Printer Friendly

Secrets of successful thin-wall molding. (Injection Molding Troubleshooter).

* Demands to create smaller, lighter parts have made thin-wall molding one of the most sought after capabilities for an injection molder. These days, "thin-wall" is generally defined by portable electronics parts having a wall thickness less than 1 mm. For large automotive parts, "thin" may mean 2 mm. In any case, thinner wall sections bring changes in processing requirements: higher pressures and speeds, faster cooling times, and modifications to part-ejection and gating arrangements. These process changes have in turn prompted new considerations in mold, machinery, and part design.

Machinery considerations

Standard molding machinery can be used for many thin-wall applications. Capabilities built into newer standard machines go well beyond those of 10 years ago. Advances in materials, gating technology, and design further expand the capabilities of a standard machine to fill thinner parts.

But as wall thicknesses continue to shrink, a more specialized press with higher speed and pressure capabilities may be required. For example, with a portable electronics part less than 1 mm thick, fill times of less than 0.5 sec and injection pressures greater than 30,000 psi are not uncommon. Hydraulic machines designed for thin-wall molding frequently have accumulators driving both injection and clamping cycles. All-electric and hybrid electric/hydraulic models with high speed and pressure capabilities are starting to appear as well.

To stand up to the high pressures involved, clamp force should be a minimum of 5-7 tons/sq in. of projected area. In addition, extra-heavy platens help to reduce flexure as wall thicknesses drop and injection pressures rise. Thin-wall machines commonly have a 2:1 or lower ratio of tiebar distance to platen thickness. Also, with thinner walls, closed-loop control of injection speed, transfer pressure, and other process variables can help to control filling and packing at high speeds and pressures.

When it comes to shot capacity, large barrels tend to be too large. We suggest you aim for a shot size of 40% to 70% of barrel capacity. The greatly reduced total cycle time seen in thin-wall applications may make it possible to reduce the minimum shot size to 20%-30% of barrel capacity, but only if the parts are thoroughly tested for property loss due to possible material degradation. Users must be careful, as small shot sizes can mean longer barrel residence times for the material, resulting in property degradation.

Molds: make 'em rugged

Speed is one of the key attributes of successful thin-wall molding. Faster filling and higher pressures are required to drive molten thermoplastic material into thinner cavities at a sufficient rate to prevent freeze off. If a standard part is filled in 2 sec, then a reduction in thickness of 25% potentially can require a drop in fill time of 50% to just 1 sec.

One benefit of thin-wall molding is that as wall sections drop, there is less material to cool. Cycle times can drop by 50% with aggressive wall-thickness reduction. Careful management of the melt-delivery system can keep runners and sprues from diminishing that cycle-time advantage. Hot runners and heated sprue bushings are often used in thin-wall molding to help minimize cycle time.

Mold material should be reviewed too. P20 steel is used extensively in conventional applications, but due to the higher pressures of thin-wall molding, molds must be built more robustly. H-13 and other tough steels add an extra degree of safety for thin-wall tools. (If possible, you will also want to select a molding material that doesn't accelerate mold wear when injected into the cavity at high speeds.)

However, robust tools cost money--possibly even 30% to 40% more than a standard mold. Yet the cost is often offset by increased productivity. In fact, the thin-wall approach is frequently used to save money on tooling. A 100% increase in productivity can mean that fewer molds need to be built, thereby saving money over the life of a program.

Here are some more tips on tool design for thin walls:

* For aggressive thin-wall applications, use steel harder than P20, especially when high wear and erosion are expected. H-13 and D-2 steels have been successful in gate inserts.

* Mold interlocks sometimes can stave off flexing and misalignment.

* Cores that telescope into the cavity can help reduce core shifting and breakage.

* Use heavier support plates (often 2 to 3 in. thick) with support pillars (typically preloaded 0.005 in.) under the cavities and sprue.

* Use more and larger ejector pins than with conventional molds to reduce pin pushing.

* Consider strategic placement of sleeve and blade knockouts.

* No. 2 diamond polish on cores and ribs can eliminate problems of part sticking. Mold surface treatments, such as nickel-PTFE can also improve part release.

* Venting is critical and can be facilitated with vented core pins and ejector pins, as well as venting along up to 30% of the parting line around the part. Vents are typically 0.0008 to 0.0012 in. deep and 0.200 to 0.0400 in. wide. While not usually necessary, some processors have sealed the parting line with an O-ring in order to pull a vacuum on the cavity for quick gas evacuation.

* With higher injection speeds, gates larger than the nominal walls help reduce material shear and gate wear and help prevent freeze-off before good packing is achieved.

* Gate inserts with a Rockwell (Rc) hardness greater than 55 are typically used to withstand high injection pressures.

* When gating directly onto a thin wall with a sprue, pinpoint, or hot-drop, use gate wells to reduce stress at the gate, aid filling, and reduce part damage when degating.

* Hot manifolds can help reduce pressure loss in runner systems, but they require at least 0.5-in.-diam. inner passages with no sharp corners or dead zones. Manifolds should have external, not internal, heaters. Valve gates, if used, must be nonrestrictive and built to take high pressure.

In addition, cooling of the cores and cavities is more critical and challenging in thin-wall applications.

Two important guidelines are:

1) Non-looping cooling lines should usually be located directly in the core and cavity blocks to help keep the mold surface temperature as consistent as possible.

2) Instead of decreasing coolant temperature to maintain the desired steel temperature, it is generally better to increase the amount of coolant flow through the tool. As a rule of thumb, the difference in temperature between the delivery coolant and return coolant should be no more than 5[degrees] to 10[degrees] F.
STANDARD VS. THIN-WALL PROCESSING

KEY FACTORS CONVENTIONAL THIN-WALL

Typical Wall, in. 0.080-0.120 0.050-0.080

Machinery Standard High-end

 Inject. Pressure, psi 9000-14,000 16,000-20,000

 Hydraulic System Standard Standard



 Control System Standard Closed-loop on
 Injection speed,
 hold pressure,
 decompression
 speed, screw rpm,
 backpressure, and
 all temperatures



Processing

 Fill Time, sec >2 1-2

 Cycle Time, sec 40-60 20-40

Tooling Standard Better venting,
 heavier
 construction,
 more ejector
 pins, better
 polish


KEY FACTORS THIN-WALL

Typical Wall, in. <0.050

Machinery Custom

 Inject. Pressure, psi 20,000-35,000

 Hydraulic System Accumulators on
 injection & clamp
 units. Servo valves.

 Control System Same as at left, with
 resolution of 0.40 in.
 on speed, 14.5 psi on
 pressure, 0.004 in. on
 position, 0.01 sec on
 time, 1 rpm on rotation,
 0.10 ton on clamp
 force, 2[degrees] F on
 temperature.

Processing

 Fill Time, sec 0.1-1

 Cycle Time, sec 6-20

Tooling Extreme venting, very
 heavy construction, mold
 interlocks, precise surface
 preparation, extensive
 ejection features, mold
 costs 30-40% higher
 than standard.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Gardner Publications, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:technique information
Comment:Secrets of successful thin-wall molding. (Injection Molding Troubleshooter).(technique information)
Author:Weiss, Kurt
Publication:Plastics Technology
Article Type:Statistical Data Included
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 1, 2002
Words:1237
Previous Article:Recycling at K 2001: New & better ways to reclaim PET. (Recycling Close-Up).
Next Article:Foamed films: Find new niches.
Topics:


Related Articles
The function of tooling in evaporative pattern molding.
New technique permits fast, ultra-thin-wall molding.
Technical service: expect more from your materials suppliers.
Where the growth is in major appliances.
Thin-wall molding.
Is metal molding in your future?
Injection molding: the next 10 years.
Multi-component injection-molding of rigid-flexible combinations.
INJECTION MOLDS.
How to injection mold cyclic olefin copolymers.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters