# Stability and Stabilization for a Class of Semilinear Fractional Differential Systems.

1. IntroductionOver the past several decades, fractional calculus has attracted much attention from scientists and engineers. This is because fractional differential equations have proven to be effective in modelling many physical phenomena and have been applied in different science and engineering fields. Significant contributions have been proposed in fractional differential equations both in theory and applications. For example, see [1-4] and references therein.

In recent years, the stability of fractional-order systems has gained increasing interest due to its importance in control theory. Also, stability theory is an important topic in the study of differential equations. In 1996, Matignon studied the stability of linear fractional differential equations in [5], which is regarded as the first work in this area. Li et al. investigated the Mittag-Leffler stability of nonlinear fractional dynamic systems in [6] and suggested the Lyapunov direct method for nonlinear fractional-order stability systems [7]. There has been more literature on stability of dynamic fractional-order systems, in which important and sufficient conditions were discussed for the stability of linear and linear time-delay fractional differential equations as stated in [8-10]. The modelling and stability of the water jet mixed-flow pump fractional-order shafting system has also been studied [11]. The stability of fractional-order nonlinear systems with 0 < [alpha] < 1 was derived in [6,12,13], according to the Lyapunov approach. Based on the uncertain Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model, the stability problems of nonlinear fractional-order systems were studied, whereas the siding-mode control approach was used to investigate the stabilization and synchronization problems of the nonlinear fractional-order system (e.g., [14-18]). As noted, a growing number of scientists are dedicated to the stability of fractional systems, with most of the above findings concentrating only on nonlinear fractional systems of 0 < [alpha] < 1.

In [19-24], the authors studied the stability of fractional nonlinear systems with order 0 < [alpha] [less than or equal to] 2. Various sufficient conditions for asymptotic stability (local or global) are obtained by using Mittag-Leffler function, Laplace transform, and the generalized Gronwall inequality. In summary, the authors of [19, 20, 23, 25] conducted studies on the stability relying on a class of commensurate and incommensurate fractional-order systems together with fractionally controlled systems with linear feedback inputs. By using Mittag-Leffler, Laplace transforms, and Gronwall-Bellman lemma, Zhang et al. [21] discussed the stability of n-dimensional nonlinear fractional order.

In this paper, we discuss the stability of a class of semi-linear fractional differential systems with the fractional order between 0 and 2. Theoretically, a stability theorem is developed with the property of convolution and the asymptotic properties of Mittag-Leffler functions. Therefore, based on this theory of stability, a basic criterion for stabilizing a class of nonlinear fractional-order systems is derived, in which control parameters can be selected through the linear control theory pole placement technique. Our results give us a simple method for determining the stability of nonlinear fractional systems with Caputo derivative with order 0 < [alpha] [less than or equal to] 2. Compared with the abovementioned stability method, the conditions we have proposed for the nonlinear component f(t, x(t)) are new and much simpler to test. Thus, there is no need to arrive at an exact solution if only the nonlinear term satisfies certain conditions. What is needed is to calculate the eigenvalues of the linear coefficient matrix A and test that [parallel]arg ([[lambda].sub.i] (A))[parallel] > ([alpha][pi]/2) is satisfied by its arguments. In addition, the results obtained can be used to stabilize the class of fractional-order nonlinear systems by means of a linear state feedback controller.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we recall some definitions and lemmas that will be used in the analysis. In Section 3, the main results, together with the stability and stabilization of the equilibrium points are presented. Section 4 is devoted to some numerical simulation examples that illustrate the validation and effectiveness of the theory. We conclude our work in Section 5.

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we state some definitions and results that are going to be used in our investigations.

Definition 1 (see [3]). The Caputo fractional derivative of order a of function x(t) is defined as

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (1)

where [GAMMA](*) is the gamma function, i.e., [mathematical expression not reproducible], and n is an integer satisfying n - 1 < [alpha] [less than or equal to] n.

The Laplace transform of the Caputo fractional derivative [mathematical expression not reproducible] is

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (2)

where n is an integer such that n - 1 < [alpha] [less than or equal to] n.

Similar to the exponential function, the function frequently used in the fractional differential equations is the Mittag-Leffler function. The definitions and properties are therefore given as follows.

Definition 2 (see [3]). The Mittag-Leffler function is defined as

[E.sub.[alpha]](z) = [[infinity].summation over (k=0)] [z.sup.k]/[GAMMA]([alpha]k + 1), Re([alpha]) > 0, z [member of] C. (3)

The Mittag-Leffler function with two parameters is defined as

[E.sub.[alpha],[beta]](z) = [[infinity].summation over (k=0)] [z.sup.k]/[GAMMA]([alpha]k + 1), Re([alpha]) > 0, [beta] [member of] R, x [member of] C. (4)

It is easy to see that [E.sub.[alpha]](z) = [E.sub.[alpha],1](z) and [E.sub.1](z) = [E.sub.1,1](z) = [e.sup.z]. The Laplace transform of Mittag-Leffler function is formulated as

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (5)

Definition 3 (see [2]). For A [member of] [C.sup.nxn], the matrix Mittag-Leffler function is defined by

[E.sub.[alpha],[beta]](A) = [[infinity].summation over (k=0)] [A.sup.k]/[GAMMA]([alpha]k + [beta]), [beta] [member of] C, Re([alpha]) > 0. (6)

Lemma 1 (see [26]). The following properties hold:

(i) There exist finite real constants [M.sub.1] [greater than or equal to] 1, [M.sub.2] [greater than or equal to] 1, [M.sub.3] [greater than or equal to] 1 such that for any 0 < [alpha] < 1,

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (7)

where A denotes matrix and [parallel]*[parallel] denotes any vector or induced matrix norm.

(ii) If [alpha] [greater than or equal to] 1, then for [beta] = 1, 2, [alpha],

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (8)

Definition 4 (see [7]). The constant [x.sub.0] [member of] [R.sup.n] is an equilibrium point of the Caputo dynamic system [mathematical expression not reproducible] if and only if f(t, [x.sub.0]) = 0.

Without loss of generality, we may assume that the equilibrium point is [x.sub.0] = 0, representing the origin of [R.sup.n] (See [7]). Hence, in the rest of this paper, we always assume that the nonlinear function f satisfies f(t, 0) = 0.

Definition 5. The zero solution of [mathematical expression not reproducible], with order 0 < [alpha] [less than or equal to] (1 < [alpha] < 2) is said to be stable if for any initial values [x.sub.k](k = 0)([x.sub.k](k = 0, 1)) and any [member of] > 0 there exists [t.sub.0] > 0 such that [parallel]x(t)[parallel] < [member of] for all t > [t.sub.0]. The zero solution is said to be asymptotically stable if [lim.sub.t[right arrow][infinity]] [parallel]x(t) [parallel] = 0.

The following property of convolution plays a key role in the proof of the main results.

Lemma 2 (see [27]). Let 1 < p, q < [infinty] satisfy (1/p) + (1/q) = 1. If f [member of] [L.sup.p](R, X) and g [member of] [L.sup.q](R, X), then f * g [member of] [C.sub.0](R, X). Here, X is a Banach space, f * g denotes the convolution of the functions f and g, i.e., [mathematical expression not reproducible], and C (R, X) = {f [member of] C(R, X): f vanishes at infinity}.

3. Existence Results

In this section, we consider the following system of fractional differential equation:

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (9)

where x(t) = [([x.sub.1](t), [x.sub.2](t), ..., [x.sub.n](t)).sup.T] [member of] [R.sup.n] denotes the state vector of the system, [alpha] [member of] (0, 2) is the order of the fractional-order derivative, f [0, +[infinty]) x [R.sup.n] [right arrow] [R.sup.n] defines a nonlinear vector field in the n-dimensional vector space, and A [member of] [R.sup.nxn] is a constant matrix. Here after, we assume that [[lambda].sub.i](i = 1, 2, ..., n) are the eigenvalues of the matrix A and that f(t, 0) = 0, i.e., 0 is an equilibrium point of system (9).

3.1. Stability for the Case 0 < [alpha] [less than or equal to] 1. We first present a stability result for the case 0 < [alpha] [less than or equal to] 1. In this case, the solution to equation (9), with initial condition x(0) = [x.sub.0], can be expressed as

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (10)

The existence and uniqueness of solutions to this problem are widely studied [1-3].

Theorem 1. The zero solution of system (9) is locally asymptotically stable if the following conditions are satisfied:

(1) The matrix A is stable.

(2) There is a function g [member of] [L.sup.q](0, [infinity]) such that

[parallel]f(t, x (t))[parallel] [less than or equal to] g(t), (11)

where q is a positive constant satisfying 1/p + 1/q = 1 and p > (1/[alpha]).

Proof. Let the initial condition be x(0) = [x.sub.0]. Then, the solution of (9) is given by (10). This is obtained from condition (1) that [absolute value of (arg([[lambda].sub.i] (A)))] > ([alpha][pi]/2). It then follows from Lemma 1 that there exist constants [M.sub.1] > 0 and [M.sub.2] > 0 such that

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (12)

Because the matrix A is stable, there exist constants M > 0 and [omega] > 0 such that

[parallel][e.sup.At][parallel] [less than or equal to] [Me.sup.-[omega]t]. (13)

Substituting it into (12) and using condition (2), one has

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (14)

Now, we define a function [phi]: [0, +[infinity]) [right arrow] [0, +[ing) as f(u) = ua-1e-wua. (15)

Because 0 < [alpha] [less than or equal to] 1 and p > 1/[alpha], a simple computation shows that [phi] [member of] [L.sup.p] (0, + [infinity]). On the other hand, from condition (2) we know that g [member of] [L.sup.q](0, + [infinity]). Then, it follows from Lemma 2 that [phi] * g [member of] [C.sub.0][0, +[infinity]), which implies that

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (16)

This, combined with (14), shows that [lim.sub.t[right arrow][infinity]] [parallel]x(t)[parallel] = 0; hence, Theorem 1 is proved.

3.2. Stability for the Case 1 < [alpha] [less than or equal to] 2. When 1 < [alpha] [less than or equal to] 2, the solution to equation (9), with initial condition x(0) = x0 and x'(0) = [x.sub.1], satisfies the following integral equation:

[mathematical expression not reproducible] (17)

Because 1 < [alpha] [less than or equal to] 2, from Lemma 1 (ii), there exists [M.sub.3] > 0 such that

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (18)

for [beta] = 1, 2, or [alplha]. We first prove an existence and uniqueness result via the principle of Banach contraction.

Theorem 2. Let T > 0 be arbitrary, the matrix A be stable, and f be Lipschitz w.r.t. the second variable, i.e., there exists a constant L > 0 such that

[parallel]f(t, u) - f(t, v)[parallel] [less than or equal to] L[parallel]u - v[parallel], (19)

for each t [member of] [0, T] and u, v [member of] [R.sup.n]. If

L < [alpha][omega]/[MM.sub.3]; (20)

where M, [M.sub.3], and [omega] are constants appeared in (13) and (8), then equation (9), with the initial condition x(0) = [x.sub.0] and x'(0) = [x.sub.1], has a unique solution in [0, T].

Proof. We transform the problem into a fixed-point problem. Let X = C([0, T], [R.sup.n]) be the Banach space of all continuous functions from [0, T] into [R.sup.n], endowed with the norm [parallel]x[parallel] = [sup.sub.t[member of][0,T]][parallel]x(t)[parallel]. We define an operator Q: X [right arrow] X as

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (21)

for t [member of] [0, T]. Then, equation (9) has a unique solution if and only if Q has a unique fixed point. Taking x, y [member of] C([0, T], [R.sup.n]) arbitrarily and t [member of] [0, T]. We obtain

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (22)

It follows that

[parallel]Qx - Qy[parallel] [less than or equal to] [less than or equal to] [MM.sub.3]/[alpha][omega] L[parallel]x - y[parallel]. (23)

Condition (20) shows that ([MM.sub.3]/[alpha][omega]) L < 1, which implies that Q is a contraction. Hence, we deduce by the principle of Banach contraction that Q has a unique fixed point, which is the unique solution to equation (9). The proof is completed.

Similar to Theorem 1, we now prove the stability of equation (9) for 1 < [alpha] [less than or equal to] 2.

Theorem 3. Suppose that the co"ditio"s i" Theorem 2 hold. The", the zero solutio" of system (9) is locally asymptotically stable, if the follow" co"ditio"s are satisfied:

(1) [parallel]arg([[lambda].sub.i](A))[parallel] > ([alpha][pi]/2), i = 1, 2, ..., n.

(2) There is a function g [member of] [L.sup.q] (0, [infinity]) such that

[parallel]f(t, x(t))[parallel] [less than or equal to] g(t), (24)

where q is a positive constant satisfying 1/p + 1/q = 1 and p > I.

Proof. Suppose that the initial condition is x(0) = [x.sub.0] and x'(0) = [x.sub.1], then the solution of (9) has the following form:

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (25)

for t > 0. Because 1 < [alpha] [less than or equal to] 2, it follows from (25) and condition (2) that

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (26)

for all t > 0. From condition (1) we know that the matrix A is stable. Hence, the inequality (13) holds. Therefore, we obtain

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (27)

for all t > 0. Similar to the proof of Theorem 1, we define the function [phi]: [0, +[infinity]) [right arrow] [0, +[infinty]) as

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (28)

Because 1 < [alpha] [less than or equal to] 2, it is easy to see that [phi] [member of] [L.sup.p](0, +[infinity]) for any p > 1. Because of Lemma 2 and condition (2), we obtain [phi] * g [member of] [C.sub.0][0, +[infinity])). Therefore, [lim.sub.t[right arrow]+[infinty]][parallel]x(t) [parallel] = 0. The proof is completed.

Remark 1. Theorems 1 and 3 give us a simple procedure for determining stability of the fractional-order nonlinear system with Caputo derivative of order 0 < [alpha] < 2. If the nonlinear term f(t, x(t)) fulfills condition (2), then the exact solution need not be reached. Importantly, it is required to calculate matrix A's eigenvalues and test their arguments. If [parallel]arg([[lambda].sub.i] (A))[parallel] > ([alpha][pi]/2), i = 1, 2, ..., n, we conclude that the origin is stable asymptotically.

3.3. Stabilization of a Class of Fractional-Order Semilinear System. In this subsection, we propose the stabilization theory of a class of fractional-order semilinear controlled systems. We consider the controlled systems of the following form:

[sup.C.sub.0][C.sup.[alpha].sub.t] x(t) = Ax(t) + f(t, x (t)) + Bu(t), (29)

where x, A and f are as in system (9), B [member of] [R.sup.nxn] is the input matrix, and u is the control input. If u is chosen to be a linear state feedback control, i.e., u = Kx for some feedback gains K, then system (29) becomes a closed-loop system:

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (30)

Suppose that (A, B) is controllable, then the feedback gain K can be chosen such that system (30) is asymptotically stable.

Theorem 4. If 0 < [alpha] < 2, feedback gain K is chosen such that the following conditions hold:

(i) [parallel]arg([[lambda].sub.i]([??])[parallel] > ([alpha][pi]/2), (i = 1, 2, ..., n), where [[lambda].sub.i] ([??]) is the eigenvalue of matrix [??].

(ii) f(t, x(t)) satisfies [parallel]f(t, x(t))[parallel] [less than or equal to] g(t), where g [member of] [L.sup.q](0, [infinity]).

(iii) The matrix A is stable. Then, the controlled system (29) is locally asymptotically stable.

Proof. The proof of Theorem 4 is similar to that of Theorems 1 and 3.

Remark 2. The nonlinear term of Chaotic fractional-order systems satisfies [parallel]f(t, x(t))[parallel] [less than or equal to] g(t), where g [member of] [L.sup.q](0, [infinity]), i.e., the hyperchaotic fractional-order novel system. Therefore, in a large class of generalized fractional-order chaotic or hyperchaotic systems, Theorem 4 can be applied to control chaotic. Of all control methods, linear feedback control is particularly attractive and has been widely extended to practical implementation due to its ease among configuration and implementation.

4. Applications

In this section, we apply the obtained results to some semilinear systems to illustrate the effectiveness of the theory.

Example 1. Consider the fractional nonlinear system with Caputo derivative:

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (31)

where [w.sub.i] > 0, i = 1, 2, 3. This system can be rewritten as (9), where

[mathematical expression not reproducible] (32)

It is easy to verify that

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (33)

where [w.sub.0] = max{[w.sub.1], [w.sub.2], [w.sub.3]}. So, condition (2) in Theorems 1 and 3 is satisfied. The eigenvalues of A are [[lambda].sub.1,2] = -0.5000 [+ or -] 1.3229i and [[lambda].sub.3] = -1. According to Theorems 1 and 3, if a < 1.2300, then the zero solution of (31) is asymptotically stable. For the initial values ([x.sub.1](0), [x.sub.2](0), [x.sub.3](0)) = (0.1, -0.2, 0.3), simulation results are displayed in Figures 1-3. Figures 1 and 2 show that the zero solution of system (31) is asymptotically stable with [alpha] = 1.21 and [alpha] = 1.22, respectively. Figure 3 also shows that the zero solution of system (31) is unstable with [alpha] = 1.23.

Example 2. Consider the following fractional nonlinear system:

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (34)

The system can be rewritten as (9), where

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (35)

Obviously,

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (36)

The eigenvalues of A are [[lambda].sub.1,2] = (-1/2) [+ or -] ([square root of (3)] i/2) and [lambda]3 = -1. According to Theorems 1 and 3, if [alpha] < (4/3), then the zero solution of (32) is asymptotically stable.

Simulation results with initial values ([x.sub.1](0), [x.sub.2](0), [x.sub.3](0)) = (-0.01, -0.02, 0.03) are displayed in Figures 4-6. Figures 4 and 5 show that the zero solution of system (34) is asymptotically stable with [alpha] = 1.1 and [alpha] = 1.3, respectively. Figure 6 further shows that the zero solution of system (34) is unstable when [alpha] = 1.34.

Example 3. The fractional-order novel hyperchaotic system can be written as

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (37)

where a, b, c, and d are some parameters. System (37) can be rewritten as (9) if we write

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (38)

It is easy to see that f(t, x(t)) satisfies

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (39)

When a = 10, b = 40, c = 2.5, and d = 10, system (37) displays a chaotic attractor, and we construct the linear state feedback controller as (9). For simplicity, let B = [(1,1,1,1).sup.T]. According to Theorem 4, feedback gain can be obtained by [parallel]arg([[lambda].sub.i](A))] > ([alpha][pi]/2). By a simple calculation, if we choose K = (2, -8, -3.5, -1), then the eigenvalues of [??] are (-17.3028, -0.11769, -2.7898 [+ or -] 10.7230i). Hence, [absolute value of (arg [[lambda].sub.i]([??]))] > 0.5[pi][alpha] if [alpha] < 1.6203. Thus, the conditions of Theorem 4 are satisfied. The zero solution of the controlled system is asymptotically stable with [alpha] = 1.14 and [alpha] = 1.15, respectively. The results of simulation with initial values ([x.sub.1](0), [x.sub.2](0), [x.sub.3](0), [x.sub.4](0)) = (-0.01, -0.02, -0.03, 0.04) are shown in Figures 7-10.

5. Conclusions

The stability of nonlinear dynamical systems is important for scientists and engineers. Therefore, in this paper, we studied a class of semilinear fractional-order systems with Caputo derivative by using properties of convolution and Mittag-Leffler function methods. We introduced the fractional comparison principle for Caputo fractional-order systems, which enriched the knowledge of both system theory and fractional calculus. We established a new sufficient condition of the asymptotic stability of zero solution for a class of fractional-order semilinear systems with order 0 < [alpha] < 2. Three illustrative examples were provided to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3814902

Data Availability

The data used in the examples were originally taken from MATLAB, and they are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 11872189).

References

[1] K. Diethelm, "The analysis of fractional differential equations," Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2004, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2019.

[2] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, and J. J. Trujillo, "Theory and applications of fractional differential equations," North-Holland Mathematics Studies, vol. 204, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2006.

[3] I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1998.

[4] S. Abbas, M. Benchohra, and G. M. N'Guerekata, "Topics in fractional differential equations," Developments in Mathematics, vol. 27, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2012.

[5] D. Matignon, "Stability results on fractional differential equations with application to control processing," in Proceedings of IMACS-SMC, Lille, France, 1996.

[6] Y. Li, Y. Q. Chen, and I. Podlubny, "Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional order nonlinear dynamic systems," Automatica, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1965-1969, 2009.

[7] Y. Li, Y. Q. Chen, and I. Podlubny, "Stability of fractionalorder nonlinear dynamic systems: Lyapunov direct method and generalized Mittag-Leffler stability," Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1810-1821, 2010.

[8] J. Shen and J. Lam, "Non-existence of finite-time stable equilibria in fractional-order nonlinear systems," Automatica, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 547-551, 2014.

[9] B. Wang, J. Ding, F. Wu, and D. Zhu, "Robust finite-time control of fractional-order nonlinear systems via frequency distributed model," Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 2133-2142, 2016.

[10] B. Xu, D. Chen, H. Zhang, F. Wang, X. Zhang, and Y. Wu, "Hamiltonian model and dynamic analyses for a hydro-turbine governing system with fractional item and time-lag," Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 47, pp. 35-47, 2017.

[11] B. Xu, D. Chen, H. Zhang, and F. Wang, "The modeling of the fractional-order shafting system for a water jet mixed-flow pump during the startup process," Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 29, no. 1-3, pp. 12-24, 2015.

[12] N. Aguila-Camacho, M. A. Duarte-Mermoud, and J. A. Gallegos, "Lyapunov functions for fractional order systems," Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2951-2957, 2014.

[13] H. T. Tuan and H. Trinh, "Stability of fractional-order nonlinear systems by Lyapunov direct method," IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 12, no. 17, pp. 2417-2422, 2018.

[14] D. Y. Chen, W. L. Zhao, J. C. Sprott, and X. Y. Ma, "Application of Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model to a class of chaotic synchronization and anti-synchronization," Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 1495-1505, 2013.

[15] R. Rakkiyappan, G. Velmurugan, and J. Cao, "Finite-time stability analysis of fractional-order complex-valued memristor-based neural networks with time delays," Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 2823-2836, 2014.

[16] D. Ding, D. Qi, and Q. Wang, "Non-linear Mittag-Leffler stabilisation of commensurate fractional-order non-linear systems," IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 681-690, 2015.

[17] M. P. Aghababa, "Control of non-integer-order dynamical systems using sliding mode scheme," Complexity, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 224-233, 2016.

[18] B. Wang, D. Zhu, J. Xue, and F. Wu, "Stabilization conditions for fuzzy control of uncertain fractional order non-linear systems with random disturbances," IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 637-647, 2016.

[19] L. Chen, Y. He, Y. Chai, and R. Wu, "New results on stability and stabilization of a class of nonlinear fractional-order systems," Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 633-641, 2014.

[20] T. Li and Y. Wang, "Stability of a class of fractional-order nonlinear systems," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2014, Article ID 724270, 14 pages, 2014.

[21] R. Zhang, G. Tian, S. Yang, and H. Cao, "Stability analysis of a class of fractional order nonlinear systems with order lying in (0, 2)," ISA Transactions, vol. 56, pp. 102-110, 2015.

[22] S. Huang, R. Zhang, and D. Chen, "Stability of nonlinear fractional-order time varying systems," Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 11, no. 3, 2016.

[23] S. Huang and B. Wang, "Stability and stabilization of a class of fractional-order nonlinear systems for 0 < [alpha] < 2," Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 973-984, 2017.

[24] S. Huang and B. Wang, "Stability and stabilization of a class of fractional-order nonlinear systems for 0 < [alpha] < 2," Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 13, no. 3, Article ID 031003, 2018.

[25] Z. Wang, D. Yang, and H. Zhang, "Stability analysis on a class of nonlinear fractional-order systems," Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 1023-1033, 2016.

[26] M. D. l. Sen, "About robust stability of Caputo linear fractional dynamic systems with time delays through fixed point theory," Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2011, Article ID 867932, 19 pages, 2011.

[27] W. Arendt, C. J. K. Batty, M. Hieber, and F. Neubrander, "Vector-valued laplace transforms and cauchy problems," Monographs in Mathematics, vol. 96, Springer, Basel, Switzerland, 2013.

Badawi Hamza Elbadawi Ibrahim [mathematical expression not reproducible], (1,2) Qixiang Dong, (3) and Zhengdi Zhang [mathematical expression not reproducible], (1)

(1) Faculty of Science, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China

(2) Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, University of Khartoum, Omdurman, Sudan

(3) School of Mathematical Sciences, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Zhengdi Zhang; dyzhang@ujs.edu.cn

Received 28 November 2019; Revised 5 February 2020; Accepted 22 February 2020; Published 30 March 2020

Academic Editor: Hugo Leiva

Caption: FIGURE 1: System (31) is asymptotically stable with [alpha] = 1.21.

Caption: FIGURE 2: System (31) is asymptotically stable with [alpha] = 1.22.

Caption: FIGURE 3: System (31) is unstable with [alpha] = 1.23.

Caption: FIGURE 4: System (34) is asymptotically stable with [alpha] = 1.1.

Caption: FIGURE 5: System (34) is asymptotically stable with [alpha] = 1.3.

Caption: FIGURE 6: System (34) is unstable with [alpha] = 1.34.

Caption: FIGURE 7: Asymptotical stabilization of the fractional-order novel hyperchaotic system (37) with [alpha] = 1.14 and feedback gain K = (2, -8, -3.5, -1).

Caption: FIGURE 8: Attractor of the fractional-order novel hyperchaotic system with order [alpha] = 1.14 ([alpha] = 10, b = 40, c = 2.5, and d = 10).

Caption: FIGURE 9: Asymptotical stabilization of the fractional-order novel hyperchaotic system (37) with [alpha] = 1.15 and feedback gain K = (2, -8, -3.5, -1).

Caption: FIGURE 10: Attractor of the fractional-order novel hyperchaotic system with order [alpha] = 1.15 ([alpha] = 10, b = 40, c = 2.5, and d = 10).

Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback | |

Title Annotation: | Research Article |
---|---|

Author: | Ibrahim, Badawi Hamza Elbadawi; Dong, Qixiang; Zhang, Zhengdi |

Publication: | Journal of Function Spaces |

Date: | Apr 30, 2020 |

Words: | 4609 |

Previous Article: | Equivalent Conditions of a Hilbert-Type Multiple Integral Inequality Holding. |

Next Article: | Some Dynamic Inequalities of Hilbert's Type. |

Topics: |