Printer Friendly

Significance of molecular-cytogenetic aberrations for the achievement of first remission in de novo acute myeloid leukemia/Dogustan olmayan akut miyeloid losemiye yonelik ilk gerilemenin kazanilmasinda molekuler sitogenetik aberasyonlarin onemi.


Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized with biologic, phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity [1-4]. With the development of cytogenetic and molecular methods, it has become possible to reveal some genetic mechanisms of the leukemic process. Cytogenetics is considered one of the most valuable prognostic determinants in AML. Depending on the type of acquired genetic disturbances in leukemic cells, patients could be classified into risk groups with different therapeutic strategy. The ascribing of patients to risk groups, however, largely depends on biologic, laboratory and phenotypic features of the disease [2,5].

The determination of risk factors in acute leukemia has been a target of large randomized international studies [2,4-7,8]. Accordingly, poor prognostic markers in adult AML were determined as advanced age (over 55 years), high WBC count (over 30.[10.sup.9]/L), French-American-British (FAB) M0, M1, M5, M6 and M7, and cytogenetic aberrations (-5, -7, 5q-, 7q-, 11q23, 3q and complex karyotypes). AML with t(8;21), t(15;17) or inv(16) is associated with a relatively favorable outcome. AML patients who fail to achieve complete remission (CR) after a first-line chemotherapy have a very poor prognosis and it is generally accepted that few cures are achieved at this stage [9].

The aim of our study was to search for correlations between molecular-cytogenetic aberrations in newly diagnosed AML patients and the frequency of first CR achieved upon treatment.

Materials and Methods


We studied 71 adult (over 18 years old) patients with de novo AML, without previous myelodysplasia or therapy with alkylating drugs. First-line therapy consisted of standard-dose cytarabine combined with an anthracycline [+ or -] 6-mercaptopurine or etoposide. A CR was defined as 5% or less blast cells in a normocellular or hypercellular bone marrow with a normal peripheral and differential blood count. A resistant disease (RD) was accepted if CR was not achieved after three courses of induction therapy.

Conventional Cytogenetics

Cytogenetic testing was performed at diagnosis of AML. The bone marrow was treated by direct (without cultivation) and indirect methods (after 48 hours of cultivation with 15% fetal bovine serum at 37[degrees]C in RPMI) to obtain metaphases. The chromosomes were stained by G-banding method and were analyzed by light microscopy and the software program Icarus Metasystem. Karyotypes were determined according to ISHC (International System for Human Cytogenetic) nomenclature [10]: clonal aberration was accepted in the presence of at least two metaphases with the same structural change or the same chromosome gain, or at least three metaphases with deletion in the same chromosomes.

Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH)

FISH analyses were performed on cytogenetic preparations obtained from bone marrow cells of leukemia cases. We used direct labeling locus-specific probes (Vysis) for MLL gene rearrangements, bcr/abl fusion, PML/RARalpha fusion, inv (16)/CBFbeta-MYH11 fusion, and centromere probe cep7/7q-.


The patients with AML were assigned to 12 subgroups (Table 1) according to established data for cytogenetic, molecular and general laboratory results. The selection of analyzed parameters is consistent with internationally accepted "prognostic factors" in adult AML. Hb value and PLT counts at registration were added.

Aneuploidy cases were examined separately (as group N 9 and N 10) because of their specificity. They were not included in the groups with hyperdiploidy and hypodiploidy.

In the group of "other" molecular-cytogenetic aberrations, we included patients with aberrations nonspecific for AML, with unknown prognostic significance.

We found genetic anomalies in 43 (61%) AML patients and a normal karyotype in the remaining 28 (39%) by means of conventional cytogenetics and FISH analysis.

Complete remission (CR) upon induction therapy (Table 2) was achieved in 28 (40%) of the AML patients, in a mean period of 2.3 months from therapy initiation. The patients with t(15;17)/ PML-RARA and inv(16)/CBFbeta-MYH11C showed the highest frequency of CR. The patients with hypodiploidy, t(9;22)/bcr-abl and complex karyotypes were therapy- resistant or died within the first three months after AML diagnosis.

According to FAB criteria, most of the AML patients were classified as AML-M2 (25%), followed by M4 (23.9%), M5 (19.7%), M0 (9.5%), M3 and M1 (8.4%), and M6 (5.6%).

The highest frequency of CR (Table 3) was observed in AML-M3 patients (83.3%). Remission was achieved in more than 50% of AML-M2 patients (52.6%), but in those with t(8;21)-in 100% of cases. The patients with AML-M6 and AML-M0 showed the lowest frequency of CR-at 0% and 28.6%, respectively.


There were significantly more AML patients with a normal karyotype, compared to the other molecular-cytogenetic groups. Specific features of this karyotypic group were the high mean WBC count (48.8x[10.sup.9]/L) and low PLT count as compared to the group with 11q23/MLL and higher LDH as compared to t(8;21) cases. We achieved CR in 11 of 28 cases (39.3%) in a mean period of 2.3 months. Therefore, in patients with a normal karyotype, high WBC, low PLT and high LDH value could be considered as poor prognostic markers. In contrast, the presence of complex cytogenetic changes, including 5/del(5q), 3q abnormalities or 7, was found to predict a significantly poorer outcome than in patients with normal cytogenetics.

In our study, we established a double hyperdiploidy frequency, tetraploidy in particular, in comparison with hypodiploidy. In the hyperdiploidy cases, higher WBC (34.67 x [10.sup.9]/L vs. 17.0 x [10.sup.9]/L) and smaller Hb concentration alterations (90 g/L vs. 52 g/L) were observed, compared to in hypodiploidy.

According to the data from other authors [11,12], prognostic significance of hyperdiploidy and hypodiploidy in AML is unfavorable. There were higher percentages of achieved CR (50%) and lower drug resistance (50%) in hyperdiploidy as compared to hypodiploidy patients. Hypodiploidy was associated with structural changes and multiple chromosomal aberrations in 100% of cases, as well as with higher diversions of laboratory parameters.

Translocation (8; 21) was correlated with patient age mainly affecting young men (mean age 35.5 years). This aberration was uniformly distributed between FAB AML-M2 and M4. The presence of this translocation in AML-M4 is usually a rare event [13,14].

In comparison with AML patients having a normal karyotype, the frequency of CR in the t(8;21) subgroup was higher (75%) (39.3% in subgroup 1), achieved in a mean period of two months. Drug resistance was reported in one patient only (25%). These data confirm translocation t(8;21) as a favorable prognostic factor in adult AML.

One of the molecular-cytogenetic markers associated with a favorable prognosis in AML-M3 is t(15;17) [14-16]. We found t(15;17)/PML-RARA in 4.11% of AML cases. A tendency was established for relating this translocation with young patient age (mean 37 years). In the t(15;17)/PML-RARA group, the lowest WBC value (7.4 x [10.sup.9]/L) and highest mean Hb (130 g/L, p<0.05) were reported, compared to the other molecular-cytogenetic groups. CR was achieved in 100% of cases in a period of 2.3 months.

According to data of other authors [13,14,16-18], inv(16)/CBF[beta]-MYH11 is associated with a favorable prognosis and fast remission. In our case of such aberration, the period for achieving remission was not shortened, probably because of the high WBC count being a poor prognostic factor.

Cytogenetic aberrations in the chromosomal band 11q23 and rearrangement of MLL gene are important prognostic factors in AML. CR was achieved in all 11q23/MLL(+) patients in a mean period of three months. In one of the patients, CR was achieved later-in the 4th month, due to therapy resistance. Translocation 11q23/MLL in AML is associated with unfavorable prognosis. The data from our study corresponded with the publications of Abdou [19] (2002), Munoz [20] (2003), Schoch [21] (2003) for difficult remission in 11q23/MLL(+) patients.

Translocation t(9;22) and fusion gene bcr-abl were found in two (2.74%) of our AML patients-one with AML-M2 and one with AML-M5. In both cases, RD and early death occurred.

One of the more frequently found aberrations in our study of AML was monosomy 7 and/or deletion of 7q-in 9 of 71 (13%) cases with AML. Aberration -7/7q- was presented only as a single molecular-cytogenetic anomaly with a higher frequency in AML-M0, M2 and M6. According to published data [22-26]--7/ 7q-is a poor prognostic factor. Our results are entirely in agreement with these data, and CR was achieved in only two cases (22.2%). Drug resistance and early death were reported in the remaining 77.8% of patients.

In 86% of trisomy 8 cases, it represented a single numerical aberration and in 14%-an additional change in PML-RARA(+) AML-M3. A lot of cases with trisomy 8 were found in AML-M2 and M5. Low CR (33.3%) and high frequency of RD (66.7%) were established in the cases with (+8) as a single aberration. In the case with PML-RARA(+) karyotype, trisomy 8 probably had no influence, since lasting CR was achieved quickly.

All patients with a complex karyotype (multiple chromosomal and gene anomalies) had AML-M6 highest mean age (61 years) and high LDH value (1463.5 UI/L). Analyzing all features of this subgroup, we concluded that the complex karyotype was associated with a poor prognosis and low frequency of CR.

In conclusion, we established in this study a dependence between the frequency and type of molecular-cytogenetic aberrations and the age of AML patients. There is increased frequency of chromosomal abnormalities with poor prognostic significance (hyper- and hypodiploidy, -7/7q-, trisomy 8) and multiple chromosomal and gene anomalies with ageing.

Molecular-cytogenetic findings have an important significance for achievement of first CR, and our data are in keeping with the publications in the scientific literature [2,4-7,10]. However, laboratory and biologic features (age, WBC and LDH) and type of AML have a large influence on the disease outcome.

Received: July 21 , 2008 Accepted: November 10, 2008

Gelis tarihi: 21 Temmuz 2008 Kabul tarihi: 10 Kasim 2008


[1.] Brunning RD, Matutes E, Flandrin G. Acute myeloid leukaemia with recurrent genetic abnormalities. In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, et al., editors. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France: IARC Press, 2001. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours, PP: 81-7.

[2.] Giles FJ, Keating A, Goldstone AH, Avivi I, Willman CL, Kantarjian HM. Acute myeloid leukemia. Hematology (Am Soc Hematol Educ Program) 2002:73-110. Review.

[3.] McKenna RW. Multifaceted approach to the diagnosis and classification of acute leukemias. Clin Chem 2000; 46: 1252-9.

[4.] Mittal P, Meehan KR. The acute leukemias. Hospital Physician 2001;5:37-44.

[5.] Moorman AV, Roman E, Willett EV, Dovey GJ, Cartwright RA, Morgan GJ. Karyotype and age in acute myeloid leukaemia: are they linked? Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2001;126:155-61.

[6.] Bauduer F, Ducout L, Dastugue N, Capdupuy C, Renoux M. De novo and secondary acute myeloid leukemia in patients over the age of 65: a review of fifty-six successive and unselected cases from a general hospital. Leuk Lymphoma 1999;35:289-96.

[7.] Hagemeijer A, van der Plas DS. Clinical relevance of cytogenetics in acute leukemia. Haematol Blood Transfus 1990;33:23-30. Review.

[8.] Enjeti AK, Tien SL, Sivaswaren CR. Cytogenetic abnormalities in de novo acute myeloid leukemia in adults: relation to morphology, age, sex and ethnicity-a single center study from Singapore. Hematol J 2004;5:419-25.

[9.] Thomas X, Le QH, Chelghoum Y, Troncy J, Tavernier E, Elhamri M, Michallet M. Impact of salvage therapy to prognostic factors on the outcome of refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Haema 2006;9:125-33.

[10.] Mitelman F. Cancer Cytogenetics. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss, 1995.

[11.] Iyer RV, Sait SN, Matsui S, Block AW, Barcos M, Slack JL, Wetzler M, Baer MR. Massive hyperdiploidy and tetraploidy in acute myelocytic leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2004;148:29-34.

[12.] Lemez P, Bene MC, Campos L, Castoldi G, Derolf A, Garand R, Haas T, Haferlach T. European Group for the Immunological Characterization of Leukemias. Near-tetraploid acute myeloid leukemias: an EGIL retrospective study of 29 cases. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6686-96.

[13.] Bloomfield CD, Ruppert AS, Mrozek K, Kolitz JE, Moore JO, Mayer RJ, Edwards CG, Sterling LJ, Vardiman JW, Carroll AJ, Pettenati MJ, Stamberg J, Byrd JC, Marcucci G, Larson RA; Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Study 8461. Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Study 8461. Ann Hematol 2004;83:84-5.

[14.] Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, Wheatley K, Harrison C, Harrison G, Rees J, Hann I, Stevens R, Burnett A, Goldstone A. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 Trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children's Leukaemia Working Parties. Blood 1998;92:2322-33.

[15.] Chauffaille ML, Figueiredo MS, Beltrani R, Antunes SV, Yamamoto M, Kerbauy J. Acute promyelocytic leukemia: the study of t(15;17) translocation by fluorescent in situ hybridization, reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction and cytogenetic techniques. Braz J Med Biol Res 2001;34:735-43.

[16.] Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, Flandrin G, Muller-Hermelink HK, Vardiman J, Lister TA, Bloomfield CD. The World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting, Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997. Ann Oncol 1999;10:1419-32.

[17.] Hernandez LM, Gonzalez MB, Granada I. Detection of inv(16) and t(16;16) by fluorescence in situ hybridization in acute myeloid leukemia M4Eo. Haematologica 2000;85:481-5.

[18.] Mrozek K, Prior TW, Edwards C, Marcucci G, Carroll AJ, Snyder PJ, Koduru PR, Theil KS, Pettenati MJ, Archer KJ, Caligiuri MA, Vardiman JW, Kolitz JE, Larson RA, Bloomfield CD. Comparison of cytogenetic and molecular genetic detection of t(8;21) and inv(16) in a prospective series of adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2482-92.

[19.] Abdou SM, Jadayel DM, Min T, Swansbury GJ, Dainton MG, Jafer O, Powles RL, Catovsky D. Incidence of MLL rearrangement in acute myeloid leukemia, and a CALM-AF10 fusion in M4 type acute myeloblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2002;43:89-95.

[20.] Munoz L, Nomdedeu JF, Villamor N, Guardia R, Colomer D, Ribera JM, Torres JP, Berlanga JJ, Fernandez C, Llorente A, Queipo De Llano MP, Sanchez JM, Brunet S, Sierra J. Acute myeloid leukemia with MLL rearrangements: clinicobiological features, prognostic impact and value of flow cytometry in the detection of residual leukemic cells. Leukemia 2003;17:76-82.

[21.] Schoch C, Schnittger S, Klaus M, Kern W, Hiddemann W, Haferlach T. AML with 11q23/MLL abnormalities as defined by the WHO classification: incidence, partner chromosomes, FAB subtype, age distribution, and prognostic impact in an unselected series of 1897 cytogenetically analyzed AML cases. Blood 2003;102:2395-402.

[22.] Beau MM, Espinosa R 3rd, Davis EM, Eisenbart JD, Larson RA, Green ED. Cytogenetic and molecular delineation of a region of chromosome 7 commonly deleted in malignant myeloid diseases. Blood 1996 Sep 15;88:1930-5.

[23.] Brozek I, Babinska M, Kardas I, Wozniak A, Balcerska A, Hellmann A, Limon J. Cytogenetic analysis and clinical significance of chromosome 7 aberrations in acute leukaemia. J Appl Genet 2003;44:401-12.

[24.] Brozek I, Babinska M, Kardas I, Wozniak A, Balcerska A, Hellmann A, Limon J. Cytogenetic analysis and clinical significance of chromosome 7 aberrations in acute leukaemia. J Appl Genet 2003;44:401-12.

[25.] Johnson E, Cotter FE. Monosomy 7 and 7q-associated with myeloid malignancy. Blood Rev 1997;11:46-55.

[26.] Preiss BS, Kerndrup GB, Schmidt KG, Sorensen AG, Clausen NA, Gadeberg OV, Mourits-Andersen T, Pedersen NT. Cytogenetic findings in adult de novo acute myeloid leukaemia. A population-based study of 303/337 patients. Br J Haematol 2003;123:219-34.

Milena G. Velizarova (1), Evgueniy A. Hadjiev (2), Kamelia V. Alexandrova (2), Dora N. Popova (3), Ivanka Dimova (4), Boriana M. Zaharieva (4), Draga Toncheva (4)

(1) Department of Clinical Laboratory and Clinical Immunology, University Alexander's Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria

(2) Clinic of Hematology, University Alexander's Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria

(3) Department of Blood Transfusion and Immunology, Lab of Clinical Immunology, Hospital for Emergency Medicine "n. I. Pirogov", Sofia, Bulgaria

(4) Department of Medical Genetics, Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria

Address for Correspondence: M.D. Milena G. Velizarova, 1 G. Sofijski str. 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria Phone: +359 2 91 72 401--+359 2 91 72 401 E-mail:
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of AML patients according to
molecular-cytogenetic findings

 Number of
Groups Karyotype patients Age *

1 Normal karyotype 28 54.32 (25-79)
2 Hyperdiploidy 6 56.33 (44-72)
3 Hypodiploidy 3 57.0 (49-62)
4 t(8;21) 4 35.50 (27-49)
5 t(15;17)/ PML-RARA 3 37 (22-62)
6 inv(16)/CBFbeta-MYH11 1 30
7 t(11q23)/MLL 2 43 (39-47)
8 t(9;22)/bcr-abl 2 49.5 (44-55)
9 (-7/7q-) 9 48.89 (20-74)
10 (+8) 7 52.71 (22-84)
11 Complex karyotype 2 61 (60-62)
12 Other 4 49 (21-69)

 WBC *
Groups (x [10.sup.9]/L) Hb * (g/L)

1 48.8 (0.9-240) 82.8 (40-147)
2 34.67 (0.8-105) 90 (55-125)
3 17.0 (9.4-26.1) 52 (30-60)
4 18.63 (9.4-24.8) 63.8 (52-97)
5 7.4 (3.1-16.0) 130 (120-147)
6 178 95
7 20.15 (15.1-25.2) 82.5 (43-122)
8 25.15 (3.0-47.3) 60 (55-64)
9 30.0 (1.0-101.6) 80.1 (59-92)
10 35.26 (1.6-143) 93.7 (72-123)
11 20.8 (15.5-26.1) 66.5 (60-73)
12 25.3 (15.5-41.2) 82.3 (73-93)

 PLT *
Groups (x [10.sup.9]/L) LDH * (UI/L)

1 57.5 (0-171) 1888 (348-6479)
2 67.2 (80-110) 781.5 (347-1929)
3 62 (30-112) 1183 (378-1994)
4 19.5 (15-30) 891 (283-1994)
5 51 (25-78) 414
6 36 1271
7 159 (112-206) 384 (378-390)
8 49.5 (80-91) 865
9 41 (0-168) 930.2 (160-1996)
10 68.8 (6-123) 2070.4 (323-7699)
11 57.5 (44-71) 1463.5 (1178-1749)
12 104 (51-173) 880.3 (331-1749)

* Mean values and min-max (in parentheses)

Table 2. Frequency of achieved complete remissions in different
molecular-cytogenetic AML subgroups

Groups Karyotype Number of Patients Frequency of
 patients with CR remissions (%)

1 Normal karyotype 28 11 39.3
2 Hyperdiploidy 6 3 50
3 Hypodiploidy 3 0 0
4 t(8;21) 4 3 75
5 t(15;17)/ PML-RARA 3 3 100
6 inv(16)/CBFbeta-MYH11 1 1 100
7 t(11q23)/MLL 2 2 100
8 t(9;22)/bcr-abl 2 0 0
9 (-7/7q-) 9 2 22.2
10 (+8) 7 3 42.8
11 Complex karyotype 2 0 0
12 Other 4 0 0

Groups CR (months) Resistant patients/patients
 with early death
 (in the first 3 months)

1 2.3 17 (60.7%)
2 2.7 3 (50%)
3 0 3 (100%)
4 2 1 (25%)
5 2.3 0
6 2 0
7 3 1 (50%)
8 0 2 (100%)
9 2 7 (77.8%)
10 2 4 (57.2%)
11 0 2 (100%)
12 0 4 (100%)

* Mean values and min-max

Table 3. Molecular-cytogenetic, biologic and laboratory data (mean
values) distribution according to FAB subgroups of AML patients


Number of patients 6 6 18 6
Normal karyotype 1 2 9 2
Hyperdiploidy * 1 0 3 2
Hypodiploidy ** 2 1 2 0
Translocations 0 1 3 3
Inversions 0 0 0 0
Deletions 1 0 2 0
Complex karyotype 0 0 0 0
Age 46.6 66 52 39
WBC (x [10.sup.9]/L) 41.7 95.2 25.9 5.1
Hb (g/L) 75.4 81.3 81.1 112.5
PLT (x [10.sup.9]/L) 40.3 56.7 60.3 38.3
LDH (UI/L) 1493.6 1053 1079 380.5
Frequency of remissions (%) 28.6 33.3 52.6 83.3


Number of patients 17 14 4
Normal karyotype 8 6 0
Hyperdiploidy * 3 5 0
Hypodiploidy ** 3 0 3
Translocations 2 3 1
Inversions 1 0 0
Deletions 0 0 0
Complex karyotype 0 0 2
Age 47 52 64
WBC (x [10.sup.9]/L) 67.8 38.6 18.5
Hb (g/L) 79 87.2 70.3
PLT (x [10.sup.9]/L) 50 90.7 52.8
LDH (UI/L) 1840 1625 1058
Frequency of remissions (%) 47.1 50 0

* Patients with trisomies included.

** Patients with monosomies included.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Aves Yayincilik
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Velizarova, Milena G.; Hadjiev, Evgueniy A.; Alexandrova, Kamelia V.; Popova, Dora N.; Dimova, Ivank
Publication:Turkish Journal of Hematology
Article Type:Clinical report
Geographic Code:4EXBU
Date:Dec 1, 2008
Previous Article:The levels of nitric oxide in beta-thalassemia minor/Beta talasemi minorde nitrik oksit seviyeleri.
Next Article:Scleredema-associated IgA myeloma with myelofibrosis in a young adult: a case report/Genc bir yetiskinde miyelofibroz ile sklerema iliskili IgA...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters