Starbucks and guns.
As a company, Seattle-based Starbucks tends to lean left, supporting "progressive" causes and candidates, but when the professional hoplophobe lobby got upset about seeing some Starbucks customers legally, open carrying firearms, Starbucks offered a reasonable response. They refused to give in to demands that they ban the practice. The anti-rights lobby was furious and several different groups decided that Starbucks must be punished, so they called for boycotts. In response, pro-rights advocates called on gun owners to show their appreciation for Starbucks' reasonable position by making it a point to do business with the company, especially during the antis' boycott periods. The result was that on the designated boycott days, Starbucks locations around the country did more business than normal.
Unfortunately, some of the rights activists took things too far. Someone (the first we recall seeing was on an anti-gun site) reworked Starbucks' iconic mermaid logo, placing guns in the mermaid's hands and adding a message about "Guns and Coffee" in the circle around the picture. This image became popular among some pro-rights advocates and the parody logo found its way onto T-shirts, baseball caps, and coffee mugs.
It was sort of cute and clever, but those sporting the bastardized logo were being rather insensitive at best to the folks at Starbucks. After all, the company has spent years and millions of dollars to build their brand, and businesses rarely consider it a friendly act to modify or repurpose a logo without specific permission to do so.
Rights advocates, not satisfied with merely being able to exercise their rights, also wanted to take the opportunity to taunt their opponents. They called for gun owners to not only buy coffee and muffins on days the antis were boycotting Starbucks, but to do it while openly carrying their favorite firearms. They called these "Starbucks Appreciation Days." The rallies went without a hitch of any kind, but they placed Starbucks in the middle of the debate--exactly where they had said they didn't want to be. To top it off, some advocates chose to express their rights to the fullest by carrying long guns--scary, ugly, black long guns. While their actions were completely legal, the end result was not what anyone was looking for--at least not anyone on the pro-rights side.
The open carry rallies at Starbucks attracted media attention and coverage that the antis' boycotts could never have generated. Suddenly, the issue of open carry of firearms in Starbucks stores was national news. That put Starbucks in an even more uncomfortable position than before: they found their company name and logo as a rallying cry, and some of their stores as a rally point for a cause that was not theirs.
So, alter more than a year of unjustifiable attacks and failed boycott attempts, the anti-rights crowd got a major concession from Starbucks--not because of anything the antis did, but because some pro-rights advocates were over-zealous.
As stated above, Starbucks was never really a friend to gun owners or the cause of individual rights, but neither were they an enemy. They're still not. While Starbucks has politely asked us to please not carry in their stores, they stopped short of declaring an official policy against the practice. They gave no indication that they are going to post any of their stores with "No Guns" signs or ask customers to leave if they show up packing. Some of our guys have been offended by the Starbucks letter--especially those most zealous in their "appreciation" of Starbucks--and are now calling for our side to boycott the company.
It's time for level heads to prevail. As a national company, Starbucks has stores in every corner of the country serving coffee and muffins to adherents of every political philosophy and creed. As such they have wisely tried to maintain neutrality on most politically sensitive issues, including the right to carry.
As far as we at The Firearms Coalition are concerned, Starbucks is still holding a neutral position. If we happen to be near a Starbucks when the urge for a good cup of overly-roasted coffee hits us, we will not hesitate to stop in--whether we are carrying (as we usually are) or not--and we suggest that other gun owners should do likewise. If some anti-rights group again calls for a boycott of Starbucks, we will go out of our way--and encourage others to do likewise--to give the company a bit of our business. Unless Starbucks posts an official policy forbidding the lawful carry of firearms in their stores, we don't plan to treat them as our enemies, and hope that others will take a similar position. We have enough real enemies to worry about without trying to make more.
Permission to reprint or post this article in its entirety is hereby granted provided this credit and link to www.FirearmsCoalition.org is included. To receive The Firearms Coalition's bi-monthly newsletter, The Knox Hard Corps Report, write to Box 1761, Dept. SGN, Buckeye, AZ 85326 or subscribe at www.FirearmsCoalition.org.
Copyright [R] 2013 Neal Knox Associates--The most trusted name in the rights movement.
By Jeff Knox
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||From The Firearms Coalition|
|Date:||Nov 1, 2013|
|Previous Article:||Without Rule of Law.|
|Next Article:||From Arisaka to assault rifle: in Part 1 (10/1 issue), Scarlata detailed Japanese rifle ammo from the 1850s through the Murata. This time, he covers...|