Printer Friendly

Results-Oriented Cultures: Insights for U.S. Agencies from Other Countries' Performance Management Initiatives.

GAO-02-862 August 2, 2002

Strategic human capital management challenges face public sector organizations both here and abroad. The United States is not alone in examining how government agencies can use their performance management systems as a tool to foster a more results-oriented organizational culture. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has reported that its member nations have increasingly moved towards performance pay and appraisal systems that reward employees, hold them accountable for the quality of their work, and connect their efforts to organizational results. Four OECD member countries--Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom--have begun to use their performance management systems to achieve results. Although the performance management initiatives in these countries reflect their specific organizational structures, cultures, and priorities, their experiences with developing and implementing results-oriented individual performance management initiatives may provide U.S. agencies with information and insights as they implement strategic human capital practices. These countries have begun to use their performance management systems to create a ''line of sight'' between individual and organizational goals, use competencies to provide a fuller assessment of individual performance, link pay to individual and overall organizational performance, and foster organization wide commitment to results-oriented performance management. Another way agencies seek to foster commitment in more results-oriented performance management systems is to involve stakeholders and include employee perspectives when designating or reforming their performance management systems.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Stonehenge International
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:General Accounting Office Reports & Testimony
Date:Sep 1, 2002
Words:227
Previous Article:Export Controls: More Thorough Analysis Needed to Justify Changes in High Performance Computer Controls.
Next Article:Tax Administration: Advance Tax Refund Program Was a Major Accomplishment, but Not Problem Free.


Related Articles
Managing For Results: Next Steps to Improve the Federal Government's Management and Performance.
Managing For Results: Next Steps to Improve the Federal Government's Management and Performance.
Contract Reform: DOE Has Made Progress, but Actions Needed to Ensure Initiatives Have Improved Results.
High-Risk Series: Strategic Human Capital Management.
Human Capital: Insights for U.S. Agencies from Other Countries' Succession Planning and Management Initiatives.
Results-Oriented Government: Using GPRA to Address 21st Century Challenges.
Are you ready? What is the role of change management in the military financial management community?
Human Capital: Senior Executive Performance Management Can Be Significantly Strengthened to Achieve Results.
Strategies for tapping into your potential--Part 2.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |