Printer Friendly

Schools Can Drop Rescinded Gainful Employment Rules Early.

Dr. Charlie Eaton at the University of California - Merced and Dr. Marybeth Gasman at the University of Pennsylvania were decrying intimations by the Department of Education that it intended to rescind "gainful employment" rules written to protect post-secondary students from institutions with predatory recruiting practices, subpar graduation rates, meager earnings for graduates and high levels of student loan debt.

Now, the two academics are among those lamenting the damage that they say low-income and minority students are likely to suffer as a result of the federal agency's official decision to jettison regulations put in place by the Obama administration to help police programs at for-profit, career-education and other post-secondary institutions that receive Title IV funding.

The policy change "is not smart and further disenfranchises low-income students and disproportionate numbers of students of color who attend for-profit institutions," said Gasman, the Judy & Howard Berkowitz Professor of Education and director of the Penn Center for Minority Serving Institutions at the University of Pennsylvania.

The education department, under the leadership of secretary Betsy DeVos, seems to be "neither dedicated to increasing equity nor making students' lives more supportive," Gasman added.

Eaton said he believes the rescission "will definitely have a negative impact for low-income students and other vulnerable groups, including veterans and communities of color that are often targeted by for-profit colleges."

Eaton also predicted that the departments revocation will face legal challenges and that the education department likely would lose.

The department "has not had a good track record of defending its regulatory repeals in court, so this may not stand up when challenged in court," he said.

The repeal takes effect July 1, 2020. However, if an institution opts for early implementation, it will not have to report the required 2018-19 data due Oct. 1 of this year; will not be required to comply with current rules requiring them to include the disclosure template or a link to it in their promotional materials, or directly distribute the disclosure template to prospective students; will no longer be required to post the disclosure template and may remove it and any other related disclosure postings that have been required; and will not be required to comply with the certification requirements for gainful-employment programs listed under the applicable rules section.

Eaton said enrollment declines occurred at many for-profit schools following introduction of the rules, and he predicted that enrollment would begin to rise now that the rules have been revoked.

The education departments rationale was that the rules placed an onerous reporting burden on institutions which, in turn, increased costs to students. The department, which has argued that more competition in education will promote better quality and ultimately benefit students, also contended that the regulations were biased against for-profit schools, which disproportionately serve minority and low-income students.

Although there was bipartisan support in Congress for rules to enhance accountability of institutions when high student debt and default rates thrust for-profit schools under a microscope a decade ago, lawmakers failed to pass legislation and Obama's White House went around them and issued the gainfulemployment rules. Schools risked losing their federal funding if they continually produced graduates and dropouts with high debt loads and no gainful employment to show for their schooling.

Others slammed the gainful-employment rule repeal, with several student and higher ed advocacy groups issuing statements.

In a statement for The Education Trust, senior vice president for partnership and engagement Denise Forte noted that the rules were put in place "to protect hundreds of thousands of students--often students of color, veterans, and students from low-income backgrounds--from predatory career-education programs that leave them with crushing debt and no degree, or with crushing debt and a worthless credential."

She said eliminating the rules constitutes an attack on students the education department is supposed to be protecting and will allow predatory programs to "continue to access billions of federal dollars while harming students financially and leaving many with an empty promise of higher education."

"The need for a college degree has never been clearer," Forte added, "yet this administration continues to put students at risk by leaving them exposed to bad actors."

Soncia Coleman, senior director of program for Young Invincibles, issued a statement saying that the rules revocation places "the interests of predatory, for-profit colleges over hard-working students and taxpayers" and "allows bad-acting schools to flourish with no accountability to its students or the taxpayers."

Rather than empowering schools "to give today's students the knowledge and skills they need to achieve financial security," she said, the education department is showing that it "cares more about predatory, for-profit colleges than it does about protecting the students, families, taxpayers and responsible schools that this rule helped."

In fact, the action will allow about $5 billion in federal financial aid to go to schools that have failed to meet standards and otherwise would close, Rep. Bobby Scott, chair of the House Committee on Education & Labor, said in a statement.

Now, Scott said, it is urgent that Congress pass "a comprehensive reauthorization of the Higher Education Act that protects students and taxpayers from low-quality for-profit schools."

BY LAMONT JONES JR.
COPYRIGHT 2019 Cox, Matthews & Associates
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2019 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:noteworthynews
Author:Jones, Lamont, Jr.
Publication:Diverse Issues in Higher Education
Date:Jul 25, 2019
Words:849
Previous Article:Higher Ed Civil Rights Coalition Releases Equity Prescription.
Next Article:Historian's Book Details the Battle of Negro Fort.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters