Printer Friendly

State consumer fraud act applied to accounting firm.

A U.S. district court ruled Illinois's Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (the consumer fraud act) applies to audit services rendered by an accounting firm in conjunction with a securities offering.

The ruling arose from Arthur Andersen & Co.'s motion to dismiss an action by a group that invested in a company called Needle in a Haystack, Inc. Andersen audited Needle's financial statements, which were included in the company's public offering of 40,000 investment units. The suing investors purchased 21,567 units for $129,402.

After the offering, Andersen discovered it had not been independent during the audit. A $30,000 promissory note executed by Neeedle for earlier services by Andersen was to be paid from the proceeds of the securities offering, but the registration statement failed to disclose this fact.

Following a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation of Andersen's independence, Needle was forced to terminate its offering and agreed to stop trading its securities.

The investors holding the now worthless securities accused Andersen of violating provisions in both the Securities Act of 1933 and Illinois's consumer fraud act. Andersen moved to dismiss the consumer fraud claim, asserting

1. The investors were not "consumers" within the meaning of the Illinois act because they did not purchase any "merchandise" from Andersen.

2. The act does not apply to accounting services.

The court dismissed both arguments. It found Andersen's services qualified as "merchandise" under the act, which contains no provision exempting accounting services from its authority. Consequently, the investors could maintain an action against Anderson. (Daniel S. Lyne v. Arthur Andersen & Co., no 91C 1885, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, 9/3/91.)
COPYRIGHT 1992 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1992, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Illinois's Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and Arthur Andersen & Co.
Author:Baliga, Wayne J.
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Date:Jan 1, 1992
Words:281
Previous Article:Special report: an inside look at the 5th Jerusalem Conference on Accountancy.
Next Article:Auditor has duty to disclose client's financial condition.
Topics:


Related Articles
Limited liability CPA firms: an attractive choice.
ACCOUNTING FRAUD.
Accounting for the big five breakups. (News Analysis).
Scandals hurt the economy. (Top News of 2002: May).
Preserving the paper (and electronic) trail: records and information management professionals will be key players in devising systems to meet the...
Burying the past: audit firms have gotten tougher--and board audit committees have, too.
Supreme Court reverses conviction in Arthur Andersen case.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters