Printer Friendly

Rickenbacker v. U.S.

U.S. District Court


Rickenbacker v. U.S., 365 F.Supp.2d 347 (E.D.N.Y. 2005). After pleading guilty to credit card fraud and being sentenced to 24 months of imprisonment, a defendant moved to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence. The district court denied the motion. The court held that defense counsel was not deficient in failing to move for a downward departure of the defendant's sentence based on perceived hardships the defendant endured while being detained prior to sentencing. According to the court, the alleged substandard conditions, consisting of being served food that the defendant believed had been accessed by rodents, and not being provided with a fully stocked library, were not conditions that rose to the level that would warrant a downward departure. The defendant had been served bread that rodents had apparently partially eaten, and in one instance a mouse had created a tunnel inside of the bread. (Nassau County Correctional Center, New York)
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:SENTENCE
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Previous Article:Castellini v. Lappin.
Next Article:U.S. v. Paige.

Related Articles
Writing to Win: The Legal Writer.
E-Prime, briefly: a lawyer's experiment with writing in E-Prime.
Miracle at sea: during World War II, flying ace Edward Rickenbacker and his crewmates crashed at sea. Their belief in God strengthened them to...
"Copy editor" nominated to U.S. Supreme Court.
Rickenbacker v. U.S.
Rickenbacker v. U.S.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters