Printer Friendly

Sprouting of pre-sprouted sugarcane seedlings and micrometeorological variables under photo-selective nets/ Brotacao de mudas pre-brotadas de cana-de-acucar e variaveis micrometeriologicas sob malhas fotosseletivas.

INTRODUCTION

Sugarcane is a monocotyledon, allogamous and perennial plant probably native of New Guinea, from where it was taken to Asia, initially used in the form of syrup. Global sugarcane production surpasses 1700 million tons in 24 million hectares. Brazil is the largest sugarcane producer in the world, with 735 million tons (FAOSTAT, 2016).

In this scenario, it is necessary to develop new technologies that increase the profitability for the producer. One of these technologies is the production of pre-sprouted seedlings (PSS), which is an alternative to conventional planting, allowing greater control of seedling quality, vigor and health (Landell et al., 2013).

It is known that sugarcane sprouting is a characteristic of the varieties, and each one shows a different response according to the environmental conditions, especially luminosity and temperature. Sprouting of culms of pre-sprouted sugarcane seedlings in protected environment is also influenced by bud position and propagule formation age (Manhaes et al., 2015; Maqbool et al., 2016; Ram et al., 2017).

Therefore, through the management of global solar radiation it is possible to maintain the other micrometeorological elements within a range that favors seedling production. The air temperature ranging from 25 to 33[degrees]C is the most adequate for sugarcane growth (Ferreira Junior et al., 2012), substrate temperature in the range from 23 to 32[degrees]C leads to sprouting percentage above 90% (Clementes, 1940), and the red spectrum strongly affects the vegetative growth, photosynthesis, flowering and sprouting (Singh et al., 2015).

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of photo-selective nets on micrometeorological variables and on sprouting of pre-sprouted sugarcane seedlings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was carried out at the Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), in the municipality of Recife, PE State, Brazil, at the coordinates 8[degrees]4' 3" S and 34[degrees]55' 0" W, at altitude of 13 m. The climate is characterized as megathermal (As'), with mean annual temperature of 25.2[degrees]C according to Koppen's classification (Pereira et al., 2002).

A protected environment with an arched structure was used. It was covered with low-density polyethylene (LDPE) plastic with anti-ultraviolet (anti-UV) additive, 50% shade net on the sides, and dimensions of 21 m length, 7 m width, 3 m ceiling height, 4.5 m total height and 147 [m.sup.2].

The seedlings were obtained by the technique of production of pre-sprouted seedlings (PSS) adapted from the methodology proposed by Landell et al. (2013), but the sprouting stage in the present study was carried out in a protected environment. Such modification consisted in planting mini-setts of the sugarcane cultivar RB92579 on 15-cell trays, using coconut powder as substrate in the conduction of the sprouting processes in the same protected environment where seedlings were grown.

The trays were placed in protected environment, where irrigations were performed every 2 days until the beginning of the sprouting process, in order to prevent the propagative material from rotting.

Seedling production was conducted under sub-irrigation system, which consists of a cultivation platform with a water tank, a submerged pump and an analog timer. The timer was programmed to turn the pump on every day at 7 h, pumping the nutrient solution for 15 min to the highest part of the cultivation platform, which was conducted by capillarity through the substrate to the roots.

The experiment was set up in a completely randomized design, with four treatments (modules) and five repetitions, which totaled 20 experimental units constituted by 75 seedlings, with a total of 1500 seedlings.

The protected environment was divided into four modules: anti-UV LDPE + Solpack' red ultranet net with 35% shading (anti-UV LDPE + red ultranet), anti-UV LDPE + Solpack' white net with 50% shading (anti-UV LDPE + white), antiUV LDPE + Solpack' freshnet thermo-reflective net with 50% shading (anti-UV LDPE + freshnet) and anti-UV LDPE without shade net (anti-UV LDPE). The nets were positioned at 0.15 m height from the trays, until 12 days after planting (DAP).

Energy availability from the external environment was characterized using sensors, which allowed continuous recording of air temperature (Tair; [degrees]C), connected to a datalogger (Campbell'--CR1000 model).

Substrate temperature (Tsubs, [degrees]C) and air temperature (Tair, [degrees]C) in each cultivation module were recorded using HOBOware' mini-dataloggers. The sensors were installed in the geometric center of the cultivation modules, which were 1.0 m wide, 1.75 m long and 0.15 m high, i.e., half the length, half the width and at a 1.0 m height from the soil. The data were measured every second and means were recorded at 15min and daily, until obtaining the seedlings for transplanting.

The effect of the photo-selective nets was evaluated based on global solar radiation, photosynthetically active radiation, air temperature, relative air humidity, substrate temperature and on sugarcane sprouting variables.

The substrate temperature (TSUBS, [degrees]C), air temperature (TAIR, [degrees]C) and relative air humidity (RH, %) of each cultivation module were recorded by mini-dataloggers from HOBOware'. The data of global solar radiation (GSR; CMP3 Pyranometer LI200/R sensor; 400-1100 nm) and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR; LI190SB Quantum sensor; 400-700 nm) were recorded by connected sensors to a data logger from Campbell' (CR1000 model). The sensors were installed in the geometric center of the cultivation modules.

The following analyses were carried out since the beginning of the sprouting process until emergence stabilization: First count of emergence (FCE)--emerged plants were counted, considering as emerged those whose epicotyl was above the substrate level at 4 days after planting (DAP); Sprouting speed index (SSI)--calculated according to the methodology described by Nakagawa (1994) until 12 DAP; Sprouting percentage (%S)--ratio between the number of emerged seedlings and the number of buds planted until stabilization at 12 DAP.

The association between cultivation modules, micrometeorological variables and sugarcane sprouting variables was assessed by principal component analysis based on the matrix of correlation between the variables.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The air temperature (Tair) in the internal environment was 7.7% higher than in the external environment (Table 1), because inside the protected environment Tair is a function of the amount of radiation entering and the amount of energy retained due to the presence of the covering plastic. Reis et al. (2013) observed that air temperature in the protected environment was 7.2% higher than that recorded in the external environment.

Inside the protected environment, the highest value of Tair (30.78[degrees]C) was recorded in the module covered with anti-UV LDPE and the lowest mean value (29.82[degrees]C) in the cultivation module covered with anti-UV LDPE + freshnet (Table 1). Tair values recorded in the modules remained within the range from 25 to 33[degrees]C (Figure 1), which is the most adequate for sugarcane growth (Ferreira Junior et al., 2012). Air temperatures below 20[degrees]C cause physiological rest and growth stoppage.

The mean substrate temperature (Tsubs) was higher in the module with anti-UV LDPE + white (33.58[degrees]C) and lower in the module covered with anti-UV LDPE + freshnet (28.52[degrees]C), compared to the other cultivation modules (Table 1). The ideal range of soil temperature to reach bud sprouting percentage above 90% is between 23 and 32[degrees]C. In turn, soil temperatures below 21[degrees]C strongly limit plant growth and sprouting; above this temperature, there is a progressive increase in sprouting (Clementes, 1940). Silva et al. (2013) report that the thermoreflective net promotes lower substrate temperature and, therefore, better conditions for the development of seedling radicles, elevating seedling emergence speed.

There were high coefficients of determination between Tair and Tsubs in the modules covered with anti-UV LDPE + red ultranet and anti-UV LDPE + white (R2 > 0.90), evidencing high linear association between the two variables (Figure 2). The similarities between the Tsubs-Tair relationships observed in the regressions with data of 15 min and TsubsTair relationships found with mean data confirm the results obtained in Table 1.

The angular coefficients of the equations denote that Tsubs was 9.8% higher than Tair in the module with anti-UV LDPE + white (Figure 2B), and 0.62, 5.53 and 5.97% lower than Tair in the modules with anti-UV LDPE + red ultranet (Figure 2A), anti-UV LDPE + freshnet (Figure 2C) and anti-UV LDPE (Figure 2D), respectively.

The first and second principal components explained 48.3 and 27.7% of the total data variation, respectively (Figure 3).

The first count of emergence (FCE) was higher in the module covered with anti-UV LDPE + freshnet, due to the similarity in the location of these components in the graphs of the modules (Figure 3A) and of the variables (Figure 3B). FCE was negatively correlated with the variables global solar radiation (Rg) (r = -0.32), photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) (r = -0.28) and air temperature (Tair) (r = -0.11).

Thus, the higher the values of Rg, PAR and Tair in the cultivation module, the longer the time required for seedlings to start emerging. Nascimento et al. (2011) reported that very high temperatures compromise the beginning of the germination, reducing germination speed and final percentage, due to the inactivation of some enzymes directly linked to this process.

In addition, the module covered with anti-UV LDPE + freshnet reduces the time required for bud sprouting because it possibly accumulates higher percentage of the red spectrum (625-740 nm) of the solar radiation and this spectrum is characterized by strongly affecting sprouting (Singh et al., 2015).

Modules covered with anti-UV LDPE + red ultranet and anti-UV LDPE + white showed greater association with the variables sprouting speed index (SSI), sprouting percentage (%S), relative air humidity (RH) and substrate temperature (Tsubs) (Figures 3A and B). Average Tsubs of 30.2 and 32.9[degrees]C were recorded in these modules, respectively.

The ideal range of soil temperature for adequate sugarcane growth is between 25 and 33[degrees]C (Aude, 1993). Soil temperatures below 21[degrees]C strongly limit bud sprouting (Clementes, 1940). Oliveira et al. (2012) emphasize that the white shade net conserves greater amount of energy from solar radiation, which increases Tair by up to 1.3[degrees]C, and such increment may also be related to the increase in Tsubs in this cultivation module.

SSI was more influenced by the micrometeorological variables relative humidity (RH) (r = 0.64) and substrate temperature (Tsubs) (r = 0.56). The highest SSI values were obtained in the modules covered with anti-UV LDPE + white (6.33) and anti-UV LDPE + red ultranet (5.87) (Figure 3). Matoso et al. (2016) observed SSI between 3.54 and 3.79 for different sugarcane cultivars.

As occurred with SSI, %S was more influenced by RH (r = 0.73) and Tsubs (r = 0.55) (Figure 3B). Silva et al. (2004) observed sprouting percentage above 74% under conditions of average RH of 80%. The highest Tsubs in the modules with antiUV LDPE + red ultranet and anti-UV LDPE + white favored the SSI and %S of pre-sprouted sugarcane seedlings, which occurred because the temperature interferes with sprouting speed, percentage and uniformity, biochemical reactions, cell differentiation and action of enzymes which perform cell division (Arrigoni-Blank et al., 2014; Silva et al., 2016).

CONCLUSIONS

1. The module covered with anti-UV LDPE + freshnet promoted the lowest transmittance of Rg and PAR. Air temperature in the protected environment was 8.7% higher than that in the external environment.

2. The module covered with anti-UV LDPE + freshnet reduced the time required for seedlings to start sprouting.

3. White net led to sprouting of 78.93%. Substrate temperature within the range from 30.44 to 33.58[degrees]C favored seedling sprouting.

4. Modules with white net and red ultranet favored seedling sprouting.

Ref. 202071--Received 03 Jun, 2018 * Accepted 16 Jun, 2019 * Published 01 Jul, 2019

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

To Solpack[R] Ltda., for the availability and for providing the photo-selective shade nets tested in the study.

LITERATURE CITED

Arrigoni-Blank, M. de F.; Tavares, F. F.; Blank, A. F.; Santos, M. C. dos; Menezes, T. S. A.; Santana, A. D. D. de. In vitro conservation of sweet potato genotypes. The Scientific World Journal, v.2014, p.1-7, 2014. https://doi.org/10.n55/2014/208506

Aude, M. I. da S. Estadios de desenvolvimento da cana-de-aqucar e suas relates com a produtividade. Ciencia Rural, v.23, p.241-248, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84781993000200022

Clementes, H. F. Factors affecting the germination of sugarcane. Hawaiian Planter's Record, v.44, p.117-146, 1940.

FAOSTAT--Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics. 2016. Available on: <http://faostat.fao.org/>. Accessed on: May 2016.

Ferreira Junior, R. A.; Souza, J. L. de; Lyra, G. B.; Teodoro, I.; Santos, M. A. dos; Porfirio, A. C. S. Crescimento e fotossintese de cana-deaqucar em funqao de variaveis biometricas e meteorologicas. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v.16, p.1229-1236, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662012001100012

Landell, M. G. A.; Campana, M. P; Figueiredo, P Sistema de multiplicaqao de cana-de-aqucar com uso de mudas pre-brotadas (MPB), oriundas de gemas individualizadas. 2.ed rev. Campinas: Instituto Agronomico de Campinas, 2013. 16p. Documentos IAC, 109

Manhaes, C. M. C.; Garcia, R. F.; Francelino, F. M. A.; Francelino, H. de O.; Coelho, F. C. Fatores que afetam a brotaqao e o perfilhamento da cana-de-aqucar. Vertices, v.17, p.163-181, 2015. https://doi. org/10.5935/1809-2667.20150011

Maqbool, N.; Wahid, A.; Basra, S. M. A. Varied patterns of sprouting and nutrient status of sugarcane sprouts in simulated and natural saline/sodic soils across two growing seasons. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, v.18, p.873-880, 2016. https:// doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0209

Matoso, E. S.; Marco, E. de; Belle, C.; Rodrigues, T. A.; Silva, S. D. dos. A. e. Desenvolvimento inicial de mudas pre-brotadas de cana-de-aqucar inoculadas com bacterias diazotroficas. Revista da Jornada da Pos-Graduaqao e Pesquisa, v.13, p.412-434, 2016.

Nakagawa, J. Testes de vigor baseados na avaliaqao das plantulas. In: Vieira R. D.; Carvalho, N. M. (eds.) Testes de vigor em sementes. Jaboticabal: FUNEP, 1994. p.49-85.

Nascimento, W. M.; Dias, D. C. F. S.; Silva, P P Qualidade da semente e estabelecimento de plantas de hortaliqas no campo. In: Nascimento, W. M. (ed.). Hortaliqas: Tecnologia de produqao de sementes. Brasilia: Embrapa Hortaliqas, 2011. p.79-106.

Oliveira, G. M. de; Leitao, M. de M. V. B. R.; Rocha, R. de C. Temperatura do ar no interior e exterior de ambientes protegidos. Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel, v.7, p.250-257, 2012.

Pereira, A. R.; Angelocci, L. R.; Sentelhas, P. C. Agrometeorologia: Fundamentos e aplicaqoes praticas. Guaiba: Agropecuaria, 2002. 478p.

Ram, B.; Karuppiyan, R.; Meena, M. R.; Kumar, R.; Kulshreshta, N. Winter sprouting index of sugarcane genotypes is a measure of winter ratooning ability. International Journal of Development Research, v.7, p.15385-15391, 2017.

Reis, L. S.; Azevedo, C. A. V. de; Albuquerque, A. W.; Silva Junior, J. F. Indice de area foliar e produtividade do tomate sob condiqoes de ambiente protegido. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v.17, p.386-391, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1590/S141543662013000400005

Silva, C. R. de; Vasconcelos, C. de S.; Silva, V. J. da; Sousa, L. B. de; Sanches, M. C. Crescimento de mudas de tomateiro com diferentes telas de sombreamento. Bioscience Journal, v.29, p.1415-1420, 2013.

Silva, M. de A.; Carlin, S. D.; Perecin, D. Fatores que afetam a brotaqao inicial da cana-de-aqucar. Revista Ceres, v.51, p.457-466, 2004.

Silva, M. L. M. da; Alves, E. U.; Bruno, R. de L. A.; Santos-Moura, S. da S.; Santos Neto, A. P dos. Germinaqao de sementes de Chorisia glaziovii O. Kuntze submetidas ao estresse hidrico em diferentes temperaturas. Ciencia Florestal, v.26, p.999-1007, 2016. https:// doi.org/10.5902/1980509824229

Singh, D.; Basu, C.; Meinhardt-Wollweber, M.; Roth, B. LEDs for energy efficient greenhouse lighting. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v.49, p.139-147, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj. rser.2015.04.117

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n8p625-629

Jose J. F. Cordeiro Junior (1), Cristiane Guiselini (2), Heliton Pandorfi (2), Alex S. Moraes (3), Dimas Menezes (4) & Luiz A. de Almeida Neto (5)

(1) Universidade Federal de Sergipe/Nucleo de Graduacao de Agronomia. Nossa Senhora da Gloria, SE, Brasil. E-mail: jairofcordeiro@hotmail.com (Corresponding author)--ORCID: 0000-0002-1138-8309

(2) Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco/Departamento de Engenharia Agricola. Recife, PE, Brasil. E-mail: cguiseli@hotmail.com--ORCID: 00000003-2909-9502; hpandorf@hotmail.com--ORCID: 0000-0002-2037-8639

(3) Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco/Departamento de Quimica. Recife, PE, Brasil. E-mail: alex.moraes@ufrpe.br- -ORCID: 0000-0002-4324-8271

(4) Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco/Departamento de Agronomia. Recife, PE, Brasil. E-mail: dimasmenezes@superig.com.br--ORCID: 00000003-2139-4259

(5) Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco/Pos-Graduacao em Engenharia Agricola. Recife, PE, Brasil. E- mail:luizz_antonio@hotmail.com--ORCID: 0000-0002-5119-244X

Caption: Figure 1. Air temperature (Tair;[degrees]C) in the protected environment and substrate temperature (Tsubs;[degrees]C) in the modules covered with: anti-UV LDPE + red ultranet; anti-UV LDPE + white; anti-UV LDPE + freshnet; anti-UV LDPE, and lower limit (LL Tsubs) and upper limit (UL Tsubs) of Tsubs for sugarcane growth and sprouting until 12 days after planting

Caption: Figure 2. Relationship between substrate temperature (Tsubs) in the studied modules and air temperature (Tair) in the protected environment. (A) in the module covered with anti-UV LDPE + red ultranet; (B) in the module covered with anti-UV LDPE + white; (C) in the module covered with anti-UV LDPE + freshnet and (D) in the module covered with anti-UV LDPE

Caption: Figure 3. Scores of the principal component 1 (PC1) and principal component 2 (PC2) of the modules (A; objects) and sprouting variables (B; loadings): first count of emergence (FCE); sprouting speed index (SSI); sprouting percentage (%S); substrate temperature (Tsubs); air temperature (Tair); relative air humidity (RH); global solar radiation (Rg); photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) until 12 DAP
Table 1. Mean values of air temperature (Tair), substrate
temperature (Tsubs), variation of air temperature relative to the
external environment ([DELTA]Tair), variation of substrate
temperature relative to air temperature ([DELTA]Tsubs-Tair), global
solar radiation (Rg), photosynthetically active radiation (PAR),
relative air humidity (RH), first count of emergence (FCE),
sprouting percentage (%S), sprouting speed index (SSI) in the
modules covered with anti-UV LDPE + red ultranet, anti-UV LDPE +
white net, anti- UV LDPE + freshnet and anti-UV LDPE, and in the
external environment until 12 DAP

Module                  Anti-UV LDPE +   Anti-UV LDPE +
                         red ultranet      white net

Tair ([degrees]C)           30.06            30.72
Tsubs ([degrees]C)          30.44            33.58
[DELTA]Tair (%)              5.33             6.28
[DELTA]Tsubs-Tair (%)        1.22             8.52
Rg (MJ [m.sup.-2]            7.05             8.60
  [d.sup.-1])
PAR (MJ [m.sup.-2]           2.74             2.40
  [d.sup.-1])
RH (%)                      67.61            68.71
FCE (%)                      1.33             2.40
%S (%)                      76.80            78.93
SSI                          5.87             6.33

Module                  Anti-UV LDPE +   Anti-UV    External
                           freshnet       LDPE     environment

Tair ([degrees]C)           29.82         30.78       27.92
Tsubs ([degrees]C)          28.52         29.26
[DELTA]Tair (%)              4.07         7.92
[DELTA]Tsubs-Tair (%)        4.56         5.19
Rg (MJ [m.sup.-2]            5.07         11.39       19.52
  [d.sup.-1])
PAR (MJ [m.sup.-2]           1.85         4.02
  [d.sup.-1])
RH (%)                      67.64         65.14       70.64
FCE (%)                      2.67         1.60
%S (%)                      68.80         60.27
SSI                          5.46         4.80

Anti-UV LDPE--low-density polyethylene with anti-ultraviolet additives
COPYRIGHT 2019 ATECEL--Associacao Tecnico Cientifica Ernesto Luiz de Oliveira Junior
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2019 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Cordeiro, Jose J. F., Jr.; Guiselini, Cristiane; Pandorfi, Heliton; Moraes, Alex S.; Menezes, Dimas;
Publication:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental
Date:Aug 1, 2019
Words:3192
Previous Article:Utilization of bedded cattle confinement for organic manure of maize crop/ Aproveitamento da cama de confinamento de bovino para adubacao organica do...
Next Article:Quality of mechanical peanut sowing and digging using autopilot/ Qualidade da semeadura e do arranquio mecanizados de amendoim com uso do piloto...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters