Printer Friendly

Star Wars: lasers can guide electrons.

Star Wars: Lasers can guide electrons

The first conclusive demonstration that an intense electron particle beam can be laser-guided into a straight-line course through a gas has just been announced by researchers at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, N.M. The technique may prove useful in a number of areas, including controlling electrons in accelerators used for particle-physics studies and fusion research. It may also constitute an important step toward developing potent "Star Wars' weaponry for use against targets in earth's atmosphere. Under the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (SN: 1/19/85, p. 39), the United States is prohibited from deploying such weapons, but is allowed to conduct research on beam weapons for strategic defense.

Particle beams have been called "the ultimate weapon.' Not only do these beams of accelerated atomic particles have the potential to inflict more damage than lasers, but they also wreak their devastation virtually instantaneously.

Charged-particle beams are being developed for use in a gaseous environment, such as earth's atmosphere. Though likecharged particles, such as electrons, normally repel each other, the large electric currents in a beam moving through the atmosphere actually set up a strong magnetic field that pinches the electrons into a tightly focused stream. This keeps the beam from spreading. What it does not do is keep the beam from arcing and snaking unpredictably as it propagates through the gas. To do that, Sandia scientists have employed a low-power laser.

The laser's light is beamed for a few billionths of a second along the straight-line path the particle beam is to follow. Energy deposited by the laser's light strips electrons off gas atoms along the entire beam path. Because the laser has an annular beam (in cross section its light forms a ring), it creates a conducting plasma tunnel. When the electron beam is then pulsed down the core of this channel, a magnetic current is set up inside the tunnel's "walls.' This magnetic field, caused by the return flow of the electron beam's current through the plasma, repels the electron beam from all sides, confining it along the path created by the laser.

In Sandia's experiments, partially funded by the Department of Defense, a krypton-fluoride infrared laser provided between 1 and 100 millijoules of energy to ionize a small amount of the organic compound diethylaniline (DEA) that had been "seeded' into a low-pressure nitrogen atmosphere. Immediately afterward, a 1.5-million-volt electron beam was directed along the laser-ionized channel. Tests showed the electron beam was both stable and efficient--80 percent of its injected current reached the target 5 feet away.

Even over kilometers-long distances, however, the researchers expect little additional current loss. Explains J. Pace VanDevender, director of the laboratory's laser and particle-beam research program, some of the electrons coming from the electron generator are not heading directly into the channel and will become lost to the system quickly. However, he says that of the remaining electrons, those successfully injected into the channel should just keep on going until they hit the target, regardless of the distance they're made to travel.

Moreover, VanDevender says, because the guidance lasers need only contain a millionth of the energy density in the particle beam, it's unlikely they would fall prey to the beam-spreading instabilities and energy losses that plague high-power laser beams directed through gases as dense as earth's atmosphere.

Other beam-guiding strategies are under study elsewhere, VanDevender notes. One electrostatic technique would use a solid-core laser beam to pave the way to a target by setting up an electric attraction between the coming particle beam and ions along its route. VanDevender believes that "for very low current [electron beams], probably the electrostatic mode is best; for higher current, the magnetic control would probably be best.' However, he adds, "Right now it's not clear which would make the best weapons system.'

Photo: Magnetic forces set up by the electron beam's return current (flowing left in the channel walls) center the beam. Inset photo shows test beam controlled in this way.
COPYRIGHT 1985 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1985, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Raloff, Janet
Publication:Science News
Date:Apr 13, 1985
Words:663
Previous Article:As the world turns, time flies.
Next Article:Encouraging efforts to kick cocaine.
Topics:


Related Articles
The 99% fallacy.
Strategic defense of X-ray initiative.
Is the force with lasers? Will lasers be selected for the Strategic Defense Initiative?
APS on SDI: too soon to decide.
Firing long-distance electrons.
American forces press service (Oct. 3, 2005): Pace issues guidance to help military 'shape the future'.
He took a leap, now he's FLYING HIGH.
PERFORMANCE NOTES.
Stellar spectacular: brightest supernova.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters