Spatio-temporal distribution of soft-bottom epibenthic fauna on the cilician shelf (turkey), mediterranean sea.
The diversity in the studied assemblage of the Eastern Mediterranean was relatively poor when compared with those from the Western sites (Cardel et al. 1999, Sarda et al. 1999, Gusso et al. 2001). According to the estimations of Koukouras et al. (2001) updated out of a total of about 6 000 benthic invertebrate species in the Mediterranean, about 67% (4 030) are found in the western Mediterranean, 38% (2 262) in the Adriatic Sea, 35% (2 119) in the Central Mediterranean, 44% (2 637) in the Aegean, and 28% (1 658) in the Levantine Sea. This trend in number of species demonstrates a west-east zoogeocline: a large number of geographic, climatic and trophic variables are highly correlated with this pattern which has been found to be similar for many taxonomic groups. Most benthic studies in the eastern Mediterranean Sea have been conducted in the Aegean Sea end (Bellan-Santini 1985, Farina et al. 1997a, Tselepides et al. 2000, Smith et al. 2000, Kallianiotis et al. 2000).
To date, there are a few studies on the epibenthic community from the Turkish coast of the Mediterranean Sea, and no seasonal studies on spatio-temporal distribution on epifauna. It is necessary to conduct such a study because it is not possible to use estimates from other areas because the number of species varies among locations around the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Ergen and Cinar (1997) reported 129 Polychaeta (Annelida) species from Antalya Bay. Kocatas et al. (2004) recorded 81 crustacean species as a Cystoseria facies (1 Cumacea, 2 Tanaidacea, 23 Isopoda, 36 Amphipoda and 19 Decapoda) from the Turkish Aegean coasts whereas Kirim et al. (2005) found 85 species as Padina facies and Ates et al. (2005) recorded a total of 40 decapod species.
Epifaunal studies by means of continuously dredging could change ecological characterization of the community. This may be the case for the macrobenthic community inhabiting the shallow sandy bottoms of the area considered in this study. Frequent small-scale disturbances, such as dredging operations, may thus be masked by large-scale environmental perturbations, such as storms, and prevailing hydrodynamic processes may be among the key factors determining the extent to which an area will be resilient to fishing disturbance (Morello et al. 2006). The community structure the continuously fished area was dominated by small, opportunistic, short-lived species while the community structure of the recently non-fished area was dominated by more fragile and lon-living sessile organisms in dredged and non-dredged fishing areas (Eleftheriou and Robertson 1992, Simboura et al. 1998, Smith et al. 2000, Sarda et al. 2000, Gusso et al. 2001, Chicharo et al. 2002, Kamenos et al. 2003).
State of the papers reviewed above shows that the Cilician shelf particularly large area of Levantine Sea has not been considered with regard of the soft-bottom megafauna. The present study was the first seasonal macrobenthic epifaunal community study in the Mediterranean coast of Turkey, even in Turkish waters, particularly during post period of Conomurex persicus' introduction (succession recently occurred in Argolikos Bay and Crete, Greece, Zenetos et al. 2002) and examines spatio-temporal distribution of the community in the investigated area, with regard to environmental characteristics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was conducted on a section of Levantine (Mediterranean Sea) continental shelf off Erdemli, Mersin Bay, Turkey (Fig. 1A). The Lamas River and a few brooks are the major source of terrestrial freshwater and organic input. Depth contours generally parallel the coast. There are no seagrass bed communities in the study area and only shallow rocky sites like the two harbors are covered by epilithic algae (Fig. 1B). Most dominant species of the shallow waters is Conomurex persicus which inhabited on the sandy bottom with depth of generally 1 m to 10 m, extending down to 20 m (Mutlu and Ergev 2006).
Benthic samples collection: Samples of soft bottom epifauna were collected using the epibenthic sledge of Hessler and Sanders (60 x 15 cm mouth opening, 0.5 x 0.5 cm mesh size: Holme and McIntyre, 1971) deployed by R/V Erdemli of Institute of Marine Sciences-Middle East Technical University (IMS-METU) in the study area (Fig. 1A). Sledges lasted about 15 min at 2 knots. Geographical coordinates were fixed from GPS to estimate distance trawled on the bottom.
Each sample was washed in a sieve (0.5 mm square mesh). On board, samples with total number of individuals higher than about 500 inds (i.e. a gastropod Conomurex persicus) were sub-sampled, with 3-5 jars each containing 70-90 randomly taken specimens preserved, and the rest of these samples were only counted.
Macrofaunal assemblages at the shallow waters seem to be shaped by the sediment properties which are indeed more heterogeneous than those at the deeper areas (Karakassis and Eleftheriou 1997). Therefore, two sampling temporal frequencies were conducted with respect to the zones: shallow water and deep water of the Cilician shelf.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
1. Sampling frequency at shallow waters: Shallow water has been restricted to depth gradient up to 10 m. Bottom of the shallow zone was composed of pure sand sediment (>99%) and physically disturbed by currents, waves, climate and anthropogenic riverine sources. In the Mediterranean Sea, the zone has been classified as a part of "fine, well-sorted sand" (SFBC, Peres 1982a). Makra and Nicolaidou (2000) found two communities of the infralittoral zone, that of Muddy Sand in Sheltered Areas (SVMC) and that of SFBC under disturbance and/or eutrophication in the Eastern Mediterranean. The zone was temporally very dynamic and well-diversified in epifaunal species and abundance, due mainly and recently to an indo-pacific dominant species, Conomurex persicus which showed interannual and monthly variation in population (Mutlu and Ergev 2006). Considering defined temporal variability samples of epifaunal individuals were collected monthly along the 5 and 10 m depth contours off Erdemli, Mersin (Fig. 1B) from June 2000 to November 2001, and then seasonally between February and April 2002 and between February and May 2000. In few cases, sampling depths were overlapped (Fig. 1B)
2. Sampling frequency at deep water: The community inhabiting mixed sediments deeper than 10 m was ascribable to the Muddy-Detritic community (DE, according to Peres 1967) composed mainly of mud, sand and detritus dwelling species. Deep water was highly variable only seasonally in hydrographical characteristics and more homogenous in the epifaunal community than the shallow waters. Therefore, the sampling duration was kept for one year during 2000 and the quarterly sledges were sampled: at 25 and 100 m in February; at 25, 50 and 100 m in May; at 25, 110 and 155 m in August; and at 25, 50, 100 and 150 m in November (Fig. 1C). Additionally, the samples were taken at 5 and 10 m to observe variability of epifaunal community transecting to deep waters in February, May, August and November during year 2000 (Fig. 1B).
Environmental data collection: Temperature, salinity and density were measured using a SeaBird Oceanographic probe (SBE Seacat 19 plus CTD). Bottom sediment was collected at each station with a Van Veen grab and was packed in a nylon bag and frozen for geological analyses (grain size, total carbonate and organic carbon contents of the sediment).
Laboratorial works: Epifaunal species and any demersal fish caught in the dredge were identified; counted and weighed (however, total wet weight of polychaetes was measured for each sample because most of the specimens were fragmented). Abundance and biomass was standardized in number of individuals and wet weight [m.sup.-2] based on the sampling distance. Analyses were completed using standard processes for: grain size using the wet/dry sieving and pipette methods (Folk 1974); total carbonate percentage (Muller 1967), and total organic carbon (Gaudette et al. 1974). Environmental parameters sampled at each station were surface/ near bottom water temperature, salinity, density, and grain size (gravel, sand, silt and clay), total carbonate, organic carbon and inorganic carbon of the sediment.
1. Sub-sampling: Efficiency of the subsampling method from just big net tows was statistically tested involving abundances into dispersion index (Anonymous 1991). The calculated indices showed that the sub-sampling was significantly efficient at p<0.05.
2. Univariate and multivariate statistics: Non-parametric Spearman rank correlation coefficients were calculated for assessing the degree to which numbers of individuals of the main epifaunal taxa were correlated together (Sokal and Rohlf 1973). The autocorrelation (Box and Jenkins 1976) function was used to identify an appropriate time series model for temporal variation in abundance of each taxa for the shallow waters.
Diversity indices (Margalef's richness, Pielou's evenness and Shannon-Weiner index) were calculated at each sampling site (Margalef 1985, Pielou 1966, Shannon and Weaver 1968). Principal Component Analyses (PCA) was applied to the environmental data subjected separately under two different matrices (hydrographical and sedimentary structures) to explain major variation occurred in the shelf the throughout the year 2000. Abundance data (X) were transformed using Log10(X+1) chosen a result of application of Taylor's Power Law (Taylor 1961). The transformation was necessary to weight the contributions of common and rare species in the multivariate representations (Field et al. 1982). Epifaunal abundance among sites was tested using multivariate analyses (cluster, MDS and SIMPER, ANOSIM) described by Clarke and Green (1988) and Clarke and Warwick (1993). ANOSIM (Analysis of Similarities) was used to test for differences among groups of samples based on the (ranked) similarity matrix from the cluster. SIMPER examined the contribution of individual species to the similarity measure (Bray-Curtis Similarity index, Bray and Curtis 1957). CLUSTER performed hierarchical agglomerative clustering of species/ sample data with group average linkage (Clarke and Warwick 2001). Ordination (nonmetric multidimensional scaling MDS) was used to evaluate the group separation derived from cluster analysis (Field et al. 1982). Environmental variables were regressed by superimposing on the epifaunal ordinations (MDS) so as to visually find subset of the variables whose MDS ordination best matches the epifaunal ordination. Additionally, canonical correlation analysis (Anderson and Robinson 2003, Anderson and Willis 2003), extremely informative, was applied to a dissimilarity matrix (Bray-curtis) based on Log10(X+1) transformed abundance matrix of the epifaunal assemblages to test intra (seasonal) or interannual and contour depthwise (5 m, 10 m, and 25-150 m) differences. The resulting scores were then analyzed using generalized discriminant analysis (CAP), giving tests based on the canonical correlations. All these statistical analyses were undertaken using the package PRIMER, (ver. 5.3.1, Clark and Warwick 2001), STATISTICA (98 Edition) and FATHOM (Jones 2002).
Study site and environmental parameters Physical properties (temperature, salinity and density) of the shallow waters are variable, depending on atmospheric forcing. In the shallow zones, water temperature was generally isothermal from the surface to bottom and varied between 16 and ~30[degrees]C. The temperature was below 20[degrees]C during November-May and then rose abruptly to ~30[degrees]C in August. There could occasionally be difference in temperatures at surface, 5 m and 10 m depths: the temperature was ~4[degrees]C warmer at the surface than at 10 m in July/August in 2002 and 2 degrees warmer in May 2000. Typically salinity of the area was about 39 psu, which was observed from July 2000 to December 2001. Hydrographical features of the shallow zone were further detailed in a study (Mutlu and Ergev 2006). In the deep zone, temperature of the water column in year 2000 varied between 15.5 (February) and 29.3 oC (August), salinity between 38.08 (May) and 39.95 (August) and density 25.27 (August) and 28.84 sigma-theta (November, Table 1). PC1 explained half (52%) of total variation for the physical parameters on the shelf. Sea surface (SST) and Near-bottom water temperature (NBT) contrasted with water densities (SSD and NBD) were major factors in the linear combinations of variables making up PC1 for seasonal variations of the study area. On PC2, the same variables explained 20% of seasonal changes in physical measurements. So physical measurements were variable in two-way: temporal (seasonal) and spatial (depths) dimensions in the study area.
Superficial sediment composition did not show significant differences over time. On the band between 80 and 100 m, there were some small-scale aggregations (>12%) of the fraction gravel. Overall, gravel concentration did not exceed 20% while sand in the surface sediments varied between 30 and 100% from deep to shallow waters, in contrast to the mud (silt +clay) distribution: Silt content varied between 0 and 75%. The concentration of clay was found to be low in May and August while it was higher in February and November. Clay predominated the sediment composition in depths greater than 100 m. Percentage distribution of the total carbonate in the bottom sediments ranged from 16 to 55%. Overall, total organic carbon (TOC) increased from 0.1 to 0.40% with increased bottom depth. On the shelf sedimentary structure and texture did not show seasonal and local linearization with variables as results of PCA but depthwise variation occurred in year 2000. PC1 explained 54% of total variation even thought the structural ordination by PCA reached a cumulative variation of 92% by PC4, which resulted in that the texture became statistically homogeneous among the seasons. Mud, silt and sand were found to be significant variables associated with variations on PC1. On PC2, 18% of total explained variation was due mainly to variation in total carbon and gravel content of the sediment. The stations were aggregated mainly depending on bottom depths on PCA ordination. Sand and finer grains were regularly variable in depth whereas carbon contents and gravel contents were locally variable due to occurrence of a carbonate zone composed of shell fragments between depths of 50 and 100 m in the study area (Ergin 1996, Ediger et al. 1997).
The epifauna was composed of 46 Scaphopoda and mollusca species, 36 Fish, 33 Polychaeta, 29 Crustacea, 6 Echinodermata, 2 Cnidaria (Anthozoa), 3 Sipuncula, 1 Nemertini, 2 Ascidiacea and 1 Pycnogonida. Of a total of 159 species, 59 species were found at the 5 m depth contour, 42 at 10 m, 76 species at shallow waters, and 99 at deep waters (Table 2). Mean abundance and biomass were 9.2 ind [m.sup.-2] and 3.1 g [m.sup.-2] for the study area. Annual total abundance varied between 0.17 and 7.0 ind [m.sup.-2] on the shelf whilst biomasses ranged from 0.44 g [m.sup.-2] to 1.18 g [m.sup.-2]. Epifaunal abundance was less in shallow waters than that in deeper areas. The highest abundance at 5 m depth contour was ~2.5 ind [m.sup.-2] whereas it was 4.25 ind [m.sup.-2] at 10 m. Species diversity generally increased from winter to autumn, with two peaks in spring and autumn. Diversity also generally increased from shallow to deep waters with the highest value at 100 m.
Species richness: A total of 76 species from 4 phyla was found throughout the year in the shallow waters (Table 2). Monthly total numbers of species varied between 1 and 19 species (Fig. 2). At the 5 m depth contour, the minimum number of species was found during two months: in March when water temperature started to rise; and October/November when the temperature started to decline. In August/ September 2000, the number of species was at a maximum, and then dropped abruptly to a minimum in October (Fig. 2A). Frequencies of occurrence (FO) were 55% for molluscs, 27% for fishes, 12% for crustaceans and 5% for echinoids. Frequent species included: C. persicus (10%) and Murex trunculus (8%) from Mollusca, Bothus podas (8%) and A. laterna (8%) from fishes, D. pugilator (6%) and Balanus sp. (3%) from crustaceans and A. irregularis (4%) and Astropecten jonstoni (2%) from echinoids.
The same seasonal patterns were observed at the 10 m depth contour (Fig. 2B). The most abundant species were C. persicus, A. laterna and M. trunculus. A hermit crab, D. pugilator and a fish, B. podas were abundant. Molluscan presence was significantly correlated with the presence of fish and Crustaceans (Spearman, N=20, p<0.05). Compared to the FO at 5 m, only the molluscan FO reduced to 46% whereas fishes' increased to 39% at 10 m. The dominant species were C. persicus (16%), M. trunculus (10%) and M. brandaris (7%) from molluscans, B. podas (7%) and A. laterna (11%) from fishes, Goneplax rhomboides (2%), D. pugilator (1%) and Balanus sp. (4%) from crustaceans and A. irregularis (2%) from echinoids.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Abundance: The most abundant taxon was molluscs, mainly a strombid species, C. persicus (78%), followed by D. pugilator (15%) and B. podas (1%). Conomurex persicus (65%). D. pugilator comprised 28% of the total abundance at 5 m whereas C. persicus contributed 94% to the total at 10 m depth. C. persicus and D. pugilator were mainly predominant in winter and summer. There was inter-annual variation in the abundance due to variability of water temperature and salinity. At 5 m the highest abundances (>1 ind [m.sup.-2]) were during spring (March) and early autumn (October) while the lowest abundances (<1 ind [m.sup.-2]) were observed during November to February whereas at 10 m, between April and September and between October and March, respectively (Fig. 3A, C, E, G). Molluscan species (C. persicus and M. trunculus) and flatfish species, (A. laterna and B. pothas) were most abundant in spring and autumn (Fig. 3A, C). Astropecten irregularis was the most abundant echinoid species. Abundance of crustacean species was significantly positively correlated with that of fish (Spearman r = 0.60, [t.sub.N-2] = 3.18, N = 20, p=0.005), but negatively with molluscans at 5 m depth contour (Spearman r = -0.47, [t.sub.N-2] = -2.24, N= 20, p=0.038).
Biomass: Biomass was dominated by molluscs, of which C. persicus contributed 97% to the total biomass (Fig. 3D). Biomass greater than 20 g [m.sup.-2] (mostly, molluscans) occurred during April-October. The next highest contributors to biomass were M. trunculus (0.78%), B. podas (0.47%), D. pugilator (0.12%) and A. irregularis (0.01%). Fish biomass increased from March to June, and then reached its minimum in October at 5 m and in September at 10 m (Fig. 3B). The biomass peaked again in January. Crustacean and echinoid biomass showed similar trends to fish except winter condition (Fig. 3F,H). During year 2000, crustacea was positively correlated with fish (Spearman r = 0.47, [t.sub.N-2]= 2.24, N= 20, p=0.038), and negatively with mollusca in terms of biomass (Spearman r = -0.60, [t.sub.N-2] = -3.18, N= 20, p=0.005).
Diversities: In general, the diversity indices showed spatial and temporal differences. At 5 m the indices peaked in December and MayJune (Fig. 5) whereas they had minimum values in March and October-November: In March, the lowest species diversity was associated with one fish, 3 molluscs, 2 crustaceans and 1 echinoid. In May-June, the highest diversities occurred with five fishes (B. podas and Solea lascaris most common species), 14 molluscs (M. brandaris, Nassarius gibbosulus, N. mutuabilis, Nayitopsis grannum most common), 2 crustacean (D. pugilator and Liocarcinus vernalis) and 2 echinoid (A. irregularis and A. jonstoni) at 5 m.
The diversity indices at 10 m peaked in December-February and June/July. High diversity continued for 3 months during the winter, in contrast to one month duration at 5 m. The diversity minima occurred during spring from March-May and during summer from August-October (Fig. 5). Diversity indices increased when several fishes (B. podas, Trachinus draco and S. lascaris), molluscs (M. brandaris, M. trunculus, P. radiata and Sepia officialis), and crustaceans (G. rhomboides) contributed. The summer peak occurred in association with 16 fish species. There were only 5 species of fish during the spring diversity minimum and 6 species during the autumn minimum (August-October).
Species richness: The total number of species, including fish, increased from winter (7 species) through spring and summer (37 and 34species) to autumn (63 species, Table 2). In February, the number of fish species was as low as that in November (2 species), peaked in May (9 species), and then decreased from spring to autumn (Fig. 4A). A. laterna was observed in all seasons whereas Gobius sp. and Apogon nigripinis were found only in February, Trigla and Gobius spp. were found in May and Mullus sp. and Saurida sp. were found in August. The number of echinoids varied from 1 (February and May) to 3 (November; Fig. 4J). The sea star, A. irregularis was recorded in February while A. chiajei was found in August. A bristle star, Ophiuroidae sp. was recorded in May. Antedon mediterranea were observed for the first time of the dredge study in November. Molluscan species increased from winter (1) to autumn (9 species, Fig. 4D) and the species composition was highly variable among seasons. However, there was no predominate molluscan species. Overall, the number of crustacean species increased from February (3 species) through May and August (9-12 species) to November (22 species, Fig. 4G). Alpheus glaber, G. rhombodies, D. pugilator and P. longirostris were found in all seasons whereas Erugosquilla massavensis was observed in warm seasons (May and August). The number of Polychaeta species doubled between May (12 species) and November (24 species) and no polychaetes were observed in February (Fig. 4M). In general, Prionospio sp. was observed in all seasons.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]
Species richness of fish seemed to increase with depth and peaked at 50 and 100 m (Fig. 4A). Contrasted to the crustaceans (Fig. 4G), number of molluscan species decreased with the bottom depth (Fig. 4D). Echinoids showed peaks at two depths: 25 m in February and May and 100-150 m (Fig. 4J) in August and November.
Abundance: Abundance increased from 0.17 ind [m.sup.-2] in winter (February) to ~7 ind [m.sup.-2] in autumn (November). Abundances of Crustacea increased from winter to autumn (Fig. 4H). The echinoid abundances remained in minimum during winter-summer and then increased abruptly in autumn as the same occurred for polychaetes (Fig. 4K, N). Molluscan abundances showed a reverse distribution with those of fishes (Fig. 4E). The most abundant species were D. pugilator comprising 79% of the total abundance (7.6 ind [m.sup.-2]), A. chiajei 3.3% and A. laterna 2.3% and G. rhomboides 1%. Seasonally, the most abundant species were: in winter, C. persicus (40%) and A. laterna (20%); in spring, Arnoglossus species (47%) and P. longirostris (6%); in summer, Arnoglossus laterna (12%) and G. nijer jozo (7%); and in autumn D. pugilator (84%). Crustacean abundances were positively correlated with those of fish whereas polychaetes were positively correlated with Echinodermata, Anthozoa, Sipuncula and Scapopoda (Spearman, N=4, p<0.05). The abundance of crustaceans was positively correlated with Polychaeta abundance, while Anthozoa abundance was negatively correlated with fish and positively with Echinodermata (Spearman, N=20, p<0.05).
Spatio-temporal quantitative distributions of the epifaunal taxa were as follows: In February, abundancees of fish, crustacean and echinoid were low (<0.004 ind [m.sup.-2]) at 25 m depth whereas molluscan's was 0.004 ind [m.sup.-2] (Fig. 4B, E, H, K). In May, taxa found at each depth were fish and Crustacea. The other taxa were observed at different depths (Fig. 4K, N). Fish abundance decreased from 0.07 ind [m.sup.-2] at 25 m to ~0.02 ind [m.sup.-2] at 100 m (Fig. 4B). In August, species of some groups (Echinodermata, Cnidaria, and Polychaeta) started to appear at depth [greater than or equal to] 100 m. Crustacean abundance varied between 0.001 and 0.05 ind [m.sup.-2] (Fig. 4H), fish between 0.001 and 0.03 ind [m.sup.-2] (Fig. 4B), and Mollusca between 0.002 and 0.005 ind [m.sup.-2] (Fig. 4E). In November, abundance of the taxa changed increasingly seaward up to ~50 m and then decreasingly in the deeper waters. Species of some groups (Sipuncula, Cnidaria, Echinodermata, Scaphopoda) started to appear at depths greater than 50 m at which fish disappeared. Fish abundance varied between 0.01 and 0.03 ind [m.sup.-2] (Fig. 4B) molluscan between 0.001 and 0.03 ind [m.sup.-2] (Fig. 4E). Crustacean abundances changed increasingly from 0.02 at 25 m to 6 ind [m.sup.-2] at 50 m (Fig. 4H).
Biomass: In February, biomass of fish, crustacean and echinoid were low (<0.005 g [m.sup.-2]) at 25 m depth (Fig. 4C, I, L) whereas molluscan's was 0.14 g [m.sup.-2] (Fig. 4F). In May, taxa found at each depth were fish and Crustacea. The other taxa were observed at different depths. Fish biomass decreased from 0.25 g [m.sup.-2] at 25 m to 0.005 g [m.sup.-2] at 100 m (Fig. 4C). In August, Crustacean abundance varied between 0.0009 and 0.06 g [m.sup.-2] (Fig. 4I), fish between 0.001 and 0.04 g [m.sup.-2] (Fig. 4C) and Mollusca between 0.01 and 0.002g [m.sup.-2] (Fig. 4F). In November, biomass of most taxa peaked at 50 m and then was tended to decrease seaward. Crustacean biomass peaked (0.51 g [m.sup.-2]) at 50 m (Fig. 4I) was contributed by a hermit crab, D. pugilator, with a biomass of 0.49 g [m.sup.-2]
Diversities: The species diversities in deep water were related to depth and season. There were two peaks in diversity during spring (May) and autumn (November), at all depths (Fig. 5). Low diversity was observed in winter (February) and summer (August). Overall, species diversity increased from 25 m to 100 m and then declined at 150 m (Fig. 5). At 25 m, the diversity was moderate in winter and autumn when the temperatures were stable at ~18[degrees]C, but in spring and summer when the temperatures were highly variable (16-30[degrees]C), this depth had the lowest diversity. At 25 m in May, 3 fish, 2 crustacean and one echionoid species were recorded and subsequently the diversity declined due to abundant fishes moving into the area. In November, 4 species of fish and 4 species of Crustaceans were found at 25 m with equal abundances. Therefore, species richness was relatively low, while evenness and diversity indices were high. At 50 m, there was an abrupt decrease in the indicies. Two abundant species, D. pugilator (6 ind [m.sup.-2]) and A. chiajei (0.3 ind [m.sup.-2]) here reduced the diversities. At 100 m, equal abundance of several species caused increased species evenness and diversity, mainly because of the abundance of crustaceans and polychaetes (Fig. 5). At about 150 m, there were no fish or polychaetes, but 2 molluscs, 5 crustaceans and 1 echinoid were found. Their abundances were less than 0.004 ind [m.sup.-2] at this zone.
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
Ordination of samples
Multidimensional scaling showed that species clusters (Fig. 6A, D) were mainly related to bottom depths (Fig. 6A) and total organic carbon content (TOC; Fig. 6C) of the sediment and slightly to silt content (Fig. 6B). Epifauna in shallow water was different than that in the deep water (Fig. 6A). The shallow waters had TOC content less than 0.3% while the TOC in the deep waters varied between 0.5% and 0.8% (Fig 6C). Distribution of silt content was <1% in the shallow waters and >10% in the deep waters (Fig. 6B). Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) showed that the deep waters differed significantly (Confidence limits of p; 0.03-1.16% at 95 percent) from the shallow waters in species abundance and composition (Table 3). In the shallow water, C. persicus (92%) and D. pugilator (3%) contributed most to the total similarity (Table 3). In the deep waters, those were A. laterna (45%) and D. pugilator (18%) (Table 3). The presence of C. persicus (58%) mainly discriminated between the waters while other species such as D. pugilator, A. laterna, G. rhomboides, B. podas and M. trunculus discriminated to a smaller degree (Table 3).
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
The canonical plot is extremely informative as it shows there were real differences in the epifaunal assemblages at the three different depth sites (Fig. 7). Squared canonical correlations were 0.953 and 0.516 and using m=15 explained 97.03% of total variation and resulted in the smallest cross-validation error (18.87%). All the test statistics resulted in the highly significant results with 9999 permutations (p=0.000), indicating strong evidence against the null hypothesis which is no difference in the epifaunal assemblages in the three depth sites. The test showed that there were no significant differences in the epifaunal assemblages inbetween years 2000 and 2001 at both depth contours of 5 (p=0.058) and 10 m (p=0.496) whereas significant seasonal differences were found with 9999 permutations (p=0.04). The seasonal difference was not significantly observed as results of canonical correlation analyses (generalized discriminant analyses) applied for the epifaunal abundance depth contours between 25 m and 155 m (Table 4). Similar to the nMDS (Fig. 6), ordination of CAP (Fig. 7A) was correlated mainly with bottom depth (Fig. 7B), TOC (Fig. 7D) and silts content of the sediments (Fig. 7C).
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
Depth and substrate were important factors influencing the structure of the macroepibenthic fauna. Two distinct epibenthic communities were identified on the basis of species distribution. The first was found at shallow depths (= 10 m with "fine, well-sorted sand" (SFBC, Peres 1982a). In particular, the community inhabiting 10 m can be ascribed to the Fine Sands slightly muddy (Makra and Nicolaidou 2000, Gusso et al. 2001). The 5 m community was similar to that found at 10m, although it had a lower number of species. Community at deep zone was ascribable to the Muddy-Detritic community (DE, Peres 1982b), being composed mainly of mud, sand and detritus dwelling species. The absences of seagrass around the study area could change depth limit (25 m) of SFBC as the depth was ascertained as 40 m for the Mediterranean Sea (Peres 1982b, Gusso et al. 2001). Beyond 40 m depth, the hydrodynamic process become less effective therefore the bottom sediments are virtually at rest. In this area the presence of bio-detrital deposits (molluscan shells and calcareous algae) induces a source of variability in the sediment composition down to 100 m as the same was found by Karakassis and Eleftheriou (1998) in Cretan shelf.
The community composition was largely the result of the considerable number of species represented by few individuals, but most abundant species (C. persicus, M. trunculus and M. brandaris with ~5 ind [m.sup.-2] in spring and autumn) on sand bottom of the shallower waters. Conomurex persicus is widespread over the shallow waters of the Levantine Sea after being introduced in 1978 (Nicolay and Manoja 1983, Galil and Zenetos 2002). The temporal trends showed remarkable change in contrast to no regular seasonal pattern in very shallow waters of the NE Aegean Sea (Kourelea et al. 2004) where C. persicus was present. The Diversity index showed a sharp decrease during February-March and October-November when the sea surface temperature started to increase or decrease after relatively stable periods. Sarda et al. (2000) showed similar general seasonal pattern in total macroinfaunal abundance of shallow sandy-bottom assemblages in the Catalan Western Mediterranean Sea as stated in German Bight (Hinz et al. 2004). In Levantine Basin of the Mediterranean Sea, these cycles were consistent with the temporal variation in several key species, especially molluscan species: Conomurex persicus could however be most reasonable species for the seasonal fluctuations of the epifaunal density (Mutlu and Ergev 2006).
In deep stations, the observed species composition conforms to the bathyal mud assemblage, similar to that of other areas of the Mediterranean and the neighboring NE Atlantic (Vamvakas 1970, Janssen 1989). The depth distribution of polychaete feeding types is directly related to the amount of organic matter available in the sediments, with surface deposit feeders strongly dominating the continental shelf. Polychaetes and Crustaceans dominated the species composition in all the samples analysed. Of the total number of species the number of polychaete species ranged from 30 to 40% over the continental shelf (25150 m) whereas Crustaceans slightly decreased with depth ranging from 20 to 35% in year 2000. Tselepides et al. (2000) found similar trend for two taxa (Polychaeta: 45.56 to 49.04% and Crustaceans 21.48 to 18.47%) over the continental shelf (40-200 m) in the Cretan Sea. Molluscs in general remained a relatively stable (10-20%) in both Cretan Sea self and Cilician basin self as it was the same in Northern Aegean Sea (NCMR 2001, UNEP/ MAP 2004). Smith et al. (2000) showed that before the trawling season, the trawl lane was numerically dominated by the Crustacea (85%), while after the trawling season the composition had become much more even. In contrast, the control area was dominated by the Echinodermata (80%) in the Cretan waters. In November 2000, abundance of Echinodermata was observed to increase (10%) in the Cilician shelf after trawling season. Contrast to polychaetes and fishes, density dominance of crustaceans increased from 20% by starting of trawl season (May-September) to 80% during mid and post trawl season. However, Tselepides et al. (2000) found the similar depthwise trend whilst Polychaetes with 45 to 70% contribution were most abundant group in the Cretan self.
It is interesting to note that stations at 10 m, are placed in both clustering and the MDS closer to the group of stations sampled at 5 m. An examination of the values of abundance (N), species (S) and diversity (H') indices per sample shows that they are significantly higher for samples taken at 5 m, while Evenness J is slightly higher for samples at 10 m. The presence of Chamelea gallina, N. circumcinetus, N. gibbosulus, N. mutuabilis, N. josephina (molluscs), D. pugilator (crustacean that was hosted by the Nassarius molluscs) and A. irregularis (echinoids) at 5 m (generally found between December and June) appears to be responsible for the increased number of species and hence the high Diversity. Astropecten irregularis were responsible for the main differences between seasons in German Bight (Hinz et al. 2004). The variety of available substrata results in an increased number of microniches, and thus of diversity at the shallow waters, while the homogeneity of the substrate could be responsible for the lower diversity and higher evenness found at the deep waters (Makra and Nicolaidou 2000), resulted from the less effective hydrodynamic process (Karakassis and Eleftheriou 1998).
Because the prevailing sandy sediments would be expected to naturally restrict the occurrence of sessile taxa, depth and sediment characteristics were the principal determinants of assemblage type. Epifaunal surveys indicate that the role of sediment type in determining the distribution of epifauna assemblages is apparently secondary to that of depth. From multivariate analyses in this study, it became evident that seasonality was not a major factor in the macrobenthic community structure. Only abundance of fish species in the shallow zone was significantly correlated as function of time series data over the sampling dates (Autocorrelation, p<0.05). It is concluded that the abundance data have come from an underlying sinusoidal model over 6-month period: The correlation was negative in period between August and January and positive between February and July. In the shallower water, fish abundance increased during positive correlations period, being more pronounced between April-May. Similar species richness trends in uniform sandy areas showed similar results via clustering of abundance data over the continental margin of Crete and the study showed groupings associated with the depth not with seasons (Tselepides et al. 2000). In the North Sea, the environmental factors which account for the faunal distributions suggested that temperature variation and depth and sediment parameters were better descriptors of the epifaunal separation than absolute temperature (Jennings et al. 1999, Callaway et al. 2002). In the Mediterranean Sea water temperature over the continental shelf starts to increase in early spring and fish that winter there. After spawning most fish begin their feeding migration in summer and during autumn the massive recruitment migration occurs (Kallianiotis et al. 2000). The spatial and temporal changes in the demersal fishes of the Galician coast (Spain) are mainly associated with oceanographic phenomena displaying great seasonal and interannual variability (Farina et al. 1997b), whereas in decapods the more stable sediment and oceanographic conditions are of greater importance (Farina et al. 1997a). The CAP as well showed significant difference in seasonal epifaunal assemblages in the shallow waters whereas no seasonal significant difference was found in the deep zone (Table 4). Community changes have often been correlated to depth, but in shallow marine environments sedimentary or other physical as well as biological variables which are depth-related are more likely to be the controlling factors than depth itself (Gray 1981, Tsutsumi et al. 1990, Fanelli et al. 2007). Tselepides et al. (2000) they stressed that species groupings are associated with the depth not with seasons over the continental margin deeper than 40 m in the Cretan waters. Simboura et al, (2000) considered different factors for the polychaete communities at different depths. For example, in the shallower stations (3-9 m) the governing factors were substratum type and hydrodynamic conditions. In the deep waters (36-150 m) the main controlling factors were the granulometric composition of the sediment and depth. Cosentino and Giacobbe (2006) concluded that in the shallower zone (<20 m), a wide typology of trophic-ethological guilds was related to community patchiness, in contrast to a greater functional uniformity of the deeper assemblage (25-50m), dominated by sessile, semi-infaunal suspension feeders.
Species richness and Shannon-Weaver diversities in the deep water changed from February to November. The most unstable season was August while the most stable month was November. Conides et al. (1999) found a similar pattern where winter was the keydivisor season or the key-divisor season is late spring, which were directly attributed to the special environmental conditions in the south of Nisyros Island.
Some species were commonly observed between depths 50 m and 100 m and were the main contributors for increasing the richness, but some of their abundances were not so high that the diversity decreased. Gremare et al. (1998) found A. chiajei species at 40 and 44 m stations within the soft bottoms of the Bay of Banyuls-sur-mer. Apseudes latreillei abundantly found at 50 m and it decreased to evenness. Tselepides et al. (2000) and Smith et al. (2000) found Levinsenia gracilis as one of the most abundant species between 100 and 200 m over the continental margin of Crete. According to the Makra and Nicolaidou (2000) abundance of this Polychaeta species indicates the moderately disturbed areas of the inner Argolikos Bay. The highest abundance was accounted for a spinculid species Onchnesoma steenstrupi at 100 m as Tselepides et al. (2000) stated O. steenstrupi was one of the most abundant species between 70 and 100 m (Murina et al. 1999).
Correlation of the benthic community indices with the sediment characteristics showed that the species variety, abundance and community are inversely proportional to mud percentage sorting of sediments. The multivariate statistics also clearly indicated that sediment type is the controlling factor for the differentiation of the segregated benthic assemblages. The organic content complements the sediment type to reinforce this differentiation. This was true in the eastern Mediterranean deep sea (Kroncke et al. 2003). Depth seems to be the governing factor for differentiating the fauna within the stations of similar sediment type in the Aegean Sea (Simboura et al. 1998). Depth and substrate were important factors influencing the structure of macroepibenthic echinoderm assemblages in the English Channel; deeper waters may also provide a more constant hydrodynamic environment, whereas temperature and salinity fluctuations will be greater in shallower waters (Ellis and Rogers 2000). Many physicochemical environmental factors were linked with depth as well as to the distance from the shore and the proximity of terrestrial inputs. In the shallow zone, C. persicus and D. pugilator contributed most to the total similarity. In the deeper zone, those were A. laterna and D. pugilator. The presence of C. persicus mainly discriminated between the zones. Serrano et al. (2006) showed a pattern of two gradients on epibenthic communities of the Cantabrian shelf, Spain: depth/water temperature and sediment characteristics; D. pugilator typified the poor sands of inner shelf; fishes (A. laterna, Callyonimus maculatuts) and Anapagusus laevis characterized the assemblage of inner and middle shelf sediments with higher organic content. Organic carbon may be used as an indicator of food energy that is readily available to a variety of benthic organisms but since it contains an unknown retractile proportion it does not display as strong a correlation (Tselepides et al. 2000). In some cases besides the effects of water depth on macrobenthic community structure, other physical and chemical factors (such as flow velocities and organic matter supply) can be important structuring factors as well (Flach and Thomsen 1998). Both unconstrained (nmMDS) and constrained (CAP analysis) ordination methods highlighted a separation of the three depth zones. However, the CAP showed that there was no significant difference in the epifauna assemblages between years of 2000 and 2001 at both depth contours of 5 and 10 m (Table 4). This could suggest that monthly dredging could not affect the fauna.
In the present study, a total number of alien species including Lessepsian species was found to be 22: 8 fish, 4 molluscan, 7 crustacean and 3 polychaeta species (Table 2). The number of invertebrate Lessepsian species in Turkish seas is as follows: polychaetes (10), decapods (23), amphipods (2), molluscs (48) (Cinar and Ergen 2005, Ergen et al. 2002, Kocatas et al. 2002 a, b). The compilation of data on alien species reported from the Turkish coasts yielded a total of 263 species belonging to 11 systematic groups, of which Mollusca had the highest number of species (85 species), followed by Crustacea (51), fishes (43) and phytobenthos (39) with the Levantine Sea represented by 202 species (Cinar et al. 2005). A total of 963 alien species have been reported from the Mediterranean until December 2005, 218 of which have been classified as excluded (23%) leaving 745 of the recorded species as valid aliens (Zenetos et al. 2005).
The present study was carried out within framework of projects (YDABCAG-100Y015) funded by the Scientific and Technical Research
Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) and a part of MSc Thesis by Mehmet B. Ergev (2002, IMSMETU, Turkey) as well. We thank also Andrew C. Seitz and Argyro Zenetos for their valuable comments and correction of English grammar.
Received 14-Ix-2007. Corrected 16-V-2008. Accepted 18-VIII-2008.
Anderson, M.J. & J. Robinson. 2003. Generalized discriminant analysis based on distances. Aust. NZ. J. Stat. 45: 301-318.
Anderson, M.J. & T.J. Willis. 2003. Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84: 511-525.
Anonymous. 1991. Lecture notes prepared for the training workshop on the statistical treatment and interpretation of marine community data. FIR/MEDPOL/ ALE/2, FAO/IOC/UNEP Training Workshop, FAO, Athens, Greece.
Ates, A.S., T. Katagan, A. Kocatas & F.E. Yurdabak. 2005. Decapod (Crustacea) fauna of Saros Bay (Northeastern Aegean Sea). Tr. J. Zool. 29: 119-124.
Bakir, K, M. Sezgin & T. Katagan. 2006. Contribution to the knowledge of alien amphipods off the Turkish coast: Gammaropsis togoensis (Schellenberg, 1925). Aquatic Invasions. 2: 80-82.
Bellan-Santini, D. 1985. The Mediterranean benthos: reflections and problems raised by a classification of the benthic assemblages. In M. Moraitou-Apostolopoulou & V. Kiortis, (eds). Mediterranean Marine Ecosystems. Plenum, New York, USA.
Box, G.E.P. & G. Jenkins. 1976. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day. San Francisco, California, USA.
Bray, J.R. & J.T. Curtis. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27: 320-249.
Callaway, R., J. Alsvag, I. Boois, J. Cotter, A. Ford, H. Hinz, S. Jennings, I. Kroncke, J. Lancaster, G. Piet, P. Prince & S. Ehrich. 2002. Diversity and community structure of epibenthic invertebrates and fish in the North Sea. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59: 1199-1214.
Cardel, M.J., R. Sarda & J. Romero. 1999. Spatial changes in sublittoral soft-bottom Polychaeta assemblages due to river inputs and sewage discharges. Acta Oecol. 20: 343-351.
Chicharo, L., A.Chicharo, M. Gaspar, F. Alves & J. Regala. 2002. Ecological characterization of dredged and non-dredged bivalve fishing areas off south Portugal. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 82: 41-50.
Cinar, M.E. & C. Altun. 2007. A preliminary study on population characteristics of the Lessepsian species, Pseudonereis anomala (Polychaeta: Nereididae), in Iskenderun Bay (Levantine Sea, eastern Mediterranean). Tr. J. Zool. 31: 403-41.
Cinar, M.E. & Z. Ergen. 2005. Lessepsian migrants expanding their distributional ranges; Pseudonereis anomala (Polychaeta: Nereididae) in Izmir Bay (Aegean Sea). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 85: 313-321.
Cinar, M.E., M. Bilecenoglu, B. Ozturk, T.Katagan & V. Aysel. 2005. Alien species on the coasts of Turkey. Medit. Mar. Sci. 6: 119-146.
Clarke, K.R. & R.H. Green. 1988. Statistical design and analysis for a 'biological effects' study. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 46: 213-226.
Clarke, K.R. & R.M. Warwick. 1993. Similarity-based testing for community pattern: the 2-way layout with no replication. Mar. Biol. 118:167-176.
Clarke, K.R. & R.M. Warwick. 2001. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, Devon United Kingdom.
Conides, A., C. Bogdanos & A. Diapoulis. 1999. Seasonal ecological variations of phyto- and zoobenthic communities in the south of Nisyros Island, Greece. The Environmentalist 19: 109-127.
Cosentino, A. & S. Giacobbe. 2006. A case study of mollusc and polychaete soft-bottom assemblages submitted to sedimentary instability in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Ecol. 27: 170-183.
Ediger, V., G. Evang & M. Ergin. 1997: Recent surfacial shelf sediments of the Cilician Basin (Turkey), northeastern Mediterranean. Cont. Shelf Res. 17: 1659-1677.
Eleftheriou, A. & M.R. Robertson. 1992. The effects of experimental scallop dredging on the fauna and physical environment of a shallow sandy community. Neth. J. Sea Res. 30: 289-299.
Ellis, J.R. & S.I. Rogers. 2000. The distribution, relative abundance and diversity of echinoderms in the eastern English Channel, Bristol Channel, and Irish Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 80: 127-138.
Ergen, Z. & M.E. Cinar. 1997. Polychaeta of Antalya Bay (Mediterranean coast of Turkey). Israel J. Zool. 43: 229-241.
Ergen, Z., M.E. Cinar, E. Dagli & G. Kurt. 2002. Lessepsian polycaete species from the Turkish coasts, p. 50-55. In B. Ozturk & Basusta N. (eds). Workshop on Lessepsian Migration proceedings, Gokceada. Turkish Marine Research Foundation, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ergin M, 1996. Subaerially exposed Late-Quaternary basinal shelf of the inner Mersin Bay, Eastern Mediterranean: Paleoenvironmental evidence. GeoMar. Lett. 16: 95-100.
Fanelli, E., A.F. Colloca & G. Ardizzone. 2007: Decapod crustacean assemblages off the West coast of central Italy (western Mediterranean). Sci. Mar. 71: 19-28.
Farina, A.C., J. Freire & E. Gonzalez-Gurriaran. 1997a. Megabenthic decapod crustacean assemblages on the Galician continental shelf and upper slope (northwest Spain). Mar. Biol. 127: 419-434.
Farina, A.C., J. Freire & E. Gonzalez-Gurriaran. 1997b. Demersal fish assemblages in the Galician continental shelf and upper slope (NW Spain): spatial structure and long-term changes. Estuar. Coast. Shelf S. 44: 435-454.
Field, J.G., K.R. Clarke & R.M. Warwick. 1982. A practical strategy for analysing multispecies distribution patterns. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 8:37-52.
Flach, E. & L. Thomsen. 1998. Do physical and chemical factors structure the macrobenthic community at a continental slope in the NE Atlantic? Hydrobiologia 376: 265-285.
Folk, R.L. 1974. Petrology of sediment rocks. Hephill Publishing Company Austin, Texas, USA.
Fredj, G., D.Bellan-Santini & M. Meinardi. 1992. Etat des connaissances sur la faune marine Mediterraneenne. Bulletin Institut Oceangraphique, Monaco, 9: 133145.
Galil, B. & A. Zenetos. 2002. A sea change--exotics in the eastern Mediterranean, p. 325-336. In E. Leppakoski, Olenin S., Gollasch S. (eds.): Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe: Distributions, impacts and management. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Galil, B.S. 2004. Carupa tenuipes Dana, 1851: An indopacific swimming crab new to the Mediterranean (Decapoda, Brachyura, Portunidae). Crustaceana 77: 249-251.
Galil, B.S. 2005. Dorippe quadridens (Decapoda, Dorippidae) - First record of an alien dorippid in the Mediterranean Sea. Crustaceana 78: 497-498.
Gaudette, H.E., W.R. Flight, L. Toner & D.W. Folger. 1974. An inexpensive titration method for determination of organic carbon in recent sediments. J. Sediment. Petrol. 44: 249-253.
Gray, J.S. 1981. The ecology of marine sediments. Cambridge studies in modern biology 2. Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Gremare, A., G. Amouroux & G. Vetion. 1998. Long Term comparison of macrobenthos within the soft bottoms of the Bay of Banyuls-sur-mer (northwestern Mediterranean Sea). J. Sea Res. 40: 281-302.
Gusso, C.C., M.F. Gravina & F.R. Maggiore. 2001. Temporal variations in soft bottom benthic communities in central Tyrrhenian Sea (Italy). Archo Oceanogr. Limnol. 22: 175-182.
Hinz, H., I. Kroncke & S. Ehrich. 2004. Seasonal and annual variability in an epifaunal community in the German Bight. Mar. Biol. 144: 735-745.
Holme, N.A. & A.D. McIntyre. 1971. Methods for the study of Marine Benthos. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford and Edinburgh, London, UK: 137 pp.
Horton, T. A. Diamant & B.S. Galil. 2004. Ceratothoa steindachneri (Isopoda, Cymothoidae): An unusual record from the Mediterranean. Crustaceana 77: 1145-1148.
Janssen, R. 1989. Benthic molluscs from the deepwater of the Eastern Mediterranaean Sea, collected during 'Meteor' cruise 5 (1987). Senckenb. Marit. 20: 265-276.
Jennings, S., J. Lancaster, A. Woolmer & J. Cotter. 1999. Distribution, diversity and abundance of epibenthic fauna in the North Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 79: 385-399.
Jones, D. L. 2002. Users manual for FATHOM: a Matlab toolbox for multivariate ecological and oceanographic data analysis. Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami-RSMAS, Florida, USA.
Kallianiotis, A., K. Sophronidis, P. Vidoris & A. Tselepides. 2000. Demersal fish and megafaunal assemblages on the Cretan continental shelf and slope (NE Mediterranean): seasonal variation in species density, biomass and diversity. Prog. Oceanogr. 46: 429-455.
Kamenos, N.A., P.G. Moore & J.M. Hall-Spencer. 2003. Substratum heterogeneity of dredged vs un-dredged maerl grounds. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 83: 411-413.
Karakassis, I. & A. Eleftheriou. 1997. The continental shelf of Crete: structure of macrobenthic communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 160:185-196.
Karakassis, I. & A. Eleftheriou. 1998. The continental shelf of Crete: The benthic environment. Mar. Ecol.-P S Z N I. 19: 263-277.
Kirim, F., A. Kocatas, T. Katagan, M. Sezgin & A.S. Ates. 2005. Crustacean biodiversity of Padina pavonia (L.) facies along the Aegean Coasts of Turkey. Tr. J. Zool. 29: 159-166.
Kocatas, A., T. Katagan & A.S. Ates. 2002a. Lessepsian invasion decapod crustaceans at Turkish seas, p. 56-58. In B. Ozturk & Basusta N. (eds): Workshop on Lessepsian Migration proceedings. Gokceada. Turkish Marine Research Foundation, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kocatas, A., T. Katagan & M. Sezgin. 2002b. Lessepsian invasion amphipods of the Mediterranean, p. 59-61. In B. Ozturk & Basusta N. (eds): Workshop on Lessepsian Migration proceedings. Gokceada. Turkish Marine Research Foundation, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kocatas, A., T. Katagan, M. Sezgin, F. Kirim & C. Kocak. 2004. Crustacean Diversity Among the Cystoseira Facies of the Aegean Coast of Turkey. Tr. J. Zool. 28: 309-316.
Koukouras, A., E. Voultsiadou, M.S. Kitsos & S. Doulgeraki. 2001. Macrobenthic fauna diversity in the Aegean Sea. Affinities with other Mediterranean regions and the Black Sea. Bios (Macedonia, Greece) 6: 61-76.
Kourelea, E., V. Dimitrios, C. Chariton-Charles, T. Georgios & C. Louis. 2004. Temporal variations in fine sand assemblages in the North Aegean Sea (Eastern Mediterranean). Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 89: 175-187.
Kroncke, I., M. Turkay & D. Fiege. 2003. Macrofauna Communities in the Eastern Mediterranean Deep Sea. Mar. Ecol.-P S Z N I. 24: 193-216.
Makra, A. & A. Nicolaidou. 2000. Benthic communities of the inner Argolikos Bay. Belg. J. Zool. 130: 61-67.
Margalef R (1985) Environmental control of the mesoscale distribution of primary producers and its bearing to primary production in the Western Mediterranean. In: Moraltou-Apostolopoulou M, Kiortsis V (eds) Mediterranean marine ecosystems. Plenum, New York, USA.
Morello, E.B., C. Froglia, R. James, A. Atkinson & P.G.Moore. 2006. Medium-term impacts of hydraulic clam dredgers on a macrobenthic community of the Adriatic Sea (Italy). Mar. Biol. 149: 401-413.
Muller, G. 1967. Methods in sedimentary petrology. E. Schweizbart'sche Verlags buch, Stuttgart, Germany.
Murina, G.V.V., M.A. Pancucci-Papadopoulou & A. Zenetos. 1999. The phylum Sipuncula in the eastern Mediterranean: composition, ecology, zoogeography. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 79: 821-830.
Mutlu, E. & M.B. Ergev. 2006. Dynamics and ecology of an Indo-Pacific gastropod, Conomurex persicus in southeastern Turkey. Rev. Biol. Trop. 54: 117-129.
Mutlu, E. 2004. Sexual dimorphisms in radula of Conomurex persicus (Gastropoda: Strombidae) in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Biol. 145: 693-698.
NCMR. 2001. Study of the short- and mid-term impact of oil pollution in South Evvoikos Gulf. NCMR Technical Report, Athens, Greece.
Nicolay, K. & E.R. Manoja. 1983. Strombus (Conomurex) decorus raybaudii n. spp. La Conchiglia The Shell 176-177: 17-18.
Ozcan, T., B.S. Galil, K. Bakir & T. Katagan. 2006: The first record of the banana prawn Fenneropenaeus merguiensis (De Man, 1888) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Penaeidae) from the Mediterranean Sea. Aquatic Invasions 1: 286-288.
Peres, J.M. 1967. The Mediterranean benthos. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 5: 449-533
Peres, J.M. 1982a. Zonation. General features of organismic assemblages in pelagial and benthal. Structure and dynamics of assemblages. Major benthic assemblages. Specific benthic assemblages. In Kinne O (ed) Marine ecology, John Wiley, Chichester V-1: 9-66, 119-186,373-581.
Peres, J.M. 1982b. Major benthic assemblages. Mar. Ecol. 5: 372-522.
Pielou, E.C. 1966. Species diversity and pattern diversity in the study of ecological succession. J. Theor. Biol. 10: 370-383.
Sarda, R., S. Pinedo & D. Martin. 1999. Seasonal dynamics of macroinfaunal key species inhabiting shallow softbottoms in the bay of Blanes (NW Mediterranean). Acta Oecol. 20: 315-326.
Sarda, R., S. Pinedo, A. Gremare & S. Taboada. 2000. Changes in the dynamics of shallow sandy-bottom assemblages due to sand extraction in the Catalan Western Mediterranean Sea. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57: 1446-1453.
Serrano, A., F. Sanchez & G. Garcia-Castrillo. 2006. Epibenthic communities of trawlable grounds of the Cantabrian Sea. Sci. Mar. 70: 149-159.
Shannon, C.E. & W. Weaver. 1968. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana University Press. Illinois, USA.
Simboura, N., A. Zenetos, M.A. Pancucci-Papadopoulou, M. Thessalaou-Legaki & S. Papaspyrou. 1998. A baseline study on benthic species distribution in two neighboring gulfs, with and without access to bottom trawling. Mar. Ecol. P.S.Z.N.I. 19: 293-309.
Simboura, N., Nicolaidou, A., Thessalou-Legaki, M., 2000. Polychaeta communities of Greece: An ecological overview. Mar. Ecol. 21: 129-144.
Smith, C.J., K.N. Papadopoulou & S. Diliberto. 2000. Impact of otter trawling on an eastern Mediterranean commercial trawl fishing ground. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57: 1340-1351.
Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. (eds).1973. Introduction to biostatistics. W.F. Freeman and Company, San Francisco. Taylor, L.R. 1961. Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature 189: 732-753.
Tselepides, A., K.N. Papadopoulou, D. Podaras, W. Plaiti & D. Kousoubas. 2000. Macrobenthic community structure over the continental margin of Crete (South Aegean Sea, NE Mediterranean). Prog. Oceonagr. 46: 401-428.
Tsutsumi, H., S. Fukunaga, N. Fujita & M. Sumida. 1990. Relationship between growth of Capitella sp. and organic enrichment of the sediment. Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser. 63: 157-162.
UNEP/MAP. 2004. Guidelines for the development of ecological status and stress reduction indicators for the Mediterranean region. MAP Technical Reports Series 154, Athens, Greece.
Vamvakas, C. 1970. Peuplements benthiques des substrats meubles du sud de la Mer Ege'e. Tethys 2: 89-129. Yokes, B. & B.S. Galil. 2006. New records of alien decapods (Crustacea) from the Mediterranean coast of Turkey, with a description of a new palaemonid species. Zoosystema 28: 747-755.
Yokes, M.B., S.U. Karhan, E. Okus, A. Yuksek, A.A. Yilmaz, I.N. Yilmaz, N. Demirel, V. Demir & B.S. Galil. 2007. Alien Crustacean Decapods from the Aegean Coast of Turkey. Aquatic Invasions 2: 162168.
Zenetos, A., I. Siokou-Frangou, O. Gotsis-Skretas & S. Groom. 2002. The Mediterranean Sea - blue oxygenrich, nutrient-poor waters. In: Europe's biodiversity-biogeographical regions and seas, Seas around Europe. (Downloaded: 27 April, 2006, http://reports. eea.eu.int/report_2002_0524_154909/en).
Zenetos, A., M.E. Cinar, M.A. Pancuci-Papadopoulou, J.G. Harmelin, G. Furnari, F. Andaloro, N. Belou, N. Streftaris & H. Zibrowius. 2005. Annotated list of marine alien species in the Mediterranean with records of the worst invasive species. Medit. Mar. Sci. 6: 63-118.
Erhan Mutlu (1) & Mehmet Betil Ergev (2)
(1.) Institute of Marine Sciences and Technology, Dokuz Eylul University, Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey; email@example.com
(2.) Derinsu Underwater Engineering & Consulting Company, Nilgun Sk. 5/1, Kavaklidere, 06680 Ankara, Turkey
TABLE 1 Temporal variation in hydrographical measurements between shallow and deep waters on the Cilician shelf in year 2000 Temperature ([degrees]C) Months Shallow Deep February 15.5 18.0 16 * 16.5 * May 21.3 20.5 19.2 * 17 * August 29.3 28.7 29 * 16 * November 21.8 22.7 23 * 16.5 * Salinity (psu) Months Shallow Deep February 38.74 39.06 38.96 * 39.04 * May 38.35 38.85 38.08 * 38.95 * August 39.17 39.31 38.95 * 39.95 * November 39.21 39.35 38.86 * 39.28 * Density ([[sigma].sub.[theta]] Months Shallow Deep February 28.64 28.54 28.80 * 28.83 * May 26.99 27.58 27.99 * 27.94 * August 25.27 25.41 25.56 * 28.71 * November 27.42 27.31 27.42 * 28.84 * Numbers in regular font are for sea surface, in * bold font for near bottom. TABLE 2 Occurrence of the epifaunal species found at shallow waters (5 m, and 10 m) and deep waters ([less than or equal to]50 m, and >50 m) Fish/Species 5m 10m Apogon nigripinis Cuvier, 1828 Arnoglossus laterna Walbaum, 1792 + + Arnoglossus sp. Balistes capriscus Gronow, 1854 + Bothus podas Delaroche, 1809 + + Buglossidium luteum Risso, 1810 + + Callionymus filamentosus Valenciennes, 1837 * Callionymus sp. * Cynoglossus sinusarabici Chabanaud, 1931 Dactylopterus volitans Linnaeus, 1758 + + Gobius niger jozo Linnaeus, 1758 Gobius sp. + + Lesueurigobius cf suerii Lesueurigobius suerii Risso, 1810 Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758 Mullus surmuletus Linnaeus, 1758 + Muraenesox cinereus Forsskal, 1775 * Neogobius sp. + Nemichthyidae sp. + Oxyurichthys petersi Klunzinger, 1871 Pagellus acarne Risso, 1827 + Pagellus sp. + Raja clavata Linnaeus, 1758 + Saurida undosquamis Richardson, 1848 * Scorpaenodes arenai Torchio 1962 + Serranus hepatus Linnaeus, 1758 + Siganus luridus Ruppell, 1829 * Solea sp. + Solea cuneata Moreau, 1881 + Pegusa lascaris Risso, 1810 + + Stephanolepis diaspros Fraser-Brunner, 1940 * * Symphurus sp. + Synodontidae sp. + + Trachinus draco Linnaeus, 1758 + + Chelidonichthys lucernus Linnaeus, 1758 + + Chelidonichthys lastoviza Bonnaterre, 1788 Mollusca/Species Abra nitida O.F. Muller, 1776 Acanthocardia aculeata Linnaeus, 1758 + Arca sp. + Astarte fusca Poli, 1795 Barbatia barbata Linne, 1758 + Bittium latreilli Payraudeau, 1826 + Bittium reticulatum da Costa, 1778 + + Chamelea gallina Linnaeus, 1758 + Cardium tuberculatum Linnaeus, 1758 + Ceretostoma erinaceum + Cerithium scabridum Philippi, 1848 * Clumocardatum ciliatum + Conomurex persicus Swainson, 1821 * * Corbula gibba Olivi, 1792 Donax semistriatus Poli, 1795 + Donax vittatus da Costa, 1778 + Epitonium commutatum Monterosato + Gibbula richardi Payraudeau, 1826 + Oenopota turricula Montagu, 1803 + Mactra corallina Linnaeus, 1758 + Murex trunculus + + Buccinum undatum Linnaeus, 1758 + Murex brandaris + + Nassarius circumcinctus Adams A., 1852 + Nassarius gibbosulus Linne, 1758 + + Nassarius mutabilis Linne, 1758 + + Natica sp. Scopoli, 1777 Naticarius punctatus Chemnitz in Karsten, 1789 + Natica stercusmuscarum Gmelin, 1791 Nassarius granum Lamarck, 1822 + Neverita josephinia Risso, 1826 + Nucula nitidosa Winckworth, 1930 Ostrea edulis Linnaeus, 1758 + + Paphia undulate Born,1778 Phalium saburon Bruguiere, 1792 + Pinctada radiata Leach, 1814 * * Pteria hirundo Linnaeus, 1758 + Rhinoclavis kochi Philippi, 1848 * Fuscoscala turtonis Turton, 1819 + Sepia officinalis L. 1758 + + Fusinus maroccensis Gmelin, 1791 + Striarca lactea Linnaeus, 1758 + Turbonilla acutissima Monterosato, 1884 + Clausinella fasciata da Costa, 1778 Scaphopoda/Species Dentalium tarentinum Lamarck, 1818 Dentaliidae sp. Crustacea/Species Alpheus glaber Olivi, 1792 + Alpheus migrans Lewinsohn & Holthuis, 1978 Alpheus rapacida De Man, 1908 Ampelisca sp. Anapagurus hyndmanni Bell, 1845 Apseudes latreillii Milne-Edwards, 1828 Balanus sp. + + Charybdis helleri A. Milne-Edwards, 1867 Corophium affine Bruzelius, 1859 Crangon crangon Linnaeus, 1758 + Crangonidae sp. Diogenes pugilator Roux, 1829 + + Ebalia cranchii Leach, 1817 Eurydice pulchra Leach, 1815 Eurynome aspera Pennant, 1777 Gnathia maxillaries Montagu, 1804 Goneplax rhomboids Linnaeus, 1758 + Leptochela pugnax De Man, 1916 Liocarcinus depurator Linnaeus, 1758 + + Liocarcinus vernalis Risso, 1816 + + Metapenaeus monoceros Fabricius, 1798 Erugosquilla massavensis Kossmann, 1880 Pagurus cuanensis Bell, 1845 + Parapenaeus longirostris Lucas, 1846 Pisa armata Latreille, 1803 + Aegaeon cataphractus Olivi, 1792 Portunus hastatus Linnaeus, 1767 + Portunus pelagicus Linnaeus, 1758 * Processa edulis Risso, 1816 Pycnogonida/Species Anoplodactylus sp. Echinodermata Amphiura chiajei Forbes, 1843 Antedon mediterranea de Lamarck, 1816 Astropecten irregularis Pennant, 1777 + + Astropecten jonstoni Delle Chiaje, 1827 + + Ophiura albida Forbes, 1839 + Ophiura sp. Nemertini/Species Nemertini Polychaeta/Species Ampharatidae (sp.) Amphictene auricoma O.F. Muller, 1776 Amphicteis gunneri M. Sars, 1835 Chone collaris Langerhans, 1881 Chone sp. Euclymene gracilis Glycera unicornis Savigny in Lamarck, 1818 Glycera convoluta Keferstein, 1862 Hydroides heterocerus Grube, 1868 Hydroides norvegicus Gunnerus, 1768 Hydroides sp. Levinsenia gracilis Tauber, 1879 Malmgrenia sp. Monticellina heterochaeta Laubier, 1961 Nephtys incisa Malmgren, 1865 Nereidae sp. Nereis sp. Notomastus aberans Day, 1957 Onuphis conchylega Sars, 1835 Ophelina cylindricaudatus Phyllodocidae sp. Polyodontes sp. Pomatoceros triqueter Linnaeus, 1767 Prionospio ehlersi Fauvel, 1928 Prionospio saccifera Mackie & Hartley, 1990 Prionospio sp. Scoloplos armiger Muller, 1776 Serpulidae sp. Spirorbis sp. Sternaspis scutata Ranzani, 1817 Terebellides sp. Terebellides stroemii Sars, 1835 Vermiliopsis infundibulum Philippi, 1844 Ascidiacea/Species Ciona intestinalis Linnaeus, 1758 Molgula manhattensis De Kay, 1843 Sipuncula/Species Onchnesoma steenstrupi Koren & Danielssen, 1875 Sipuncula sp1. Sipuncula sp2. Anthozoa/Species Pennatula rubra Ellis, 1761 Actinia cari Delle Chiaje, 1825 Depth [less than or Fish/Species equal to]50m >50m Apogon nigripinis Cuvier, 1828 * Arnoglossus laterna Walbaum, 1792 + + Arnoglossus sp. + Balistes capriscus Gronow, 1854 Bothus podas Delaroche, 1809 Buglossidium luteum Risso, 1810 Callionymus filamentosus Valenciennes, 1837 * Callionymus sp. Cynoglossus sinusarabici Chabanaud, 1931 * Dactylopterus volitans Linnaeus, 1758 Gobius niger jozo Linnaeus, 1758 + + Gobius sp. + + Lesueurigobius cf suerii + Lesueurigobius suerii Risso, 1810 + Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758 + Mullus surmuletus Linnaeus, 1758 Muraenesox cinereus Forsskal, 1775 * Neogobius sp. Nemichthyidae sp. Oxyurichthys petersi Klunzinger, 1871 * Pagellus acarne Risso, 1827 Pagellus sp. Raja clavata Linnaeus, 1758 Saurida undosquamis Richardson, 1848 * Scorpaenodes arenai Torchio 1962 Serranus hepatus Linnaeus, 1758 Siganus luridus Ruppell, 1829 Solea sp. Solea cuneata Moreau, 1881 Pegusa lascaris Risso, 1810 Stephanolepis diaspros Fraser-Brunner, 1940 Symphurus sp. Synodontidae sp. Trachinus draco Linnaeus, 1758 Chelidonichthys lucernus Linnaeus, 1758 + Chelidonichthys lastoviza Bonnaterre, 1788 + Mollusca/Species Abra nitida O.F. Muller, 1776 + Acanthocardia aculeata Linnaeus, 1758 + Arca sp. Astarte fusca Poli, 1795 + Barbatia barbata Linne, 1758 + Bittium latreilli Payraudeau, 1826 Bittium reticulatum da Costa, 1778 Chamelea gallina Linnaeus, 1758 Cardium tuberculatum Linnaeus, 1758 Ceretostoma erinaceum Cerithium scabridum Philippi, 1848 Clumocardatum ciliatum Conomurex persicus Swainson, 1821 * Corbula gibba Olivi, 1792 + Donax semistriatus Poli, 1795 Donax vittatus da Costa, 1778 Epitonium commutatum Monterosato Gibbula richardi Payraudeau, 1826 Oenopota turricula Montagu, 1803 Mactra corallina Linnaeus, 1758 Murex trunculus Buccinum undatum Linnaeus, 1758 Murex brandaris Nassarius circumcinctus Adams A., 1852 Nassarius gibbosulus Linne, 1758 Nassarius mutabilis Linne, 1758 Natica sp. Scopoli, 1777 + Naticarius punctatus Chemnitz in Karsten, 1789 Natica stercusmuscarum Gmelin, 1791 + Nassarius granum Lamarck, 1822 Neverita josephinia Risso, 1826 Nucula nitidosa Winckworth, 1930 + Ostrea edulis Linnaeus, 1758 Paphia undulate Born,1778 + Phalium saburon Bruguiere, 1792 Pinctada radiata Leach, 1814 * Pteria hirundo Linnaeus, 1758 Rhinoclavis kochi Philippi, 1848 Fuscoscala turtonis Turton, 1819 Sepia officinalis L. 1758 Fusinus maroccensis Gmelin, 1791 Striarca lactea Linnaeus, 1758 Turbonilla acutissima Monterosato, 1884 Clausinella fasciata da Costa, 1778 + Scaphopoda/Species Dentalium tarentinum Lamarck, 1818 + Dentaliidae sp. + Crustacea/Species Alpheus glaber Olivi, 1792 + + Alpheus migrans Lewinsohn & Holthuis, 1978 * Alpheus rapacida De Man, 1908 * Ampelisca sp. + Anapagurus hyndmanni Bell, 1845 + Apseudes latreillii Milne-Edwards, 1828 + Balanus sp. + Charybdis helleri A. Milne-Edwards, 1867 * Corophium affine Bruzelius, 1859 + Crangon crangon Linnaeus, 1758 + Crangonidae sp. + Diogenes pugilator Roux, 1829 + + Ebalia cranchii Leach, 1817 + Eurydice pulchra Leach, 1815 + + Eurynome aspera Pennant, 1777 + Gnathia maxillaries Montagu, 1804 + Goneplax rhomboids Linnaeus, 1758 + + Leptochela pugnax De Man, 1916 * Liocarcinus depurator Linnaeus, 1758 + Liocarcinus vernalis Risso, 1816 Metapenaeus monoceros Fabricius, 1798 * * Erugosquilla massavensis Kossmann, 1880 * * Pagurus cuanensis Bell, 1845 Parapenaeus longirostris Lucas, 1846 + + Pisa armata Latreille, 1803 + Aegaeon cataphractus Olivi, 1792 + Portunus hastatus Linnaeus, 1767 Portunus pelagicus Linnaeus, 1758 Processa edulis Risso, 1816 + Pycnogonida/Species Anoplodactylus sp. + Echinodermata Amphiura chiajei Forbes, 1843 + + Antedon mediterranea de Lamarck, 1816 + Astropecten irregularis Pennant, 1777 + + Astropecten jonstoni Delle Chiaje, 1827 Ophiura albida Forbes, 1839 Ophiura sp. + Nemertini/Species Nemertini + Polychaeta/Species Ampharatidae (sp.) + Amphictene auricoma O.F. Muller, 1776 + Amphicteis gunneri M. Sars, 1835 + Chone collaris Langerhans, 1881 + Chone sp. + Euclymene gracilis + Glycera unicornis Savigny in Lamarck, 1818 + Glycera convoluta Keferstein, 1862 + Hydroides heterocerus Grube, 1868 * Hydroides norvegicus Gunnerus, 1768 + Hydroides sp. + Levinsenia gracilis Tauber, 1879 + Malmgrenia sp. + Monticellina heterochaeta Laubier, 1961 + Nephtys incisa Malmgren, 1865 + Nereidae sp. + Nereis sp. + Notomastus aberans Day, 1957 * Onuphis conchylega Sars, 1835 + Ophelina cylindricaudatus + Phyllodocidae sp. + Polyodontes sp. + Pomatoceros triqueter Linnaeus, 1767 + Prionospio ehlersi Fauvel, 1928 + Prionospio saccifera Mackie & Hartley, 1990 * Prionospio sp. + Scoloplos armiger Muller, 1776 + Serpulidae sp. + Spirorbis sp. + Sternaspis scutata Ranzani, 1817 + Terebellides sp. + Terebellides stroemii Sars, 1835 + Vermiliopsis infundibulum Philippi, 1844 + Ascidiacea/Species Ciona intestinalis Linnaeus, 1758 + Molgula manhattensis De Kay, 1843 + Sipuncula/Species Onchnesoma steenstrupi Koren & Danielssen, 1875 + Sipuncula sp1. + Sipuncula sp2. + Anthozoa/Species Pennatula rubra Ellis, 1761 + + Actinia cari Delle Chiaje, 1825 + Species marked with * are alien species for the Mediterranean Sea. TABLE 3 Contributor species in the shallow and deep waters and discriminator species between the zones Species Av Sim Ratio Percent Cum% GROUP I (Shallow waters) AvSim: 33.74, S.D.: 29.435 Conomurex persicus * 31.0 1.1 92.0 92.0 Diogenes pugilator 1.0 0.2 3.1 95.1 Arnoglossus laterna 0.4 0.1 1.1 96.2 Bothus podas 0.3 0.1 1.0 97.2 Murex turunculus 0.2 0.1 0.6 97.8 GROUP II (Deep waters) AvSim: 9.91, S.D.: 14.646 Arnoglossus laterna * 4.4 0.3 44.9 44.9 Goneplex rhomboides * 1.8 0.5 18.1 62.9 Parapenaeus longimanus 0.4 0.3 3.8 66.7 Alpheus glaber 0.3 0.3 3.5 70.2 Gobius niger jozo 0.3 0.2 3.5 73.7 Av Dis (Grps II & I): 98.43, S.D.: 2.983. R: 1, p: 19.618 (0.200 %), Approx. 95% C.I. is (0.03%-1.16%) Species Av Dis Ratio Percent Cum% Conomurex persicus ** 57.21 1.75 58.12 58.12 Diogenes pugilator 10.48 0.47 10.65 68.77 Arnoglossus laterna 5.47 0.50 5.55 74.32 Goneplex rhomboides 2.72 0.44 2.77 77.09 Bothus podas 1.87 0.53 1.90 78.99 Murex turunculus 1.20 0.44 1.22 80.21 *, contributor species, **, discriminator species. AvSim: Average similarity; Cum%: Cumulative percent dis/similarity; S.D.: Standard deviation of dis/similarity, R: ANOSIM R statistic; Av Dis: Average dissimilarity, Approx. 95% C.I: Approximate Confidence interval at 95% level. TABLE 4 Results of cross-validation and permutation test for depth, interannual, seasonal groups of the epifaunal assemblages a) Depthwise (m=15); Total correct: 81.13%; p=0.000 Sample 5 m 10 m 25-155 m size % correct 5 m 17 3 0 20 85.00 10 m 6 16 0 22 72.73 25-155 m 1 0 10 11 90.91 b) Interannual at 5 m; (m=1); Total correct: 80.00%; p=0.058 2000 2001 2000 5 2 7 71.43 2001 2 11 13 84.62 c) Interannual at 10 m; (m=4); Total correct: 54.55%; p=0.496 2000 2001 2000 3 6 7 33.33 2001 4 9 13 69.23 d) Seasonal at shallow (5 and 10 m) (m=5); Total correct: 35.71%; p=0.040 Summer Autumn Winter Spring Summer 3 2 2 5 12 25.00 Autumn 4 3 2 3 12 25.00 Winter 3 1 4 1 9 44.44 Spring 3 1 0 5 9 55.56 e) Seasonal at deep (25-155 m) (m=7); Total correct: 40.00%; p=0.559 Spring Summer Autumn Spring 2 0 1 3 66.67 Summer 0 0 3 3 00.00 Autumn 0 2 2 4 50.00 Rows are true groups, columns are predicted groups. m= number of axes.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Mutlu, Erhan; Betil Ergev, Mehmet|
|Publication:||Revista de Biologia Tropical|
|Date:||Dec 1, 2008|
|Previous Article:||Indice fisicoquimico de la calidad de agua para el manejo de lagunas tropicales de inundacion.|
|Next Article:||Water use in four model tropical plant associations established in the lowlands of Costa Rica.|