Printer Friendly

Right-handers' reduced brain connection.

A psychologist at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, has uncovered what appears to be a fundamental difference between the brains of right-handers and those of left- and mixed-handers. The corpus callosum--a thicket of nerve fibers that joins the right and left brain hemispheres and permits the two sides of the brain to comunicate with each other -- is about 11 percent larger in left-handed and ambidextrous people, reports Sandra F. Witelson in the Aug. 16 SCIENCE.

The finding does not demonstrate that these people have a built-in advantage over right-handers in thinking or information processing, cautions Witelson. It does imply, however, that left-handers are not "mirror images" of right-handers. "There is an actual anatomical difference in at least one brain structure," she says. "A bigger corpus callosum may have more nerve fibers. This would mean there are more connections in the brain and more possibilities for [hemispheric] intercommunication."

Previous studies, using mainly right-handers, have indicated that language and analytic functions are controlled largely by the left side of the brain, while spatial and nonverbal processes are coordinated primarily by the right side. But nonright-handers, says Witelson, may have a more even distribution of language and spatial functions that calls for more side-to-side communication along a larger corpus callosum.

This is the first time, she adds, that postmortem examinations of individuals' corpus callosa have been compared with neuropsychological tests administered while they were alive. Her sample was composed of 42 seriously ill cancer patients who agreed to undergo tests and, in the event of death, to donate their brains to the scientific endeavor. They ranged in age from 25 to 65 years at the time of death. Consistent right-handedness was found in 27 subjects, and 15 showed mixed-handedness, using combinations of left- and right-hand preference for various tasks. Consistent left-hand preference is rare, says Witelson, and was not observed in any of the subjects.

Although the mixed-handers were found to have a larger corpus callosum than consistent right-handers by about 11 percent, no size difference was found for a small section at the rear of the fiber bundle known as the splenium. There is evidence, notes Witelson, that the splenium largely transmits messages about sensory stimuli; the rest of the corpus callosum may be involved in higher-level processes that vary according to handedness.

The sex of the person, she points out, made no difference in the size of the corpus callosum.

Witelson and her co-workers are now attempting to determine whether the larger corpus callosa of mixed-handers contain a greater total number of nerve fibers, thicker axons (which transmit messages from neurons), more myelin (which coats the axons) or thicker fibers.

If more fibers do exist in the larger callosa of mixed-handers, says Witelson, the difference between hand groups may be related in part to neuron death that occurs during gestation. Recent studies indicate that there is an overproduction of brain cells in the developing fetus, she explains. By about 7 months after conception, neurons and their connecting axons are reduced as brain structure is fine-tuned. In this scenario, the 70 percent of the population that is right-handed undergoes markedly more neuronal death before birth than the mixed- and left-handed minority.

"The more fruitful question may be not what leads to more fibers in nonright-handers," observes Witelson, "but what results in fewer fibers in consistent right-handers." Everyone may start out ambidextrous, she says, but for some reason most people develop a specialization of functions in the brain hemispheres that is associated with right-handedness.

It is not known, however, whether verbal skills and other intellectual abilities are superior when localized in one brain hemisphere or shared by both hemispheres, adds Witelson.

"With this basic finding," she says, "researchers can expand the data using modern imaging technology to study the brains of living subjects."
COPYRIGHT 1985 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1985, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Bower, Bruce
Publication:Science News
Date:Aug 17, 1985
Words:630
Previous Article:Breaking the rules in crystallography.
Next Article:Sodium found in Mercury's atmosphere.
Topics:


Related Articles
A brain-damage advantage for lefties?
A 'handy' guide to primate evolution: the hands of monkeys and apes may hold clues to the riddle of human handedness and brain organization.
Left brain may serve as language director.
Sexual orientation linked to handedness.
Lefties, righties take neural sides in perceiving parts.
Winterstein rallies North.
A hopeful clue for resistant MS.
Stem cells & MS: what the investigators see.
No place like om: meditation training puts oomph into attention.
Brains, bodies, beliefs, and behavior.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters