Ruth Sidel, Unsung Heroines: Single Mothers and the American Dream.
Although the terms "deserving" and "undeserving" the poor are not frequently used today, they continue to resonate in American culture. Originally, the undeserving poor were able-bodied, unemployed men who, it was believed, should be compelled to work. Those who were deserving of compassion and public aid included the disabled, frail elderly and widows with children. During the early 20th century efforts to expand services and income benefits to these groups resulted in several state initiatives which provided means tested old-age and widows pensions. Subsequently, these programs were nationalized and the federal government assumed primary responsibility for providing cash benefits to these groups of needy people.
However, during the latter half of the 20th century, a new definition of the undeserving poor emerged. It focused on single women with children, particularly on those who had never married. The payment of income benefits to these women was frequently challenged and they were increasingly demonized in the political arena and in the media. In time, public opinion towards single mothers changed. As Ruth Sidel shows, old prejudices against illegitimacy and promiscuity were resurrected and, as larger numbers of minority women sought financial aid, racist sentiments played an increasingly important role in defining single mothers as deviants who scrounged off hard-working taxpayers and enjoyed a comfortable if not lavish lifestyle. The so-called welfare reform initiatives of the 1980s and 1990s translated these views into public policy.
Sidel directly attacks the myths underpinning current public policies towards single mothers and argues instead that these women are "unsung heroines" who seek to raise their children and make ends meet in the face of enormous challenges. Her argument is based on in-depth interviews with no less than 50 women who have been single mothers at some point in their lives. The interviews were conducted between 2001 and 2003 in New York and the women came from a variety of ethnic, class, and age backgrounds. The ethnographic portrait that Sidel presents is a moving one which provides valuable, powerful insights into the experiences of these women, their backgrounds, the difficulties they encountered, their resilience and their achievements.
In addition to reporting on her interviews in great detail, Sidel quotes extensively from the literature to support her case. She does not dismiss the role of marriage or of the need to avoid teen pregnancies but she rejects the simplistic theologies on which current public policies towards single women are based. She argues convincingly that efforts to reduce teen pregnancy and promote marriage must be linked to policies that address the fundamental problems of low income and material need that, she contends, present the greatest barrier to the realization of the American dream for these women and their children. The book offers a powerful alternative to the current orthodoxies that shaped government policy. Hopefully, its alternative imagery will influence public opinion and ultimately promote policies and programs that support rather than demonized single mothers. Sidel's extremely important book deserves to be widely read.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Book Notes|
|Publication:||Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare|
|Article Type:||Book review|
|Date:||Dec 1, 2007|
|Previous Article:||Carlos Martin Beristain, Humanitarian Aid Work: A Critical Approach.|
|Next Article:||Charles Lemert and Anthony Elliott, Deadly Worlds: The Emotional Costs of Globalization.|