Printer Friendly

Solar neutrino mysteries persist.

Solar neutrino mysteries perists

Neutrinos emerge from a variety of reactions between atomic nuclei. As the physics of stars--and particularly the sun--is made up of chains of such reactions, scientists wishing to observe how those reactions proceed have chosen to monitor the flux of neutrinos coming from the sun.

It isn't easy. Neutrinos are the most elusive particles known to physics. From 1971 until last year, the world had only one neutrino observatory, a tank of drycleaning fluid deep in the Homestake mine at Lead, S.D., operated under the direction of Raymond Davis of the University of Pennsylvania. That experiment finds, on the average, about one-third of the neutrinos the standard theory of solar physics predicts.

Since early 1987, an apparatus called Kamiokande has been concentrating on solar neutrinos. Located at Kamioka, Japan, it detects neutrinos from somewhat different nuclear solar processes. Its first results indicate only 63 percent of the predicted flux, reported to Yoji Tatsuka of the University of Tokyo at last week's meeting of the American Physical Society in Baltimore.

Evidence from Homestake suggests neutrinos may be subject to magnetic effects -- a true revolution for accepted neutrino physics. The Homestake results have caused a decade-long scramble among solar theorists to figure out what might be wrong either with the theory of the sun or with standard belief about the behavior of neutrinos. Any new finding about the behavior of neutrinos could have a domino effect in many branches of particle physics. The Davis experiment has been running long enough to have records of two cyclic fluctuations in the solar neutrino flux. One of these is anticorrelated with the 11-year sunspot cycle, with the neutrino readings low when sunspot activity is high and vice versa. The other -- the one Davis wanted to stress at the Baltimore meeting -- is a fluctuation according to which part of the sun the neutrinos come through.

The sun's rotation axis is inclined about 6 [deg.] to the ecliptic. Thus, as the earth goes around its orbit, the neutrinos recorded by the Homestake detector come from slightly different parts of the sun. Twice a year, on June 5 and Dec. 5, says Davis, the neutrinos Homestake observes come out through the sun's equatorial region, where the magnetic field is lowest. His group analyzed their data, he says, and found a decrease in the rate.

This finding suggests that magnetic fields affect neutrinos, that they have a magnetic moment or intrinsic magnetism. A theoretical proposal, known as the Mikhaev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein (MSW) effect, in which magnetic interactions change neutrinos from one kind to another, has become a popular explanation for the discrepancy between the theoretical prediction and the observations. Neutrinos come in three varieties--electron neutrinos, muon neutrinos and tau neutrinos -- named for the other particles with which they are produced. Put most simply, the MSW theory proposes that interactions with magnetic fields on the way out of the sun change neutrinos from one kind to another. Under certain conditions there i s a resonance, which guarantees change for a large number of neutrinos.

The Homestake detector is sensitive only to electron neutrinos. If the nuclear processes in the sun were producing the expected amount of electron neutrinos, but these were being changed to another kind on the way out, that could explain the discrepancy between the Homestke findings and the theoretical prediction.

A neutrino with a magnetic moment causes consternation in particle physics circles. It would mean that neutrinos are subject to electric and magnetic forces, a circumstance not contemplated in traditional neutrino physics. It would require changes in those parts of particle physics in which neutrinos are important. A neutrino with a magnetic moment, and one capable of changing from one kind to another, would also have to have a small rest mass. When the neutrino's existence was postulated more than 50 years ago, it was supposed to have zero rest mass.

In recent years, some of the attempts to unify all of particle physics have proposed a small rest mass for the neutrino. A few laboratory experiments seeking a neutrino mass have claimed positive results; more have been negative. The question remains highly controversial.

For the solar part of the question, a few new experiments are either planned or in preparation. They will use different detecting substances to get neutrinos of different energies -- which come from different nuclear processes -- and so check different aspects of solar theory. Two will use gallium: the Gallex experiment, a collaboration of European and American institutions, which will set up 30 tons of gallium in Italy's Gran Sasso tunnel; and a Soviet-U.S. collaboration, which is setting up 60 tons of gallium in a mine entrance at Mt. Amdrychi at Baksan in the Caucasus. The third, a Canadian-U.S. collaboration, will use a tank of heavy water in a mine near Sudbury, Ontario.
COPYRIGHT 1988 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1988, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Thomsen, Dietrick E.
Publication:Science News
Date:Apr 30, 1988
Words:804
Previous Article:Linking body fat to neurons and energy.
Next Article:On a wing and a pedal.
Topics:


Related Articles
Weak sun blamed on WIMPS.
Scientists, 'boxed in,' scramble after supernova, find neutrinos.
Neutrino astronomy born in a supernova.
Neutrino physics after the supernova.
Regenerating neutrinos.
Is dark matter causing a glow?
Sunspots and neutrinos.
Huge pulsars boosted by tiny neutrinos?
First data from new neutrino detector.
A Little Mass Goes a Long Way.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters