Printer Friendly

South Carolina court rejects "unauthorized practice of law" rules.

The South Carolina Supreme Court rejected rules proposed by that state's bar association that would have prohibited CPAs from engaging in estate planning work and income tax practices other than preparation. The South Carolina Bar Association claimed such worked constituted "the unauthorized practice of law."

The American Institute of CPAs, the South Carolina Association of CPAs and several national CPA firms worked together to oppose the rules. John Hunnicutt, AICPA group vice-president-government affairs, termed the court's rejection of the rules "a huge success."

The court order held that "CPAs do not engage in the unauthorized practice of law when they render professional assistance, including compensated representation before agencies and the Probate Court, that is within their professional expertise and qualifications."

The court refused to adopt a comprehensive definition of the unauthorized practice of law, favoring instead the more limited approach of resolving that question "in the context of an actual case or controversy." The order noted the court's "respect" for the CPA profession and the "unique status" CPAs hold.
COPYRIGHT 1992 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1992, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Supreme Court
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Dec 1, 1992
Previous Article:Small firms satisfied with AICPA but ask for more attention.
Next Article:How useful is fair value accounting?

Related Articles
Introduction and decision.
Court goes a-hunting gerrymanders.
States' rights survive High Court challenges.
Supreme Court Holds Alabama Foreign Franchise Tax Unconstitutional TEI, Others Had Urged Court to Invalidate Tax.
State tax nexus.
Domino strategy: when Allstate's claims adjusters engage in the unauthorized practice of law, plaintiff attorneys can knock down the company's...
Supreme Court adopts TEI's alternative argument in Mead.
Federalism and the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court asked to protect access to state courts.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters