Printer Friendly

Short cervix: bed rest won't stop preterm birth: unintended consequences.


SAN FRANCISCO--Restricting physical activity does not reduce the odds of preterm birth in asymptomatic nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy who have a short cervix, and doing so may even be harmful, a study has shown.

More than a third of the 646 women with a short cervix who were studied were placed on some kind of activity restriction, despite the general lack of evidence and guideline endorsement for the practice in this context, Dr. William Grobman reported at the Pregnancy Meeting, the annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

Compared with their counterparts who were not placed on any kind of activity restriction, women who rested had a more than doubling of the odds of giving birth before 37 weeks after other factors, including cervical length, were considered.

"To me, the key important point is that there is no evidence of benefit, Land there are] multiple potential paths of harm," said Dr. Grobman, who is a maternal-fetal medicine specialist at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago.

"Even if there is not harm tor preterm birth, there probably is harm in other regards--in terms of deconditioning, in terms of bone loss," he said.

Placing such women on activity restriction, sometimes in the hospital, also has major implications for resource use and lost productivity

The new data should temper current screening trends, according to Dr. Grobman.

"There has been increasing emphasis on the value of screening asymptomatic women and how that might be beneficial," he explained. "But oftentimes, what is not accounted for in that are the unintended consequences that you bring."

In the larger context, about three-fourths of such women with a short cervix will not be delivered preterm, and those who do often give birth many weeks after the condition is first detected.

In addition, especially when women are receiving prenatal care, there is usually sufficient opportunity to detect early labor and intervene.

The women studied were participants in the SCAN trial of progesterone for preventing preterm birth in nulliparous women with a short cervix.

Those with prolapsing membranes were excluded.

All had a cervix measuring less than 30 mm on second-trimester transvaginal ultrasound, with an in-terquartile range of about 19-28 mm, Dr. Grobman reported on behalf of investigators with the maternal-fetal medicine unit (MFMU) network of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Study results, presented in a poster session, showed that 39% of the women were put on some type of activity restriction, meaning pelvic rest (prohibition of sexual activity), reduction of work activity, and reduction of nonwork activity.

The majority were put on all three types and usually at home, on an outpatient basis.

After adjustment for potential confounders, relative to their peers who were not put on activity restriction, women who were had significantly higher odds of being delivered before 37 weeks (odds ratio, 2.4) and before 34 weeks (OR, 2.8).

In closing, Dr. Grobman cautioned that the results apply only to the population studied. "I'm not talking about bed rest for anyone, ever, for anything. These are asymptomatic women in a study [who were] found to have a short cervix."


Major finding: Compared with their peers who were not placed on activity restriction, women who rested had a more than doubling of the odds of preterm birth after adjustment for potential confounders (OR, 2.4).

Data source: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial involving 646 asymptomatic nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy and a short cervix.

Disclosures: Dr. Grobman disclosed no relevant financial conflicts.
COPYRIGHT 2013 International Medical News Group
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:London, Susan
Publication:OB GYN News
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Apr 1, 2013
Previous Article:Feds clarify regs on copay-free contraception.
Next Article:Master Class: robotic hysterectomy advances: see-and-treat approach.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters