Printer Friendly

Scalia: `God's Justice'? (Editorials).

During his tenure on the Supreme Court, Antonin Scalia has made no secret of his views on church-state issues. From government-sponsored prayer to public funding of religious schools, he has consistently shown he has little use for the First Amendment's separation of church and state.

Scalia, however, was in rare form in the May 2002 issue of First Things, a conservative Catholic journal about religion in America. In an essay titled, "God's Justice and Ours," Scalia explains why he feels compelled to support the death penalty despite his church's opposition to the practice. One section of the piece was particularly noteworthy because it perfectly captured the logic Scalia uses to justify his utter disregard for government neutrality towards religion.

Scalia was explaining his worldview about how a government acquires moral authority and why the nation-state can permissibly kill its own citizens. He concluded that government is an instrument of God and an institution that operates with "divine authority behind" it. He went on to write that people of faith should fight "as effectively as possible" any effort to "obscure" our government's religious underpinnings.

To be sure, many religious leaders and institutions maintain that the government is an entity used by God to further just causes. If Scalia accepts this view as a devout believer, which he unquestionably is, that is no one's business but his.

The problem, however, is that Scalia is one-ninth of this country's highest judicial body. He has unique responsibilities that demand strict neutrality and objectivity. While Scalia can believe whatever he wants about issues of faith, he may not use religion as the basis for judicial rulings. In short, he swore on the Bible to uphold the Constitution, not the other way around.

As his First Things essay makes clear, Scalia has abandoned any pretense about keeping a healthy distance between the institutions of religion and government. He has consciously and intentionally turned his back on the framework set up by the Founding Fathers, which created a secular government based on a secular Constitution adopted by "we the people." Our laws were not created to enforce a divine authority, but according to the Constitution, to "form a more perfect union."

The First Things article is all the more alarming because President George W. Bush has named Scalia as a model for the ideal justice. In fact, during the 2000 presidential campaign, Bush repeatedly said he would appoint judges such as Scalia to the Supreme Court if given the opportunity.

When a vacancy occurs on the high court, those of us who favor religious liberty must be ready to examine the Bush nominee's church-state views carefully.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Americans United for Separation of Church and State
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Antonin Scalia
Publication:Church & State
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Sep 1, 2002
Previous Article:Religious school vouchers: subsidizing division. (Editorials).
Next Article:Members of Congress push amendments to keep `under God' in pledge. (People & Events).

Related Articles
Scalia's chutzpah, Clinton's veto.
Louisiana School's Evolution Disclaimer Fails At High Court.
Church-state rulings have gone too far, Scalia tells Va. crowd. (People & Events).
Advice and consent: Scalia says yes, but Rummy is reluctant.
One nation indivisible? 'Under God' case at Supreme Court tests nation's commitment to church-state separation, religious pluralism.
Justices will hear pledge case.
Scalia escalates attacks on church-state separation at New York conference.
Attack of the clones: President Bush and his Religious Right allies want to stack the Supreme Court with right-wing ideologues.
Nine justices, Ten Commandments, 2 important cases: church-state separation hangs in the balance as the Supreme Court debates Decalogue displays.
Of commandments and the constitution: thou shalt respect diversity.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters