Printer Friendly

Snow job: anti-cokehead discrimination.

JOEL HERNANDEZ WANTS his old job back, and employers and addicts across the country may have a stake in whether he gets it.

Fired from Hughes Missile Systems (now Raytheon) in 1991 when he tested positive for cocaine, Hernandez, who also had a drinking problem, reapplied in 1994 after joining Alcoholics Anonymous and giving up drugs. Hughes rejected his application, citing a company policy against rehiring former employees discharged for misconduct. But Hernandez contends he is protected as a recovered drug addict under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit agreed, and the Supreme Court is expected to rule on Raytheon's appeal of that decision soon.

"The 9th Circuit court's decision needs to be reversed," says Ann Reesman, general counsel of the Equal Employment Advisory Council. "The decision is very problematic for the employer's need to regulate the workplace. Any situation can be viewed as, 'My disability made me do it.'"

Hernandez's attorneys claim the case is "fact specific" and would not set a broader precedent. But Walter Olson, author of The Excuse Factory: How Employment Law Is Paralyzing the American Workplace (1997), believes the Supreme Court's track record of supporting neutral policies concerning employee conduct makes it likely that the 9th Circuit's decision will be overturned.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Citings; case argues that addicts qualify as disabled
Author:Turner, Brandon
Publication:Reason
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jan 1, 2004
Words:215
Previous Article:St. Martha.
Next Article:WiFoes: radio signals make waves.
Topics:


Related Articles
Punitive damages argued before U.S. Supreme Court in sex discrimination case.
Ninth Circuit upbraids Chevron for `paternalistic' decision in worker's ADA case.
The Americans with Disabilities Act.
Prohibited Discrimination Under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
This person doesn't sound white: evidence of discrimination and laws to prevent it have failed to eradicate "talking while black" and other forms of...
The ADA and the Food Code: collision?
HIGH COURT ISSUES NARROW ADA RULING.
The fight for reproductive rights: hard-won protections for reproductive freedom are increasingly under attack, says this advocate for pregnant...
Court-access decision's narrow scope worries advocates for disabled.
Public university can defund biased religious group, AU contends.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters