Printer Friendly

Sanskrit sardigrdi-.

IT IS A GREAT PLEASURE to offer in honor of my good friend Stanley Insler the following modest contribution towards elucidating the prehistory of an obscure Sanskrit lexeme. The first appearance of sardigrdi- is in the (in)famous passage of the Asvamedha Ritual where various participants recite verses with very explicit sexual content while the queen has intercourse under a blanket with the just-suffocated stallion. (1) Until recently, all that was known about our word was that it refers to some part of the female sexual organs.

Rahul Peter Das has now shown in a 1998 article that sardigrdi- (also with later variants sardagrdi- and sardigrda-) surely refers specifically to the portio vaginalis of the uterus. (2) He does not discuss a possible etymology for the word, but he offers one crucial observation that helps direct the search for a source: he cites evidence (1998: 305) that in both Indian and Western medical tradition the portio vaginalis is often regarded as a penis within the vagina. This fact first of all strongly supports the suggestion of Hoffmann (1975-76: 570 (2)), cited by Das, that the second part of the word is to be identified with Vedic grda- 'penis'. (3) It furthermore suggests that sardi-grdi- is an ordinary determinative compound *'vagina-penis', 'penis of/in the vagina'. We are thus led to a preform *sarda/i- *'vagina'.

To my knowledge, no one has suggested any PIE source for this first element of our compound, but I believe there are comparanda available. First, there is the West Germanic strong verb *serdan 'futuere', attested in Old Norse seroa (with a metathesized variant streoa) and Middle High German serten. (4) As per Seebold (1970: 396), the Germanic stem points to a PIE *serdh-. The adduction of Welsh serth 'ribald, obscene' (Pokorny 1959: 911; Johannesson 1956: 788; de Vries 1961: 470; et al.) is false, and there is thus no basis for supposing a preform *sert- and generalization of a Verner variant in Germanic. (5)

Two difficulties stand in the way of the comparison of Sanskrit *sarda/i- *'vagina' with Germanic *serdan, one phonological and one semantic. The first, the discrepancy between the voiced stop of Sanskrit *sarda/i- and the voiced aspirate presupposed by Germanic *serda-, is not a serious obstacle to connecting the two. Such variation in the quality of root-final "enlargements" is not unusual. Even if one eliminates the more questionable material cited by Pokorny (1959: 1011ff.), it is in my view difficult to disassociate Germanic *step- < PIE *steb- seen in English 'stop (up)' from the *stebh- that appears in Sanskrit stabhnati 'block, prop up', or to separate *werg-and *wergh- 'turn' (Pokorny 1959: 1154). Compare further the doublets *dheub- ~ *dheubh- and *streb- ~ *strebh- cited in Watkins (2000), among others.

As for the semantic development, I cannot cite a direct parallel for derivation of a noun for 'vagina' from a verbal root referring to sexual intercourse. I do not regard this absence as particularly grave, given the relative dearth of reference works that offer full access to this extensive area of the lexicon. Such a derivation is in any case typologically unremarkable. While concretization of action nouns often leads to result nouns, it is also common enough for such nouns to refer to the patient (person or thing) upon which the action is performed, not the product of the action. From Sanskrit a-stem action nouns one may cite ksaya- 'dwelling-place' or vara-'choice' (in the sense of the person or thing chosen). Such a development is normal with what one may term "experiential" verbs: Grk. [LANGUAGE NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] 'food', [LANGUAGE NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] 'drink', [LANGUAGE NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] 'sight (thing seen)' (likewise the last two English glosses). The English noun 'lay' in the sexual sense refers not only to the act of intercourse, but also to the person who is 'laid'. Sanskrit *sarda/i *vagina' may thus also be etymologically the recipient of the act of intercourse.

A notoriously wide range of verbs may be used for the sex act in colloquial speech or slang, and a similar origin seems likely for *setd(h)-. Besides Old Norse seora and saro cited above, there is also saroa, attested since the eighteenth century with the meanings 'polish, finish; touch, handle' (Johannesson 1956: 788). This stem is in all likelihood an Old Norse innovation based on the productive pattern seen in sets like ON hverfa 'turn (intr.); disappear' beside hvarfa 'wander' and hvarf 'disappearance'. (6) Nevertheless, Johannesson's connection of saroa with seroa is quite plausible, and the attested meaning 'polish' of the former suggests that the meaning 'have sexual intercourse' of the latter is derived from an original sense *'rub, scrape'. (7)

Parallels for such a semantic development are easy to find. German uses (aus)raspeln, rubbeln, and (ein)reiben for sexual intercourse (see Borneman 1971). Compare also Italian fregare (see Battaglia 1970: 328, also on fregagnolo) and French (se) ft-otter (see Robert 1985: 744f.). While the supposed shift in meaning is trivial, one would admittedly like to have rather better evidence for a *serd(h)- *'rub, scrape' than the very late-attested ON saroa.

Fortunately, such is available--in Hittite. There we have a verb sart-, whose original inflection is that of an athernatic hi-verb (pres. 3rd sg. sartai, pret. 3rd pl. sarter). We find also innovative stems sarta(i). and sartiya- (mi-conjugation). (8) The verb is poorly attested, and the few available contexts are not always complete, but the basic sense is reasonably clear. In the Old Hittite ritual text Kilo 17.43 i 14 (an Old Hittite manuscript), one functionary performs the action of sart- on the feet of others: ([LANGUAGE NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII])-as [LANGUAGE NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]ALAM.ZU-an GIR.HI. A=SUNU serhit sartai "The 'bear-man' s.'s the feet of the 'acrobats' with (a) setha." As per Neu (1981: 161 and [165.sup.484], an approximate sense 'wipe' is suggested by the parallel with KBo 21.98 ii 7-8: [LANGUAGE NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII][las ... -a]n serhann=a harzi n=apa purius ana[skezzi] "The set-ha-man holds [ ] and (a) setha, and he wipes his lips." The restorations are assured by Kilo 19.163 i 22-23. Neu, loc. cit., tentatively interprets serha- as a purifying substance a nd assumes a meaning 'besmear' for sart-.

However, as noted by Burde (1974: 45), one could equally well take serha- as a scraper or similar implement and interpret sart- as 'wipe/rub off'. Either meaning would also fit the general context of katta sartaizzi's. down(ward)' in KBo 21.20 i 11, which describes a medical treatment (unfortunately the immediate context is lacking). Likewise, pending a convincing restoration of the missing noun in Kilo 3.8 ii 31-34, our verb there may likewise refer either to wiping the tongue with a substance or wiping it clean with some instrument: [LANGUAGE NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] hasawas x-x dau n=an=kan EME=SU sartaiddu EGIR-da=ma=an ISTU I.NUN iskeddu namma=an ISTU LAL-it EME=SU arha anasdu "Let the h.-woman take [ ] and s. his tongue. Afterwards, let her anoint it with butter. Then let her wipe off his tongue with honey." A sense 'wipe/smear on' does seem assured for the occurrence in VBoT 120 iii 9-10: nu=kan SA [LANGUAGE NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] I. DUG.GA ser sartiyanun "I rubbed thereupon fine oil of the palace." Likewise the name of a festival with verbal noun points to '(be)smear': 1 [LANGUAGE NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] eshar sartauwar "one festival of smearing blood" (KUB 46.2 Vo 5). A derived noun [LANGUAGE NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] '(copper)s.' is attested in KBo 22.142 iv 11 9 in a list of tools. This could be either a kind of 'scraper' or a tool used to apply some substance. (9)

A basic sense 'wipe' is also suitable for the rather different context of KUB 36.110 Vo 17-21 (an Old Hittite ms.): appaliyas=a E-[er=set] karaitti peran w[etan] karaiz lah[uw...] n=at para sartai n=a[t] aruna [ ] "But the house of the deluded one is built before the flood. The flood pours out (or is poured out) and wipes it away and [carries] it into the sea." The restorations are assured by the contrast with the previously mentioned house of the Hittite king, which is built firmly on a rock. Since the agent removing the house is water, a contextual translation 'wash away' (thus Starke 1977: 143 and 171) is quite in order. (10) The fundamental meaning, however, remains that of removal by a wiping or scraping action, with the preverb para 'forth, out' indicating the direction of movement (out into the sea).

More problematic is the contextual meaning of the remaining occurrence, in the second paragraph of the so-called Old Hittite "Palace Chronicle" (KUB 36.104 Ro 5, with restorations from the duplicates KUB 48.77,3 and KBo 12.44 i 7, all Neo-Hittite mss.): [LANGUAGE NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] sara sar[(ter)] "They s-ed up Pappa, the urianni." The context makes clear that this is an act of punishment or humiliation. Starke (1977: 143) renders literally as "'spulen' nach oben" and likewise Dardano (1997: 78 and 145) as 'sciacquare'? with an indication that the real meaning is unclear. While certainty is not possible, I believe the solution lies in assuming that the core meaning of *serd(h)- and its Hittite reflex was *'move the surface of one object obliquely against that of another'. The degree of violence and the precise angle of the contact could vary considerably. There are ample parallels for such a wide range of variability in roots of this meaning: modern German streichen generally means 'stroke, touch gently, spread, coat, whet, rub, graze against', but the noun Streich can also mean 'blow, lash'. The English cognate 'strike' is now a verb of violence, but it once had a more gentle sense, as still seen in '(to) stroke'. One can also compare Hittite s(a)lig- 'graze against' with OIrish sligid 'strikes' (but fo-slig 'smears'!) and German schleichen 'crawl, creep'. (11) French frotter 'rub', also used for sexual intercourse as noted above, was also once used to mean 'beat', a sense preserved in frotter les oreilles 'box the ears' > 'upbraid'. I tentatively suggest that Hittite sara sart- likewise refers to slapping someone about the face. The preverb reflects the fact that in such an action the motion of the hands is inevitably upward.

As already proposed by Johannesson and Magnusson, a root *serd(h)- as defined above may be related to other enlarged forms of a root *ser- whose basic sense was that of bringing one object up against the surface of another with varying degrees of violence. One may compare with them the Icelandic verb sarga 'rasp, scrape; try to cut repeatedly with a dull knife; play (a violin)' and surga 'make a rasping sound', reflecting a virtual PIE *sergh-(or possibly *serk-). (l2) As they further suggest, one should also relate Latin sarrio 'to hoe, weed' and serra 'saw', probably < *sers- (for this preform see Schrijver 1991: 493). An enlarged form *serp- furnishes the word for 'sickle' appearing in Greek [LANGUAGE NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] OCS [LANGUATE NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII], Latvian sirpis, and Latin sarp(i)o 'prune' (cf. also OHG sarf 'sharp, rough'). The enlarged root appears in Skt. Srni- 'sickle' and srni- 'elephant goad'. The root *serd(h). appearing in Hittite sart(ai)- 'rub, wipe, scrape' (possibly also 's lap, rough up') is thus not isolated but part of a quite extensive set of words for similar actions. The use of such a verb to refer to sexual intercourse is typologically so trivial that we have no way to determine whether this usage in Germanic *serdan and (indirectly) in Sanskrit *sarda/- *'vagina' is an inheritance or the result of independent innovation.

(1.) For the context of this occurrence see Jamison (1996: 65ff., esp. 68-69).

(2.) I was unable to hear the original presentation of this paper at the American Oriental Society meeting in New Orleans in April, 1998. I am grateful to Professor Das for generously sharing with me a draft of his article in advance of its publication.

(3.) I have nothing new to offer on the prehistory of grda-. Cf. Mayrhofer (1990: 494). Alexander Lubotsky (pers. comm.) points out that the succession of two plain voiced stops suggests a non-Indo-European loanword.

(4.) Asgeir Blondal Magnusson, Islensk orosifjabok (1989), also cites a noun saro (17th cent.), which he glosses with a modern Icelandic slang word for 'intercourse'. I am indebted to Guorun Thorhallsdottir for this and other references to Magnusson's work, which is not directly accessible to me. Old English seoroan is a loanword from Old Norse and thus not an independent witness, but its attested usage does confirm the evidence of the MHG verb that the particular association of ON seroa with sodomy is a secondary specialization.

(5.) The Welsh adjective serth 'discourteous, insulting, vulgar, coarse, obscene' is in all likelihood merely a specialized use of the homophonous adjective serth 'steep, sloping' (see the alternative derivation by Pokorny 1959: 1023). From a base meaning *'slanted' one can easily obtain both attested meanings (cf. German schief). In any case, the oldest attested example of serth in the 14th-century Ystorya Bown de Hamtwn has no sexual connotations and hardly means 'obscene'. There is thus no reason to suppose any direct connection between serth and sexuality. My thanks go to Stefan Schumacher for his help on this point. On Olrish serc 'love' see below.

(6.) I thank Guorun Thorhallsdottir for valuable advice on this and other aspects of the Old Norse evidence for the verbs discussed here. While there seems to be some evidence for a weak verb sertan 'futuere' in Old High German (notably in the "Pariser Gesprache"), this most likely represents a secondary weak inflection of the strong verb (thus Riecke 1996: 156), not a genuine *sard(i)ja- matching ON [LANGUAGE NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] See most recently on the forms in the "Gesprache," Gusmani (1999: 169) with references.

(7.) Magnusson (1989) (see n. 4) also suggests a connection between seroa and saroa as well as with Old Norse sarga and other more distant cognates discussed below.

(8.) Oettinger (1979: 476) suggests a hi-verb with final -i-, but as he himself points out, pret. 3rd pl. sarter argues against this, while pres. 3rd sg. sartai is ambiguous. The shift to the miverb type in -a(i)- (-aizzi, -anzi) makes far more sense if the original pattern was sartai, *sartanzi. The unusual shift of an athematic hi-verb to a stem sartiya- may be misleading. The hapax sartiyanum (VBoT 120 iii 10) may be a nonce creation based on tiyanun in the immediately preceding sentence.

(9.) I owe the last two examples to Harry Hoffner, to whom I am most grateful for generously sharing with me the lexical file on sart(ai)- of the Chicago Hittite Dictionary.

(10.) So also the CHD, 1995: 114 (which see for the sense of appaliyalla-), but with equal justification the CHD, 1980-89: 14 renders 'will dislodge', and Archi (1979: 57) opts for 'sweeps away'.

(11.) There is no justification for deriving the Olrish verbs from different roots, contra Vendryes (1974: S-133).

(12.) It is unlikely that one should, with Pokorny (1959: 911) et al., derive Olrish serc 'love' from this source. The Irish word refers very broadly to physical and spiritual love, sacred and profane. Contra Vendryes (1974: S-92), the particular meaning of Breton serch 'concubine' may easily be due to euphemism and carries no special weight. For a better alternative etymology for serc see most recently Janda (2000: 192).

REFERENCES

Archi, Alfonso. 1979. Auguri per il Labarna. In Studio Mediterranea Piero Meriggi dicata, ed. O. Carruba. Pp. 22-51. Pavia: Iuculano.

Battaglia, Salvatore. 1970. Grande Dizionario della Lingua Italiana, vol. VI. Turin: Unione Tipografica Editrice Torinese.

Borneman, Ernest. 1971. Sex in Volksmund. Hamburg: Rowohlt.

Burde, Cornelia. 1974. Hethitische medizinische Texte. Studien zu den Bogazkoy-Texten, vol. 19. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

CHD. 1980-89, 1995. The Hittite Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, volume L-N; volume P, fascicle 2, ed. Hans G. Guterbock and Harry A. Hoffner, Jr. Chicago: The Oriental Institute.

Dardano, Paola. 1997. L'anedotto e il racconto in eta antico hittita: La cosidetta "cronaca di palazzo." Rome: "II Calamo."

Das, Rahul P. 1998. Sanskrit sardigrdi- Acta Orientalia 51: 303-7.

Gusmani, Roberto. 1999. Altdeutsche Gesprache: Testo e glossario. Incontri Linguistici 22: 129-74.

Hoffmann, Karl. 1975-76. Aufsatze zur Indoiranistik, ed. Johanna Narten. Wiesbaden: Reichert.

Jamison, Stephanie. 1996. Sacrificed Wife, Sacrificer's Wife. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Janda, Michael. 2000. Review of Eros, Liebe und Zuneigung in der Indogermania, ed. Michaela Ofitsch. Kratylos 45:190-92.

Johannesson, Alexander. 1956. Islandisches Etymologisches Worterbuch. Bern: Francke.

Mayhofer, Manfred 1990. Etymologisches Worterbuch des Altindoarischen I. Band, Lfg. 7. Heidelberg: Winter.

Neu, Erich. 1981. Glossar zu den althethitischen Ritualtexten. Studien zu den Bogazkoy-Texten, vol. 26. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

Oettinger, Norbert. 1979. Die Stammbildung des hethitischen Verbums. Nurnberg: Hans Karl.

Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches Etymologisches Worterbuch. Bern: Francke.

Riecke, Jorg. 1996. Die Schwachen jan-Verben des Althochdeutschen: Ein Gliederungsversuch. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Robert, Paul. 1985. Dictionnaire alphabetique et analogique de la langue francaise. 2nd ed., by Alain Rey, vol. IV. Paris: Le Robert.

Schrijver, Peter. 1991. The Reflexes of the Proto-Indo-European Laryngeals in Latin. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Seebold, Elmar. 1970. Vergleichendes und etymologisches Worterbuch der germanischen starken Verben. The Hague: Mouton.

Starke, Frank. 1977. Die Funktionen der dimensionalen Kasus und Adverbien im Althetischen. Studien zu den Bogazkoy-Texten, vol. 23. Wieshaden: Harrassowitz

Vendryes, Joseph. 1974. Lexique etymologique de l'irlandais ancien. Paris: CNRS.

de Vries, Jan. 1961. Altnordisches etymologisches Worterbuch. Leiden: Brill.

Watkins, Calvert. 2000. The American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mufflin.
COPYRIGHT 2002 American Oriental Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Melchert, H. Craig
Publication:The Journal of the American Oriental Society
Geographic Code:9INDI
Date:Apr 1, 2002
Words:2958
Previous Article:The Indo-Iranian word for 'shank, shin'.
Next Article:Nilakantha Caturdhara's Mantrakasikhanda.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |