Here he writes in conclusion: 'For this critic, it is an evolving transcultural language that effortlessly integrates the principles of modernism with traditional responses to a tropical climate.'
Koolhaas in his seminal 1995 essay on Singapore architecture writes of a modernity stripped of ideology when reviewing the public housing stock that covers the majority of the housing needs of the island's population. As the Singapore House reviewed by Powell shows, the architectural aesthetic there has now moved far beyond what Koolhaas was commenting on almost a decade earlier.
Although, particularly after experiencing first hand the construction industries' almost total reliance and treatment of imported unskilled and uneducated labour, I can't help but think that when defining the term modernism in relationship to architecture in Singapore the critic and architects are still missing a proper understanding of the word.
Wellington, New Zealand
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||The Architectural Review|
|Article Type:||Letter to the Editor|
|Date:||Apr 1, 2004|
|Previous Article:||Sutherland Lyall indefatiguably forages and ferrets for cyber fodder.|
|Next Article:||Why the differentiation?|