Sawmill Chemicals and Carcinogenesis.
Not only are workers in the sawmill and other wood industries exposed to a variety of natural chemicals, fungi, and, bacteria in raw barks and woods, they are also exposed routinely to myriad and combinations of synthetic chemicals used in these wood and wood-related enterprises. As an example, in a paper on sawmill workers occupationally exposed to chlorophenate fungicides (1), no particular mention was made of experimental carcinogenicity studies of several chemicals that have been found to be pervasive in sawmill wood-working environs and the wood preservatives industry. Among many chemicals, these typically include chlorophenols, likely containing dioxin contaminants; creosotes; certain flame retardants; formaldehyde; metal salts (arsenic, chromium, copper); phenol; and various pesticides and fungicides. Without a doubt, most workers in the wood industries are exposed routinely and repetitiously to both natural and synthetic chemicals, and to wood and other dusts as well.
In this commentary, I summarize carcinogenesis results for several chemicals used in the wood industry, as well as for wood dust. Findings from experimental carcinogenesis studies in animals are not only important for ascertaining or confirming carcinogenic risks to humans (2-5) but for planning and performing etiologic epidemiologic studies as well (6). After all, we know that experimental carcinogenicity data are the prime indicators of potential carcinogenic hazards to humans (7-11). We also recognize that for all human carcinogens that have been tested in animals, there is a perfect correlation (2,8,12-14), and, significantly, for nearly one-third of the known human carcinogens, positive carcinogenesis findings in animals were first identified in experimental animals and only subsequently observed in humans (15,16). This alone surely represents a failure of the public health system, and one hopes that this will happen not at all or less so in the future. Of course, for some chemicals such as drugs and pesticides, toxicology studies are done typically before widespread human exposure occurs. Yet, even for chemicals in those two categories, they are often marketed despite having positive animal carcinogenicity or other toxicology information.
Using animal and human chemical carcinogenesis data and evaluative results, certain chemicals used in the wood industry should be considered logical and potential causal sources of occupational cancers. For example, studying children whose parents work in the sawmill industry, Heacock et al. (1) found only a small, nonsignificant association of childhood cancers for offspring of male workers exposed to chlorophenol fungicides and their dioxin contaminants. Hence, their "analyses provide little evidence to support a relationship between the risk of childhood cancer and paternal occupational exposure to chlorophenate fungicides in British Columbian sawmills" (1). However, Mirabelli et al. (17) did find an association between occupational exposure to chlorophenol and the risk of nasal and nasopharyngeal cancers in U.S. men 30-60 years of age.
In 1987, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) indicated that information on the occurrence of cancer in lumber and sawmill workers was limited (18). Specifically, nasal tumors, lymphomas and leukemias, and soft-tissue sarcomas have been linked with work in the lumber and sawmill industries, but the findings were considered inconsistent (18,19). Subsequently, the data on sawmill workers and cancer have become more abundant. In contrast, most of the available cohort and case-control studies of cancer of the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses have shown increased risks associated with exposure to wood dust (20), and occupational exposures to wood dust are considered carcinogenic to humans. Moreover, employment in the furniture- and cabinet-making industry has been causally associated with nasal adenocarcinoma, as well as with an increased risk of other nasal cancers (18).
Wood dust, generated in the processing of wood for diverse uses, is a complex substance and varies considerably according to species of tree and even geography. Composed mainly of cellulose, polyoses, and lignin, wood dust may contain a variety of nonpolar organic extractives (fatty acids, resin acids, waxes, alcohols, terpenes, sterols, steryl esters, and glycerols), polar organic extractives (tannins, flavonoids, quinones, and lignans), and water-soluble extractives (carbohydrates, alkaloids, proteins, and inorganic material) (20). Various chemicals are added to wood to impart hardiness, longer life, and resistance to pests, humidity, and other means of deterioration. Some of these added agents are the subjects of this communication. As an example, within the furniture-manufacturing industry, exposure may occur not only to dusts but to solvents and formaldehyde in glues and surface coatings. Manufacture of plywood and particle board may entail exposure to formaldehyde, solvents, phenol, wood preservatives, and engine exhausts. Exposures to chemicals in industries where other wood products are manufactured vary but are considered similar to those in the furniture-manufacturing industry.
Whereas the experimental studies of wood dust are considered inadequate for evaluation of carcinogenic risk, wood dust is carcinogenic to humans, causing cancer of the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses (20-22). According to IARC, "The excess [in cancer] appears to be attributable to wood dust per se, rather than to other exposures in the workplace, since the excess was observed in various countries during different periods and among different occupational groups, and because direct exposures to other chemicals do not produce relative risks of the magnitude associated with exposure to wood dust"(20). These earlier findings have been further substantiated and provide strong support for the association between exposure to wood dust in a variety of occupations and the risk of sino-nasal adenocarcinoma, although less so for the occurrence of squamous cell carcinomas (23). Further, there is suggestive but inconclusive evidence for a causal role of occupational exposure to wood dust in cancers of the nasopharynx. Workers exposed to wood dust may have an excess risk of nasopharyngeal cancer and multiple myeloma in addition to sino-nasal cancer. Possible limitations tend to obscure relationships, rather than create false positive findings (21). Excesses of other cancers, including lung and stomach, have been reported among persons employed in wood industries or occupationally exposed to wood dust, but not as consistently or unequivocally.
In this paper, briefly presented in alphabetical order, are experimental carcinogenesis findings, with some remarks on human evidence, on several chemicals used or found in the sawmill industry: arsenic, chromated-copper-arsenate (CCA), creosotes, formaldehyde, pentachlorophenol, phenol, polychlorophenols, and tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). More details on animal studies regarding exposure levels, body weights and mortality, and incidence rates of tumors can be found in the cited references, as can the epidemiologic evidence.
Arsenic has been long known to cause cancer in humans (24,25) and has been correlated convincingly with cancers of the skin, lungs, liver, kidney, and urinary bladder (7,26,27). In laboratory animals the findings have been considered less than adequate in that few studies have been done on arsenic and arsenic compounds, specifically arsenic trioxide, a common form of human exposures (28,29).
However, the two major metabolites of arsenics, DMAA (dimethylarsinic acid) and MMAA (monomethylarsinic acid), have been evaluated, and both have been shown to cause or promote cancer in rodents (28-32). Bioassays have been reported that show DMAA (cacodylic acid), typical of organic arsenicals, induced cancer of the urinary bladder in rodents, a site concordant with that seen in humans (28), and DMAA also promoted tumors of the urinary bladder as well as of several other organs: kidney, lung, liver, skin (fibrosarcomas), and thyroid glands in rats (30-33). MMAA promoted tumors of the urinary bladder in rats (30). This clearly indicates that humans and rodents possess a similar tendency to develop shared-site tumors when exposed to arsenicals.
CCA is used worldwide for wood preservation, and it contains varying percentages of mixtures of arsenic pentoxide, chromium trioxide, and cupric oxide. Hexavalent chromium and arsenic trioxide are carcinogenic to animals and to humans (7,18,28), with chromium typically causing lung tumors and arsenic-inducing cancer in several sites (see "Arsenic"). No carcinogenicity studies on CCA per se were found, and no adequate reports on the carcinogenicity of copper or copper salts were located. Copper 8-hydroxyquinoline has been studied in animals but is considered deficient for evaluation.
Creosotes have worldwide use as wood preservatives. Creosotes contain a collection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Potential hazards come from inhalation exposures and considerable opportunity for exposures to the skin. Creosotes, creosote oils, and anthracene oils were tested for carcinogenicity in mice by skin application, producing skin tumors, including carcinomas. One of the creosotes also produced lung tumors in mice after skin application (18,34). In a number of case reports, the development of skin cancer in workers exposed to creosote is described. Cutaneous epithelioma occurred in workers handling creosotes or creosoted wood during timber treatment. A mortality analysis of workers in many occupations indicated an increased risk of scrotal cancer for creosote-exposed brickmakers (18,34-38). This, of course, was the first identified chemical-caused occupational cancer, as described in 1775 by the surgeon Sir Percival Pott that chimney sweeps developed scrotal cancer as a direct consequence of exposure to a defined "substance" (soots) in their occupation (39). Environmentally, fish exposed in a creosote-polluted harbor (40) and river (41) developed liver tumors.
World production of formaldehyde is about 15 million metric tons, and this gas is used mainly in the production of phenolic, urea, melamine, and acetal resins, which have wide use in the production of adhesives and binders in the wood, plastics, textiles, leather, and related industries (20,42). Formaldehyde is used also as an aqueous solution disinfectant (formalin), embalming fluid, and preservative in many applications, particularly by anatomists and pathologists for tissues and organs. Formaldehyde occurs naturally in most living systems and in the environment. Nonoccupational sources include vehicle emissions, building materials, food, tobacco smoke, and use as a disinfectant. Several million people are exposed occupationally to formaldehyde in industrialized countries alone. Continuous relatively high-level exposures frequently exceeding 1 mg/[m.sup.3] have been measured in particle-board mills, during the varnishing of furniture and wooden floors, in foundries, during the finishing of textiles, and in fur processing. Other exposures include formaldehyde-based glues and varnishes, solvents, wood dust, wood preservatives, and textile finishing agents (20,42).
In experimental animals, exposure to formaldehyde by inhalation causes squamous-cell carcinomas of the nasal cavities. In drinking water studies, tumors were induced in the forestomach and gastrointestinal tract, as were leukemias (20,42-44). In humans, formaldehyde has been associated with nasopharyngeal cancers, and with squamous-cell carcinoma of the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses (20,42,45-49). Further long-term occupational studies are obvious, including substantiation of cancers of the brain in anatomists and embalmers.
Pentachlorophenol (PCP), a member of the polychlorophenols chemical family, is a biocide used primarily as a wood preservative and as a herbicide, algaecide, defoliant, germicide, fungicide, and molluscicide. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of PCP were conducted by feeding diets containing a technical-grade composite or Dowicide EC-7 (a commercial grade with lower levels of contaminants) to groups of mice (50,51). Both technical PCP- and EC-7-related neoplasms were observed in three organs/systems: liver, adrenal gland medulla, and vascular endothelium (hemangiosarcomas). Results suggest that the carcinogenic responses were due almost exclusively to PCP, with possibly a minimal potentiating influence by contaminants, in particular hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (52). Two-year feed studies in rats exposed to 99% pure PCP showed increased incidences of mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis and nasal squamous cell carcinoma in male but not female rats (53,54).
Pentachlorophenol induced skin papillomas in the Tg.AC transgenic mouse model and not in p53+/- mice (55). Using the mouse cancer data (50), Reigner et al. (56) reported that risks of cancer for lifetime exposure to PCP are from 20 to 140 times greater than the acceptable extra risk ([10.sup.-6]). IARC considers that there is sufficient evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of PCP, whereas there is limited evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of combined exposures to polychlorophenols or to their sodium salts (57,58). Epidemiologic studies have shown significant associations with several types of cancer, but the most consistent findings have been for soft-tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Phenol, ranked in the top 50 chemicals produced in the United States with roughly 4-5 billion pounds, is used in the production of bisphenol A, caprolactam, phenolic resins (phenol formaldehyde), wood preservatives (PCP), chlorophenols, and several alkylphenols and xylenols (59,60). Phenol is also used in disinfectants and antiseptics. Occupational exposure to phenol has been reported during its production and use, as well as in the use of phenolic resins in the wood products industry. There is suggestive (one study) but inconsistent evidence for lung cancer risk among woodworkers exposed to phenol (60).
In male rats treated with phenol in drinking water, increased incidences of leukemia, pheochromocytomas of the adrenal gland, and c-cell carcinomas of the thyroid gland were found; however; these occurred only in the lower-dose group and not in high-dose male rats or in female rats or mice (61,62). Other than the data showing a carcinogenic effect of phenol in male rats, an explanation for these findings has not been forthcoming. Phenol has been shown to be a promoter in mouse skin exposure studies (59). Using Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells, phenol induced morphologic transformations, gene mutations at two loci (both ouabain-resistant and 6-thioguanine-resistant mutant frequencies were increased), chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, and unscheduled DNA synthesis (63). Obviously phenol is genotoxic.
Di-, tri-, tetra-, and pentachlorophenols (see PCP above) might all be used in the wood industry or are products of other chlorophenols. Exposures to chlorophenols' and their salts have occurred in their production, in the making of certain phenoxy acid herbicides, and in the wood, textile, and tannery industries (58). 2,4,5-Tri- and tetracholorphenols have not been tested adequately for carcinogenicity in animals. 2,4-Dichlorophenol, at exposures up to 10,000 ppm in the diet for 2 years, did not cause any increases in tumors in rats or mice (64). Interestingly, mononuclear cell leukemias in rats and lymphomas in mice were decreased in these studies. Conversely, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol induced mononuclear cell leukemias in male rats and liver tumors in mice (65).
Several case-control and cohort studies have shown significant associations with several types of cancer, with the most consistent findings being for soft-tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (58). A possible confounding effect of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (see below), which occur as contaminants in chlorophenols, cannot be fully excluded. In humans, controlling for estimated formaldehyde and wood dust exposure did not alter the correlation between cancer and exposure, as much of the estimated chlorophenol exposure was among machinists (17). These findings support the hypothesis that occupational exposure to chlorophenol is a risk factor for nasal and nasopharyngeal cancer, although the role of machining-related exposures warrants further assessment (17).
Dioxins are everywhere. They have been long known as being carcinogenic to laboratory animals, causing a wide range of tumors (66-69), and are now confirmed as being carcinogenic to humans (7,67-72). TCDD causes cancer in multiple species, multiple strains, both sexes, and in multiple organs and tissues (66-69). TCDD causes cancer by multiple routes, various durations of exposure, and ranges of exposure concentrations (66). Tumor responses in both animals and humans are varied and include (in decreasing order of confidence) total tumors, lung cancer, soft-tissue sarcoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, breast cancer, digestive system cancers, multiple myeloma, skin, and thyroid gland in humans; and (alphabetically) adrenal glands, hematopoietic system (lymphomas), liver, lung, mouth (tongue and hard palate), nasal turbinates (nose), skin, and thyroid gland in animals. Clearly, several dioxin-induced tumor sites are common in both humans and in animals. TCDD is another instance where the carcinogenesis findings were first identified in animals and only later in humans (15).
Certain chemicals used in the wood industry are carcinogenic to experimental animals and to humans. All of the chemicals reviewed in this commentary have been shown or reported to cause cancer. Carcinogenic organ sites are varied and are frequently the same in .animals and in humans. Working in the wood industries certainly entails excess risks of cancers, among other diseases and workplace injuries. Of course, a key to preventing occupationally and environmentally associated cancers, such as in the wood industries, is avoiding exposures to chemicals, and in particular chemicals known to cause cancer in animals or/and humans (73). In the wood industry, as I am convinced is the same in most industries and for many cancers, etiologic factors are rarely single discrete agents, but are most likely associated with combinational effects as being the causes of a majority of cancers (74). This includes not only chemical exposures but also environmental conditions, individual genetic susceptibilities, and lifestyles. Unfortunately, however, animal bioassays, epidemiology studies, risk assessments, and regulatory actions typically center on individual agents. Almost singularly, IARC evaluates occupations, workplaces, and manufacturing processes for potential cancer causation. More of these types of composite evaluations need to be done. Today more than ever, regarding chemicals and cancer, preventing or reducing cancer incidences and mortalities depends significantly and necessarily on limiting or avoiding exposure to all known occupational, environmental, and animal carcinogens (75, 76). Why would we think otherwise?
REFERENCES AND NOTES
(1.) Heacock H, Hertzman C, Demers PA, Gallagher R, Hogg RS, Teschke K, Hershler R, Bajdik CD, Dimich-Ward H, Marion SA, et al. Childhood cancer in the offspring of male sawmill workers occupationally exposed to chlorophenate fungicides. Environ Health Perspect 108:499-503 (2000).
(2.) Huff J. Value, validity, and historical development of carcinogenesis studies for predicting and confirming carcinogenic risks to humans. In: Carcinogenicity Testing, Predicting, & Interpreting Chemical Effects (Kitchin KT, ed). New York:Marcel Dekker, 1999;21-123.
(3.) Maltoni C, Soffritti M, Belpoggi F. The scientific and methodological bases of experimental studies for detecting and quantifying carcinogenic risks. Ann NY Acad Sci 895:10-26 (1999).
(4.) Huff J, Weisburger E, Fung VA. Multicomponent criteria for predicting carcinogenicity: dataset of 30 NTP chemicals. Environ Health Perspect 104(suppl 5):1105-1112 (1996).
(5.) Tomatis L, Huff J. Evolution of research on cancer etiology. In: Molecular Basis of Human Cancer (Coleman WB, Tsongalis GJ, eds). Totawa, NJ:Humana Press, in press.
(6.) Huff J, Haseman J, Rall D. Scientific concepts, value, and significance of chemical carcinogenesis studies. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 31:621-652 (1991).
(7.) NTP. 9th Report on Carcinogens. Research Triangle Park, NC:National Toxicology Program, 2000.
(8.) Huff J. Chemicals causally associated with cancers in humans and in laboratory animals: a perfect concordance. In: Carcinogenesis (Waalkes MP, Ward JM, eds). New York:Raven Press, 1994;25-37.
(9.) IARC. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum Vol 1-78 (1972-2000).
(10.) Huff J. Long-term chemical carcinogenesis bioassays predict human cancer hazards. Issues, controversies, and uncertainties. Ann NY Acad Sci 895:56-79 (1999).
(11.) Huff J. Animal and human carcinogens. Environ Health Perspect 107:A341-342 (1999).
(12.) Tomatis L, Agthe C, Bartsch H, Huff J, Montesano R, Saracci R, Walker E, Wilbourn J. Evaluation of the carcinogenicity of chemicals: a review of the Monograph Program of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (1971 to 1977). Cancer Res 38(4):877-685 (1978).
(13.) Wilbourn J, Haroun L, Heseltine E, Kaldor J, Partensky C, Vainio H. Response of experimental animals to human carcinogens: an analysis based upon the IARC Monographs programme. Carcinogenesis 7(11):1853-1863 (1986).
(14.) Tomatis L, Aitio A, Wilbourn J, Shuker L. Human carcinogens so far identified. Jpn J Cancer Res 80(9):795-807 (1989).
(15.) Huff J. Chemicals and cancer in humans: first evidence in experimental animals. Environ Health Perspect 100:201-210 (1993).
(16.) IARC. Preamble. Some antiviral and antineoplastic drugs, and other pharmaceutical agents. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 76:9-31 (2000).
(17.) Mirabelli MC, Hoppin JA, Tolbert PE, Herrick RF, Gnepp DR, Brann EA. Occupational exposure to chlorophenol and the risk of nasal and nasopharyngeal cancers among U.S. men aged 30 to 60. Am J Ind Med 37(5):532-541 (2000).
(18.) IARC. Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: an updating of IARC Monographs Volumes 1 to 42. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum Suppl 7 (1987).
(19.) IARC. Wood, leather and some associated industries. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 25 (1981).
(20.) IARC. Wood dust and formaldehyde. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 62:192 (1995).
(21.) Demers PA, Boffetta P, Kogevinas M, Blair A, Miller BA, Robinson CF, Roscoe RJ, Winter PD, Colin D, Matos E, et al. Pooled reanalysis of cancer mortality among five cohorts of workers in wood-related industries. Scand J Work Environ Health 21(3):179-190 (1995).
(22.) Demers PA, Kogevinas M, Boffetta P, Leclerc A, Luce D, Gerin M, Battista G, Belli S, Bolm-Audorf U, Brinton LA, et al. Wood dust and sing-nasal cancer: pooled reanalysis of twelve case-control studies. Am J Ind Med 28(2):151-166 (1995).
(23.) Gordon I, Boffetta P, Demers PA. A case study comparing a meta-analysis and a pooled analysis of studies of sinonasal cancer among wood workers. Epidemiology 9(5):518-524 (1998).
(24.) Hutchinson J. Arsenic and cancer. Br Med J 2:1280-1281 (1887).
(25.) Hutchinson J. On some examples of arsenic-keratosis of the skin and of arsenic-cancer. Trans Pathol Soc Lond 39:352-363 (1888).
(26.) IARC. Arsenic and arsenic compounds. In: Some Metals and Metallic Compounds. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 23:39-141 (1980).
(27.) IARC. Arsenic. In: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity: An Updating of IARC Monographs 1 to 42. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. Suppl 7:100-106 (1987).
(28.) Huff J, Chan P, Nyska A. Is the human carcinogen arsenic carcinogenic to laboratory animals? Toxicol Sci 55(1):17-23 (2000).
(29.) Chan P, Huff J. Arsenic carcinogenesis in animals and in humans: mechanistic, experimental, and epidemiological evidence. Environ Carcinog Ecotox Rev C 15:83-122 (1997).
(30.) Wanibuchi H, Wei M, Yamamoto S, Li W, Fukushima S. Carcinogenicity of an organic arsenical, dimethylarsinic acid and related arsenicals in rat urinary bladder [Abstract]. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 40:349 (1999).
(31.) Wanibuchi H, Yamamoto S, Chen H, Yoshida K, Endo G, Hod T, Fukushima S. Promoting effects of dimethylarsinic acid, on N-butyl-N-[4-hydroxybutyl]nitrosamine-induced urinary bladder carcinogenesis in rats. Carcinogenesis 17(11):2435-2439 (1996).
(32.) Wei M, Wanibuchi H, Yamamoto S, Li W, Fukushima S. Urinary bladder carcinogenicity of dimethylarsinic acid in male F344 rats. Carcinogenesis 20(9):1873-1876 (1999).
(33.) Yamamoto S, Wanibuchi H, Hod T, Yano Y, Matsui-Yuasa I, Otani S, Chen H, Yoshida K, Kuroda K, Endo G, et al. Possible carcinogenic potential of dimethylarsinic acid as assessed in rat in vivo models: a review. Mutat Res 386(3):353-361 (1997).
(34.) IARC. Polynuclear aromatic compounds, part 4, bitumens, coal-tars and derived products, shale-oils and soots. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 35:83-159 (1985).
(35.) Landrigan PJ. Health risks of creosotes. JAMA 269(10):1309 (1993).
(36.) Ostrowski SR, Wilbur S, Chou CH, Pohl HR, Stevens YW, Allred PM, Roney N, Fay M, Tylenda CA. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's 1997 priority list of hazardous substances. Latent effects--carcinogenesis, neurotoxicology, and developmental deficits in humans and animals. Toxicol Ind Health 15(7):602-644 (1999).
(37.) Holme JA, Refsnes M, Dybing E. Possible carcinogenic risk associated with production and use of creosote-treated wood [in Norwegian]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 119(18):2664-2666 (1999).
(38.) Karlehagen S, Andersen A, Ohlson CG. Cancer incidence among creosote-exposed workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 18(1):26-29 (1992).
(39.) Pott P. Cancer scroti. In: Chirurgical Observations Relative to the Cataract, the Polypus of the Nose, the Cancer of the Scrotum, the Different Kinds of Ruptures, and the Mortification of the Toes and Feet. London:T.J. Carnegy, 1775;63-68.
(40.) Malins DC, Krahn MM, Myers MS, Rhodes LD, Brown DW, Krone CA, McCain BB, Chun SL. Toxic chemicals in sediments and biota from a creosote-polluted harbor: relationships with hepatic neoplasms and other hepatic lesions in English sole (Parophrys vetulus). Carcinogenesis 6(10):1403-1469 (1985).
(41.) Vogelbein WK, Fournie JW, Van Veld PA, Huggett RJ. Hepatic neoplasms in the mummichog Fundulus heteroclitus from a creosote-contaminated site. Cancer Res 50(18):5978-5986 (1990).
(42.) ATSDR. Toxicological Profile for Formaldehyde. Atlanta GA:Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1999.
(43.) Soffritti M, Maltoni C, Maffei F, Biagi R. Formaldehyde: an experimental multipotential carcinogen. Toxicol Ind Health 5(5):699-730 (1989).
(44.) Kerns WD, Pavkov KL, Donofrio DJ, Gralla EJ, Swenberg JA. Carcinogenicity of formaldehyde in rats and mice after long-term inhalation exposure. Cancer Res 43(9):4382-4392 (1983).
(45.) Vaughan TL, Stewart PA, Teschke K, Lynch CF, Swanson GM, Lyon JL, Berwick M. Occupational exposure to formaldehyde and wood dust and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Occup Environ Med 57(6):376-384 (2000).
(46.) Hansen J, Olsen JH. Formaldehyde and cancer morbidity among male employees in Denmark. Cancer Causes Control 6(4):354-360 (1995).
(47.) Hansen J, Olsen JH. Occupational exposure to formaldehyde and risk of cancer [in Danish]. Ugeskr Laeger 158(29):4191-4194 (1996).
(48.) Wilbourn J, Heseltine E, Moller H. IARC evaluates wood dust and formaldehyde. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Scand J Work Environ Health 21 (3):229-232 (1995).
(49.) Nelson N, Levine RJ, Albert RE, Blair AE, Griesemer RA, Landrigan P J, Stayner LT, Swenberg JA. Contribution of formaldehyde to respiratory cancer. Environ Health Perspect 70:23-35 (1986).
(50.) NTP. Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Two Pentachlorophenol Technical-Grade Mixtures (CAS No. 87-86-5) in B6C3F1 Mice (Feed Studies). TR-349. Research Triangle Park, NC:National Toxicology Program, 1989.
(51.) McConnell EE, Huff JE, Hejtmancik M, Peters AC, Persing R. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of two grades of pentachlorophenol in B6C3F1 mice. Fundam Appl Toxicol 17(3):519-532 (1991).
(52.) Zeise L, Huff J, Salmon AG, Hooper NK. Human risks from 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins. Adv Mod Environ Toxicol 17:293-342 (1990).
(53.) NTP. Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Pentachtorophenol (CAS NO. 87-86-5)in F344/N Rats (Feed Studies). TR 483. Research Triangle Park, NC:National Toxicology Program, 1989.
(54.) Chhabra RS, Maronpot RM, Bucher JR, Haseman JK, Toft JD, Hejtmancik MR. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of pentachlorophenol in rats. Toxicol Sci 48(1):14-20 (1999).
(55.) Spalding JW, French JE, Stasiewicz S, Furedi-Machacek M, Conner F, Tice RR, Tennant RW. Responses of transgenic mouse lines p53(+/-) and Tg.AC to agents tested in conventional carcinogenicity bioassays. Toxicol Sci 53(2):213-223 (2000).
(56.) Reigner BG, Bois FY, Tozer TN. Pentachlorophenol carcinogenicity: extrapolation of risk from mice to humans. Hum Exp Toxicol 12(3):215-225 (1993).
(57.) IARC. Pentachlorophenol. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Hum 53:371-402 (1991).
(58.) IARC. Polychlorophenols and their sodium salts. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 71 Pt 2:769-816 (1999).
(59.) ATSDR. Toxicological profile for phenol. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1998.
(60.) IARC. Phenol. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 71 Pt 2:749-768 (1999).
(61.) NCI. Bioassay of Phenol for Possible Carcinogenicity (CAS No.108-95-2). TR-203. Bethesda, MD:National Cancer Institute, 1980.
(62.) Huff J. Carcinogenesis results on seven amines, two phenols, and one diisocyanate used in plastics and synthetic elastomers. Prog Clin Biol Res141:347-363 (1984).
(63.) Tsutsui T, Hayashi N, Maizumi H, Huff J, Barrett JC. Benzene-, catechol-, hydroquinone- and phenol-induced cell transformation, gene mutations, chromosome aberrations, aneuploidy, sister chromatid exchanges and unscheduled DNA synthesis in Syrian hamster embryo cells. Murat Res 373(1):113-23 (1997).
(64.) NTP. Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of 2,4-Dichlorophenol (CAS No. 120-83-2)in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Feed Studies). TR 353. Research Triangle Park, NC:National Toxicology Program, 1989.
(65.) NCI. Bioassay of 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol for Possible Carcinogenicity (CAS No. 88-06-2). TR-155. Bethesda, MD:National Cancer Institute, 1979.
(66.) Huff J. Dioxins and mammalian carcinogenesis. In: Dioxins and Health (Schecter A, ed). New York:Plenum Press, 1994;389-407.
(67.) IARC working group on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: polychlorinated dibenzo-para-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 69:1-631 (1997).
(68.) Huff J, Lucier G, Tritscher A. Carcinogenicity of TCDD: experimental, mechanistic, and epidemiologic evidence. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 34:343-372 (1994).
(69.) McGregor DB, Partensky C, Wilbourn J, Rice JM. An IARC evaluation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans as risk factors in human carcinogenesis. Environ Health Perspect 106(suppl 2):755-760 (1998).
(70.) Kogevinas M, Becher H, Benn T, Bertazzi PA, Boffetta P, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Coggon D, Colin D, Flesch-Janys D, Fingerhut M, et al. Cancer mortality in workers exposed to phenoxy herbicides, chlorophenols, and dioxins. An expanded and updated international cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 145(12):1061-1075 (1997).
(71.) Kogevinas M. Carcinogenicity of dioxins. Lancet 354(9176):429-433 (1999).
(72.) Kogevinas M. Human health effects of dioxins: cancer, reproductive and endocrine system effects. Hum Reprod (in press).
(73.) Tomatis L, Huff J, Hertz-Picciotto I, Sandier DP, Bucher J, Boffetta P, Axelson O, Blair A, Taylor J, Stayner L, Barrett JC. Avoided and avoidable risks of cancer. Carcinogenesis 18(1):97-105 (1997).
(74.) Wolf J, Schmezer P, Fengel D, Schroeder HG, Scheithauer H, Woeste P. The role of combination effects on the etiology of malignant nasal tumours in the wood-working industry. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 535:1-16 (1998).
(75.) Tomatis L Etiologic evidence and primary prevention of cancer. Drug Metab Rev 32(2):129-137 (2000).
(76.) Tomatis L, Melnick RL, Haseman JK, Barrett JC, Huff J. Alleged "misconceptions" distort perceptions of environmental cancer risks. FASEB J 15(1):195-203 (2001).
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
Address correspondence to J. Huff, NIEHS, PO Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA. Telephone: (919) 541-3780. Fax: (919) 541-5002. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
I thank J. Bucher and S. Masten for reading and reviewing this paper and for their valuable comments.
Received 5 September 2000; accepted 13 October 2000.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Environmental Health Perspectives|
|Date:||Mar 1, 2001|
|Previous Article:||Solutions to Health Care Waste: Life-Cycle Thinking and "Green" Purchasing.|
|Next Article:||Metabolites of Pyrethroid Insecticides in Urine Specimens: Current Exposure in an Urban Population in Germany.|