Printer Friendly

Some cholesterol screening gets failing marks.

The results of cholesterol testing in shopping malls, supermarkets and other public places may give a false sense of security to those who test at acceptable levels, The Wall Street Journal recently reported. Citing two different studies reported in The Journal of the American Medical Association, the paper noted that the accuracy of the machines being used, as well as the competence of the personnel conducting the screening programs, has been called into question.

The cause for concern is that these screening programs often underestimate true cholesterol levels, thereby failing to alert some persons to their need for lowering their levels. Even in recognized clinical laboratories, the results of cholesterol testing have often been less than consistent, and physicians have long been urged to use laboratories that do provide consistent results and to see that their patients are repeatedly tested by the same laboratory.

Although inadequate training of many personnel involved in public screening programs has been an obvious source of error, the machines used to perform the tests are now the object of scrutiny as well. Five of the portable automatic analyzers used in such programs were tested by a Boston group of specialists against a standard test used in a reliable laboratory. Given an allowable error of 5 percent (that would accurately assess the risk of 95 percent of persons tested), two of the machines (Eastman Kodak's "ektachem DT-60" and Abbott Laboratories "Vision") were well within the limit, whereas three others were not. On the basis of the Boston tests, DuPont's "Analyst" would have calculated the risk of only 74 percent of those tested, Miles Ames' "Seralyzer" would have identified only 75 percent, and a German-made machine, the "Reflotron," 83 percent.
COPYRIGHT 1990 Benjamin Franklin Literary & Medical Society, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1990 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:shopping malls, supermarkets, and other public places
Publication:Medical Update
Date:May 1, 1990
Words:283
Previous Article:More on microwave cooking.
Next Article:Death rays from outer space - or right in our homes?
Topics:


Related Articles
Is now the time for cholesterol screening?
Cholesterol tests: how accurate are they?
Kellogg screens for high cholesterol levels.
Turning up the dirt on cholesterol screens.
The accuracy of those proliferating screening programs.
A lab-driven program for cholesterol testing.
Benefits of cooperative efforts between the lab and a hospital wellness program.
Should the public have direct access to lab services?
A community cholesterol screen: five days, 8,656 tests.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters