Printer Friendly

Seeing the forest and the trees helps cut atmospheric carbon dioxide: addressing carbon on land is essential for stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations.

In Brief: Putting a price tag on carbon dioxide emitted by different land use practices could dramatically change the way that land is used--forests become increasingly valuable for storing carbon, and overall carbon emissions reductions become cheaper, according to research presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Without valuing the carbon in land, we risk losing large swaths of unmanaged ecosystems to agricultural crops and biofuels, said Leon Clarke of the Joint Global Change Research Institute (JGCRI) in College Park, Md., a collaboration between the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in Richland, Wash., and the University of Maryland.

Most analyses of future global carbon dioxide output mainly consider carbon emissions from fossil fuels and industrial processes, or otherwise include only parts of the global carbon cycle. Some studies predict dramatic changes in how people use land as they cut down trees to grow food and bioenergy crops. This study is the first to value carbon in all natural and human systems.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The scientists found that addressing land-based carbon is essential for stabilizing greenhouse gases at low levels. Overall, land contains 2,000 billion tons of carbon, compared to the 750 billion tons in the atmosphere. In addition, forests hold more carbon than grazing land does. Converting land from forest to food or bioenergy crops releases carbon into the atmosphere. Conversely, turning agricultural land back into forests tucks carbon away on land, reducing it in the atmosphere.

Economist Clarke has shown that including terrestrial carbon changes the carbon dioxide dynamics and costs of managing greenhouse gas emissions. When all carbon emissions--fossil fuel, industrial, and land-use change emissions--are included in a global management plan regardless of their origin, deforestation slows and could reverse, managers place limits on the expansion of biofuels production, and emission control becomes cheaper.

The JGCRI analysis also found that emissions from land use changes were heavily influenced by how well crops grew.

"That means to limit atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, improving technology for growing crops is potentially as important as energy technologies such as carbon capture and storage," said Clarke.

The analysis by PNNL scientists at JGCRI explores what could happen to global economies and environments as biofuels become an important part of energy production. The analysis included carbon dioxide emissions from energy, the atmosphere, land use, and terrestrial sources. The results offer insights into how to best incorporate biofuels into our global economy.

For more information contact Mary Beckman, DOE/Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, mary.beckman@pnl.gov.
COPYRIGHT 2009 American Society of Agricultural Engineers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:UPDATE
Publication:Resource: Engineering & Technology for a Sustainable World
Date:Jul 1, 2009
Words:423
Previous Article:Biofuel crop goals may need change: nations that sow food crops for biofuels may reap less than previously thought.
Next Article:New ways to clean up water and use it again.
Topics:


Related Articles
Piecing together Australia's climate change picture.
Aerosols cloud climate picture: reactions may have mixed effects on temperature.
Slow changes to Earth systems can amplify global warming.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters