Printer Friendly

Statement of intent.

When I attempt to state what I have tried to do as a writer since I began, what occurs to me first of all is that I have never written two books of the same kind, nor ever wanted to reuse a formula, or a system, or an approach already developed in some earlier work.

This systematic versatility has baffled more than one critic seeking to put his finger on the "characteristics" of my writing, and in all probability it has also disheartened some of my readers. It has earned me the reputation of being some sort of computer or machine for producing texts. As I see it, I should rather compare myself to a farmer with many fields: in one field he grows beets, in another wheat, in a third alfalfa, and so on. In like manner, the books I have written belong to four different fields, to four different modes of questioning which, in the last analysis, perhaps address the same problem, but approach it from different perspectives each of which corresponds, for me, to a specific kind of literary work.

The first of these modes could be called "sociological": it has to do with looking at the ordinary and the everyday. It is this mode of questioning that underlies texts like Things, Especes d'espaces, Tentative de description d'un lieu parisien, and the work done by the team at Cause Commune directed by Jean Duvignaud and Paul Virilio. The second mode is of an autobiographical kind: W or The Memory of Childhood, La Boutique obscure, Je me souviens, Lieux ou j'ai dormi, etc. The third is the ludic mode, which relates to my liking for constraints, exploits, "exercises," and gives rise to all the work based on the notions and devices gleaned from OuLiPo's experiments: palindromes, lipograms, pangrams, anagrams, isograms, acrostics, crosswords, etc. The fourth and last is the novelistic mode, and it grows from my love of stories and adventures, from my wish to write books to be read at a gallop: Life A User's Manual is the obvious example.

This is a rather arbitrary distribution which could be refined considerably. Almost none of my books is entirely devoid of autobiographical traces (for example, an allusion to one of the day's events in a chapter in progress); likewise, almost none is assembled without recourse to one or another Oulipian structure or constraint, even if only symbolically, without the relevant constraint or structure constraining me in the least.

Actually, beyond these four horizons that define the compass of my work - the world around me, my own history, language, fiction - I think my ambition as a writer would be to run through the whole gamut of the literature of my age without ever feeling I was going back on myself or treading ground I had trodden before, and to write every kind of thing that it is possible for a man to write nowadays: big books and small ones, novels and poems, plays, libretti, crime fiction, adventure stories, science fiction, serials, and children's books ...

I have never felt at ease with talking about my work in theoretical or abstract terms. Even if what I produce seems to stem from a long-worked-out program, from a long-standing plan, I believe far more that I find my direction by following my nose. From the books I have written, in the order I have written them, I get the sometimes reassuring and sometimes uneasy feeling (uneasy because it is always suspended on a "projected" work, on an incompletion pointing to the unsayable, the desperate object of writing's desire) that they map a path, mark out a space, signpost a fumbling route, describe the specific staging posts of a starch that has no why but only a how: I feel confusedly that the books I have written are inscribed and find their meaning in the overall image that I have of literature, but it seems to me that I shall never quite grasp that image entirely, that it belongs for me to a region beyond writing, to the question of "why I write," which I can never answer except by writing, and thus deferring forever the very moment when, by ceasing to write, that image would visibly cohere, like a jigsaw puzzle inexorably brought to its completion.
COPYRIGHT 1993 Review of Contemporary Fiction
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1993 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Georges Perec/Felipe Alfau
Author:Perec, Georges; Bellos, David
Publication:The Review of Contemporary Fiction
Date:Mar 22, 1993
Words:713
Previous Article:Georges Perec owns up.
Next Article:The doing of fiction.
Topics:

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters