Printer Friendly

Spouse in house to Supreme Court. (Income Security).

TORONTO -- The Falkiner Case on Ontario's "spouse in the house" rule is headed for the Supreme Court of Canada after the provincial government applied for and was granted leave to appeal.

The case harks back to 1995 when the Ontario government changed social assistance legislation so that a person was defined as a "spouse" as soon as they started living together. Until then the someone of the opposite sex became a spouse after removing a three-year cohabitation period. Over a thousand women were cut off from welfare benefits.

In the Falkiner case four women successfully challenged the government's new definition in the Ontario courts. Justice Alvin Rosenberg ruled the province's definition of "spouse" is unconstitutional.

The Ontario government took the case to the Ontario Court of Appeal and in May 2002, that court upheld Justice Rosenberg's ruling and declared that social assistance recipients are a protected class of persons under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and ruled that governments cannot discriminate against social assistance recipients.

Following that decision, the Ontario government amended the definition of "spouse" to reimpose a cohabitation period reducing it to three months.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Community Action Publishers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Community Action
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1CONT
Date:Apr 14, 2003
Words:188
Previous Article:Alliance wants healthy living strategy to consider people with disability. (Disability).
Next Article:The Insertion Model or the Workfare Model? The Transformation of Social Assistance Within Quebec and Canada.
Topics:


Related Articles
Overcoming the Boggs dilemma in community property states.
More focus on new court term from lawyers, less from media. (News & Trends).
Employment benefits and divorce: who pays the tax?
Ontario's house-in-spouse ruling found unconstitutional.
Online research strategies for the bookish lawyer: lawyers with more legal than technical know-how can still use the many computer tools available to...
Federal telemarketing rules create new responsibility for apartment companies. (Capitol Beat).
Are unallocated support payments alimony?
Ontario retreats from appealing spouse-in-the-house decision.
Celebrating victories: the NAA/NMHC joint legislative program reports on its major legislative and regulatory accomplishments from 2005.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters