosts most frequently consumed by cobia in Chesapeake Bay and North Carolina. Hogchoker (Trinectes maculatus) was more frequently consumed by cobia in Chesapeake Bay (our study) than in North Carolina (Smith, 1995). Blackcheek tonguefish (Symphurus plaigusa) was regularly consumed by cobia in North Carolina (Smith, 1995) but was absent from cobia stomachs in Chesapeake Bay. In Chesapeake Bay, Syngnathus sp. (pipefish) and Hippocampus sp. (seahorse) were only important in the diet of smaller cobia, whereas in North Carolina, these fishes were important in the diet of all cobia (Smith, 1995).
Cobia in our study predominantly consumed benthic and epibenthic prey items, most notably portunid crabs. Feeding studies on other large predatory fishes in Chesapeake Bay during the summer months, such as bluefish, Pomatomous saltatrix, and weakfish, Cynoscion regalis, reveal that these species consume prey items associated predominantly with pelagic food webs (Hartman and Brandt, 1995a, 1995b). Striped bass, Morone saxatalis, a large predator present in Chesapeake Bay year-round, is also reported to feed predominantly on pelagic fishes (Hartman and Brandt, 1995a, 1995b; Walters, 1999). During the summer, portunid crabs were consumed by bluefish, weakfish, and striped bass in Chesapeake Bay; however, portunid crab consumption was typically less than 5% of total prey items present in the stomachs of these fishes (Hartman and Brandt, 1995a, 1995b; Walters, 1999). Red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus, a large predator that uses Chesapeake Bay between spring and fall is also reported to selectively consume portunid crabs in estuarine environments in the Gulf of Mexico (Scharf and Schlict, 2000); however, feeding habits of red drum in Chesapeake Bay have not been documented. Although other large predators in Chesapeake Bay occasionally consume portunid crabs, cobia is the only large predator in Chesapeake Bay for which selective consumption of portunid crabs is documented.
Table 1 Index of relative importance (IRI) of prey items consumed by cobia (n=78) in lower Chesapeake Bay, June-July 1997. IRI was calculated as (% Number + % Volume) x (% Frequency), as described in Smith (1995) and Meyer and Franks (1996). Frequency (%F) is the percent of stomachs that contained food. UnID = unidentified. Frequency Number (stomachs) %F (counts) Phylum Cnidaria Class Hydrozoa Family Sertulariidae Sertularia sp. 1 1.28 1 Phylum Mollusca Class Bivalva Family Mytilidea Mytilus edulis 2 2.56 47 Phylum Arthropoda Class Crustacea Family Squillidae Squilla empusa 2 2.56 2 Family Pagruidae 3 3.85 3 Family Portunidae Callinectes sapidus 46 58.97 226 Ovalipes ocellatus 43 55.13 321 Family Canceridae Cancer sp. 2 2.56 2 Cancer irroratus 1 1.28 1 Family Xanthidae Neopanope sp. 1 1.28 3 Phylum Chordata Class Chonrichthyes Family Myliobatidae Rhinoptera bonasus 7 8.97 8 Class Osteichthyes Family Clupeidae Opisthonema oglinum 1 1.28 3 Brevoortia tyrannus 1 1.28 1 UnID Clupeidae 2 2.56 2 Family Batrachoididae Opsanus tau 1 1.28 1 Family Ophidiidae Ophidion marginatum 1 1.28 1 Ophidion sp. 3 3.85 4 Family Sygnathidae Syngnathus floridae 1 1.28 1 Syngnathus sp. 2 2.56 2 Hippocampus erectus 1 1.28 1 Hippocampus sp. 5 6.41 49 Family Pomatomidae Pomatomus saltatrix 1 1.28 1 Family Sciaenidae Micropogonias undulatus 3 3.85 3 Family Uranoscopidae Astroscopus sp. 1 1.28 1 UnID Pleuronectiformes 3 3.85 4 Family Bothidae Paralichthyes dentatus 2 2.56 2 Scopthalamus aquosus 1 1.28 1 UnID Bothidae 1 1.28 1 Family Soleidae Trinectes maculatus 9 11.54 14 UnID Soleidae 3 3.85 3 Family Diodontidae Chilomycterus schoepfi 3 3.85 3 Totals 712 Volume %N (mL) %V Phylum Cnidaria Class Hydrozoa Family Sertulariidae Sertularia sp. 0.14 8 0.07 Phylum Mollusca Class Bivalva Family Mytilidea Mytilus edulis 6.60 17 0.14 Phylum Arthropoda Class Crustacea Family Squillidae Squilla empusa 0.28 11 0.09 Family Pagruidae 0.42 5 0.04 Family Portunidae Callinectes sapidus 31.74 6736 57.31 Ovalipes ocellatus 45.08 2505 21.31 Family Canceridae Cancer sp. 0.28 26 0.22 Cancer irroratus 0.14 5 0.04 Family Xanthidae Neopanope sp. 0.42 5 0.04 Phylum Chordata Class Chonrichthyes Family Myliobatidae Rhinoptera bonasus 1.12 81 0.69 Class Osteichthyes Family Clupeidae Opisthonema oglinum 0.42 160 1.36 Brevoortia tyrannus 0.14 180 1.53 UnID Clupeidae 0.28 275 2.34 Family Batrachoididae Opsanus tau 0.14 185 1.57 Family Ophidiidae Ophidion marginatum 0.14 42 0.36 Ophidion sp. 0.56 47 0.40 Family Sygnathidae Syngnathus floridae 0.14 2 0.02 Syngnathus sp. 0.28 9 0.08 Hippocampus erectus 0.14 3 0.03 Hippocampus sp. 6.88 52 0.44 Family Pomatomidae Pomatomus saltatrix 0.14 180 1.53 Family Sciaenidae Micropogonias undulatus 0.42 663 5.64 Family Uranoscopidae Astroscopus sp. 0.14 40 0.34 UnID Pleuronectiformes 0.56 5 0.04 Family Bothidae Paralichthyes dentatus 0.28 25 0.21 Scopthalamus aquosus 0.14 15 0.13 UnID Bothidae 0.14 2 0.02 Family Soleidae Trinectes maculatus 1.97 440 3.74 UnID Soleidae 0.42 15 0.13 Family Diodontidae Chilomycterus schoepfi 0.42 15 0.13 Totals IRI Phylum Cnidaria Class Hydrozoa Family Sertulariidae 0 Sertularia sp. Phylum Mollusca Class Bivalva Family Mytilidea 17 Mytilus edulis Phylum Arthropoda Class Crustacea Family Squillidae 1 Squilla empusa 2 Family Pagruidae Family Portunidae 5252 Callinectes sapidus 3660 Ovalipes ocellatus Family Canceridae 1 Cancer sp. 0 Cancer irroratus Family Xanthidae 1 Neopanope sp. Phylum Chordata Class Chonrichthyes Family Myliobatidae 16 Rhinoptera bonasus Class Osteichthyes Family Clupeidae 2 Opisthonema oglinum 2 Brevoortia tyrannus 7 UnID Clupeidae Family Batrachoididae 2 Opsanus tau Family Ophidiidae 1 Ophidion marginatum 4 Ophidion sp. Family Sygnathidae 0 Syngnathus floridae 1 Syngnathus sp. 0 Hippocampus erectus 47 Hippocampus sp. Family Pomatomidae 2 Pomatomus saltatrix Family Sciaenidae 23 Micropogonias undulatus Family Uranoscopidae 1 Astroscopus sp. 2 UnID Pleuronectiformes Family Bothidae 1 Paralichthyes dentatus 0 Scopthalamus aquosus 0 UnID Bothidae Family Soleidae 66 Trinectes maculatus 2 UnID Soleidae Family Diodontidae 2 Chilomycterus schoepfi 11754 Totals Table 2 Consumption of portunid crabs as a function of five cobia size classes in lower Chesapeake Bay. Cobia size class (cm FL) <100 100-109.9 Callinectes sapidus n 9 16 Mean carapace width (mm) 55.2 72.3 Range of carapace width (mm) 33-86 42-120 Ovalipes ocellatus n 42 37 Mean carapace width (mm) 39.1 41.2 Range of carapace width (mm) 26-50 30-56 Cobia size class (cm FL) 110-119.9 120-129.9 Callinectes sapidus n 12 23 Mean carapace width (mm) 75.0 116.7 Range of carapace width (mm) 45-120 42-120 Ovalipes ocellatus n 38 32 Mean carapace width (mm) 37.7 45.3 Range of carapace width (mm) 20-51 20-51 Cobia size class (cm FL) >130 Callinectes sapidus n 42 Mean carapace width (mm) 94.7 Range of carapace width (mm) 35-120 Ovalipes ocellatus n 27 Mean carapace width (mm) 37.1 Range of carapace width (mm) 27-55
Stomachs were collected in conjunction with a study on cobia reproduction in Chesapeake Bay. We thank Susan Crute, Jason Romine, and Holly Simpkins for technical assistance. Donnie Wallace and Harry Johnson Jr. provided access to their facilities at Wallace's Bait and Tackle, Fox Hill, VA. We thank the recreational and commercial fishermen who allowed their catches to be sampled. This project was supported by grants (RF96-8, RF97-9) from the Virginia Marine Resources Commission upon recommendation by the Recreational Fishing Advisory Board.
* Contribution 2390 of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA 23062.
(1) Annual reports. Virginia Game Fish Tagging Program, Marine Resources Commission, 968 Oriole Dr. South, Suite 102, Virginia Beach, VA 23451.
Darracott, A. 1977. Availability, morphometrics, feeding, and breeding activity of a multi-species, demersal fish stock of the western Indian Ocean. J. Fish. Biol. 10(1):1-16.
Franks, J. S., N. K. Garber, and J. R. Warren. 1996. Stomach contents of juvenile cobia, Rachycentron canadum, from the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fish Bull. 94(2):374-380.
Hartman, K. J., and S. B. Brandt. 1995a. Trophic resource partitioning, diets, and growth of sympatric estuarine predators. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 124:520-537.
1995b. Predatory demand and impact of striped bass, bluefish, and weakfish in the Chesapeake Bay: applications of bioenergetics models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52:1667-1687.
Joseph, E. B., J. J. Norcross, and W. H. Massmann. 1964. Spawning of cobia, Rachycentron canadum, in the Chesapeake Bay area, with observations of juvenile specimens. Ches. Sci. 5:67-71.
Meyer, G. H., and J. S. Franks. 1996. Food of cobia, Rachycentron canadum, from the north-central Gulf of Mexico. Gulf Res. Rep. 9(3):161-167.
Pinkas, L., M. S. Oliphant, and I. L. K. Iverson. 1971. Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters. Calif. Dep. Fish Game Fish Bull. 152, 105 p.
Richards, C. E. 1967. Age, growth, and fecundity of the cobia, Rachycentron canadum, from Chesapeake Bay and adjacent mid-Atlantic waters. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 96(3):343-350.
Scharf, F. S., and K. K. Schlicht. 2000. Feeding habits of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) in Galveston Bay, Texas: Seasonal diet variation and predator-prey size relationships. Estuaries 23(1):128-139.
Shaffer, R. V., and E. L. Nakamura. 1989. Synopsis of biological data on the cobia, Rachycentron canadum (Pisces: Rachycentridae). U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech Rep NMFS 82 [FAO Fisheries Synopsis 153], 21 p.
Smith, J. W. 1995. Life history of cobia, Rachycentron canadum (Osteichthyes: Rachycentridae), in North Carolina waters. Brimleyana 23:1-23.
Walters, J. F., III. 1999. Diet composition and feeding habits of large striped bass (Morone saxatilis) in Chesapeake Bay. M.S. thesis, School of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, VA, 124 p.
Michael D. Arendt School of Marine Science College of William and Mary Virginia Institute of Marine Science Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 Present address: Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Division 217 Fort Johnson Road Charleston, South Carolina 29422-2559 E-mail address: firstname.lastname@example.org John E. Olney Department of Fisheries Science School of Marine Science College of William and Mary Virginia Institute of Marine science Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 Jon A. Lucy Sea Grant Marine Advisory Program Virginia Institute of Marine Science Glooucester Point, Virginia 23062
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Arendt, Michael D.; Olney, John E.; Lucy, Jon A.|
|Article Type:||Statistical Data Included|
|Date:||Oct 1, 2001|
|Previous Article:||Age and growth of red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, from the Northern Gulf of Mexico off Louisiana *.|
|Next Article:||Preliminary genetic population structure of southern flounder, Paralichthys lethostigma, along the Atlantic Coast and Gulf of Mexico.|