Printer Friendly

Soviet mindset infects U.S. government agencies: feds all to Lysenkoism.

Every day inside the Food and Drug Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, Drug Enforcement Administration, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Agriculture, Department of the Interior, and Department of Health and Human Services, career scientists labor under political managers who frequently edit, alter, and amend their findings to support politically desired outcomes. This process is known as Lysenkoism. It corrupts and distorts the marketplace of ideas and information to serve the political ends of those in power. Politically favored orthodoxies win out over the pursuit of truth in science--to our detriment.

Trofim Lysenko served as Director of the Institute of Genetics of the USSR's Academy of Sciences from 1940-65. As a young botanist and agronomist of peasant origin, he gained the attention of Soviet leader Joseph Stalin when he addressed a major famine issue. Severe winters in the CCCP destroyed early winter wheat seedlings. Lysenko established that hydrating and chilling the seedlings could preserve them to yield spring harvests. With the political stature achieved due to his popularity with Stalin, Lysenko went on to rule over the Soviet Union's biological and agricultural science, demanding rigid adherence to his pseudoscientific theories, which gained political protection from the government. Scientists who dissented from Lysenko's edicts sometimes were executed. The term Lysenkoism refers to the manipulation of science to support politically desired ends.

As our own Federal government increasingly has interjected itself into private decisions related to science --such as fracking for shale gas extraction; defining what species are endangered and what constitutes wetlands and wilderness; the development of new drugs; the role of certain nutrients in reducing the risk of disease; the types of surfaces and equipment that are least likely to harbor pathogens in food processing; among many others--it has established political orthodoxies which usually are distortions that selectively cull from scientific evidence that which may be argued to be supportive of a desired political outcome.

The Environmental Protection Agency, for instance, may deem that fracking imposes unacceptable environmental risks when, in fact, risks to the environment likely are minimal, depending on the techniques employed. The agency also may claim that the movement of soils during construction poses a potential risk to protected rivers, lakes, or streams when, in reality, there is no scientific foundation for the conclusion.

Scientists within a Federal agency or department often will be predisposed to reach conclusions that are supported in science only to find that political managers above them reject the conclusions. At the FDA, for example, career scientists frequently lament that their evaluations are altered by political managers who manipulate reviews of new drugs, health claim petitions, and medical devices to achieve politically preferred out comes. The same generally is true of the relationship between scientists and their political managers throughout the Federal administrative agencies. Entire organizations, such as the Union of Concerned Scientists, have come into existence precisely because of untoward manipulations of science by political managers in the government.

In an age when the Federal government was of far smaller size, scope, and regulatory effect, manipulations of this kind had a de minimis impact on the private sector. Today, however, the Federal government's scientific orthodoxies tend to dominate and define all standards applicable in the private sector. Overall, this politicization of science dumbs down the marketplace of ideas and information and results in less innovation and improvement in the standard of living.

In short, we not only are victimized by a Federal government that directly regulates out of existence opportunity and enterprise but by one that manipulates science, altering our perception of the world and denying us the progress in thinking and in the human condition that inevitably would result were we otherwise free.

Jonathan W. Emord is an attorney and the principal of Emord and Associates, Clifton, Va., and the author of several books, most recently, Restore the Republic-Flow the American People Can Once Again Be Free and Prosperous.
COPYRIGHT 2014 Society for the Advancement of Education
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Science & Technology
Author:Emord, Jonathan W.
Publication:USA Today (Magazine)
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jun 1, 2014
Previous Article:Biomass fuel needs to deoxify.
Next Article:Harnessing the sun's energy for use at night.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters