Printer Friendly

Rules of court in judicial review cases to be repealed to enhance access to courts.

The Attorney-General's Chambers (Chambers) will repeal the requirement of the Rules of the Court 2012 in judicial review cases that all cause papers be served on Chambers.

Attorney-General Tommy Thomas, in a media statement, said in order to promote the development of judicial review by courts in the twin branches of public law, namely constitutional law and administrative law, the Chambers will engage with the Bar and the Rules Committee, to repeal the requirement in Order 53 Rule 3(3) of the Rules of the Court 2012.

He said pending the coming into effect of the amendment, Chambers, from henceforth, dispenses with the requirement of such service on it.

'This is particularly so when the majority of judicial review cases concern employment disputes between employers, on the one side, and trade unions or individual employees, on the other, often emanating from awards of the Industrial Court.

'Such disputes are intrinsically private in nature, and have no public element in them. For such cases, it is preferable to treat them like ordinary litigation by private parties which does not involve the government,' he said.

Thomas further said that even in the category of cases involving challenges to decisions of the Executive or statutory corporations, which necessarily would involve the public interest, service is henceforth dispensed with at the leave stage under Order 53.

'Hence, Chambers will give effect to the letter and spirit of the two stage procedure under Order 53. It is for the applicant to satisfy the Court on an ex parte basis, that the threshold, however small, has been satisfied.

'There is however one exception. In cases where Chambers will represent the respondent at the inter-partes stage, we reserve the right to appear by counsel at the leave stage. Likewise, if we are invited by the court to assist it,' he said.

The Attorney-General said Chambers also recognised the importance of promoting judicial review as a means of developing public law.

'To that end, we shall not, unless exceptional circumstances warrant it, seek costs in the event it succeeds in judicial review proceedings. Likewise, Chambers expects adverse parties and their counsel to reciprocate, so that the jurisprudence already developing in our courts that public law litigation should be 'cost free' would become an established feature of Malaysian Law,' he said.

COPYRIGHT 2018 Malay Mail Online
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Malay Mail Online (Petaling Jaya, Malaysia)
Date:Jul 23, 2018
Previous Article:New Economic Policy, New Economic Model under review for 12th Malaysia Plan, says Azmin.
Next Article:No more cart before the horse for PTPTN payment defaulters, Parliament told.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters