Revision of Psammosteus livonicus Obruchev (Agnatha, Heterostraci) from the Devonian Amata regional stage of the NW of the East European Platform/Ida-Euroopa platvormi loodeosa Devoni Amata lademe louatu kala Psammosteus livonicus Obruchev (Heterostraci) taksonoomiline revisjon.
Two branchial plates and a ridge scale of a previously unknown psammosteid (Heterostraci, Pteraspidiformes) were discovered by D. Obruchev during field work at the Devonian vertebrate localities on the banks of the Daugava River upstream from Koknese, southern Latvia in 1959. The left bank exposure (outcrop 1, Fig. 1B) opposite to Pasta muiza became well-known as a result of the thorough study of the section and fauna by W. Gross (Gross 1942). Later, the new species Psammosteus livonicus Obruchev was established based on the Pasta muiza specimens, coming mostly from outcrop 1 (Obruchev & Mark-Kurik 1965, p. 238). V. Karatajute-Talimaa collected vertebrate fossils, including those belonging to P. livonicus, in this locality in 1959 and 1962 (Karatajute-Talimaa 1966). In 1963 she and E. Mark-Kurik joined L. Lyarskaya's excavations in Pasta muiza as that particular area of the Daugava River valley was threatened by flooding during the construction of the Plavinas Hydroelectric Power Plant. A dorsal plate and several branchial plates of P. livonicus were found during the field work (Mark-Kurik 1968). L. Lyarskaya, who continued to work in Pasta muiza in 1964, 1968 and 1969, collected additional branchial plates and ridge scales of P. livonicus. Today the Pasta muiza outcrop is submerged under of the Daugava River reservoir, which prevents the collection of topotype specimens. Still, there are detailed descriptions of this important, though vanished, Devonian vertebrate locality, given by Gross (1942) and particularly by L. Lyarskaya (Vorobyeva & Lyarskaya 1968; Lyarskaya 1972; see also L. Lyarskaya's stratigraphical data in Karatajute-Talimaa 1966).
The earliest known branchial plate fragment (PIN 220/527), recognized now as that of Psammosteus livonicus, was found by D. Obruchev in 1927 in the locality Milodezh, in the Leningrad Region, Russia, and was described in his DSc thesis (Obruchev 1943a) as a new species Psammolepis(?) aerata. He also assigned several other plates to this species: two fragments of a branchial plate (PIN 220/400, PIN 220/419) and a possible fragment of a scale (PIN 220/529) from the localities Milodezh and Goryni. Unfortunately, these specimens were not found later in the collections of the Borisiak Palaeontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow). For this reason they are not listed in the section 'Material' of this paper. Based on the examination of the photographs from the dissertation, it can be concluded that because of its transversely curved shape specimen PIN 220/529 may be a fragment of the Psammosteus livonicus ridge scale. Specimens PIN 220/400 and PIN 220/419 possess a different ornamentation, similar to that of Psammolepis. Obruchev did not consider it reasonable to publish Psammolepis(?) aerata in the joint monograph Obruchev & Mark-Kurik (1965), probably due to poor fossil material and unclear systematic position. However, L. B. Halstead Tarlo, visiting Moscow in 1961 and studying the plate fragment from Milodezh, assigned it without doubt to the genus Psammolepis. Later Halstead Tarlo described it as the branchial plate of 'Psammolepis aerata Obruchev, 1965 (in press)' and compared its ornamentation with that of Karelosteus weberi Obruchev, 1933 (Halstead Tarlo 1964, p. 108, 1965, p. 111).
Hence, the presence of P. livonicus in the eastern part of the Main Devonian Field (from the Andoma Hill locality) was mentioned much later (Ivanov et al. 2005). Afterwards Moloshnikov (2009) described a new genus and species Oredezhosteus kuleshovi based on fragments of branchial plates and a ridge scale from the locality of Yam-Tesovo, in the Leningrad Region. The specimens had an ornamentation characteristic of P. livonicus, but their preservation type differed from that of Pasta muiza specimens; this was probably the cause of the author's confusions. Moloshnikov also proposed to assign Psammosteus livonicus Obruchev to his new genus. Our investigation of the holotypes and originals of Psammosteus livonicus and Oredezhosteus kuleshovi permits us to assign both of these taxa to the former species and recognize the latter as its junior synonym. Moreover, the genus Oredezhosteus cannot be considered as valid due to the lack of reliable features to distinguish it from Psammosteus.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The Psammosteus livonicus specimens under study are stored in the collections of the Borisiak Palaeontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (PIN 220 and 1737), Moscow, Russia; Natural History Museum of Latvia (G 43), Riga, Latvia; Laboratory of Bedrock Geology, Nature Research Centre (GTC 1690), Vilnius, Lithuania; Institute of Geology at Tallinn University of Technology (GIT 25 and 116), Tallinn, Estonia; Palaeontological Museum of St. Petersburg State University (PM SPU 71) and Museum of the Department of Vertebrate Zoology of St. Petersburg State University (thin sections collection A.3), St. Petersburg, Russia. The material described in this paper consists of 34 specimens: a dorsal plate, 22 branchial plates, 4 ridge scales, 5 tesserae, a fragment of an undeterminate plate and 1 microcell with an isolated tubercle. A thin section has also been studied. The presence of numerous distal fragments of branchial plates is due to their higher durability and selective preservation of skeletal elements in terrigenous deposits of the Main Devonian Field.
Psammosteid genera are predominantly determined on the basis of the characters of plates and general morphology of their ornamentation, consisting of dentine tubercles on their external surfaces. However, details of the tubercles (morphology and number of radial ribs, crenulations, ramifications, microtubercles and plumose wrinkles) are species-level characters. Ornamentation can change during ontogeny or healing of mechanical injuries. Slight wear of the crowns of tubercles, which can alter the original state of ornamentation, is especially misleading in species recognition (Novitskaya 1971). Therefore, a need arose to study details of the topographic variability of ornamentation and histology of psammosteid plates for determination of their original morphology. The ornamentation of the holotype and other specimens of P. livonicus was studied in detail under the trinocular microscopes Nikon AZ100 Multizoom and Leica M125. As a result the photographs, depicting topographic variations in the ornamentation in certain parts of the plates, were obtained. A tessera and several fragments with well-preserved ornamentation were also examined under the scanning electron microscope Hitachi TM 3000 and Hitachi S-3400N. Tomographic examination of specimen PM SPU 71-4 was made by SkyScan 1172 and software CTAn and CTVol.
The views on psammosteid systematics underwent some changes during the 20th century. At first psammosteids sensu stricto (from Drepanaspis to Psammosteus) in the group Heterostraci were proposed to form the families Drepanaspidae and Psammosteidae (Traquair 1900; Brotzen 1936; Berg 1940; Obruchev 1941) or only the family Drepanaspidae (Stensio 1927), or only the family Psammosteidae (Woodward 1910; Gross 1937; Berg 1955). The families Drepanaspidae and Psammosteidae were united by several authors in the suborder Psammosteida (Kiaer 1932; Gross 1935; Halstead Tarlo 1965) and later they were assigned to the order Psammosteida (Obruchev 1964; Obruchev & Mark Kurik 1965). Psammosteids sensu stricto were also united with Tesseraspis in the order Drepanaspida (Stensio 1958; 0rvig 1961) and also with the family Obrucheviidae in the suborder Psammosteida (Tarlo 1962) or the order Psammosteiformes (Halstead 1993). However, Gross (1963) showed that the juvenile stages of primitive psammosteids of the genus Drepanaspis demonstrated recapitulations of the ancestral features, drawing them closer to pteraspids. Still, the position of psammosteids in the order Pteraspidiformes is ambiguous. Currently psammosteids are often regarded as the family Psammosteidae (Janvier 1996; Pernegre & Elliott 2008). More rarely they are assigned to the suborder Psammosteida in the order Pteraspidiformes, which includes such families as Drepanaspididae, Guerichosteidae, Pycnosteidae, Psammolepididae, Psammosteidae and Obrucheviidae (Elliott et al. 2004). The latter classification is accepted in the present paper.
The material comes largely from five localities of the Amata Regional Stage (RS) in Latvia and the NW region of Russia (Fig. 1). The Amata RS, usually 20-30 m thick (Kurss et al. 1981), is subdivided into the Staritsa and Podsnetogorskie Regional Beds (RB) in the eastern part of the Main Devonian Field (Ivanov & Lebedev 2011). There were originally two outcrops near Pasta muiza (Fig. 1B), situated on the left bank (outcrop 1) and the right bank (outcrop 2) of the Daugava River, upstream from Koknese, Latvia. Practically all material, including the holotype, comes from outcrop 1 opposite to Pasta muiza, and only a single specimen was found by D. Obruchev at outcrop 2. Therefore, it is reasonable to refer to the main locality, i.e. outcrop 1, as Pasta muiza. The deposits in this locality were represented by fine-grained sandstones intercalating with clays of the Amata RS in the lower part and dolomites of the Plavinas RS in the upper part (Gross 1942; Vorobyeva & Lyarskaya 1968). The holotype of Psammosteus livonicus and some other specimens were found in the interval between the base of white sandstones of the Amata RS and 2-2.5 m below the lower boundary of the dolomite member of the Plavinas RS. Thus, in the type locality P. livonicus has been discovered both in the lower and upper parts of the Amata RS, where this taxon occurs together with the zonal antiarch species Bothriolepis prima Gross, 1942 and B. obrutschewi Gross, 1942 (Obruchev & Mark-Kurik 1965; Vorobyeva & Lyarskaya 1968).
The localities of Borschovo, Yam-Tesovo and Milodezh are situated in the Luga District of the Leningrad Region, NW Russia. The Borschovo locality (Fig. 1C) includes some outcrops on the left bank of Lake Antonovskoe, downstream of the Oredezh River. The remains of P. livonicus were discovered in the terminal eastern outcrop 3, situated to the right of the road from Borschovo village. The deposits in this outcrop are represented by pink, yellowish-grey, reddish-brown and light blue cross-bedded medium- and fine-grained sandstones, intercalating with purple and greenish clay. Psammosteid remains, including a branchial plate and separate tubercles of P. livonicus, were found at two levels in the middle part of the outcrop, in light blue and overlying yellowish-grey sandstones of the Staritsa RB (Ivanov & Lebedev 2011). The Yam-Tesovo locality encompasses a series of outcrops, situated close to each other on the left bank of Lake Pristanskoe. They are exposed in the upper part of the bank slope. The deposits of the section are represented by reddish-brown, more rarely light grey cross-bedded fine- and medium-grained sandstones with intercalations of purple and greenish clays and clay pebbles. Psammosteids, including P. livonicus, occur in reddish-brown sandstones of the upper part of the section, corresponding to the Staritsa RB (Hekker & Philippova 1935; Ivanov & Lebedev 2011).
The Milodezh locality (Fig. 1C) is a long cliff on the right bank of the Oredezh River near the village of the same name. This Staritsa RB outcrop is composed of reddish-brown cross-bedded fine- and medium-grained sandstones (Hekker & Philippova 1935); vertebrate fossils, presumably psammosteids, come from about the middle part of the section. The presence of the Podsnetogorskie RB here is not confirmed yet.
The locality on Andoma Hill is situated on the southeastern bank of Lake Onega in the Vytegra District of the Vologda Region (Fig. 1D). This section is a cliff, a couple of kilometres long. Specimens of P. livonicus occur in the upper part of the outcrop N-2 at Gnevashevskaya village, in the layer AG 1-2. This layer is composed of variegated fine and very fine poorly cemented sandstones and sands, intercalating with thin layers of silty clay and siltstone. These deposits are assigned to the Andoma Formation, which is correlated with the Amata-Plavinas interval (Luksevics et al. 2012; Glinskiy & Ivanov 2015).
The position of the boundary between the Middle and Upper Devonian in the Main Devonian Field is still ambiguous. Three boundary positions have been proposed: at the base of the Amata RS, in the Amata RS (at the base of the Podsnetogorskie RB) and at the base of the Snetnaya Gora RB of the Plavinas RS (Esin et al. 2000; Mark-Kurik & Poldvere 2012). The first position is accepted in the current research. Thus the Amata RS is assigned here to the Frasnian Stage.
Subclass HETEROSTRACI Lankester, 1868
Order PTERASPIDIFORMES Berg, 1940
Suborder PSAMMOSTEIDA Kiaer, 1932
Family PSAMMOSTEIDAE Traquair, 1896
Genus Psammosteus Agassiz, 1844
1840 Placosteus Agassiz, p. 33 (nomen nudum) (pars).
1844 Psammosteus Agassiz, p. 103 (pars); 1947 Obruchev, pp. 517-518; 1964 Obruchev, p. 74; 1965 Halstead Tarlo, pp. 114-115; 1965 Obruchev & Mark-Kurik, pp. 215-219; 2004 Novitskaya, p. 189.
1844 Ctenacanthus Agassiz, p. 119 (pars).
1911 Dyptychosteus Preobrazhensky, p. 33.
1924 Asterolepis(l) Weber, p. 135.
1943 Yoglinia Obruchev, p. 41; 1965 Halstead Tarlo, pp. 93-95.
1965 Psammolepis Halstead Tarlo, p. 111 (pars).
1964 Crenosteus Halstead Tarlo, p. 117; 1965 Halstead Tarlo, p. 141.
2009 Oredezhosteus Moloshnikov, pp. 197, 199.
Type species. Psammosteus maeandrinus Agassiz, 1844.
Diagnosis. The dorsal plate is entirely covered with cyclomorial tesserae characterized by concentric type of growth. The ventral plate is elongated, without posterior notch and covered with tesserae. The branchial plates are stenobasal, transversely elongated, flattened. Their distal part bears ornamentation, the proximal part of the ventral side is covered with elongated tesserae, which are usually detached in fossils. Dentine tubercles are of various shapes, their structure can be complicated partly due to lengthening or branching of marginal crenulations. In some places tubercles fuse into ridges, especially on the branchial plates.
Species composition. Psammosteus asper Obruchev, 1965; P. bergi (Obruchev, 1943); P. bystrowi Obruchev, 1965; P. cuneatus Obruchev, 1965; P. falcatus Gross, 1942; P. kiaeri Halstead Tarlo, 1964; P. levis Obruchev, 1965; P. livonicus Obruchev, 1965; P. maeandrinus Agassiz, 1844; P. megalopteryx (Trautschold, 1880); P. pectinatus Obruchev, 1965; P. praecursor Obruchev, 1947; P. tchernovi Obruchev, 1965; P. tenuis Obruchev, 1965.
Remark. The genus Oredezhosteus Moloshnikov is included in the genus Psammosteus on the basis of stenobasal branchial plates and cyclomorial tesserae.
Psammosteus livonicus Obruchev, 1965 Figures 2-8
1965 Psammosteus livonicus Obruchev in Obruchev & Mark-Kurik, p. 238, pl. 94, figs 1, 2; 1965 Novitskaya, pp. 275-277, fig. 221; 1968 MarkKurik, pp. 420-421, fig. 11A; 1968 Obruchev & Mark-Kurik, p. 280, fig. 1, 3D; 2004 Novitskaya, p. 191; 2005 Elliott & Mark-Kurik, pp. 101, 103, fig. 4F.
1965 Psammolepis aerata Obruchev in Halstead Tarlo, p. 111, pl. 19, fig. 9.
2009 Oredezhosteus livonicus Moloshnikov, p. 199, fig. 1a.
2009 Oredezhosteus kuleshovi Moloshnikov, p. 200, fig. 1b, c; pl. 13, figs 1-5.
Holotype. PIN 1737/7, right branchial plate (Obruchev & Mark-Kurik 1965, pl. 94, figs 1, 2), Latvia, left bank of the Daugava River, Pasta muiza, outcrop 1; Upper Devonian, Frasnian, Amata RS.
Material. Left branchial plates: GTC 1690-2, GTC 1690-3, GTC 1690-6, GIT 116-272, GIT 116-275, PIN 1737/8, Pasta muiza; PM SPU 71-1, Borschovo. Right branchial plates: GTC 1690-1, GTC 1690-4, GTC 1690-5, G 43-251, G 43-252, G 43-261, GIT 116-273, GIT 116-288, PIN 1737/7, Pasta muiza; PIN 1737/74, Yam-Tesovo. Small fragments of branchial plates: G 43-278, Pasta muiza; PIN 220/527, PM SPU 71-3, Milodezh; PIN 1737/75, Yam-Tesovo; PM SPU 71-6, Andoma Hill, outcrop N-2. Dorsal plate GIT 25-12, Pasta muiza. Ridge scales: G 43-285, G 43-304, PIN 1737/9, Pasta muiza; PIN 1737/76, Yam-Tesovo. Fragment of undetermined plate PM SPU 71-4, Yam-Tesovo. Tesserae: GIT 116-327, GIT 116-328, Pasta muiza, PM SPU 71-5, Yam-Tesovo, PM SPU 71-7, PM SPU 71-8 Andoma Hill, outcrop N-2. Isolated tubercle PM SPU 71-2, Borschovo. Thin section across of branchial plate: A.3-1, Pasta muiza. Remark: all Pasta muiza specimens come from outcrop 1, except ridge scale PIN 1737/9 which comes from outcrop 2.
Occurrence. Amata RS, Frasnian, Upper Devonian, Bothriolepis prima-B. obrutschewi Zone, Latvia, Russia.
Diagnosis. Ornamentation consists of large, domeshaped, less often cone- and peak-shaped dentine tubercles (up to 2 mm in diameter, on average 0.7-1.5 mm), whose relative position is mostly regular. Rounded (including oval) tubercle bases are dominant, angular halberd- and fan-shaped bases are less common. Sharp radial ribs of tubercles start from the top of the crown, more rarely lower (in the case of high and abraded tubercles); some ribs can diverge into several branches. At the bases of the tubercles ribs pass into marginal crenulations (usually 13-24). The crenulations vary in length and thickness; their tips are truncated. The tips can diverge into two, less often three or rarely four branches (ramifications). Radial ribs, crenulations and their ramifications bear microtubercles (usually 5-7). On the branchial plates two, more rarely three tubercles can fuse into short ridges, which are arranged either transversely or longitudinally (along the margins of branchial plates).
1. General morphology. Dorsal plate GIT 25-12 is generally oval, with a truncated anterior margin and anteriorly concave lateral margins (Mark-Kurik 1968, fig. 11A). The plate is 26.5 cm long and 20 cm wide, 1-4 mm thick, and slightly convex (up to 2 cm) in its posterior part. The external surface has lost almost all ornamentation. Still, three tesserae have been preserved; they are 3-7 mm in diameter and show small groups of tubercles (Fig. 7: 44). The sensory canal system is exposed as narrow ridges of spongy aspidin; it consists of a couple of widely spaced medial dorsal canals and two pairs of transverse commissures (Elliott & Mark-Kurik 2005, fig. 4F, modified from Mark-Kurik 1968, fig. 11A).
Branchial plates are stenobasal; a short base (proximal margin) is observed in juvenile individuals (Fig. 2N, O, S, T); the base increases in length in adults (Fig. 3A, B, E, F). As a rule, the plates are semicircularly expanded in width. The anterolateral margin is convex, the posterior margin is concave (Fig. 2D, E; Fig. 3E, F). Specimen PIN 1737/8 has an anterior proximal ledge (Fig. 3A, B; Fig. 4K, L). The distal end of the branchial plates, if not worn, is pointed and usually curved backwards (Fig. 2I, J, N, O). The distal angle varies from 30[degrees] to 65[degrees]. The shape of the proximal margin is unknown; it was probably rounded. The branchial plates are dorsally convex in width: 1.6 cm in GIT 116-273, 0.6 cm in GIT 116-272, 0.7 cm in GIT 116-275, 0.2 cm in PIN 1737/7, 0.4 cm in PIN 1737/8 and 0.5 cm in PIN 1737/74. Such curvature of the majority of plates was probably present in living individuals. Rare flattening of other branchial plates was the result of fossilization of skeletal tissues, plastic if wet (Obruchev & Mark-Kurik 1965). The distal part of the branchial plates is slightly dorsally convex in length. The ornamented surface is developed on the distal part of the branchial plates. As a rule, its area is smaller on the dorsal side than on the ventral one (Fig. 2I, J, N, O, S, T; Fig. 3A, B). The ornamentation on the ventral side sometimes occupies a large area, supposedly equal to or exceeding half of the width of the branchial plate (in PIN 1737/8, Fig. 3B). The boundary between the ornamented and unornamented surfaces of the branchial plates is either distally curved or almost straight. The ornamented surface can be substantially decreased, for example in branchial plate GIT 116-273 (Fig. 3E, F); specimen GIT 116-273 has many secondary tesserae predominantly on the ventral side, represented by tubercles in the area of detached primary tesserae, weakly attached by the aspidine of the large plate (Fig. 3E, F; Fig. 4M, N). The incomplete length of the branchial plates varies from 1.8 cm (GIT 116-275) to 11.9 cm (PIN 1737/8). Incomplete width of the most completely preserved branchial plate is from 5.6 cm (GIT 116-272) to 17.0 cm (PIN 1737/8). The thickness of the plates (from proximal to distal part) is 0.10.3 cm in GIT 116-272 and 0.4-0.5 cm in PIN 1737/8.
Ridge scales are elongated, with convex proximal and pointed distal ends (Fig. 3I-O; Fig. 4O-R). According to their position on the body, the ridge scales are externally convex in width. The ornamentation covers almost the entire external surface; only a narrow band at the proximal margin stays unornamented. On the visceral side the ornamented surface occurs in the distal part, occupying roughly 1/3 of the total surface. Incomplete length of the ridge scales varies from 3.0 cm (PIN 1737/76) to 6.75 cm (PIN 1737/9), the width is from 1.7 cm (PIN 1737/76) to 2.20 cm (PIN 1737/9). The maximal thickness of the plates is 0.35 cm (PIN 1737/76) and 0.33 cm (PIN 1737/9). The plates are dorsally curved to the width of 0.25 cm (PIN 1737/9) and 0.30 cm (PIN 1737/76). Based on the state of preservation of the ornamentation it can be proposed that specimens PIN 1737/9 and PIN 1737/76 resided on the ventral side of the body.
The tesserae (GIT 116-327, GIT 116-328) from the ventral side of branchial plate GIT 116-272 have rhombic shape, and a high cone-shaped central tubercle, surrounded by circles of smaller ones (Fig. 7C, D). Incomplete length of GIT 116-327 is 3.1 mm, the width is 2.2 mm. Specimen PM SPU 71-5 has a crown of dentine tubercles, neck and base of aspidin (Fig. 7E).
2. Ornamentation. The ornamentation is represented by tubercles, which vary in the shape of their bases. The ornamented surface has one dominant round morphotype of tubercle bases. Single tubercles can fuse into ridges (Glinskiy 2013). The ornament of the branchial plates consists of dome-, cone- or peakshaped dentine tubercles (Fig. 6: 9, 10, 21, 27; Fig. 7: 31). The height of the cone- and peak-shaped tubercles reaches 1.3 mm. Their crowns are vertical (the angle with the base of the tubercle is 90[degrees]). More rarely they are slanted (with an angle less than 90[degrees]); in the latter cases the bases of tubercles can be round, oval, angular, fan- or halberd-shaped (Fig. 6: 1, 3, 11, 12, 15, 20). Bases of polygonal, leaf-like and other shapes are rarer (Fig. 6: 2, 4, 7, 12). The tubercle base with crenulations is up to 2 mm in length. Their average size is 0.7-1.5 mm. Sharp radial ribs of tubercles commonly start from the top of the crowns (Fig. 6: 7, 10, 12, 16; Fig. 7: 29-32, 39) (of dome- or peak-shaped tubercles), but sometimes (because of their large sizes, characteristics of growth and life-time abrasion) they do not reach the top (of cone- and dome-shaped tubercles). Some ribs diverge into several branches (Fig. 6: 2, 10, 12, 16, 17, 27; Fig. 7A, C). Ribs and their branches pass into marginal crenulations. The length of crenulations of individual tubercles varies from 0.2 to 0.8 mm. Crenulations are usually wide, but sometimes substantially more narrow ones can be found between them (Fig. 6: 9, 15, 23). Their ends are truncated (Fig. 6: 5, 8, 9-12). The tubercle length can extend in the case of long marginal crenulations (PM SPU 71-3). The number of crenulations varies from 13 to 27. As a rule, individual tubercles have 13-24 crenulations. Tips of the crenulations can branch into two or three, more rarely four ramifications (Fig. 6: 1, 3, 5, 10, 15; Fig. 7A). In a number of cases radial ribs and corresponding marginal crenulations are very densely located and branch frequently (Fig. 6: 1-4, 25, 26). Radial ribs, crenulations and sometimes their ramifications bear microtubercles numbering up to 11, usually 5-7 (Fig. 7A,C, E). Small tubercles of later generations (with the diameter of the base 0.20.4 mm) are usually rounded, more rarely elongated; they bear 7-12 marginal crenulations (Fig. 6: 6-8, 19, 22, 23; Fig. 7A, B, 32). On the branchial plates and ridge scales two, more rarely three or four tubercles fuse into short ridges with a length up to 2-3 mm (Fig. 6: 2, 4, 6, 18, 25, 26; Fig. 7: 33, 40). The number of crenulations of fused tubercles varies from 20 to 40 (Fig. 6: 2, 4, 25, 26).
The ornamentation of the ridge scales is characterized by tubercles with an oval base, while circular bases appear more rarely; there are short ridges (Fig. 7: 40-42). The crowns of tubercles are slanted (on average 60[degrees]) and directed backwards. Tubercles on the external side have normal size, but the visceral side of specimen PIN 1737/9 consists of very fine tubercles with the diameter at the base of 0.2-0.3 mm (Fig. 7: 43). The length of small ridges is 0.4-0.6 mm. The tessera bears one central conical tubercle with the base length of 1 mm and small pointed tubercles 0.5 mm in diameter, which surround the central one forming a circle.
3. Ornamentation topography. The tubercles are located predominantly regularly, and only in exceptional cases--irregularly (Fig. 6: 5, 6). Marginal crenulations of neighbouring tubercles on the ornamented surface often overlap each other. The ornamented surface on branchial plates can be divided into three zones (Fig. 5). Tubercles are mostly high, cone- and peak-shaped in the distal zone A. The relative position of tubercles in this part of the branchial plates is mostly regular due to insignificant variation in the length of crenulations and bases (round, more rarely oval) of tubercles (Fig. 6: 13, 20, 21, 27; Fig. 7: 29, 31). Tubercles are located in the nodes of a square (Fig. 6: 21, 27; Fig. 7: 31) or, more rarely, rhombic network (Fig. 7: 29). In the median zone B low, predominantely dome-shaped tubercles of identical sizes and with constant length of crenulations are present along with high cone- and peak-shaped tubercles with varied shapes of bases (Fig. 6: 9, 11, 14, 1618, 22, 25, 26). These tubercles are collocated regularly (less often irregularly), essentially in the nodes of a rhombic network (Fig. 6: 9, 17; Fig. 7: 30, 32, 36, 39). The median zone of the ornamented surface is characterized by fused tubercles forming ridges, but there are rare exceptions, when ridges are located in other zones (PM SPU 71-1). Closer to the anterolateral and proximal margins of the branchial plate the ridges are aligned subparallel to the margins (Fig. 6: 18; Fig. 7: 33) of the plate, but further from the margins of the plate they become to form transverse rows (Fig. 6: 14, 28; Fig. 7: 29). In the proximal zone C only low cone-, peak- and dome-shaped tubercles are present (Fig. 6: 10, 12, 15, 19; Fig. 7: 30, 32, 36). Generally they have a round base and are located regularly in the nodes of a rhombic network. In the distal and median zones the length of the base of the tubercles reaches 0.7-2 mm, in the proximal zone their size is 0.32 mm. Small tubercles of later generations can be present between large ones (Fig. 6: 6, 19, 22-24).
4. Internal structure. According to Novitskaya (1965, 2004), the superficial layer of the plates of psammosteids (without some Obrucheviidae) is formed by orthodentine tubercles which lack enameloid (Keating et al. 2015) (see Fig. 8). The inner dentine is replete with a larger quantity of dentinal tubules and external dense dentine is clearly observed inside the tubercle. Both types of skeletal tissues are developed evenly. The tubercles are separated from each other by grooves with open pores, leading into internal cavities (ampullae according to Johanson et al. 2013), the bottom and partly the walls of which consist of aspidin. The median spongy layer is composed of small-celled reticular and large-celled cancellous aspidin. As shown by previous studies (Novitskaya 1965) and our new data, the reticular layer of the branchial plates is weakly developed in Psammosteus livonicus. Aspidin of the median layer is composed of very massive differently directed trabeculae, separated by small cavities (Fig. 8). The basal lamellar layer in the dorsal plate and on the dorsal side of branchial plates of P. livonicus is formed by thin aspidin lamellae, overlapping each other and penetrated by a loose network of vascular canals (Halstead 1969). Tomographic examination of specimen PM SPU 71-4 has shown the complicated radial structure of the pulp cavities inside the dentine tubercles (Fig. 7D). The main pulp cavity and the canals (radial pulp canals) radiating from it can be distinguished. The latter correspond in their direction to the radial ridges and marginal crenulations. There are inner cavities (microtubercular chambers) in the higher portions of the canals, which are located inside the microtubercles.
Comparison. The dorsal plate of Psammosteus livonicus resembles largely the plate of P. praecursor Obruchev in its shape and the pattern of the lateral line sensory system canals (Elliott & Mark-Kurik 2005). The shape of the branchial plates of adult individuals of P. livonicus is close to that of P. praecursor, which also has an elongated proximal margin. Psammosteus livonicus can be distinguished from other species of the genus Psammosteus primarily by the size and morphology of tubercles. The common tubercles of P. asper Obruchev resemble mostly those of P. livonicus, although their marginal crenulations are less numerous (7-12). Psammosteus livonicus differs from P. bystrowi, whose ornamentation comprises rare and large rounded tubercles, but they have slightly tapering and less frequent crenulations (8-15). In comparison with the species described here, tubercles of P. cuneatus Obruchev have smaller average size, domination of fan-like and halberdlike shapes and simple, shorter, tapering ends of crenulations (9-18); the tubercles of P. cuneatus are regularly and densely located. In massiveness of aspidin Psammosteus livonicus is different from P. maeandrinus and similar to P. praecursor.
Remarks. There are two other genera of psammosteids with ornamentation resembling that of Psammosteus livonicus. Psammosteus livonicus differs from Karelosteus weberi Obruchev, 1933 in smaller tubercles (the average tubercle size of Karelosteus is 1.5-4 mm), primarily rounded shape of their bases, mostly vertical orientation of tubercle crowns and robustness of marginal crenulations; their ends are truncated. Psammosteus livonicus can be distinguished from P. venyukovi Obruchev, 1965 by a less regular shape of tubercles and their larger average size, the absence of pyramid-shaped forms among them and variation in the length of crenulations of individual tubercles.
Genus-level systematics of psammosteids is based on morphological features of dorsal, ventral and branchial plates, types of tesserae and variations in their spatial distribution. The general morphology of the ornament, for example, size of tubercles (in the case of Pycnosteus, Ganosteus and Karelosteus), can also be considered as a genus-level feature. On the contrary, in the species-level psammosteid systematics differences in the ornamentation become important (Obruchev & Mark-Kurik 1965). Psammosteus livonicus has cyclomorial tesserae and stenobasal branchial plates, characteristic of the genus Psammosteus. In spite of the well-grounded inclusion of P. livonicus into the genus Psammosteus by the previous authors (Obruchev & Mark-Kurik 1965; Mark-Kurik 1968; Elliott & Mark-Kurik 2005), Moloshnikov (2009) proposed the assignment of P. livonicus to a new genus Oredezhosteus. According to his view, the following general features are distinctive for the new genus: width of the branchial plates with a long base (proximal margin), tubercles occupying more than half of the width of the branchial plate and high large dome-shaped symmetrical tubercles. When describing branchial plate PIN 1737/74, which became the holotype of Oredezhosteus kuleshovi, the length of the plate base was erroneously estimated, as its proximal part was missing. As the other specimens show (Fig. 3), the branchial plates of adult individuals of P. livonicus are stenobasal and the extension of their proximal margin is associated with the larger size of these plates. Such ontogenetic tendency towards elongation of the bases of branchial plates is visible in other members of the genus Psammosteus: P. bergi (Obruchev, 1943), P. praecursor Obruchev, 1947 and P. megalopteryx (Trautschold, 1880) with abundant fossil material (Obruchev & Mark-Kurik 1965). The anterior proximal ledge (Fig. 3A, B; Fig. 4K, L) in specimen PIN 1737/8 is not typical for branchial plates of adult individuals of Psammosteus. It is probably connected with a developmental defect caused by an injury, e.g. a bite (Fig. 7: 34). The only exception is the Psammosteus megalopteryx branchial plate (Obruchev & Mark-Kurik 1965, fig. 196).
As redescription has shown, the ornamentation can occupy different areas on the dorsal and ventral sides of the branchial plates. Therefore, this character should not be regarded as stable even within a species. Thus, in order to assess the side to which a branchial plate belongs, first of all the relative size of the ornamentation on its dorsal and ventral sides must be taken into account, as well as the marks of life-time abrasion of the tubercles' tops on the ventral side by the seafloor. Furthermore, the unornamented surface of the dorsal side of branchial plates of Psammosteus has linear grooves for muscle attachment and the ventral side bears imprints of detached tesserae. The curvature of the plate, which could have been changed during fossilization, should also be noted. Small tubercles between large ones are present in the majority of psammosteids: this feature occurs in the early species Schizosteus heterolepis (Preobrazhensky, 1911), as well as in the later forms, for example in Karelosteus weberi. Therefore, this feature cannot be regarded as distinctive for a genus.
The significant distinctive features of the genus Oredezhosteus proposed by Moloshnikov (2009) are the large size of tubercles and the characters of tubercles' shape. The general morphology of the ornament can indeed help to distinguish a genus. However, a new genus cannot be based on the general morphology of the ornament only. In contrast to Karelosteus, which is not known fully enough and is provisorily retained, P. livonicus is known on the basis of complete branchial plates, a dorsal plate and a cyclomorial tesserae. The morphology of plates and cyclomorial type of tesserae indicate that the genus Oredezhosteus is not valid. The features based only on the ornament are not sufficient to distinguish a new genus. If such were the case, each species of Psammosteus should be described as a new genus on the basis of uniqueness of its ornamentation. Researchers would also have to deal with the problem of a poor basis for the systematics of psammosteids at the species level. It is recommended that a new genus should not be based only on its ornamentation before necessary data at the genus level of psammosteid systematics are available.
Some plate specimens of P. livonicus show the signs either of weak (Fig. 6: 1-4, 9, 11-13, 17-21) or strong abrasion of the ornamentation (Fig. 7: 38). High tubercles are liable to abrasion, whereas smaller and lower tubercles situated between the higher ones preserve initially pointed tips with ridges converging at them (Fig. 7A, E). It is the abrasion, which, being incorrectly interpreted by Moloshnikov (2009), led this author to the unreasonable establishment of the species 'Oredezhosteus kuleshovi'. 'Psammolepis aerata' should also be assigned to P. livonicus because of the overall character of the ornamentation, which is especially comparable on the ventral side of the branchial plate. Abrasion, dense position and shortness of crenulations on the dorsal side of the plate initially complicated the identification of specimen PIN 220/527. However, the count of radial ribs and marginal ramifications passing into them allowed us to become firmly convinced that the specimen belongs to P. livonicus.
The specimens of P. livonicus show some injuries to the surficial layer. Various healing mechanisms can be observed. For example, there is a bite mark, presumably left by a sarcopterygian, on the ventral side of branchial plate PIN 1737/8 (Fig. 3B; Fig. 7: 34). The mark is covered with a new generation of bubble-shaped tubercles, so-called blisters (Fig. 7: 35). L. Halstead Tarlo (Halstead 1969) suggested that such regeneration was the result of reaction to some kind of aggravation because any signs of mechanical damages of the former sculpture were not discovered in association with them. Our example shows that the origin of blisters is connected with the reaction to a mechanical injury. The growth of tubercles of a new generation occurs at the place of mechanical damage of the surficial layer on ridge scale PIN 1737/76. Overgrowth of large, broken off tubercles with smaller tubercles shows that the damage was healed (Fig. 7: 41). This phenomenon was previously known in Ganosteus stellatus (Obruchev & Mark-Kurik 1965).
Analysis of the morphology of the branchial plates with consideration of species-level features of their ornamentation proves that the establishment of the genus Oredezhosteus Moloshnikov is baseless. The species Psammolepis aerata Obruchev in Halstead Tarlo 1965 and Oredezhosteus kuleshovi Moloshnikov, 2009 are included in the revised species--Psammosteus livonicus Obruchev, 1965 as its junior synonyms on the basis of the ornamentation analysis.
Acknowledgements. We are grateful to A. Ivanov and P. Skutschas (St. Petersburg State University), O. Lebedev (Borisiak Palaeontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences), U. Toom (Institute of Geology at Tallinn University of Technology), I. Zupins (Natural History Museum of Latvia) and G. Skridlaite (Laboratory of Bedrock Geology, Nature Research Centre, Lithuania) for assistance and providing access to the psammosteid collections, and A. Ivanov, O. Lebedev and E. Luksevics (University of Latvia) for useful discussions. We acknowledge D. Elliott (Northern Arizona University) and the anonymous reviewer for their valuable remarks, and kind improvement of our English by D. Elliott. The authors also thank T. Marss and O. Hints (Institute of Geology at Tallinn University of Technology), A. Spiridonov (Vilnius University), D. Pinakhina (St. Petersburg State University) and G. Mirantsev (Borisiak Palaeontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences) for help and valuable advice. We are obliged to G. Baranov (Institute of Geology at Tallinn University of Technology), S. Bagirov (Borisiak Palaeontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences), N. Vlasenko and V. Shilovskikh (Research Park of St. Petersburg State University) for much help with photographs and S. Nilov and S. Bocharov (St. Petersburg State University) for help with X-ray computed tomography.
During different stages of the work, the first author has been partially supported by grants from St. Petersburg State University 3.39.1117.2011, 0.38.292.2015 and the European Social Fund's Doctoral Studies and Internationalisation Programme DoRa, which is carried out by Foundation Archimedes. The reported study was partially supported by RFBR, research project No. 14-04-01507 a. The research was performed at the Center for Geo-Environmental Research and Modeling (GEOMODEL) of the Research Park of St. Petersburg State University.
Agassiz, L. 1840. Tableau general des Poissons fossiles. In Recherches sur les Poissons fossiles, Neuchatel, Soleure, 1, 32-49.
Agassiz, L. 1844. Monographie des Poissons fossiles du vieux gres rouge ou systeme Devonien (Old Red Sandstone) des Isles Britanniques et de Russie. Neuchatel, 188 pp.
Berg, L. S. 1940. Sistema ryboobraznykh i ryb, nyne zhivushchikh i iskopaemykh [Classification of fishes, both recent and fossil]. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR [Proceedings of the Zoological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR], 5, 1-517 [in Russian, partly in English, pp. 346-517].
Berg, L. S. 1955. Sistema ryboobraznykh i ryb, nyne zhivushchikh i iskopaemykh [Classification of fishes, both recent and fossil]. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR [Proceedings of the Zoological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR], 20, 1-286 [in Russian].
Brotzen, F. 1936. Beitrage zur Vertebratenfauna des west-podolischen Silurs und Devons. I. Protaspis arnelli n. sp. und Brachipteraspis n. gen. latissima Zych. Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Arkiv for Zoologi, 28A, 1-52.
Elliott, D. & Mark-Kurik, E. 2005. A review of the lateral line sensory system in psammosteid heterostracans. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia, 8, 99-108.
Elliott, D. K., Mark-Kurik, E. & Daeschler, E. B. 2004. A revision of Obruchevia (Psammosteida: Heterostraci) and a description of a new obrucheviid from the Late Devonian of the Canadian Arctic. Acta Universitatis Latviensis, 679, 22-45.
Esin, D., Ginter, M., Ivanov, A., Lebedev, O., Luksevics, E., Avkhimovich, V., Golubtsov, V. & Petukhova, L. 2000. Vertebrate correlation of the Upper Devonian and Lower Carboniferous on the East European Platform. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 223, 341-359.
Glinskiy, V. 2013. Topograficheskaya izmenchivost' ornamenta devonskikh beschelyustnykh--psammosteid [Topographic variability of the ornamentation of Devonian jawless vertebrates - psammosteids]. In Sovremennaya paleontologiya: Klassicheskie i novejshie metody. Desyataya Vserossijskaya nauchnaya shkola molodykh uchenykhpaleontologov [Modern Paleontology: Classical and Newest Methods. The Tenth All-Russian Scientific School for Young Scientists in Paleontology. Abstracts] (Lopatin, A. V., Parkhaev, P. Yu. & Rozanov, A. Yu., eds), pp. 15-16. PIN RAN Press, Moscow [in Russian].
Glinskiy, V. & Ivanov, A. 2015. The assemblages of psammosteid agnathans from the Middle-Late Devonian of the Andoma Hill (Russia). In IGCP596-SDS Symposium (Brussels, September 2015): Climate Change and Biodiversity Patterns in the Mid-Palaeozoic, Abstracts (Mottequin, B., Denayer, J., Konigshof, P., Prestianni, C. & Olive, S., eds), Strata, serie 1: Communications, 16, 57-59.
Gross, W. 1935. Histologische Studien am Aussenskelett fossiler Agnathen und Fische. Palaeontographica, 83A, 1-60.
Gross, W. 1937. Die Wirbeltiere des rheinischen Devons. Abhandlungen der Preufiischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, 176, 1-83.
Gross, W. 1942. Die Fischfaunen des baltischen Devons und ihre biostratigraphische Bedeutung. Korrespondenblatt des Naturforscher-Vereins zu Riga, 64, 373-436.
Gross, W. 1963. Drepanaspis gemuendenensis Schluter Neuuntersuchung. Palaeontographica, 121, 1-15.
Halstead, L. B. 1969. Calcified tissues in the earliest vertebrates. Calcified Tissue Research, 3, 107-124.
Halstead, L. B. 1993. Agnatha. In The Fossil Record 2 (Benton, M. J., ed.), pp. 573-581. Chapmann & Hall, London.
Halstead Tarlo, L. B. 1964. Psammosteiformes (Agnatha) - A review with descriptions of new material from the Lower Devonian of Poland. I. General part. Palaeontologia Polonica, 13, 1-135.
Halstead Tarlo, L. B. 1965. Psammosteiformes (Agnatha) - A review with descriptions of new material from the Lower Devonian of Poland. II. Systematic part. Palaeontologia Polonica, 15, 1-167.
Hekker, R. F. & Philippova, M. F. 1935. Razrez po ruch'yu Tesovoj, pritoku Oredezha [Geological section on the Creek Tesovoj, River Oredezh affluent]. Trudy Leningradskogo geologo-gidrogeodezicheskogo tresta, 5-7, 23-36 [in Russian].
Ivanov, A. & Lebedev, O. 2011. Devonian Vertebrate Localities in the Luga River Basin (Leningrad Region, Russia). Guidebook for the Field Trip. St. Petersburg University Press, St. Petersburg, 37 pp.
Ivanov, A., Luksevics, E., Stinkulis, G., Tovmasjan, K., Zupins, I. & Zabele, A. 2005. Devonian stratigraphy and vertebrate fauna of the Andoma Hill section (Onega Lake, Russia). In Middle Paleozoic Vertebrates of Laurussia: Relationships with Siberia, Kazakhstan, Asia and Gondwana. Ichthyolith Issues, Special Publication, 9, 17-21.
Janvier, P. 1996. Early Vertebrates. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 393 pp.
Johanson, Z., Smith, M., Kearsley, A., Pilecki, P., Mark-Kurik, E. & Howard, C. 2013 Origins of bone repair in the armour of fossil fish: response to a deep wound by cells depositing dentine instead of dermal bone. Biology Letters, 9, 20130144.
Karatajute-Talimaa, V. N. 1966. Botriolepidy shventoiskogo gorizonta Pribaltiki [Bothriolepids of the Sventoji Horizon of the East Baltic area]. In Paleontologiya i stratigrafiya Pribaltiki i Belorussii [Palaeontology and Stratigraphy of the Baltic and Byelorussia], Vol. 1(6) (Grigelis, A. A., ed.), pp. 191-279. Mintis, Vilnius [in Russian, with English summary].
Keating, J. N., Marquart, C. L. & Donoghue, P. C. J. 2015. Histology of the heterostracan dermal skeleton: insight into the origin of the vertebrate mineralised skeleton. Journal of Morphology, 276, 657-680.
Kiaer, J. 1932. The Downtonian and Devonian vertebrates of Spitsbergen. IV. Suborder Cyathaspida. A preliminary report edited by A. Heintz. Skrifter Svalbard Ishavet, 52, 1-26.
Kurss, V. M., Viiding, H. A. & Mark-Kurik, E. Yu. 1981. Amata Regional Stage. In Devon i karbon Pribaltiki [Devonian and Carboniferous of the Baltic Area] (Sorokin, V. S., ed.), pp. 157-167. Zinatne, Riga [in Russian].
Lankester, E. R. 1868. On the discovery of the remains of cephalaspidian fishes in Devonshire and Cornwall; and on the identity of Steganodictyum, M'Coy, with genera of those fishes. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 24, 546-547.
Luksevics, E. V., Ivanov, A. O. & Zupins, I. A. 2012. Kompleksy devonskikh pozvonochnykh Andomskoj gory i korrelyatsiya s razrezami Glavnogo devonskogo polya [Assemblages of Devonian vertebrates from Andoma Hill and correlation with sections of the Main Devonian Field]. In PaleozojRossii: regional'naya stratigrafiya, paleontologiya, geo- i biosobytiya. Materialy III Vserossijskogo soveshchaniya [Paleozoic of Russia: Regional Stratigraphy, Palaeontology, Geoand Bioevents. Materials of the Third All-Russian Conference] (Zhamojda, A. I., ed.), pp. 128-130. VSEGEI, St. Petersburg [in Russian].
Lyarskaya, L. 1972. A classification of Devonian vertebrate localities of Latvia. Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Toimetised, Keemia, Geoloogia, 21, 259-268.
Mark-Kurik, E. 1968. New finds of the psammosteids (Heterostraci) in the Devonian of Estonia and Latvia. Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Toimetised, Keemia, Geoloogia, 17, 409-424.
Mark-Kurik, E. & Poldvere, A. 2012. Devonian stratigraphy in Estonia: current state and problems. Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 61, 33-47.
Moloshnikov, S. V. 2009. Oredezhosteus, a new psammosteid genus (Heterostraci, Psammosteiformes) from the Lower Frasnian (Upper Devonian) of the Main Devonian Field. Paleontological Journal, 43, 197-200.
Novitskaya, L. I. 1965. Microstructure of some Psammosteida. In Psammosteidy (Agnatha, Psammosteidae) devona SSSR [Devonian Psammosteids (Agnatha, Psammosteidae) of the USSR] (Obruchev, D. V. & Mark-Kurik, E. Yu., eds), pp. 257-282. Institute of Geology, Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR, Tallinn [in Russian].
Novitskaya, L. I. 1971. On the diagnostic evaluation of the ornamentation of jawless vertebrates and fishes. Paleontologicheskij Zhurnal, 4, 82-96 [in Russian].
Novitskaya, L. I. 2004. Subclass Heterostraci. In Iskopaemye pozvonochnye Rossii i sopredel'nykh stran. Beschelyustnye i drevnie ryby [Fossil Vertebrates of Russia and Adjacent Countries. Agnathans and Early Fishes] (Novitskaya, L. I. & Afanassieva, O. B., eds), pp. 69-207. GEOS, Moscow [in Russian].
Obruchev, D. V. 1933. Opisanie chetyrekh novykh vidov ryb Leningradskogo devona [Description of four new fish species from the Leningrad Devonian]. Materials of CNIGRI, Paleontology and Stratigraphy, 1, 12-15 [in Russian].
Obruchev, D. V. 1941. Ostatki Aspidosteus gen. nov. (Heterostraci) iz verkhnego devona r. Lovati [Remains of Aspidosteus gen. nov. (Heterostraci) from the Upper Devonian of River Lovat]. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, 8(4), 7-22 [in Russian, with English summary].
Obruchev, D. V. 1943a. Psammosteidy (Psammosteiformes) devona SSSR i Shpitsbergena i evolyutsiya beschelyustnykh [Devonian Psammosteids (Psammosteiformes) of the USSR and Spitzbergen and the Evolution of Agnatha]. Palaeontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Manuscript of the DSc Thesis [in Russian].
Obruchev, D. V. 1943. Yoglinia n. g., latest pteraspid from the Middle Devonian of the Leningrad District. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 41, 41-43 [in Russian, with English summary].
Obruchev, D. V. 1947. O rode Psammosteus (Heterostraci) [About genus Psammosteus (Heterostraci)]. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 56, 517-520 [in Russian, with English summary].
Obruchev, D. V. 1964. The ramus Agnatha. Jawless vertebrates. In Osnovy paleontologii [Basics of Paleontology], Vol. 11 (Obruchev, D. V., ed.), pp. 34-116. Nauka, Moscow [in Russian].
Obruchev, D. V. & Mark-Kurik, E. Yu. 1965. Psammosteidy (Agnatha, Psammosteidae) devona SSSR [Devonian Psammosteids (Agnatha, Psammosteidae) of the USSR]. Institute of Geology, Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR, Tallinn, 304 pp. [in Russian, with English summary].
Obruchev, D. & Mark-Kurik, E. 1968. On the evolution of the psammosteids (Heterostraci). Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Toimetised, Keemia, Geoloogia, 17, 279-284.
0rvig, T. 1961. Notes on some early representatives of the Drepanaspida (Pteraspidomorphi, Heterostraci). Arkiv for Zoologi, 12, 515-535.
Pernegre, V. N. & Elliott, D. K. 2008. Phylogeny of the Pteraspidiforms (Heterostraci), Silurian-Devonian jawless vertebrates. Zoologica Scripta, 37, 391-403.
Preobrazhensky, I. A. 1911. O nekotorykh predstavitelyakh sem. Psammosteidae Ag. [On some representatives of the family Psammosteidae Ag.]. Protokoly obshchestva estestvoispytatelej Yur'evskogo universiteta. Sitzungsberichte der Naturforscher-Gesellschaft bei der Universitat Jurjew (Dorpat), 19(3, 4), 21-36 [in Russian].
Stensio, E. A. 1927. The Downtonian and Devonian vertebrates of Spitsbergen. Part I. Family Cephalaspidae. Skrifter Svalbard Nordishavet, 12, 1-397.
Stensio, E. A. 1958. Les Cyclostomes fossiles. In Traite de Zoologie, Vol. 13, Part 1 (Grasse, P. P., ed.), pp. 173425. Masson, Paris.
Tarlo, L. B. 1962. The classification and evolution of the Heterostraci. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 7, 249-290.
Traquair, R. H. 1896. The extinct vertebrata animals of the Moray Firth Area. In A Vertebrate Fauna of the Moray Basin, Vol. 2 (Harvie-Brown, J. H. & Buckley, T. E., eds), pp. 235-285. Edinburgh.
Traquair, R. H. 1900. Report on fossil fishes collected by the Geological Survey of Scotland in the Silurian rocks of the South of Scotland. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 39, 827-864.
Trautschold, H. 1880. Ueber Dendrodus und Coccosteus. Verhandlungen der Russisch-Kaiserlichen Mineralogischen Gesellschaftzu St. Petersburg, Zweite Serie, 15, 139-156.
Vorobyeva, E. I. & Lyarskaya, L. A. 1968. Ostatki kisteperykh i dvoyakodyshashchikh iz amatskikh sloev Latvii i ikh zahkoronenie [Remains of crossopterygians and dipnoans from the Amata Beds in Latvia and their burial conditions]. In Ocherki po filogenii i sistematike iskopaemykh ryb i beschelyustnykh [Essays on the Phylogeny and Systematics of Fossil Fishes and Agnathans] (Obruchev, D. V., ed.), pp. 71-86. Nauka, Moscow [in Russian].
Weber, V. N. 1924. Materialy k geologii yugo-vostochnoj chasti 40-go lista [Materials on the geology of the southeastern part of the 40th map sheet]. Izvestiya Geologicheskogo Komiteta, 40, 103-139 [in Russian].
Woodward, A. S. 1910. A Guide to the Fossil Reptiles, Amphibians, and Fishes in the Department of Geology and Palaeontology in the British Museum (Natural History). Printed by order of the Trustees, London, 129 pp.
Vadim N. Glinskiy (a) and Elga Mark-Kurik (b)
(a) Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab. 7/9, 199034, Saint Petersburg, Russia; firstname.lastname@example.org
(b) Institute of Geology at Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia; elga.mark- email@example.com
Received 17 June 2015, accepted 17 September 2015
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Glinskiy, Vadim N.; Mark-Kurik, Elga|
|Publication:||Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences|
|Date:||Mar 1, 2016|
|Previous Article:||Diurnal cycle of precipitation in Estonia/Sademete oopaevane jaotus Eestis.|
|Next Article:||A sparsely encrusted hardground with abundant Trypanites borings from the Llandovery of the Velise River, western Estonia (Baltica)/Horedalt...|