Statistical Optimization of Process Parameters by Central Composite Design (CCD) for an Enhanced Production of L-asparaginase by Myroides gitamensis BSH-3, a Novel Species.
L-asparaginase (EC. No.- 126.96.36.199) catalyses the conversion of L-asparagine into L-aspartic acid and ammonia. L-asparaginase has been widely used in chemotherapy in the field of medicine. L-asparaginase has been proved as a potential enzyme for the treatment of Acute Lymphocytic Leukaemia (ALL) and Lymphosarcoma Cancer (1). The therapeutic property of L-asparaginase seeks commercial importance, showing significant role in modern oncology (2). It acts as a model enzyme in the field of drug discovery and also acts as biosensor for leukemia (3).
From the available literature, it was evident that if L-asparaginase is given to cancer patients, there would be enormous reduction in L-asparagine level from its pool (4). L-asparaginase also plays an important role in food industry by producing an acrylamide free food (5).
Unlike normal cells, the malignant cells require large amount of L-asparagine for protein synthesis and cell division, as L-asparaginase catalyzes the deamination of L-asparagine into L-aspartic acid and ammonia, hence L-asparagine levels in the cancer cells decrease drastically, thereby it leads to the decrease in protein synthesis and cell division in tumor cells. In normal cells, oxaloacetate is converted to aspartate by transamination which further converts into L-asparagine by asparagine synthetase which converts the carboxy group to amide group in the side chain. The gene which codes for asparagine synthetase was located on chromosome number No. 7 (7q21.4) in humans. Tumor cells are unable to produce L-asparagine due to the lack of asparagine synthetase, hence they should obtain this amino acid from the blood circulation. In murine leukemia cell lines, protein synthesis is repressed in the absence of L-asparagine, which results in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (6).
Therapeutic enzymes act on their target site with a high affinity and great specificity and they won't exhibit any side effects. At present, L-asparaginase is available in the market with different brand names, such as ERWINASE, CLOLAR, LEUKINE, ONCASPAR, ARR-ANON, KIDROLASE and ELSPAR.
Microbial enzymes are preferred over animal or plant enzymes due to their consistency, cost-effective production, ease of process modification and optimization. These enzymes show higher stability than the enzymes that are derived from animals and plants (7). Microbial enzymes provide a greater diversity of catalytic activities and wide range of specificities and stability to perform their biochemical reactions.
Several agro manufacturing byproducts such as rice bran, wheat bran, green gram bran, coconut cake, groundnut cake, soya meal, etc. have been used for the production of different microbial enzymes. Among all agro industrial by-products, wheat bran is the most commonly used substrate as it has been reported to have nourishing components required for the growth of microorganisms (8). The composition of wheat bran contains different soluble sugars like glucose, arabinose, galactose, xylose, e/c. These soluble sugars are useful for the initiation of cell growth and replication of microbes (9). Simultaneously, wheat bran has higher amounts of protein and low lignin content as compared to other substrates. Therefore, wheat bran is preferred as the better substrate for the production of microbial enzymes.
Classical One Factor At a Time (OFAT) design facilitates optimizing the process parameters individually and the designs obtained are quite useful for awaking the optimized conditions due to which the principal parameters either can be considered or eliminated for further optimization processes (10). Thus, optimum parameters of the entire process have been determined using statistical tools such as regression of full factorial to obtain a statistical model. The entire optimization process involved in the L-asparaginase enzyme production, usually involves fitting of data to a polynomial equation, using multiple regression analysis and one way ANOVA. Hence, various interactions of the experimental design and predicted models are needed for an efficient production of L-asparaginase with an enhanced yield through Solid State Fermentation system (SSF).
Currently, the application of both Classical One Factor At a Time (OFAT) and Central Composite Design (CCD) for the optimization of process parameters were the main focus, which was taken into consideration for the enhanced production of L-asparaginase by supplementing wheat bran as a carbon source for the Myroides gitamensis (M. gitamensis). The bioprocess optimization was done by stepwise experimental strategy i.e.,: (1) screening the most significant factors affecting enzyme production using a Classical One Factor At a Time (OFAT) method, (2) optimization of the significant screened parameters and generating a surface interaction plot showing the relationship between optimized parameters and L-asparaginase production by the application of Central Composite Design (CCD) and (3) validation of the model for the entire production process.
Materials and Methods
Myroides strain BSH-3 was isolated from slaughter house soil samples, Visakhapatnam, India and identified as M. gitamensis (GenBank Accession Number HF571338) on the basis of morphological, biochemical and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence (11) and submitted in microbial type culture collection (MTCC 11601), Bangkok culture collection (BCC 64301) and microbial culture collection (MCC 2182). The isolated pure strain of M. gitamensis was maintained on nutrient agar slants and incubated at 37[degrees]C for 24 hr. After 24 hr of incubation, the active culture was used for production process.
Media composition and culture conditions
Firstly, M gitamensis BSH-3 was cultured using basal medium containing (g/L): glucose-2.0, L-asparagine-10.0, K[H.sub.2]P[O.sub.4]-1.52, KCl-0.52, MgS[O.sub.4]. 7[H.sub.2]O-0.52, CuN[O.sub.3].3[H.sub.2]O-trace, ZnS[O.sub.4].7[H.sub.2]O-trace and FeS[O.sub.4]. 7[H.sub.2]O-trace (12). The pH was then adjusted to 7.0 using 0.1 N NaOH and 0.1 N HCl before autoclaving. One ml of BSH-3 strain overnight culture (1x[10.sup.8] cells/ml) was transferred aseptically into an Erlenmeyer flask (250 ml) containing 50 ml of basal medium and then incubated at 37[degrees]C, on a rotary shaker at 120 pm for 24 hr.
Determination of bacterial growth rate
Absorbance ([A.sub.600]) of cultured broth was measured for every 4 hr up to 48 hr for stable growth using UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu U-800). A basal medium lacking the inoculum was also maintained as a control.
Estimation of L-asparaginase activity
L-asparaginase activity was estimated according to the method of Mashburn and Wriston (13). In this assay, the reaction mixture consisting of 100 [micro]l enzyme extract, 200 [micro]l 0.05 M Tris-Hcl buffer (pH=8.6) and 1.7 ml of 0.01 M L-asparagine was incubated for 10 min at 37 [degrees]C. The rate of hydrolysis of L-asparagine was determined by measuring the released ammonia using Nessler's reagent.
The reaction was stopped by the addition of 500 [micro]l of 1.5 M TCA. Then, the reaction mixture was centrifuged at 1000 ref at 4 [degrees]C for 10 min and then 0.5 ml of supernatant was diluted to 7 ml with distilled water and 1 ml of Nessler's reagent was added. The reaction mixture was incubated in boiling water bath for 10 min and then cooled. Later, the absorbance (A500) was recorded using UV-Vis spectrophotometer (ShimazduU-800) followed by protein estimation according to method of Lowry's (14). The ammonia liberated was entrapped from a curve derived with ammonia sulphate as standard curve and expressed in IU.
After the identification of significant parameters, the optimization process was done by Classical One Factor At a Time (OFAT) method by varying single factor only and keeping the remaining factors constant (15). The optimal level of substrate (wheat bran) was studied by varying the concentration (2-14 g/L). Different nitrogen sources (Yeast extract, beef extract, peptone, tryptone, malt extract and urea) were used over the range of 0.5% and carbon sources (arabinose, fructose, dextrose, lactose, maltose, starch and sucrose) at a final concentration of 0.2%. Optimum pH, temperature and incubation period were determined by studying in the range of 5 to 9, 25 to 55[degrees]C and 24 to 48 hr, respectively. Samples were drawn continuously at 24 hr interval and then the enzyme and protein assay was carried out to calculate the enzyme specific activity.
Central Composite Design based optimization (CCD)
A five level RSM based CCD was employed for optimization process parameters of L-asparaginase production from M. gitamenesis. Based on the observations with classical OFAT experiments, five parameters were selected in the range, pH (6.5-8.5), temperature (36-38[degrees]C), wheat bran (11-13 g/L), incubation time (47-49 hr) and yeast extract (5-7 g/L). All the processes were done in triplicates and represented in coded terms as the lowest, central and the highest level of five variables indicating as -1, 0 and +1, respectively (Table 1). The observations resulted with response surface methodology were recorded and interpreted with their respective possible surface interaction plots.
Purification of crude enzyme
The 36 hr culture broth was centrifuged at 11,200 rcf for 30 min at 4[degrees]C using plastocrafts refrigerated centrifuge. The supernatant was collected and stored at 4 [degrees]C for further analysis. Ammonium sulfate precipitation was performed according to the method of Charles et al (16). The active ammonium sulfate fractionation (3.0 ml) was loaded onto a column of sephadex G-200 (17).
SDS-PAGE was carried out as described by Laemmli (18) using 15 cm 10% acryl amide gel. Cathode and anode were at the top and bottom of the gel, respectively. About 30 [micro]l of crude, ammonium sulfate precipitation fractionation, gel filtration fractions and markers (1 mg/ml) were loaded into each well and electrophoresed at constant voltage of 100 V of electric field at 4 [degrees]C until the bromophenol blue moved to the bottom of the gel. Bovine serum albumin, 66 kDa; ovalbumin, 43 kDa; carbonic anhydrase, 20.1 kDa; cytochrome-C, 12 kDa were used as markers.
The observations obtained by both Classical One Factor At a Time (OFAT) and Central Composite Design (CCD) in the present investigation were analyzed using Minitab (version 16.0). Statistical analysis of the observations was evaluated through analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the regression equation was generated along with the predicted responses. The response surface was expressed at the following secondorder polynomial equation represented as follows:
[mathematical expression not reproducible]
Where Y is the predicted response; K is the number of factor variables; [[beta].sub.0] is the model constant; [[beta].sub.i], is the linear coefficient; [[beta].sub.ii] is the quadratic coefficient; [[beta].sub.ij] is the interaction coefficient. "[X.sub.i]" is the factor variable in its coded form.
Maximum cell mass of M gitamensis [BSH-3.sup.T] and L-asparaginase production was observed with glucose as a carbon source, whereas, low growth and L-asparaginase production was observed with starch followed by lactose and arabinose (Table 2). Among six different nitrogen sources used, maximum growth and L-asparaginase production was observed with yeast extract followed by soybean meal and beef extract. Low cell mass and L-asparaginase production was observed in the medium containing urea (Table 3). The optimum growth and L-asparaginase production was observed at pH=8.0 and beyond this there is a sudden decrease in growth and L-asparaginase production (Figure 1). This indicates that M. gitamensis [BSH-3.sup.T] is a slightly alkalophilic organism. Figure 2 shows the optimum growth and L-asparaginase production at 40 [degrees]C and beyond optimal temperature, growth and L-asparaginase production was less. There was a sharp increase in the growth of M gitamensis [BSH-3.sup.T] and L-asparaginase production from 12-36 hr of incubation and gradual decrease up to 84 hr of incubation (Figure 3). This clearly showed that both growth and L-asparaginase production sharply decreased to 50% after 48 hr of incubation.
Central Composite Design based optimization (CCD)
The production of L-asparaginase by M. gitamensis BSH-3 was maximized by optimization of the medium components through Central Composite Design (CCD) of response surface methodology. Thirty-two experiments were conducted in triplicate with different concentrations of wheat bran, yeast extract and different pH, temperature and incubation time (Table 4). The response obtained from experiments of Central Composite Design (Table 5) were calculated with second order polynomial multiple regression.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on data collected from experiments as shown in table 6. The coefficient of determination [R.sup.2] showed the appropriateness of the adequate model. The above results were analyzed and calculated and determination of coefficient ([R.sup.2]) was found to be 0.9809 indicating that the statistical model can explain 98.09% of variability in the response and only 1.91% of the total variations were not explained by the model. In the present study, for the production of L-asparaginase, the adjusted [R.sup.2] value (0.9401) was less than the [R.sup.2] value (0.9809). The adjusted [R.sup.2] may be distinctly smaller than the [R.sup.2] with a low value of the coefficient of variation which indicates good precision and reliability of the study.
The interaction of the L-asparaginase activity and independent variables was demonstrated by three dimensional response surface diagrams. In each 3D curve, effect of two factors on enzyme activity was shown, maintaining other variables constant at level zero.
Surface plots are generally the graphical representation of the regression equation for identifying the optimal levels of each parameter for attaining the maximum response (L-asparaginase) production. The response surface plots of L-asparaginase were presented in figure 4 (A-F). The pair-wise interaction generated from 3D graphs of the five parameters explains the role of different parameters which affect the production of L-asparaginase. Figure 4F shows that 12 g of wheat bran is required for maximum specific activity (270 IU) was observed at the mid value of substrate amount (12 g). Figures 4A and B show the effect of pH on L-asparaginase production in combination with substrate concentration (wheat bran) and temperature. There is increase in L-asparaginase production with increase in pH and the maximum production was at pH=7.5. In previous studies, Mohammad et al and Rajesh et al have reported that the commercial production of L-asparaginase by submerged fermentation using different bacterial species required optimum pH between around pH=8.0 (19,20). The L-asparaginase activity steadily increased with increase in temperature and reached a maximum activity (270 IU) at the optimal value at 37[degrees]C. The same effect of temperature on the growth and L-asparaginase production by Cylindrocarpon obtusisporum MB-10, Pseudomonas stutzeri MB-405, Bacillus sp, have been observed (21,22). Figure 4C shows that 6 gram of yeast extract is required for maximum production of L-asparaginase (295 IU) and it remains constant with variation in incubation time. Maximum L-asparaginase production using yeast extract as a sole source of nitrogen in Fusarium equiseti was reported (23).
Purification of crude enzyme
The enzyme was salted out in 20-40% ammonium sulphate fraction and this fraction was further purified by gel filtration on sephadex G-200 gel filtration column. The L-asparaginase was eluted as a single peak infraction. These fractions were pooled, lyophilized and used for further studies. SDS-PAGE analysis of the purified L-asparaginase showed a single band (Figure 5). L-asparaginase was purified to apparent homogeneity with molecular mass of 26 kDa.
Production of enzymes by microorganism depends on many parameters like nutrients, salt concentration, pH and temperature. In fact, the composition of culture medium is closely associated with the metabolic capacities of the producing strain and it significantly influences the biosynthesis of enzymes (24). The concept of medium optimization for enzyme production involves the exploitation of medium components and cultural condition to obtain the desired product in a cost effective manner.
Therefore, selection of right production medium is necessary for optimal production of preferred enzyme (25). As the characteristics of the microorganisms are modified continuously with time, the fermentation process and media should also be changed for the enhanced production of enzyme.
The fermentative production of enzymes is influenced by various factors such as the choice of microorganism selected, choice of raw material used, inoculum level, temperature, pH, aeration, agitation, duration of fermentation, and type of fermentation, precursors used in the fermentation medium and enzyme concentration produced during fermentation (26). Hence, the fermentation process and fermentation media have been continuously updated to obtain better yields of enzyme production.
To find the optimized parameters, response surface methodology is a suitable mathematical and statistical tool; it can be helpful to find experimental design for illuminating the relations between different parameters. Recently, RSM was used extensively to optimize fermentation parameters (27). The current study reveals that wheat bran had impact on the production of L-asparaginase production. Wheat bran contains approximately 62% carbohydrate, 18% protein and 5% fat and it is a relatively complete source of nutrients for microbes (28-30). The use of a perfect agro-residual based substrate for enhancing enzyme production in a solidstate fermentation process mostly depends upon its easier degradation into nutrients and its utilization by the microorganism to produce the targeted metabolite. The present investigation revealed that L-asparaginase production varied with agro-residual wheat bran substrate. The production of L-asparaginase by microorganisms is highly dependent upon medium pH as it plays a crucial role in transportation of different components across the cell membrane and in organizing the metabolic behavior of the cell (31). Results showed that enzyme production was increased with pH achieving an optimum level at pH=7.5. Further production of the enzyme decreased subsequently at higher pH values attaining activity up to pH=10.0.
Central Composite Design based response surface methodology for multi parameter optimization is useful for investigating the optimal conditions. The present investigation optimizes different process parameters namely, incubation time, pH, temperature, nitrogen source and substrate concentration for the enhancement of L-asparagianse production by M. gitamensis. The coefficient of determination ([R.sup.2]) values for all parameters showed a goodness of fit between the predicted model and an experimental data with a confidence level of 95%. Analysis of different cultural conditions (incubation time, pH, temperature, nitrogen source and substrate concentration) are required for the commercial scale production of L-asparaginase enzyme. The results obtained in the current investigation were fitted well with an experimental data and the predicted models. The currently adopted approach can be applied for any enzyme production on commercial scale. Optimization of the solid substrate was a very important measure to increase enzyme activity and realize industrial production of L-asparaginase. The process of L-asparaginase production in laboratory scale may have the scale-up potential.
The authors are thankful to GITAM university management for providing research facilities to carry out this work.
(1.) Mishra A. Production of L-asparaginase, an anticancer agent from Aspergillus niger using agricultural waste in solid state fermentation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2006; 135(1):33-42.
(2.) Verma N, Kumar K, Kaur G, Anand S. L-asparaginase: a promising chemotherapeutic agent. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2007;27(1):45-62.
(3.) Teodor E, Litescu SC, Lazar V, Somoghi R. Hydrogelmagnetic nanoparticles with immobilized L-asparaginase for biomedical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009;20(6):1307-1314.
(4.) Narta UK, Kanwar SS, Azmi W. Pharmacological and clinical evaluation of l-asparaginase in the treatment of leukemia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2007;61(3):208-221.
(5.) Pedreschi F, Kaack K, Granby K, The effect of asparaginase on acrylamide formation in French fries. Food Cham 2008; 109(2):386-392.
(6.) Offman MN, Krol M, Patel N, Krishnan S, Liu J, Saha V, et al. Rational engineering of L-asparaginase reveals importance of dual activity for cancer cell toxicity. Blood 2011;117(5):1614-1621.
(7.) Savitri N, Asthana N, Azmi W. Microbial L-asparaginase: a potent antitumour enzyme. Indian J Biotechnol 2003;2:184-194.
(8.) El-Shishtawy RM, Mohamed SA, Asiri AM, Gomaa AB, Ibrahim IH, Al-Talhi FIA. Solid fermentation of wheat bran for hydrolytic enzymes production and saccharification content by a local isolate Bacillus megatherium. BMC Biotechnol 2014; 14:29.
(9.) Stevenson L, Phillips F, O'sullivan K, Walton J. Wheat bran: its composition and benefits to health, a European perspective. Int J Food Sci Nutr 20I2;63(8):1001-1013.
(10.) Irfan M, Nadeem M, Syed Q. One-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) optimization of xylanase production from Trichoderma viride-IR05 in solid-state fementation. J Radiation Res Applied Sci 2014;7(3):317-326.
(11.) Talluri VP, Bhavana M, Siva Kumar K, Anil Kumar P, Rajagopal SV. Myroides gitamensis sp.nov., L-asparaginase producing bacteria isolated from slaughter house soil sample in Visakhapatnam, India. J Microb Biochem Technol 2014;6(3): 144-147.
(12.) Gulati R, Saxena RK, Gupta R. A rapid plate assay for screening L-asparaginase producing micro-organisms. Lett AppI Microbiol 1997;24(1):23-26.
(13.) Mashburn LT, Wriston JC Jr. Tumor inhibitory effect of Lasparaginase from E.coli. Arch Biochem Biophys 1964;105:450-452.
(14.) Lowry OH, Rosebrough NL, Farr AL Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the folin reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193(1):265-275.
(15.) Zhang H, Wang Z, Xu SY. Optimization of processing parameters for cloudy ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba Linn.) juice. J Food Eng 2007;80(4): 1226-1232.
(16.) Charles P, Devanathan V, Anbu P, Ponnuswamy MN, Kalaichelvan PT, Hur BK. Purification, characterization and crystallization of an extracellular alkaline protease from Aspergillus nidulans HA-10. J Basic Microbiol 2008;48:347-352.
(17.) Adinarayana K, Eliaiah P, Prasad DS. Purification and partial characterization of thermostable serine alkaline protease from a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis PE-11. AAPS PharmSciTech 2003;4(4):E56.
(18.) Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 227(5259):680-685.
(19.) Shahnoor HM, Abul Kalam A, Abu Sayem SM, Mostafa G, Md. Mozammel Hoq. Production and partial characterization of feather-degrading keratinolytic serine protease from Bacillus licheniformis MZK-3. J Biol Sci 2007; 7(4):599-606.
(20.) Rajesh MJ, Leelavathy R, Vanapalli VS, Thirumurugan G, Rajaram MS. Effect of inducers and physical parameters on the production of L-asparaginase using Aspergillusterrus. J Bioprocess Biotech 2011;1:1-6.
(21.) Manna S, Sinha A, Sadhukhan R, Chakrabarty SL. Purification, characterization and antitumor activity of L-asparaginase isolated from Pseudomonas stutzeri MB-405. Curr Microbiol 1995;30(5):291-298.
(22.) Moorthy V, Ramalingam A, Sumantha A, Shankaranaya RT. Production, purification and characterisation of extracellular L-Asparaginase from a soil isolate of Bacillus sp. Afr J Microbiol Res 2010;4(18): 1862-1867.
(23.) Hosamani R, Kaliwal BB. Isolation, molecular identification and optimization of fermentation parameters for the production of L-asparaginase, an anticancer agent by Fusarium equiseti. Int J Microbiol Res 2011;3(2): 108-119.
(24.) Hymavathi M, Sathish T, Subba Rao Ch, Prakasham RS. Enhancement of L-asparaginase production by isolated Bacillus circulans (MTCC 8574) using response surface methodology. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2009; 159(1): 191-198.
(25.) Rani GB, Chiranjeevi T, Chandel AK, Satish T, Radhika K, Narasu ML, et al. Optimization of selective production media for enhanced production of xylanases in submerged fermentation by Thielaviopsis basicola MTCC 2014;51(10):2508-2516.
(26.) El-Naggar Nel-A, Moawad H, El-Shweihy NM, El-Ewasy SM. Optimization of culture conditions for production of the anti-Leukemic glutaminase free L-Asparaginase by newly isolated Streptomyces olivaceus NEAE-119 using response surface methodology. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:62703l.
(27.) Potumarthi R, Jacques L, Many W, Michael D. Surface immobilization of Rhizopus oryzae (ATCC 96382) for enhanced production of lipase enzyme by multiple responses optimization. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 2012;7(S3): S285-S295.
(28.) Madruga MS, Camara FS. The chemical composition of Multimistura as a food supplement. Food Chem 2000;68 (1):41-44.
(29.) Beg QK, Bhushan B, Kapoor M, Hoondal GS. Enhanced production of thermostable xylanase from Streptomyces sp. QG11-3 and its application in biobleaching of eucalyptus kraft pulp. Enzyme Microb Technol 2000;27(7): 459-466.
(30.) Eliaiah P, Srinivasulu B, Adinarayana K. Optimization studies on neomycin production by a mutant strain of Streptomyces marinensis in solid state fermentation. Process Biochem 2004;39(5): 529-534.
(31.) Krishna C. Solid-state fermentation systems-an overview. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2005;25(1-2):1-30.
VSSL Prasad Talluri (1,2,3*), Sri Santhi Lanka (2), and V Rajagopal Saladi (2)
(1.) Department of Biotechnology, College of Natural and Computational Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
(2.) Department of Biotechnology, CITAM Institute of Science, CITAM University, Visakhapatnam- 530 045, Andhra Pradesh, India
(3.) Department of Biotechnology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technicka 5, CZ 76628 Prague 6, Czech Republic
(*) Corresponding author: VSSL Prasad Talluri, M.Sc., Department of Biotechnology, College of Natural and Computational Science, University of Condor, Condor, Ethiopia
Tel: +91 8019155333
Received: 19 Mar 2017
Accepted: 28 Nov 2017
Table 1. Coded and actual levels of the independent variables for the design of CCD experiment Coded Levels Independent variables Symbols - -1 0 +1 Yeast extract (g) A 5 6 7 pH B 6.5 7.5 8.5 Temperature ([degrees]C) C 37 37 38 Wheat bran (g) D 11 12 13 Incubation time(hr) E 47 48 49 Table 2. Effect of carbon source on the growth of M. gilamemis [BSH-3.sup.T] and production of L-asparaginase Carbon source Enzyme activity (IU) Cell mass (mg/ml) Arabinose 98.6[+ or -]1.2 0.78[+ or -]0.044 Fructose 108.4[+ or -]0.9 0.85[+ or -]0.041 Glucose 124.8[+ or -]2.1 1.17[+ or -]0.038 Lactose 98.1[+ or -]0.8 0.67[+ or -]0.042 Maltose 104.8[+ or -]1.1 0.75[+ or -]0.021 Starch 81.4[+ or -]1.2 0.35[+ or -]0.020 Sucrose 102.2[+ or -]2.3 0.68[+ or -]0.032 Table 3. Effect of nitrogen source on M. gilamemis BSH-3T Nitrogen source Enzyme activity (IU) Cell mass (mg/ml) Beef extract 160.8[+ or -]3.4 0.82[+ or -]0.013 Malt extract 152.4[+ or -]4.2 0.76[+ or -]0.023 Peptone 158.2[+ or -]5.2 0.78[+ or -]0.031 Tryptone 156.4[+ or -]6.7 0.74[+ or -]0.035 Urea 123.2[+ or -]3.4 0.43[+ or -]0.024 Yeast extract 220.2[+ or -]5.2 1.40[+ or -]0.034 Table 4. Experimental design of five variables with coded values for the production of L-asparaginase Enzyme specific Activity (IU) Run order A B C D E Experimental Predicted 1 +1 -1 +1 +1 -1 205 211.9 2 0 0 +1 0 0 279.8 263.4 3 -1 +1 -1 -1 +1 108.3 105.4 4 0 0 -1 0 0 241.6 257.9 5 0 0 0 0 +1 295.6 288.5 6 0 0 0 0 0 263.9 268.4 7 0 0 0 0 0 278.3 268.4 8 +1 -1 -1 +1 +1 216.9 221.5 9 +1 +1 +1 -1 -1 231.8 232.1 10 -1 0 0 0 0 119.9 139.6 11 0 0 0 0 -1 282.1 289.1 12 -1 -1 +1 +1 +1 103.2 106.9 13 -1 +1 -1 -1 -1 111.2 102.4 14 0 0 0 0 0 265.1 268.4 15 -1 +1 +1 +1 -1 108.3 107.8 16 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 215 221.2 17 -1 -1 -1 -1 +1 110.2 105.6 18 -1 -1 +1 -1 -1 116.4 114.2 19 +1 -1 -1 -1 -1 218.5 217.1 20 +1 0 0 0 0 269.1 249.2 21 0 0 0 -1 0 227 243.8 22 0 +1 0 0 0 237.8 247.6 23 0 0 0 +1 0 258.9 242.1 24 -1 +1 -1 +1 +1 109.3 106.5 25 -1 -1 -1 +1 -1 110.4 108.3 26 +1 +1 -1 +1 -1 204 204.4 27 +1 -1 +1 -1 +1 213.6 218.1 28 0 0 0 0 0 269.4 268.4 29 0 0 0 0 0 271.9 268.4 30 0 -1 0 0 0 259.5 249.7 31 0 0 0 0 0 261.7 268.4 32 +1 +1 -1 -1 +1 209.6 207.5 Enzyme specific activity (IU)=28554.2+808.023 *A+203.875 *B+035.073 *C+527.393 *D-1949.05 *E-73.9135 *[A.sup.2]-19.7035 *[B.sup.2]-7.71355 *[C.sup.2]-25.4035 *[D.sup.2]+20.4305 *[E.sup.2]+0.593750 *AB+1.33123 *AC-1.10025 *AD+0.093750 *AE+2.94375 *BC-0.0087500 *BD-0.418750 *BE-1.85025 *CD-1.45025 *CE+3.30025 *DE. Table 5. ANOVA analysis of RSM model for enzymatic production individual factors Source DF (a) Seq SS (b) Adj MS (c) F P A 1 54044 54044 225.43 0.014 B 1 19 19 0.08 0.785 C 1 137 137 0.57 0.405 D 1 14 14 0.00 0.817 E 1 2 2 0.01 0.929 [A.sup.2] 1 13443 13443 50.08 0.002 [B.sup.2] 2219 2219 4.01 0.017 [C.sup.2] 243 243 0.01 0.021 [E.sup.2] 1028 1028 4.29 0.043 AB 0 0 0.19 0.881 AC 28 28 0.02 0.980 AD 20 20 0.12 0.737 AE 8 8 0.08 0.801 BC 139 139 0.03 0.541 BD 2 2 0.58 0.101 BE 3 3 0.02 0.010 CD 55 55 0.01 0.020 CE 34 34 0.23 0.201 DE 175 175 0.14 0.180 Table 6. ANOVA analysis of RSM model for production of L-asparaginase by Myroides sp BSH-3 Source DF (a) Seq SS (b) Adj SS (b) Adj MS (c) F P Regression 20 135174 135174 0758.7 28.19 <0.001 Linear 5 54215 54215 10843.1 45.23 0.001 Square 5 80492 80492 10098.3 07.15 <0.001 Interaction 10 407 407 40.7 0.19 0.004 Residual error 11 2037 2037 239.7 - - Lack of fit 0 2450 2450 408.3 10.90 0.001 Pure error 5 187 187 37.5 - - Total 31 137811 [R.sup.2] = 98.09%, [R.sup.2] = 94.01% Note: (a): Degree of freedom; (b): Sum of Squares; (c): Mean Squares.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Original Article|
|Author:||Talluri, V.S.S.L. Prasad; Lanka, Sri Santhi; Saladi, V. Rajagopal|
|Publication:||Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology (AJMB)|
|Date:||Jan 1, 2019|
|Previous Article:||A Multidisciplinary Study to Evaluate the Anti-quorum Sensing Ability of Phyto-compounds in Ruellia patula Jacq.|
|Next Article:||The Effect of TAX-1 Gene of Human T-cell Leukemia Virus Type-1 on the Expression of CCR5 in K562 Cell Line.|