Sex Roles: How do lay people weigh information about instrumentality, expressiveness, and gender-typed hobbies when judging masculinity-femininity in themselves, best friends, and strangers?
To study how people weigh information when judging their own and others' masculinity-femininity (M-F), the author asked 170 male and 205 female participants to rate themselves and their best friends on M-F, instrumentality, expressiveness, and gender-typed hobby preferences. Also, each participant judged the M-F of eight fictitious women (or men) described as possessing low or high instrumentality, low or high expressiveness, and hobbies typical of men or women. Regression analyses showed that gender-typed hobby preferences predicted M-F ratings of self and friends more strongly
than instrumentality or expressiveness did. Similarly, analyses of participants' judgments of fictitious people showed that participants weighed gender-typed hobbies more strongly than instrumentality and expressiveness when judging targets' M-F. All results converged to show that lay people's judgments of M-F are based more on information about gender-typed interests than on information about instrumentality or expressiveness.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Women and Language|
|Article Type:||Brief article|
|Date:||Mar 22, 2007|
|Previous Article:||Sex Roles: Constructing gender in chat rooms.|
|Next Article:||Sex Roles: Challenge and conformity on "contested terrain": images of women in four women's sport/fitness magazines.|