Printer Friendly

Securities - False statements - Tangible equity.

Byline: Mass. Lawyers Weekly Staff

Where the Securities and Exchange Commission has charged the defendants with making false statements as part of an alleged "short-and-distort" scheme, a motion by the defendants to dismiss the complaint should be denied except as to a tangible equity statement.

" The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC') alleges that Rev. Fr. Emmanuel Lemelson and his private investment firm Lemelson Capital Management, LLC (collectively, 'Lemelson') publicized false information about biopharmaceutical company Ligand Pharmaceuticals ('Ligand') after Lemelson took a short position in Ligand in May 2014 on behalf of The Amvona Fund a hedge fund Lemelson advises and partly owns. During 2014, Lemelson allegedly used written reports, interviews, and social media to spread false claims about the financial health of Ligand to drive down the price of Ligand's stock. Throughout this period, Lemelson publicly disclosed that he had taken a short position in Ligand. The SEC claims that Ligand's stock lost more than one-third of its value during Lemelson's scheme.

"The SEC asserts that Lemelson violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 'Exchange Act') and Rule 10b-5 thereunder (Count I) and violated Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder (Count II). The SEC also brings a claim for unjust enrichment or other equitable relief against Relief Defendant The Amvona Fund, LP (Count III).

" [I]n an August 22, 2014 report, Lemelson asserted that Ligand had 'issued 245 million in new debt, against tangible equity of just $21,000, giving rise to a debt to tangible equity ratio of 11,667 to 1 (that is $11,667 dollars [sic] in debt for every $1 in tangible common shareholder equity)' and that 'shareholders have only the protection of $21,000 in tangible equity to shield them from $245 million in debt' (the 'Tangible Equity Statement').

" The only statement this Court addresses here is the Tangible Equity Statement.

"In the August 22, 2014 report, entitled 'Ligand Pharmaceuticals' (NASDAQ: LGND) Institutional Holders waste no time dumping stock in response to Insolvency and bankruptcy risk,' Lemelson asserted that Ligand was in critical financial trouble. ... To support this opinion, Lemelson made the Tangible Equity Statement. The SEC argues that Lemelson intentionally or recklessly misstated Ligand's debt-to-equity ratio and that the statement is material because it goes to the heart of Ligand's overall financial viability and supported Lemelson's argument that Ligand's stock was worth $0. ... The Complaint focuses on how 'Lemelson intentionally misstated Ligand's debt-to-equity ratio.' Compl. 52 (emphasis added). Defendants argue that Lemelson's statement concerned the debt-to-tangible-equity ratio and therefore is demonstrably true. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b), the SEC has failed to plead with particularity how a statement about Ligand's debt-to-tangible-equity ratio is materially false or misleading to a reasonable investor.

"Additionally, because the claimed violations of Section 206(4) and Rule 206(4)-8 and the claim of unjust enrichment depend on the viability of the Commission's 10(b) claim, the Court denies Defendants' motion as to Counts II and III.

"The Court denies Defendants' motion to dismiss except with respect to the Tangible Equity Statement (Docket No. 10). The Court will allow the SEC leave to amend its complaint as to the allegation. Any such amendment shall be made within 60 days."

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lemelson, et al. (Lawyers Weekly No. 02-048-19) (5 pages) (Saris, C.J.) (Civil Action No. 18-11926-PBS) (Jan. 23, 2019).

Click to read the full text of the opinion.

Copyright {c} 2019 BridgeTower Media. All Rights Reserved.
COPYRIGHT 2019 BridgeTower Media Holding Company, LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2019 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lemelson, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Publication:Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly
Date:Jan 28, 2019
Words:593
Previous Article:Contract - Contempt - Termination notice.
Next Article:Criminal - Restitution.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters