Printer Friendly

Salovum egg yolk containing antisecretory factor as an adjunct therapy in severe cholera in adult males: a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION

Vibrio cholerae is the enteric bacterial pathogen that causes cholera. The disease can often be very severe characterized by frequent passage of voluminous watery stools and vomiting leading to severe dehydration and, if not efficiently treated, might result in death; the rates can be as high as 50-80% (1). Prevention of dehydration, rehydration using appropriate oral or intravenous fluids, and the use of an effective antimicrobial agent, along with continued feeding, are important in the case-management strategy of cholera (2,3). Since cholera involves stimulation of secretory process in response to cholera toxin produced by V. cholerae, efforts to identify and test potential antisecretory agents to reduce the severity of diarrhoea are ongoing. Most of these agents assessed so far have no or minimal effect (4-15). Until now, none of the antisecretory agents has been recommended for the clinical management of cholera patients.

As possible antisecretory agents, some endogenous factors have recently drawn the attention of researchers. Antisecretory factor (AF), a naturally-occurring protein, is produced in the brain and in the secretory organs, such as gallbladder, lungs, kidneys, and the intestine, in response to infection (16-20). AF is also secreted in blood, bile, and breastmilk in response to intestinal enterotoxin challenge (21), and the content in sows' milk is probably crucial for protection against neonatal diarrhoea in suckling piglets (22). It has also been found that carbohydrates and amino acids of specially-processed cereals are also able to induce secretion of AF or AF-like proteins (23,24), which might be useful for therapeutic applications. Preclinical animal studies have shown that AF can have both prophylactic and therapeutic applications in the treatment of various types of diarrhoea (25-29). Results of human studies also demonstrated that AF possesses strong anti-inflammatory properties (30-32).

The Salovum egg yolk powder contains antisecretory-like proteins in a much higher (500 times) concentration than found in normal hen eggs. This is achieved by feeding hens with specially-processed cereals, capable of inducing production of antisecretory-like proteins in the yolk, from which an egg powder is produced (33,34). In view of its apparent antisecretory and anti-inflammatory effects, AF could be therapeutically useful in diarrhoeal diseases of various aetiologies. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of salovum egg yolk powder containing AF in the management of adult male cholera patients

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This open, controlled (pilot study) clinical trial was conducted among 40 adult patients to evaluate the effect of AF-rich Salovum egg yolk powder as an adjunct therapy in the management of severe cholera. The study patients were selected from among those attending the Dhaka Hospital of icddr,b from June to December 2005. The Ethics Review Committee of icddr,b approved the protocol. Adult male patients who attended the Dhaka Hospital for treatment were screened for eligibility. All patients aged 18-55 years with a history of watery diarrhoea of <24 hours and signs of severe dehydration and initial stool dark-field microscopy positive for V. cholerae were eligible for participation in the study. Patients with a history of chronic diarrhoea, dysentery, receiving antimicrobial or antidiarrhoeal drugs within one week before admission, renal or hepatic dysfunction, known allergies to eggs, and refusal of written informed consent were excluded from the study. Upon initial screening, patients were brought to the research ward of the hospital, weighed, and placed on a cholera cot. A standard medical history, thorough physical examinations, including assessment of dehydration using the modified guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO) (35), and vital signs were recorded in pre-designed forms. Before randomization in the study, all the patients were rehydrated with intravenous (IV) fluids containing polyelectrolytes (Na 133, Cl 98, K 13, and acetate equivalent to 48 mmol/L of bicarbonate) at a rate of 100 mL/kg of body-weight over 4-6 hours, in addition to replacement of ongoing losses in stool and vomit.

The enrollment of patients in the study was done every day from 6 am to 2 pm when most severely-dehydrated patients attend the hospital. In total, 68 adult male patients with suspected cholera were screened at the hospital, of whom 40 were randomized to treatment (trial profile in Fig. 1). The main reasons for the exclusion of 28 patients were: 22 being V. cholerae negative by dark-field microscopy and six refused to provide consent to participate in the study.

Randomization

Eligible patients who fully rehydrated within 4-6 hours were randomized in equal numbers to receive: (a) AF (2 sachets of Salovum egg yolk powder--2 g each, i.e. total 4 g, were dissolved in 100 mL of oral rehydration salt solution (ORS) and fed orally every two hours during the first 24 hours and then four hourly until the resolution of diarrhoea but up to a maximum of 72 hours), in addition to standard treatment (ORS, antibiotic, and usual hospital diet) or (b) the standard treatment (ORS, antibiotic, and usual hospital diet) alone. The dose decided was partly arbitrary and was based on a previous study among patients with inflammatory bowl disease; the dose used 4 g four hourly for 14 days. Since cholera is an acute severe disease, we decided frequent dosing (2 hourly) at least for 24 hours. A trained staff of icddr,b, not involved in the study, prepared the randomization list, and the name of intervention was indicated on a paper, kept inside the sealed envelopes. The sealed envelopes were kept with the pharmacists of the Dhaka Hospital as they were not involved in the study. After receiving the name, the study serial number, and the hospital number of the patient to be randomized, the pharmacist opened the sequentially-numbered sealed envelopes, starting with the lowest number and moving towards higher numbers and supplied the sachet of Salovum egg yolk powder or informed about control (standard treatment alone).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Case management

Immediately after randomization (following IV rehydration), maintenance oral rehydration therapy was started using the WHO-recommended ORS (Na 75, glucose 75, Cl 65, K 20, and citrate 10 mmol/L and osmolarity 245 mosmol/L). During maintenance, patients consumed ORS according to need, with minimum volume equal to continued loss of watery/loose stool and vomit. All the patients received capsule doxycycline (300 mg) as a single dose within 20 minutes of randomization into the study. A standard diet was provided according to the hospital practice (breakfast at 6:30 am, lunch at 12 noon, and supper at 6 pm). Plain water was allowed as desired by the patients preferably after food. IV fluid therapy was restarted in some patients where signs of severe dehydration reappeared despite appropriate ORS therapy or where excessive vomiting prevented successful oral therapy. Stool was collected in a bucket placed underneath the cholera cot. All intakes (IV fluid, ORS, and water) and outputs (stool, urine, and vomit) were measured and recorded every six hours during the study until discharge. Weight of stool was measured with an electronic scale with a precision of 1 g (Sartorius, Germany). Urine was separated in a urine collector and measured with a calibrated cylinder. Weight of vomit was measured by collection in a pre-weighed bowl by subtracting the weight of the bowl. The volume of ORS and plain water consumed by the patients was measured with a calibrated cylinder. Body-weight was measured on admission (before initiation of IV therapy), at randomization (after IV rehydration), and every six hours until discharged, using the same electronic scale.

Laboratory investigations

Fresh stool samples were examined for V. cholerae by dark-field microscopy during the initial 4-6-hour IV rehydration period. Stool samples were cultured for the isolation and identification of V. cholerae, Salmonella, and Shigella using the standard techniques at randomization. Peripheral venous blood samples were tested for haematocrit, total and differential white blood cells, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, serum sodium, potassium, chloride, and bicarbonate at randomization and after 24 hours.

All the patients were observed closely until discharge. Resolution of diarrhoea was defined if patients did not pass any stool for at least 12 hours or if they passed two consecutive normal (formed) stools. Clinical success was defined as cessation of diarrhoea within 72 hours from the start of study medication, and those with continued watery stool for more than 72 hours were considered clinical failure. Oral therapy failure was defined as reappearance of signs and/or symptoms of dehydration, requiring unscheduled IV fluid therapy. The duration (hours) of diarrhoea was calculated from the time of randomization to the last watery stool.

Analysis of data

All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS PC+ software (version 10). All the statistical tests were two-tailed, performed at 5% level of significance. The continuous variables were compared using the Student's f-test, and the categorical variables were compared with the [chi square] test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed for the duration of diarrhoea and was compared by log rank test.

RESULTS

The demographic and baseline clinical characteristics with regard to the patients' age, body-weight, duration of diarrhoea before admission, duration of vomiting, stool (g)/kg of body-weight per hour during the IV rehydration period were comparable between the groups (Table 1). There were no significant differences between the two treatments for the major outcome variables: stool output, ORS intake, and need for unscheduled IV fluids (Table 2). The mean duration of diarrhoea was also similar in both the groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (Fig. 2) also showed a similar pattern in both the groups (p=0.83, log rank test). Serum electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine were within normal limits and were similar in both the groups (data not shown). No adverse experience, such as abdominal pain, any allergic skin manifestation, etc., was noted during the study.

DISCUSSION

The results of the study demonstrated that Salovum egg yolk powder rich in AF used as an adjunct therapy as standard treatment of severe cholera failed to show any additional beneficial effect. It neither reduced the severity of illness by reducing stool output nor reduced the duration of diarrhoea. Although results of studies in animal models showed its antisecretory effect, its efficacy in patients with secretory diarrhoea due to microbial pathogens was not previously proven (25-29). The reasons why the Salovum egg yolk powder containing AF did not work cannot be explained from this study. We can assume the possible causes as: (a) degradation of the antisecretory protein while passing through the stomach to the small intestine, the main site of its action; (b) failure to work for the nature of the disease process in severe cholera where the intestinal transit time is very short and the material might have washed out before it could act; and (c) the dose of Salovum egg yolk powder used might not be adequate. Therefore, further clinical studies with larger doses might be planned in future. Recently, one study has shown the beneficial effect of Salovum egg yolk powder in terms of reducing the stool frequency and early recovery of children suffering from acute (duration of diarrhoea <7 days) and prolonged (duration of diarrhoea >7 days) noncholera watery diarrhoea (36). However, this study is not comparable with our study, especially in relation to the study subjects, aetiology, and pathophysilogy. It may be mentioned that the patients in the Salovum group had a greater frequency of stools and a higher stool volume (Table 1) during the observation period compared to the control group, although these trends were not significant. After intervention, the patients in the Salovum group had a higher stool volume on day 1, 2, and cumulative up to 72 hours and greater ORS intake on day 1 and cumulative up to 72 hours. They also had slightly longer duration of diarrhoea and an increased number of patients receiving unscheduled IV fluid compared to the control group but these trends were also not significant (Table 2). If the Salovum group did have patients who had a more severe state of cholera at baseline than the control group, this might conceal any beneficial effects of Salovum egg yolk powder.

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Conclusions

We conclude that the use of Salovum egg yolk powder containing AF apparently did not provide any additional benefit in the treatment of severe cholera in adults. Although this was found to be safe for short-term evaluation, we do not have any information on long-term adverse effects. Further studies with a larger sample-size and in different doses involving both cholera and non-cholera diarrhoea in children and adults are warranted to establish the efficacy of Salovum egg powder containing AFs.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The study was conducted with the support (Grant No. GR-00339) from Novartis Consumer Health. icddr,b acknowledges with gratitude the commitment of Novartis Consumer Health to its research efforts.

REFERENCES

(1.) Benenson AS. Cholera. In: Benenson AS, editor. Control of communicable diseases in man. 11th ed. New York, NY: American Public Health Association, 1970: 52.

(2.) World Health Organization. Programme for Diarrhoeal Diseases Control. A manual for the treatment of acute diarrhoea for use by physicians and other senior health workers. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1984. 25 p.

(3.) World Health Organization. The rational use of drugs in the management of acute diarrhoea in children. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1990. 71 p.

(4.) Holmgren J, Lange S, Lonnroth I. Reversal of cyclic AMP-mediated intestinal secretion in mice by chlorpromazine. Gastroenterology 1978;75:1103-8.

(5.) Jacoby HI, Marshall CH. Antagonism of cholera enterotoxin by anti-inflammatory agents in the rat. Nature 1972;235:163-5.

(6.) Lonnroth I, Holmgren J, Lange S. Chlorpromazine inhibits cholera toxin-induced intestinal hypersecretion. Med Biol 1977;55:126-9.

(7.) Smith PL, Field M. In vitro antisecretory effects of trifluoperazine and other neuroleptics in rabbit and human small intestine. Gastroenterology 1980;78:1545-53.

(8.) Rabbani GH, Butler T, Bardhan PK, Islam A. Reduction of fluid-loss in cholera by nicotinic acid: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1983;2:1439-42.

(9.) Islam A, Bardhan PK, Islam MR, Rahman M. A randomized double blind trial of aspirin versus placebo in cholera and non-cholera diarrhoea. Trop Geogr Med 1986;38:221-5.

(10.) Rabbani GH, Butler T. Indomethacin and chloroquine fail to inhibit fluid loss in cholera. Gastroenterology 1985;89:1035-7.

(11.) Rabbani GH, Butler T, Knight J, Sanyal SC, Alam K. Randomized controlled trial of berberine sulphate therapy for diarrhea due to enterotoxigenic Escherichia

coli and Vibrio cholerae. J Infect Dis 1987;55:979-84.

(12.) Molla AM, Gyr K, Bardhan PK, Molla A. Effect of intravenous somatostatin on stool output in diarrhea due to Vibrio cholerae. Gastroenterology 1984:87:845-7.

(13.) Farthing MJ. Introduction. Enkephalinase inhibition: a rational approach to antisecretory therapy for acute diarrhea. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999;13(Suppl 6):1-2.

(14.) Llorens C, Gacel G, Swerts JP, Pedrisot R, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Schwartz JC et al. Rational design of enkephalinase inhibitors: substrate specificity of enkephalinase studied from inhibitory potency of various dipeptides. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1980; 96:1710-6.

(15.) Rachmilewitz D, Kermeli F, Chorev M, Selinger Z. Effect of opiates on human colonic adenylate cyclase activity. Eur J Pharmacol 1983:93:163-73.

(16.) Lange S, Lonnroth I. The antisecretory factor: synthesis, anatomical and cellular distribution, and biological action in experimental and clinical studies. Int Rev Cytol 2001;210:39-75.

(17.) Lange S, Lonnroth I. Passive transfer of protection against cholera toxin in rat intestine. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1984;24:165-8.

(18.) Lonnroth I, Lange S. Inhibition of cyclic AMP-mediated intestinal hypersecretion by pituitary extracts from rats pretreated with cholera toxin. Med Biol 1984;62:290-4.

(19.) Lonnroth I, Lange S. A hormone-like protein from the pituitary gland inhibits intestinal hypersecretion induced by cholera toxin. Regul Pept Suppl 1985; 4:216-8.

(20.) Lonnroth T, Lange S. Purification and characterization of the antisecretory factor-A protein in the central nervous system and in the gut which inhibits intestinal hyper secretion induced by cholera toxin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1986;883:138-44.

(21.) Lange S, Lonnroth I. Bile and milk from cholera toxin treated rats contain a hormone-like factor which inhibits diarrhea induced by the toxin. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1986:79:270-5.

(22.) Lonnroth I, Martinsson K, Lange S. Evidence of protection against diarrhoea in suckling piglets by a hormone-like protein in the sow's milk. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 1988;35:628-35.

(23.) Lonnroth I, Lange S. Intake of monosaccharides or amino acids induces pituitary gland synthesis of proteins regulating intestinal fluid transport. Biochim Biophys Acta 1987;925:117-23.

(24.) Ulgheri C, Paganini B, Rossi F. Antisecretory factor as a potential health-promoting molecule in man and animals. Nutr Res Rev 2010:23:300-13.

(25.) Lange S, Lonnroth I, Skadhauge E. Effect of the antiseretory factors in pigs. Pflugers Arch 1987;409:328-32.

(26.) Torres J, Jennische E, Lange S, Lonnroth I. Clostridium difficile toxin A induces a specific antisecretory factor which protects against intestinal mucosal damage. Gut 1991;32:791-5.

(27.) Lange S, Lonnroth I. Palm A, Hyden H. The effect of antisecretory factor on the permeability of nerve cell membrane to chloride ion. Pflugers Arch 1987;410:648-51.

(28.) Laurenius A, Wangberg B, Lange S, Jennische E, Lundgren BK, Bosaeus I. Antisecretory factor counteracts secretory diarrhoea of endocrine origin. Clin Nutr 2003;22:549-52.

(29.) Johansson E, Jennische E, Lange S, Lonnroth I. Antisecretory factor suppresses intestinal inflammation and hypersecretion. Gut 1997;41:642-5.

(30.) Bjorck S, Bosaeus I, Ek E, Jennische E, Lonnroth I, Johansson E et al. Food induced stimulation of the antisecretory factor can improve symptoms in human inflammatory bowel disease: a sudy of a concept. Gut 2000;46:824-9.

(31.) Eriksson A, Shafazand M, Jennische E, Lange S. Effect of antisecretory factor in ulcerative colits on histological and laboratory outcome: a short period clinical trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003:38:1045-9.

(32.) Ericksson A, Shafazzand M, Jennische E, Lonnroth I, Lange S. Antisecretory factor-induced regression of Crohn's disease in a weak responder to conventional pharmacological treatment. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2003;9:398-400.

(33.) Lange S, Lonnroth I, Martinsson K. Concentrations of antisecretory factor in eggs and in chicken blood. Br Poult Sci 1994;35:615-20.

(34.) Lange S. Protein AF: Synthesis and biological effects. In: Antisecretory proteins and medical food--new options for an effective treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: summary of a symposium, the Swedish National Meeting for Gastroenterologists (Seven Gastrodagarna), 26 April 2002. Stockholm: AS-FAKTOR AB, 2002:1-4.

(35.) Alam NH, Ashraf H. Treatment of infectious diarrhoea in children. Paediatr Drugs 2003;5:151-65.

(36.) Zaman S, Mannan J, Lange S, Lonnroth I, Hanson LA. B 221, a medical food containing antisecretory factor reduces child diarrhoea: a placebo controlled trial. Acta Paediatr 2007;96:1655-9.

Dr. N.H. Alam

Clinical Sciences Division

icddr,b

GPO Box 128, Dhaka 1000

Bangladesh

Email: nhalam@icddrb.org

Nur H. Alam [1], Hasan Ashraf [1], Maryam Olesen [2], Mohammed A. Salam [1], Niklaus Gyr [3], and Remy Meier [4]

[1] icddr,b, GPO Box 128, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh, [2] Novartis Consumer Health, Bern, Switzerland, [3] University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland, and [4] Gatroenterology Department, University Hospital, Liestal, Switzerland
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of study
patients on admission

                                        Salovum egg
Variable                            (mean [+ or -] SD)
                                          (n=20)

Age (years)                         23.65 [+ or -] 4.80
Body-weight (kg) on admission       45.25 [+ or -] 5.10
Duration (hours) of diarrhoea          10 [+ or -] 5
before admission
Number of stools before admission      14 [+ or -] 9
Duration (hours) of vomiting            7 [+ or -] 4
before admission
Number of vomits before admission       8 [+ or -] 7
Number of stools during the            15 [+ or -] 9
observation period
Received IV fluids (mL/kg of
body-weight) during
the IV rehydration period             192 [+ or -] 28
Stool rate during the IV
rehydration period
(g/kg of body-weight/hour)          13.44 [+ or -] 7.68

                                           Control
Variable                             (mean [+ or -] SD)     p value
                                           (n=20)

Age (years)                          24.90 [+ or -] 6.28     0.25
Body-weight (kg) on admission        43.86 [+ or -] 4.62     0.96
Duration (hours) of diarrhoea           10 [+ or -] 5        0.88
before admission
Number of stools before admission       15 [+ or -] 8        0.57
Duration (hours) of vomiting             8 [+ or -] 5        0.26
before admission
Number of vomits before admission       10 [+ or -] 8        0.42
Number of stools during the             10 [+ or -] 7        0.42
observation period
Received IV fluids (mL/kg of
body-weight) during
the IV rehydration period              181 [+ or -] 37       0.27
Stool rate during the IV
rehydration period
(g/kg of body-weight/hour)          10.41  [+ or -]  7.55    0.60

IV=Intravenous; SD=Standard deviation

Table 2. Comparison of outcome variables of study patients

                                                   Salovum egg
Variable                                        (mean [+ or -] SD)
                                                      (n=20)

Stool weight (g) on day 1/kg of body-weight     218 [+ or -] 119
Stool weight (g) on day 2/kg of body-weight      23 [+ or -] 39
Stool weight (g) cumulative/kg of body-weight
up to 72 hours                                  245 [+ or -] 152
ORS (mL) intake on day 1/kg of body-weight      279 [+ or -] 107
ORS (mL) intake on day 2/kg of body-weight       42 [+ or -] 54
ORS (mL) intake cumulative up to 72 hours/kg    325 [+ or -] 143
Duration (hours) of diarrhoea                    33 [+ or -] 14
Number of patients received                          5 (25)
unscheduled IV fluid *
                                                     Control
Variable                                        (mean [+ or -] SD)
                                                      (n=20)

Stool weight (g) on day 1/kg of body-weight      195 [+ or -] 195
Stool weight (g) on day 2/kg of body-weight       22 [+ or -] 34
Stool weight (g) cumulative/kg of body-weight
up to 72 hours                                   218 [+ or -] 169
ORS (mL) intake on day 1/kg of body-weight       245 [+ or -] 108
ORS (mL) intake on day 2/kg of body-weight        46 [+ or -] 59
ORS (mL) intake cumulative up to 72 hours/kg     295 [+ or -] 169
Duration (hours) of diarrhoea                     32 [+ or -] 10
Number of patients received                           4 (20)
unscheduled IV fluid *

Variable                                        p value

Stool weight (g) on day 1/kg of body-weight      0.57
Stool weight (g) on day 2/kg of body-weight      0.87
Stool weight (g) cumulative/kg of body-weight
up to 72 hours                                   0.60
ORS (mL) intake on day 1/kg of body-weight       0.32
ORS (mL) intake on day 2/kg of body-weight       0.82
ORS (mL) intake cumulative up to 72 hours/kg     0.55
Duration (hours) of diarrhoea                    0.64
Number of patients received                      0.70
unscheduled IV fluid *

* Values are number (%); IV=Intravenous; ORS=Oral rehydration salt
solution; SD=Standard deviation
COPYRIGHT 2011 International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Alam, Nur H.; Ashraf, Hasan; Olesen, Maryam; Salam, Mohammed A.; Gyr, Niklaus; Meier, Remy
Publication:Journal of Health Population and Nutrition
Article Type:Report
Date:Aug 1, 2011
Words:3678
Previous Article:Hypomagnesaemia as a mortality risk factor in protein-energy malnutrition.
Next Article:Prevalence of antiretroviral drug resistance mutations and HIV-1 subtypes among newly-diagnosed drug-naive persons visiting a voluntary testing and...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters