Printer Friendly

Spatial dynamics of understorey insectivorous birds and arthropods in a southeastern Brazilian Atlantic woodlot/Dinamica espacial de aves insetivoras de sub-bosque e artropodes em um fragmento de Mata Atlantica no sudeste brasileiro.

1. Introduction

In tropical forest areas, communities of understorey birds tend to be dominated by insectivorous birds (Greenberg, 1981) which are very dependent on forest environments and rarely move between forest patches in fragmented areas (Stouffer and Bierregaard, 1995). Although such movements have been recorded for some species, these birds tend to restrict their activities to the limits of the fragments (Marini, 2000; Yabe and Marques, 2001). This has led to the disappearance of understorey insectivorous species, either as the result of human impacts (Canaday, 1996) or by an increase in the degree of isolation of fragmented areas (Aleixo and Vielliard, 1995; Sekercioglu et al., 2002).

If food is a limiting resource for bird species in such forest patches (Newton, 1980), the composition and diversity of the understorey bird fauna of a locality should vary in response to fluctuations in the supply of this resource. Considering different guilds, Martin and Karr (1986), Wong (1986) and Poulin et al. (1994) noted that insectivorous birds had greater spatial stability and are more site-attached than frugivorous ones, but this does not mean that fluctuations do not occur, since forest insectivorous birds may have spatial distribution related to availability of arthropods. These spatial relationships are due to structural heterogeneity of the environment (Blake and Hoppes, 1986; Naranjo and Ulloa, 1997) influencing bird behaviour and distribution of prey (Robinson and Holmes, 1982; Smith et al., 1998) and, consequently, spatial distribution of insectivorous birds. In Brazil, these ecological approaches have received very little attention, despite the importance investigations into animal population response to food availability should receive in conservation programmes. This is particularly true in Atlantic Forest areas, a biome that has been reduced to less than ten percent of its original coverage (Tonhasca, 2005).

In this work, our objective was to investigate the relationships between capture rates of understorey insectivorous birds and spatial distribution of arthropod density in an area of Atlantic rain forest.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study area

The sampled area is a patch of upper montane rain forest located at the Ibitipoca State Park (1,488 ha; 21[degrees]42' S and 43[degrees]53' W), state of Minas Gerais, Lima Duarte municipality southeastern Brazil. It is an area of Atlantic rain forest with approximately 90 ha (Oliveira-Filho and Fontes, 2000), known locally as "Mata Grande". The forest altitude is around 1,400 m a. s. l. The climate is characterised by an annual mean temperature of 18.9[degrees]C (Aragona and Setz, 2001) and annual mean rainfall of 1,544 mm (Carvalho et al., 2000). In 2004 rainfall was markedly seasonal and the dry season was from May to October and the remaining period was the rainy season. October was considered as dry season due to the rainfall of 66.6 mm, almost half of the historical mean of 121.8 mm (Manhaes, 2003 a) (Figure 1).

2.2. Bird samplings

The field work was carried out from January to December 2004 in monthly periods of seven to eight days. Due to the intensive rainfall in February and logistic problems related to the Park's facilities in April, those months were not sampled. We performed captures of birds with mist nets (12 x 3 m, 38 mm mesh) in five net lines plotted in pre-existing trails used only by researchers and the Park staff. Samples were taken at one net line each day and sequentially from one to five. This procedure was repeated monthly. The distance between the end of a net line and the beginning of another ranged from 84 m to 818 m. At each net line, nine nets installed at the ground level were kept open for about seven hours, beginning between 6:00 and 6:30 AM. The nets were monitored at 60 minutes intervals, and the captured birds were marked with numbered metal rings and released near the sampled net line. At the end of the study we had 3,178 net-hours.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Daily sampling effort varied between 51.75 to 68.5 net-hours and correction of the sampling effort to 50 net-hours allowed spatial analysis with the same capture effort. Individuals recaptured in the same month were included in spatial variability analyses when the recaptures occurred at different net lines.

We classified birds as insectivorous if a collection of five or more fecal samples, collected after the birds were held in cloth bags, contained over 90% of these samples only with arthropods. Species with less than five samples were included in the analyses based on literature data (Willis, 1979; D'Angelo Neto et al., 1998). Hummingbirds were treated as mainly nectarivores and were excluded from the analyses. The nomenclature followed Remsen et al. (2008).

2.3. Arthropod samplings

We used the branch clipping method, which consists of clipping the branches of trees or bushes involved by collecting bags (Cooper and Whitmore, 1990). Samplings were carried out in random schedules throughout the day, alternating between the left and right sides of the net lines each month. Vegetation close to the ground and branches up to 2 m were bagged (0.6 x 0.8 m plastic bags) at a distance not higher than 5 m perpendicularly to each net. Thus, nine collections were done at each net line totalling 45 monthly samples. The vegetation was vigorously shaken inside the bags to displace the captured arthropods and discarded. The residual vegetation was deposited over a cloth screen and carefully surveyed. Arthropods were collected with forceps, and kept dry in a freezer. Finally, we inspected the bags in order to find arthropods possibly adhered on the internal surface. Since the volume of the vegetation collected was variable, the number of arthropods was corrected to 100 g, after obtaining the difference between the weight of the bag with vegetation and the empty bag. For spatial variability, this value was multiplied by the mean of the vegetation density at each net line. The density was obtained counting the number of vegetation touches on a pole (Willson and Comet, 1996) (PVC pole, 1.9 cm diameter and 3 m high). The pole was vertically supported on the soil at a distance of 3 m perpendicularly to one net, with a 3 m distance between each measurement. With this procedure, four measurements were obtained at each side of a net, eight per net and 72 per net line. Additionally, the density of bamboo thickets, the main differential characteristic of the vegetation between net lines, was compared to the remaining vegetation.

The arthropods were classified down to the lowest possible taxonomic level, in general Order, although in some cases the identified items did not correspond to stricto sensu taxonomic units, such as insect larvae and cocoons. To reduce the possible inconsistency between density of preys and its availability for birds, only arthropods with 1.5 to 20 mm in length were counted. Studies in Panama suggest that small forest birds consumed preys mainly in this size range (Karr, 1976; Karr and Brawn, 1990; Poulin and Lefebvre, 1996).

2.4. Analyses

From monthly values of capture rates and arthropod density we clustered the net lines through Cluster analysis using average Euclidean distance and UPGMA. To verify spatial correspondence between these variables, we correlated the two distance matrices obtained applying the Mantel test. Analyses based on capture rates were restricted to the general tendencies of the insectivores as a whole, due to the reduced number of samples for most species. However, we tested the differences in the number of captures per net line of the most numerous species with the G test. In this case, the values were not corrected for capture rates since the greatest difference of the sampling effort between two net lines was 1.5 net-hour, for a total accumulated greater than 600 net-hours at each net line. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was applied to verify differences in vegetation density among net lines.

3. Results

We collected 4,466 arthropods, being Araneae and Coleoptera the most abundant groups with 2,034 and 675 specimens respectively, reaching 60.7 percent of the total. Although the branch clipping method may underestimate arthropod groups that run away fast at minimum vegetation disturbance (Cooper and Whitmore, 1990), such insects can be considered well sampled, specially Hymenoptera, Diptera, Orthoptera and some Hemiptera non-Heteroptera, that summed up to 955 specimens (21.4%) (Figure 2). Spatially, the dendrogram revealed a consistent clustering (cophenetic correlation coefficient = 0.93) distinguishing the net line one from the others (Figure 3).

We obtained 364 captures of 230 individuals belonging to 26 bird species, and the number of captures varied from one (five species) to 59 (Dysithamnus mentalis (Temminck)). The most common species were D. mentalis (25.7% of the captured individuals), Conopophaga lineata (Wied) (14.3%), Platyrinchus mystaceus Vieillot (10%), Basileuterus culicivorus (Deppe) (7.8%) and Sclerurus scansor (Menetries) (6.1%) (Table 1). We captured 18 species in September but only nine in December. However, the most numerous species occurred regularly throughout the year.

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

The distribution of captures in the net lines was homogeneous in the cases of D. mentalis (G = 2.04, d.f. = 4, p = 0.74) and C. lineata (G = 3.01, d.f. = 4, p = 0.57). Conversely, other species were recorded at specific net lines, such as Drymophila ochropyga (Hellmayr), with 80 percent of the captures at net line one (G = 25.07, d.f. = 1, p < 0.0001), P. mystaceus, with 83 percent of the captures at net lines three to five (G = 9.71, d.f. = 1, p = 0.002), and S. scansor, with 82.1 percent of the captures at net lines four and five (G = 18.45, d.f. = 1, p < 0.0001). Spatially, the dendrogram of the capture rates (cophenetic correlation coefficient = 0.81) revealed a different distribution of the net lines when compared to arthropod density (cophenetic correlation coefficient = 0.93) (Figure 3).

The absence of correlation between the spatial distribution of the capture rates and arthropod density (Mantel test, r = -0.33, p = 0.354) indicates that bird movements between net lines in function of the monthly density of the food resource did not occur, which can be observed by the different distributions of the net lines in Figure 3.

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

Total vegetation density differed between net lines, with higher values for net line one (ANOVA, [F.sub.(4,355)] = 8.48, p < 0.001). There was an inversion in bamboo densities when compared to the other types of vegetation from net line one to five (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

Typical rain forests are subject to somewhat regular rainfall throughout the year (Tonhasca, 2005), and it is possible that in such forests, the effects of desiccation on insects are smaller due to the constant shade and humidity. Therefore, proliferation of arthropods may occur because there are fewer problems relating to maintenance of hydric balance, reducing the risks of desiccation (Janzen and Schoener, 1968), or because water favours reproduction (Orians, 1980). Although Mata Grande has the physiognomy of Atlantic rain forest (Oliveira-Filho and Fontes, 2000), it lies within a domain of seasonal semideciduous forests and is subject to the seasonal regional climate. Thus, the annual humidity level must be more due to the two streams that run through the forest. Spatially, Richards and Windsor (2007) demonstrated on Barro Colorado Island that arthropod abundance was greater in the understorey than in gaps in the dry season, due to differential exposure to high temperatures and low humidity. However, in Mata Grande, the net lines were less subject to the effects of insolation because they were plotted on pre-existing trails that rarely cross gaps, so that clustering of net lines, based on arthropod density, could not be a consequence of such abiotic conditions.

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

Differences in plant density were possibly a prevalent factor in the dissimilarity between the net lines, because higher plant densities imply in more foraging substrates both for arthropods and birds (Blake and Hoppes, 1986). However, we did not find spatial relationships between bird capture rates and arthropod density. Insectivorous birds can be attracted to places where the offer of prey is greater (Blake and Hoppes, 1986), but the spatial distribution of some species of birds at Mata Grande is probably better explained by vegetation structure and bird behaviour than the direct influence of prey density. Drymophila ochropyga is a typical understorey insectivore that lives in bamboo thickets (Ridgely and Tudor, 1994) and, although it does not exclusively use its foliage as foraging substrate (Leme, 2001), the number of captures was coincident with density of bamboos. There were more captures of P. mystaceus in habitats with low foliage density. Presumably the behaviour of this species, which includes upward-striking to prey upon insects (Fitzpatrick, 1985), was favoured. Conversely, D. mentalis, a species that forage predominantly perched (Schulenberg, 1983) and can be a substrate generalist (Lopes et al., 2006), seemed less influenced in its movements in the understorey and was regularly present in all net lines. The absence of terrestrial species S. scansor in net line one, with a high density of bamboos, resembles previous observations (Reid et al., 2004), in which a ground-foraging insectivorous species was uncommon in bamboo thickets, despite the arthropod availability. However, another species that feeds on the soil, C. lineata, was regularly found in all net lines at Mata Grande, possibly because it was less restricted in terms of substrate, foraging on live foliage near the ground (Willis et al., 1983). Territoriality is another behavioural trait of tropical insectivorous birds (Greenberg and Gradwohl, 1986), although it is difficult to estimate the real effect of territorial fidelity on capture rates in Ibitipoca because territory sizes vary among different species, even in small areas, as observed by Stouffer (2007), who found territories ranging from 6 ha to 25.5 ha for a guild of insectivorous birds at a 100ha site in Central Amazonia in Brazil.

To associate bird guilds that forage in specific substrates with its arthropod communities may help to elucidate more detailed patterns about predator-prey interactions. The sampling by branch clipping may not represent in detail the availability for all insectivorous birds due to the different types of substrate explored by different species, but in this work we followed Blake and Hoppes (1986) and we assume that densities of the arthropods collected provide a basis for comparing arthropod availability among net lines. Furthermore, some observations allow validating the inferences on the results: first, the vegetation sampled included seedlings and low-growing plants. Near ground dwelling arthropods, such as Blattariae, Dermaptera, Diplopoda and Opiliones, were collected on the short foliage and regularly found in the diet of the studied birds (Manhaes, 2007). In addition, the low proportions of these taxa and great representativity of Araneae, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera and Hemiptera non-Heteroptera are consistent with data from arthropod communities in other neotropical areas (Olson, 1994; Poulin and Lefebvre, 1997; Sekercioglu et al., 2002); second, foliage-gleaners represented 67% of bird captures; third, some bird species, such as Basileuterus leucoblepharus (Vieillot) (Mendonca-Lima et al., 2004) and C. lineata (Willis et al., 1983), that normally forage on the ground, also capture insects in the foliage. Moreover, woodcreepers as Sittasomus griseicapillus (Vieillot) (Remsen and Parker, 1984) and some other ones exhibit a wide range of foraging behaviours, feeding regularly on live foliage and dead leaves (Chapman and Rosenberg, 1991); finally, mixed bird flocks or army-ant followers, that could have influenced the capture rates, were not observed close to the net lines (although army ants have been previously recorded in the area (Manhaes, 2003b)).

Although the cryptic nature and other antipredator adaptations of some arthropods can influence bird capturing success and reduce the amount of resources available (Robinson and Holmes, 1982; Karr, 1980), arthropods can be very abundant and may not constitute a limiting food resource for bird populations (Rosenberg et al., 1982; Kilgo, 2005). Also, arthropods have more homogeneous spatial distribution than fruits, favouring populational stability and low numerical fluctuation of insectivorous birds (Wong, 1986). Comparatively, in a parallel study, frugivores from Mata Grande exhibited spatial variability in function of fruit abundance (Manhaes, 2007). In addition, understorey insectivorous birds tend to be restricted to the limits of the fragments, mainly due to its low dispersing ability (Borges and Stouffer, 1999). In most of its extension, Mata Grande is a forest patch isolated from other forests by grasslands, rocky outcrops and valleys in different altitudes and local insectivores probably have low population influx.

This study spanned one year and possible annual variations of the results should be considered. Nonetheless, they are consistent with the studies of Martin and Karr (1986) and Wong (1986) on insectivorous birds in areas of tropical forests, which suggest spatial distribution specially associated to individual characteristics of the species and habitat rather than the presence of preys.

Acknowledgements--This work had the support of the Programa de Pos-graduacao em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais da Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos. We thank the Instituto Estadual de Florestas de Minas Gerais (IEF) for the permit for activities at the Ibitipoca State Park and to Centro Nacional de Pesquisa para Conservacao das Aves Silvestres (CEMAVE-IBAMA) for the bird bands.

References

ALEIXO, A. and VIELLIARD, JME., 1995. Composicao e dinamica da avifauna da mata de Santa Genebra, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 493-511.

ARAGONA, M. and SETZ, EFZ., 2001. Diets of maned wolf Chrysocyon brachyurus (Mammalia: Canidae), during wet and dry seasons at Ibitipoca State Park, Brazil. Journal of Zoology, vol. 254, no. 1, p. 131-136.

BLAKE, JG. and HOPPES, WG., 1986. Influence of resource abundance on use of tree-fall gaps by birds in an isolated woodlot. Auk, vol. 103, no. 2, p. 328-340.

BORGES, SH. and STOUFFER, PC., 1999. Bird communities in two types of anthropogenic successional vegetation in central Amazonia. Condor, vol. 101, no. 3, p. 529-536.

CANADAY, C., 1996. Loss of insectivorous birds along a gradient of human impact in Amazonia. Biological Conservation, vol. 77, no. 1, p. 63-77.

CARVALHO, LMT., FONTES, MAL. and OLIVEIRA-FILHO, AT., 2000. Tree species distribution in canopy gaps and mature forest in an area of cloud forest of the Ibitipoca Range, southeastern Brazil. Plant Ecology, vol. 149, no. 1, p. 9-22.

CHAPMAN, A. and ROSENBERG, KV., 1991. Diets of four sympatric Amazonian woodcreepers (Dendrocolaptidae). Condor, vol. 93, no. 4, p. 904-915.

COOPER, RJ. and WHITMORE, RC., 1990. Arthropod sampling methods in ornithology. Studies in Avian Biology, vol. 13, p. 29-37.

D'ANGELO NETO, S., VENTURIN, N., OLIVEIRA-FILHO, AT. and COSTA, FAF., 1998. Avifauna de quatro fisionomias florestais de pequeno tamanho (5-8 ha) no campus da UFLA. Revista Brasileira de Biologia = Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol. 58, no. 3, p. 463-472.

FITZPATRICK, JW., 1985. Form, foraging behavior, and adaptative radiation in the Tyrannidae. Ornithological Monographs, vol. 36, p. 447-470.

GREENBERG, R., 1981. The abundance and seasonality of forest canopy birds on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biotropica, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 241-251.

GREENBERG, R. and GRADWOHL, J., 1986. Constant density and stable territoriality in some tropical insectivorous birds. Oecologia, vol. 69, no. 4, p. 618-625.

JANZEN, DH. and SCHOENER, TW., 1968. Differences in insect abundance and diversity between wetter and drier sites during a tropical season. Ecology, vol. 49, no. 1, p. 96-110.

KARR, JR., 1976. Seasonality, resource availability, and community diversity in tropical bird communities. American Naturalist, vol. 110, no. 4, p. 973-994.

KARR, JR., 1980. Geographical variation in the avifaunas of tropical forest undergrowth. Auk, vol. 97, no. 2, p. 283-298.

KARR, JR. and BRAWN, JD., 1990. Food resources of understory birds in central Panama: quantification and effects on avian populations. Studies in Avian Biology, vol. 13, p. 58-64.

KILGO, JC., 2005. Harvest-related edge effects on prey availability and foraging of Hooded Warblers in a bottomland hardwood forest. Condor, vol. 107, no. 3, p. 626-635.

LEME, A., 2001. Foraging patterns and resource use in four sympatric species of antwrens. Journal of Field Ornithology, vol., 72, no. 2, p. 221-227.

LOPES, EV., VOLPATO, GH, MENDONCA, LB., FAVARO, FL. and ANJOS, L., 2006. Abundancia, microhabitat e reparticao ecologica de papa-formigas (Passeriformes, Thamnophilidae) na bacia hidrografica do rio Tibagi, Parana, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 395-403.

MANHAES, MA., 2003a. Variacao sazonal da dieta e do comportamento alimentar de traupineos (Passeriformes: Emberizidae) em Ibitipoca, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Ararajuba, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 45-55.

--, 2003b. Dieta de traupineos (Passeriformes, Emberizidae) no Parque Estadual do Ibitipoca, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Iheringia, Serie Zoologia, vol. 93, no. 1, p. 59-73.

--., 2007. Ecologia trofica de aves de sub-bosque em duas areas de Mata Atlantica no Sudeste do Brasil. Sao Carlos: Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos. 135 p. Tese de Doutorado em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais. Available from: <http://www.bdtd.ufscar.br/ tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=1675>.

MARINI, MA., 2000. Efeitos da fragmentacao florestal sobre as aves em Minas Gerais. In ALVES, MAS., SILVA, JMC., SLUYS, MV., BERGALLO, HG. and ROCHA, CFD. (Eds.). A Ornitologia no Brasil: pesquisa atual e perspectivas. Rio de Janeiro: EdUERJ. p. 41-54.

MARTIN, TE. and KARR, JR., 1986. Temporal dynamics of neotropical birds with special reference to frugivores in second-growth woods. Wilson Bulletin, vol. 98, no. 1, p. 38-60.

MENDONCA-LIMA, A., HARTZ, SM. and KINDEL, A., 2004. Foraging behavior of the White-browed (Basileuterus leucoblepharus) and the Golden-crowned (B. culicivorus) warblers in a semidecidual forest in southern Brazil. Ornitologia Neotropical, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 5-15.

NARANJO, LG. and ULLOA, PC., 1997. Diversidad de insectos y aves insectivoras de sotobosque en habitats perturbados de selva lluviosa tropical. Caldasia, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 507-520.

NEWTON, I., 1980. The role of food in limiting bird numbers. Ardea, vol. 68, p. 11-30.

OLIVEIRA-FILHO, AT. and FONTES, MAL., 2000. Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic forests in southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica, vol. 32, no. 4, p. 793-810.

OLSON, DM., 1994. The distribution of leaf litter invertebrates along a Neotropical altitudinal gradient. Journal Tropical Ecology, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 129-150.

ORIANS, GH., 1980. Some adaptations of marsh-nesting blackbirds. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 312 p. Monographs in Population Biology no. 14.

POULIN, B., LEFEBVRE, G. and McNEIL, R., 1994. Diets of landbirds from northeastern Venezuela. Condor, vol. 96, no. 2, p. 354-367.

POULIN, B. and LEFEBVRE, G., 1996. Dietary relationships of migrant and resident birds from a humid forest in central Panama. Auk, vol. 113, no. 2. p 277-287.

--, 1997. Estimation of arthropods available to birds: effect of trapping technique, prey distribution, and bird diet. Journal of Field Ornithology, vol. 68, no. 3, p. 426-442.

REID, S., DIAZ, IA., ARMESTO, JJ. and WHLLSON, MF., 2004. Importance of native bamboo for understory birds in Chilean temperate forest. Auk, vol. 121, no. 2, p. 515-525.

REMSEN JR., JV., CADENA, CD. JARAMILLO, A., NORES, M., PACHECO, JF., ROBBINS, MB., SCHULENBERG, TS., STILES, FG., STOTZ, DF. and ZIMMER, KJ., 2008. A classification of the bird species of South America. American Ornithologist's Union. Available from: <http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/ SACCBaseline.html>.

REMSEN, JV. and PARKER, TA., 1984. Arboreal dead-leaf-searching birds of the neotropics. Condor, vol. 86, no. 1, p. 36-41.

RICHARDS, LA. and WINDSOR, DM., 2007. Seasonal variation of arthropod abundance in gaps and the understorey of a lowland moist forest in Panama. Journal Tropical Ecology, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 169-176.

RIDGELY, RS. and TUDOR, G., 1994. The birds of South America. The suboscine passerines. Austin: University of Texas Press. vol. 2, 814p.

ROBINSON, SK. and HOLMES, RT., 1982. Foraging behavior of forest birds: the relationships among search tactics, diet, and habitat structure. Ecology, vol. 63, no. 6, p. 1918-1931.

ROSENBERG, KV., OHMART, RD. and ANDERSON, BW., 1982. Community organization of riparian breeding birds: response to annual resource peak. Auk, vol. 99, no. 2, p. 260-274.

SCHULENBERG, TS., 1983. Foraging behavior, eco-morphology and systematics of some antshrikes (Formicariidae: Thamnomanes). Wilson Bulletin, vol. 95, no. 4, p. 505-521.

SEKERCIOGLU, CH., EHRLICH, PR., DAILY, GC., AYGEN, D., GOEHRING, D. and SANDI, RF., 2002. Disappearance of insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 1, p. 263-267.

SMITH, R., HAMAS, M. and DALLMAN, M., 1998. Spatial variation of the Black-throated Green Warbler along the shoreline of northern Lake Huron. Condor, vol. 100, no. 3, p. 474-484.

STOUFFER, PC., 2007. Density, territory size, and long-term spatial dynamics of a guild of terrestrial insectivorous birds near Manaus, Brazil. Auk, vol. 124, no. 1, p. 291-306.

STOUFFER, PC. and BIERREGAARD, RO., 1995. Use of amazonian forest fragments by understory insectivorous birds. Ecology, vol. 76, no. 8, p. 2429-2445.

TONHASCA, A., 2005. Ecologia e historia natural da Mata Atlantica. Rio de Janeiro: Interciencia. 197 p.

WILLIS, EO., 1979. The composition of avian communities in remanescent woodlots in southeastern Brazil. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia, vol. 33, no. 1, p. 1-25.

WILLIS, EO., ONIKI, Y. and SILVA, WR., 1983. On the behavior of Rufous Gnateaters (Conopophaga lineata, Formicariidae). Naturalia, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 67-83.

WILLSON, MF. and COMET, TA., 1996. Bird communities of northern forests: ecological correlates of diversity and abundance in the understory. Condor, vol. 98, no. 2, p. 350-362.

WONG, M., 1986. Trophic organization of understory birds in a Malaysian dipterocarp forest. Auk, vol. 103, no. 1, p. 100-116.

YABE, RS. and MARQUES, EJ., 2001. Deslocamentos de aves entre capoes no Pantanal Mato-grossense e sua relacao com a dieta. In ALBUQUERQUE, JBL., CANDIDO JR, JF., STRAUBE, FC. and ROSS, AL. (Eds.). Ornitologia e conservacao: da ciencia as estrategias, Tubarao: Editora Unisul. p. 103-124.

Manhaes, MA. (a,c) * and Dias, MM. (b)

(a) Programa de Pos-graduacao em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos--UFSCar, Rod. Washington Luis, Km 235, CEP 13565-905, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil

(b) Departamento de Ecologia e Biologia Evolutiva, Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos--UFSCar, Rod. Washington Luis, Km 235, CEP 13565-905, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil

(c) Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora--UFJF, CEP 36036-900, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil

* e-mail: marcomanhaes1@yahoo.com.br

Received February 1, 2010--Accepted June 11, 2010--Distributed February 28, 2011

(With 4 figures)
Table 1. Number of captures of insectivorous birds per
net line Mata Grande, Ibitipoca State Park,
southeastern Brazil, in 2004.

Species                         Net line           Total

                         1    2    3    4     5

Thamnophilus             6    2    5          2     15
caerulescens
Vieillot, 1816

Dysithamnus              11   10   15   8    15     59
mentalis
(Temminck, 1823)

Drymophila               12   2    1                15
ochropyga
(Hellmayr, 1906)

Conopophaga              11   6    6    10   13     46
lineata
(Wied, 1831)

Sclerurus                     1    4    10   13     28
scansor
(Menetries, 1835)

Sittasomus               1    5    3    2     1     12
griseicapillus
(Vieillot, 1818)

Xiphocolaptes            1         1    2     2      6
albicollis
(Vieillot, 1818)

Xiphorhynchus                      3          4      7
fuscus
(Vieillot, 1818) (a)

Campylorhamphus          1                           1
falcularius
(Vieillot, 1822) (a)

Synallaxis               3                           3
ruficapilla
Vieillot, 1819 (a)

Synallaxis               2    3    2    1     4     12
cinerascens
Temminck, 1823

Syndactyla               1                           1
rufosuperciliata
(Lafresnaye, 1832) (a)

Anabazenops fuscus       3    2    2                 7
(Vieillot, 1816)

Automolus                          1                 1
leucophthalmus
(Wied, 1821) (a)

Lochmias nematura                             1      1
(Lichtenstein,
1823) (a)

Xenops rutilans               1                      1
Temminck, 1821 (a)

Phylloscartes                 3         3     3      9
ventralis
(Temminck, 1824)

Hemitriccus diops        3    1    1                 5
(Temminck, 1822) (a)

Corythopis               1         1    3     8     13
delalandi
(Lesson, 1830)

Platyrinchus             4    4    14   10   16     48
mystaceus
Vieillot, 1818

Leptopogon               8    2    1          3     14
amaurocephalus
Tschudi, 1846

Tolmomyias                                    4      4
sulphurescens
(Spix, 1825) (a)

Lathrotriccus                      3    2     1      6
euleri
(Cabanis, 1868)

Basileuterus             3    6    4    2     9     24
culicivorus
(Deppe, 1830)

Basileuterus                  1    1          2      4
hypoleucus
Bonaparte,
1830 (a)

Basileuterus             6    4    4    3     5     22
leucoblepharus
(Vieillot, 1817)

Total                    77   53   72   56   106    364

(a) Species with less than five fecal samples, treated
as insectivores based on literature data (Willis, 1979;
D'Angelo Neto et al. 1998). The remaining ones presented
five or more samples and at least 90% of them contained
arthropods.
COPYRIGHT 2011 Association of the Brazilian Journal of Biology
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:ECOLOGY
Author:Manhaes, M.A.; Dias, M.M.
Publication:Brazilian Journal of Biology
Date:Feb 1, 2011
Words:4626
Previous Article:Diet and feeding daily rhythm of Pimelodella lateristriga (Osteichthyes, Siluriformes) in a coastal stream from Serra do Mar-RJ/Dieta e ritmo diario...
Next Article:Pomacea canaliculata (Mollusca, Gastropoda) in Patagonia: potential role of climatic change in its dispersion and settlement/Pomacea canaliculata...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters