Printer Friendly

Statistics of distortion trade policy intervention during the crisis.

Since the outbreak of the global financial crisis in August 2008 and the ensuing G20 summit in November, governments have resorted to less transparent forms of commercial policy intervention. While tariff changes account for only a fifth of all interventions and while the use of trade defence measures has risen over time, many other forms of non-tariff measures (NTMs) have been deployed.

Trade negotiators, exporters and analysts have been interested in NTMs for decades. During much of the post-war era the concern was that as the swamp of tariff measures was drained, the effects of NTMs, some of which impede or discourage international commerce, would become apparent. Since the 1970s, certain analysts have argued that governments might be tempted to substitute NTMs for tariff measures, a temptation made stronger as successive trade accords lowered tariffs. During the global financial crisis and its associated growth slowdown, defenders of open borders have been concerned that governments might resort to NTMs to delay or prevent job losses at, or closure of, domestic firms and shift the burden of adjustment on to foreign companies and rivals.

As deliberations at the World Trade Organization (WTO) and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development have long recognized, it is worth bearing in mind that NTMs can take many different forms. Indicative lists are useful, but governments can create new types of NTMs or blend different measures. As a result, it is better to examine whether a policy measure alters the relative treatment of domestic and foreign rivals, rather than to confine analysis to measures on an indicative list or measures covered by WTO agreements. This is the approach taken by the Global Trade Alert (GTA) team, a group of independent trade analysts around the world that I coordinate. The data reported here summarizes their reports on nearly 2,500 state announcements made since November 2008.

The table reports on the frequency that different types of NTMs have been resorted to since the G20 summit in November 2008. To provide a useful point of comparison, data on tariff measures is also included. The measures are listed in descending order of the total number of times governments have employed each measure in a way that would almost certainly discriminate against a foreign commercial interest. As can be seen, the use of bailouts and state aid measures that tilt the level playing field, as well as trade defence measures, has been more frequent than the use of tariff measures. Even if all financial sector bailouts are excluded, the use of state aid for manufacturing, agriculture and other service sectors occurred more frequently than tariff changes. Overall, more than 80% of the state measures reported in the Global Trade Alert database are NTMs.

However, governments did not only harm foreign commercial interests during the recent global financial crisis; nearly 600 measures were taken that either improved the transparency of trade policy regimes, liberalized those regimes, or did not affect the relative treatment of domestic versus foreign commercial interests. Still, for every such measure there were almost 2.5 measures that harmed foreign commercial interests. Among the five measures most used during the crisis, there is considerable variation in the use of measures that harm foreign commercial interests. For example, for every tariff hike there were approximately 1.5 measures that lowered tariffs or improved transparency in the national tariff regime. The reverse is true of the most used NTMs; here beggar-thy-neighbour measures outnumbered trade-promoting measures by more than two to one. In the case of discriminatory bailouts and state aid, the number of beggar-thy-neighbour measures outnumbered commercially neutral measures by more than one hundred to one.

When the history of the first four years of the global economic crisis is written, do not be surprised if bailouts, many of which did not grab headlines like those in the financial sector, get prime billing. Protectionism in the 1930s may have been associated principally with tariff increases and in the 1980s with voluntary export restraints, but now beggar-thy-neighbour measures have taken a different form. The important lesson is that governments must innovate in their policy responses to crises--looking for yesterday's most popular form of intervention may miss where the action is today.

The number of trading partners, tariff lines and sectors affected varies considerably across NTMs, as shown in the table. Trade defence measures may be numerous, and given the number of anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigations in the pipeline, they will soon overtake subsidies in a frequency count. However, trade defence measures affect far fewer jurisdictions, tariff lines and economic sectors than bailouts. This is because antidumping and countervailing duty measures target specific products from specific trading partners and are, therefore, more surgical in effect. This is not to downplay the impact of such duties, but rather to argue that the scale of commerce affected by subsidies is likely to be greater.

Export subsidies and competitive devaluations affect large numbers of products too. Measures relating to trade finance and export taxes and restrictions affect a large percentage of trading nations, but not necessarily a large percentage of product categories. Such findings provide a preliminary assessment of the relative importance of different types of NTMs; more definitive assessments will require empirical analyses of the major interventions taken during the crisis. Given that more than 2,000 NTMs have been implemented since November 2008, waiting for the effect of each to be studied in detail may be akin to making the perfect the enemy of the good.

Naturally, there is interest in which jurisdictions have been implementing NTMs. Generally, as documented in previous Global Trade Alert reports, the percentage of worldwide totals of protectionist measures implemented by G20 countries has risen every year since 2009. Since November 2008, G20 countries have implemented 47% of the world's harmful NTMs. For comparative purposes it is worth noting that the G20 is responsible for 42% of the world's tariff hikes. More generally, governments that have resorted to protectionism the most have done so by circumventing WTO rules, typically imposing NTMs that are not, or are less stringently, covered by WTO rules rather than relatively transparent trade policy measures such as tariffs.

Although the use of beggar-thy-neighbour policies during the global economic crisis has not reached the scale seen during the 1930s, the substantial implementation of NTMs is disturbing. While governments have not sought to blatantly violate WTO rules, the incompleteness of such rules has been laid bare. Looking forward, perhaps fiscal pressure will induce governments to phase out subsidies and bailouts; but even if these are withdrawn, precious little prevents governments from employing other measures that can distort international commerce.

SIMON J. EVENETT

Professor of International Trade and Economic Development

University of St. Gallen

TYPE OF MEASURE

Bail out / state aid measure

Trade defence measure (AD, CVD, safeguard)

Tariff measure

Non-tariff barrier (not otherwise specified)

Export taxes or restriction

Investment measure

Migration measure

Export subsidy

Public procurement

Import ban

Local content requirement

Trade finance

Quota (including tariff rate quotas)

Other service sector measure

State-controlled company

Sanitary and phytosanitary measure

Technical barrier to trade

Consumption subsidy

State trading enterprise

Competitive devaluation

Intellectual property protection

Import subsidy

Sub-national government measure

Total

Median
TYPE OF MEASURE                  Total number     Number of non-
                                 of measures in   discriminatory
                                 GTA database     and liberalizing
                                                  measures
                                                  (green in GTA
                                                  database)

Bail out / state aid measure               405                  3
Trade defence measure
  (AD, CVD, safeguard)                     655                105
Tariff measure                             541                265
Non-tariff barrier
  (not otherwise specified)                168                 13
Export taxes or restriction                159                 41
Investment measure                         158                 64
Migration measure                           99                 32
Export subsidy                              66                  3
Public procurement                          77                  3
Import ban                                  54                  6
Local content requirement                   56                  4
Trade finance                               32                  0
Quota (including tariff rate
  quotas)                                   45                 12
Other service sector measure                44                  8
State-controlled company                    23                  2
Sanitary and phytosanitary
  measure                                   32                  7
Technical barrier to trade                  43                 15
Consumption subsidy                         18                  4
State trading enterprise                     9                  1
Competitive devaluation                      5                  0
Intellectual property
  protection                                11                  2
Import subsidy                              14                  4
Sub-national Government
  measure                                    6                  0
TOTAL                                    2,720                594
Median

TYPE OF MEASURE                  Number of          Ratio of non-
                                 almost certainly   discriminatory
                                 beggar-thy-        and liberalizing
                                 neighbour          measures to
                                 measures           beggar-thy-
                                 (red in the GTA    neighbour
                                 database)          measures

Bail out / state aid measure                 362         0,0083
Trade defence measure
  (AD, CVD, safeguard)                       321         0,3271
Tariff measure                               178         1,4888
Non-tariff barrier
  (not otherwise specified)                  121         0,1074
Export taxes or restriction                   88         0,4659
Investment measure                            49         1,3061
Migration measure                             49         0,6531
Export subsidy                                41         0,0732
Public procurement                            41         0,0732
Import ban                                    33         0,1818
Local content requirement                     26         0,1538
Trade finance                                 21         0,0000
Quota (including tariff rate
  quotas)                                     19         0,6316
Other service sector measure                  17         0,4706
State-controlled company                      17         0,1176
Sanitary and phytosanitary
  measure                                     15         0,4667
Technical barrier to trade                    15         1,0000
Consumption subsidy                            8         0,5000
State trading enterprise                       8         0,1250
Competitive devaluation                        5         0,0000
Intellectual property
  protection                                   3         0,6667
Import subsidy                                 1         4,0000
Sub-national Government
  measure                                      1         0,0000
TOTAL                                      1,439
Median                                                   0,3271

TYPE OF MEASURE                         Number
                                        of pending
                                        measures

Bail out / state aid measure                  135
Trade defence measure
  (AD, CVD, safeguard)                        337
Tariff measure                                151
Non-tariff barrier
  (not otherwise specified)                    27
Export taxes or restriction                    42
Investment measure                             35
Migration measure                              18
Export subsidy                                 11
Public procurement                             26
Import ban                                     15
Local content requirement                      21
Trade finance                                   6
Quota (including tariff rate
  quotas)                                      23
Other service sector measure                   18
State-controlled company                        3
Sanitary and phytosanitary
  measure                                      13
Technical barrier to trade                     18
Consumption subsidy                            10
State trading enterprise                        2
Competitive devaluation                         0
Intellectual property
  protection                                    8
Import subsidy                                  2
Sub-national Government
  measure                                       2
TOTAL                                         923
Median

                                 For red measures only,
TYPE OF MEASURE                    percentage of ...

                                 jurisdictions   jurisdictions
                                 implementing    affected by
                                 specified       measures
                                 measure         of specified
                                 type            measure
                                                 type

Bail out / state aid measure             20,6            81,1
Trade defence measure
  (AD, CVD, safeguard)                   26,6            36,9
Tariff measure                           30,0            65,7
Non-tariff barrier
  (not otherwise specified)              12,4            63,5
Export taxes or restriction              24,5            76,4
Investment measure                       12,4            34,8
Migration measure                        10,7            45,5
Export subsidy                           18,0            85,0
Public procurement                        9,0            57,9
Import ban                               10,3            39,1
Local content requirement                 6,0            53,2
Trade finance                             3,0            67,4
Quota (including tariff rate
  quotas)                                 5,2            43,3
Other service sector measure              4,7            18,5
State-controlled company                  2,1            27,9
Sanitary and phytosanitary
  measure                                 5,2            26,6
Technical barrier to trade                3,4            29,6
Consumption subsidy                       2,6            33,5
State trading enterprise                  1,3            20,6
Competitive devaluation                   2,1            74,7
Intellectual property
  protection                              1,3            22,7
Import subsidy                            0,4             0,9
Sub-national Government
  measure                                 0,4            15,0
TOTAL
Median                                    5,2            39,1

                                 For red measures only,
TYPE OF MEASURE                    percentage of ...

                                 tariff lines   sectors
                                 affected by    affected by
                                 measures       measures
                                 of specified   of specified
                                 measure        measure type
                                 type

Bail out / state aid measure            62,0           73,4
Trade defence measure
  (AD, CVD, safeguard)                  18,8           38,0
Tariff measure                          67,5           48,1
Non-tariff barrier
  (not otherwise specified)             29,8           83,5
Export taxes or restriction             16,4           36,7
Investment measure                       1,5           87,3
Migration measure                        4,0           35,4
Export subsidy                          61,7           45,6
Public procurement                      34,0           74,7
Import ban                              14,2           36,7
Local content requirement               21,8           55,7
Trade finance                           35,0           44,3
Quota (including tariff rate
  quotas)                                5,5           16,5
Other service sector measure             2,0           22,8
State-controlled company                 3,7           17,7
Sanitary and phytosanitary
  measure                                4,2           10,1
Technical barrier to trade              45,0           57,0
Consumption subsidy                      6,8           13,9
State trading enterprise                 2,4            6,3
Competitive devaluation                 87,1           48,1
Intellectual property
  protection                             0,5            2,5
Import subsidy                           0,1            1,3
Sub-national Government
  measure                                0,5            1,3
TOTAL
Median                                  14,2           36,7
COPYRIGHT 2012 International Trade Centre UNCTAD/GATT
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Comment:Statistics of distortion trade policy intervention during the crisis.
Author:Evenett, Simon J.
Publication:International Trade Forum
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 1, 2012
Words:1999
Previous Article:Q & A: exploring new horizons Moroccan SME trades up.
Next Article:International standards a key solution to address barriers to trade.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |