Printer Friendly

Reproductive biology of the leopard grouper Mycteroperca rosacea (Streets, 1877) in the coastal area of Santa Rosalia, BCS, Mexico.


The leopard grouper Mycteroperca rosacea (Streets, 1877) is distributed from the southwestern coast of the Baja California Peninsula in the Gulf of California to Jalisco (Heemstra & Randall, 1993), and is therefore considered endemic to the Mexican Pacific. Due to its restricted distribution, as well as to its reproductive biology, it is cataloged as vulnerable and has been included in the Red List of threatened species by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (Craig & Sadovy, 2008). This species is considered an iteroparous species, cataloged until now as having gonochoric species (Erisman et al., 2008); it forms reproductive aggregations from March to June, depending on location (Aburto-Oropeza et al., 2008). In addition to being a predictable event, the increase in the abundance of individuals at reproductive sites results in the species being vulnerable to overexploittation, as capture efforts usually are focused on those sites. It is a relatively easy way to obtain a large catch volume, and the impact of extraction on reproducing individuals can cause more significant long-term effects on the population, as it reduces significantly the number of individuals that participate in the reproductive event (Russell, 2001).

The leopard grouper is considered a high-quality species (Aburto-Oropeza et al., 2008); it is the third fish species regarding catch volume in Baja California Sur (BCS), and BCS has the highest catch volume in the country. The highest recorded catches in BCS were of 670 ton (CONAPESCA, 2013). Despite the economic importance of this species, no management plan has been developed, and there are no established catch quotas or daily fishing limits for its commercial fishery within the Gulf of California (Erisman et al., 2007). The importance of the leopard grouper is not restricted only to the economic environment; it is also important ecologically because species belonging to the Serranids are considered active predators and are located at the upper levels of the food chain (Pelaez-Mendoza, 1997).

This species, especially the wild populations within the Gulf of California, have been little studied. We focused on the reproductive biology of M. rosacea in the coastal area of Santa Rosalia, BCS, to determine its reproductive cycle, especially its duration and intensity, compared with other areas of the Gulf of California, and establish the possible effect of water temperature on its reproduction.


Sampling was carried out monthly from March 2014 to May 2015 along the coastal zone of Santa Rosalia, BCS. This location belongs to the municipality of Mulege, in the central area of the eastern coast of the Baja California Peninsula (Fig. 1).

Fish were caught by artisanal fishery methods using barbed fishing spears. The total length (TL), total weight (TW), gonad and liver weight were recorded for each organism. Gonads were preserved in Davidson AFA solution (glycerin, formaldehyde, ethylic alcohol, filtered seawater, and acetic acid) for later histologic processing and sex determination (Estrada-Godinez et al., 2011). The sex ratio was calculated by dividing the number of individuals of each sex. A 1:1 sex ratio was hypothesized; the [chi square] statistical test with Yates correction was used to corroborate this, with [alpha] = 0.05 for all tests (Sokal & Rolf, 1995).

Gonads were processed using the standard histological technique to determine cellular types, annual variability, and gonad developmental stages. Gonads were dehydrated at increasing ethanol concentrations and embedded in paraffin. 4 [micro]m thick cuts were obtained using a microtome (Leica RM 2155). Tissues were mounted and stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and additional stains were performed using Mallory's trichrome stain procedure.

Five developmental stages were considered for females, taking into account the oocyte development description by Estrada-Godinez et al. (2011). a) Primary growth, consisting of three stages (chromatin nucleus, early perinucleolus, and late perinucleolus); b) Secondary growth: oocytes having cortical alveoli and lipid inclusions; c) Vitellogenesis: oocytes presenting primary and secondary yolk granules; d) Final maturation: characterized by hydrated oocytes with migrated nucleolus and post-ovulatory follicles, and e) Spawned: during this stage the unspawned oocytes are reabsorbed (atresia). Three stages were identified in males. a) Regressed: in which a considerable quantity of spermatogonia were observed dominating almost the entire testicle, although some areas with spermatozoid presence were also found, b) mature: during which spermatocytes were observed over almost the entire testicular tissue, with high number of spermatozoids, c) spent: where practically the entire testicular tissue presented spermatozoids, with spermatic sacs partially full. There was an additional stage in males called d) reabsorption: during which a considerable quantity of conjunctive tissue without apparent organization, but with a few spermatozoids, was observed.

The following somatic indexes (Shulman & Love, 1999) were used to evaluate the physiological condition of individuals:

Gonadosomatic index: GSI = GW/TW x 100

Hepatosomatic index: HSI = LW/TW x 100

Condition factor: CF = TW/[TL.sup.3] x 100

where: GW = gonad weight; TW = total weight (eviscerated); LW = liver weight; TL = total length.

The data obtained with the somatic indexes (GIS, HSI, and CF) were expressed as percentages and arcsine square root transformed. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the averages of these indexes. Duncan's test was then used to determine significant differences (P > 0.05) between sampling months and somatic indexes (Estrada-Godinez et al., 2011).

The reproductive season was delimited according to different stages of gonadic development and to the variations presented in the somatic indexes, following Estrada-Godinez et al. (2011); 1) maturation: observed from the beginning of vitellogenesis in oocytes until the final maturation stage; males can be observed in a maturity state; 2) spawning: the oocytes are spawned in the water and fertilized by males; 3) post-spawning: the females have postovulatory follicles, and the atresia process can be observed, whereas most males are spent; and 4) resting: only oogonia and oocytes undergoing primary growth can be observed in females, whereas males are in a regression state.

The size at first maturity [L.sub.50%] of the species and for each sex was calculated with the percentage of spawning (females), and ejaculated (males) in each length range (6.3 cm in length) compared to the total number of individuals sampled of this stages. The logistic distribution of percentage of mature and spawned fish grouped at intervals and [L.sub.50%] were obtained accord to criterions of Taylor & Murphy (1992). Statistica v.8 program was used to obtain the logistic distribution variables.

Average sea surface temperature images, extracted from composite images acquired from Aqua-MODIS and Terra-MODIS sensors, were obtained from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. These images were of High-Resolution Picture Transmission (HRTP) in Hierarchical Data Format (HD). Images were processed using the Windows Image Manager[c] (WIMSoft) program to obtain sea surface temperatures. A Spearmans test was carried out to identify whether there was a correlation between temperature and somatic indexes (Statistica v.8).


Three hundred and forty five Mycteroperca rosacea specimens were obtained. Total length (TL) ranged from 21 to 74 cm. Ninety-three individuals were males (26.7%), 185 were females (53.6%), 15 were bisexual immature (4.6%), and 52 could not be identified (15.1%). Females ranged in size from 21 to 74 cm TL, males measured from 24 to 68 cm TL, immature bisexual measured from 30 to 68.5 cm TL, and unidentified individuals measured from 24 to 49 cm TL (Fig. 2).

The sex ratio for the entire sample was 2.0:1.0 (females: males), with significant differences ([chi square] = 48.41, d.f. = 1, P < 0.05) from the expected 1:1 proportion. Females were significantly more abundant in October and November 2014 (Table 1). Immature bisexual individuals were recorded at a low percentage during almost the entire year of sampling (Fig. 3). The spawning period occurred from March to May in 2014 and 2015, at temperatures of between 20.3 and 22.2[degrees]C (Fig. 4).

Immature bisexual individuals were identified following criteria by Estrada-Godinez et al. (2011). These individuals presented primary growth oocytes as well as spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and spermatozoids (Figs. 5a-5b).

Presence of spermatocytes was observed in males, as well as spermatozoids in the spermatic lobes and spermatic sacs (Fig. 5c). Females with gonads containing cells at the primary growth stage were observed, but there were also females beginning the maturity process, with secondary growth oocytes, vitellogenesis, and spermatocysts (Fig. 5d).

Significant differences (P < 0.05) in the GSI were observed between months for males as well as for females, but there were no significant differences between the sexes (P > 0.05). Maximum male and female GSI values occurred from March to May in 2014 and 2015, coinciding with the spawning seasons (Fig. 6).

There were significant differences in HSI between months when males and females were analyzed separately (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences between sexes (P > 0.05). There was no relationship between the maximum or minimum HSI values and GSI for either sex (Fig. 6).

There were significant differences in CF between months for each sex (P < 0.05) but there were no significant differences between males and females (P > 0.05). Maximum CF values were not related to the GSI of either males or females (Fig. 6).

Individual size at first maturity of M. rosacea females was 23.9 cm TL, that of males was 24 cm TL, and the minimum size of immature bisexual individuals was 26 cm TL (Fig. 7).

The M. rosacea [L.sub.50] for the coastal area of Santa Rosalia, BCS, estimated by adjusting a logistic curve, was 40.8 cm TL for both sexes combined, 37.3 cm TL for males, and 42.4 cm TL for females (Fig. 8).

The maximum superficial sea temperature in 2014 was 30[degrees]C in July, and the minimum was 18[degrees]C in January. When there was an increase in temperature linked with the warm season, gonads started their gametogenic development, which continued until maturity and spawning; when the temperature reached 30[degrees]C, however, the population entered a resting stage (Fig. 9).

There was a negative correlation between GSI and temperature in males as well as females. This inverse relationship indicated that the GSI decreased at temperatures, whereas it increased at low temperatures. There was no correlation between HSI, CF, and temperature (Table 2).


Leopard groupers M. rosacea reached a maximum size of 74 cm TL in Santa Rosalia (SR). The females were larger than the males, who did not surpass 68 cm TL. This size difference does not necessarily imply that this species presents sexual dimorphism, as has been proposed by Estrada-Godinez et al. (2011). These authors reported that males were larger than females (65 cm TL maximum size) in La Paz Bay (LPB; 400 km from our study site). However, Erisman et al. (2008) found that males and females achieved similar maximum sizes to the ones found in the present study in Bahia de Los Angeles and Loreto; however, they did not report sexual dimorphism in M. rosacea based on size.

As reported previously in other studies (Kiewek-Martinez, 2004; Erisman et al., 2008; Kiewek-Martinez et al., 2010; Estrada-Godinez et al., 2011), 15 individuals were cataloged as immature bisexual. It is presumed that immature bisexual individuals are females that develop spermatic tissue. However, as no previous maturity signal of either sex was observed, we consider that this is a gonochoric species that can present this immature bisexual stage. There is no evidence to date demonstrating the opposite, as has been reported for other serranid species classified as hermaphrodites (Erisman et al., 2008).

Erisman et al. (2008) observed that immature bisexual individuals were smaller than mature males and females, and concluded that males derived from females. In the present study, according to histologic evidence, we found primary and secondary males, due to the presence of males measuring less than immature bisexual individuals without evidence of having gone through an immature bisexual stage.

The population sex ratio was 2:1 females to males, similar to what was found by Estrada-Godinez et al. (2011) for this same species in LPB. These authors reported that a sex ratio consisting of females being more abundant than males is commonly observed in congeners of this family. Differences in sex ratio also occurred in October (5.3 females: 1.0 males) and November (16.0:1.0 females to males).

According to McGovern et al. (1998), these variations occur in species forming reproductive aggregations, where males are captured at a higher rate than females, which would explain the decrease in males in the months following reproduction, as has been reported for Mycteroperca microlepis. These variations in sex ratios were also attributed to behavior; it was observed that in M. microlepis males separated from the females and became solitary after the reproductive event, migrating to deeper areas (50-90 m), while females moved to shallow areas (~30 m). This behavior could occur in M. rosacea, although it has not been reported yet. Given the behavioral and reproductive strategy of M. rosacea, it is probable that the sex ratio is skewed towards females due to fishing pressure or to sexual segregation, as has been reported for M. microlepis.

An essential part of reproduction is food availability, as individuals need to obtain the necessary energy for this event, and could be reflected by somatic indexes. The GSI attained its maximum values from March to May in 2014 and 2015, indicating the occurrence of the reproductive season. During this time the histologic cuts of the gonads showed the stages of highest gonadal development (vitellogenesis and final maturation), whereas the minimum values indicated the resting season (primary growth). Estrada-Godinez et al. (2011) also observed this pattern, with maximum index values coinciding with the most advanced gonad developmental stage, which indicates that the GSI is an ideal index to determine the time of sexual maturity.

The HSI recorded cyclic changes in liver weight due to lipid accumulation. The liver is also responsible for the production of vitellogenin, which facilitates the process of vitellogenesis in the oocytes and can be considered an organ of energy storage that can be used to measure the reserves available to the individual. This index should, therefore, have an opposite trend than the GSI (Saborido-Rey, 2008).

In this study no pattern was detected in the HSI that would indicate the reproductive season, and although Estrada-Godinez et al. (2011) observed higher values during the reproductive season, they attributed this to high protein concentration and accumulation of triglycerides and cholesterol, finding thus a positive correlation between GSI and HSI, which differs with what was found in the present study. According to energy transference, it should be expected that there would be a negative correlation between HSI and GSI. We did not find this correlation, and we assume that M. rosacea is not a species for which energy accumulation plays a vital role in the reproductive process as has been detected in other teleost fish (Saborido-Rey, 2008).

The CF reflects the energy available to the organism, and similarly to the HSI, it was not correlated to the GSI, as was reported by Estrada-Godinez et al. (2011), who did not observe variations in this index during the year. It seems that contrary to other species that fast before reproduction (Saborido-Rey, 2008), M. rosacea feeds year-round regardless of the maturity stage in which it is found, as was also postulated by Estrada-Godinez et al. (2011).

As confirmed by the study by Perez-Rojo (2016), it was determined that M. rosacea is an active predator with broad trophic plasticity in the SR area. Despite being considered an ichthyophagous predator with a marked preference for sardines (Sardinops caeruleus) during the cold season, it can alternate its diet to consume mainly euphausiids (Euphasia distinguenda) during the warm season. These two prey species are abundant during the cold and warm season, respectively. It was confirmed that M. rosacea does not require storage of large energy reserves; this was validated by the HSI and CF values, which did not present notable variations over an annual cycle.

The energy transference required for the reproductive event depends on external factors that indicate when the most favorable conditions are occurring. Temperature played an essential role in gametogenesis, as spawning in SR occurred at between 20 and 23[degrees]C, similar to what was reported by Estrada-Godinez et al. (2011) for the same species in LPB (21-25[degrees]C).

Kiewek-Martinez et al. (2010) and Estrada-Godinez et al. (2011) stated that temperatures above 25[degrees]C were linked with the end of spawning in leopard grouper, and with the highest percentage of individuals in atresia. There are no data for June, and it is presumed that the highest number of atresias would occur in this month because the temperature in June 2014 was 27.9[degrees]C; therefore, this month is when the post-spawn stage could occur. It was observed that M. rosacea differs from other species for which the beginning of gametogenesis and spawning occur at the highest temperatures (Kiewek-Martinez, 2004).

Accordingly, with the reproductive cycle established for M. rosacea in the area of SR and contrary to what was found by Estrada-Godinez et al. (2011) for BLP, there were temporal differences in the cycle stages. The resting stage for individuals in SR started in July, whereas it started one month later in BLP, but it ended in December for the two populations. Gonadic maturation occurred in January and February, although in BLP it occurred two months later (March to April), in a subsequent year it occurred in January and February, as was reported in the present study.

Spawning lasted two months (May-June) in BLP, whereas it lasted three months (March-May) in SR, with the highest percentage of spawning females in 2015. These differences could be due to the dynamics of the GC compared with BLP, as BLP has particular hydrographic characteristics (Obeso-Nieblas et al., 2014), due to the intrusion of oligotrophic waters in summer characterized by high temperatures and low nutrients, which cause a delay in BLP compared with the ocean dynamics within the GC (Obeso-Nieblas et al., 2014).

There was a low percentage of individuals presenting hydrated oocytes or with post-ovulatory follicles in the reproductive season, which suggests that the sampling site is not an important reproductive area and that M. rosacea could be migrating towards the southern end of the sampling area. Erisman et al. (2007) and Aburto-Oropeza et al. (2008) suggest that this species could move to Bahia de Loreto due to the vast number of individuals observed at that location. Despite Bahia de Loreto being 175 km south of SR, reproductive migrations of considerable distance have been reported for M. microlepis (McGovern et al., 1998), which could also be occurring withM. rosacea.

Males at the spermiated stage were observed from March to May 2014 and from January 2015, which indicated that the beginning of male spermatic cell maturation occurs a few months before female maturation, similar to what was observed by Estrada-Godinez et al. (2011).

We were able to determine the size at first maturity using the gonadal maturation degree. According to Aburto-Oropeza et al. (2008), the leopard grouper needs 14 years to duplicate its population size, and the size of first catch occurs at approximately 2.5 years. In the present study, we obtained a size at first maturity of 40.8 cm TL in the coastal area of SR, which differs from the size reported by Aburto-Oropeza et al. (2008) of 42 cm for the GC. It should be pointed out that these authors did not specify the method used to determine size at first maturity so that the estimation in our study is the first in which this determination was carried out systematically with an adequate number of individuals. There was no marked difference between the two estimates despite there being methodological uncertainties in the calculation made by Aburto-Oropeza et al. (2008), and despite the difference in the years between that study and ours, so that we can infer that the population is still healthy with regards to fisheries.

Female size at first maturity was 42.4 cm, whereas male size at first maturity was 37.3 cm, denoting possible higher fishing pressure on males of this species. M. rosacea reproductive aggregations are formed with one female surrounded by approximately 40 males (Aburto-Oropeza et al. 2008). The probability of males making up the largest share of the catch can lead to higher fishing pressure and to a need for males to mature at smaller sizes. However, some populations are characterized by females having a larger size at first maturity than males (Saborido-Rey, 2008).

According to what was observed during this study, the reproductive event is influenced by food availability as well as by sea surface temperature, which indicates that the environmental characteristics could modify the timing or intensity of reproduction. Temperature allows the synchronization of optimum environmental conditions and induces the final maturation and spawning of gametes (Estrada-Godinez et al., 2014).

DOI: 10.3856/vol46-issue4-fulltext-7


The authors are grateful for economic support provided by the projects SIP-IPN (1805 and 1924) and CONACYT Problemas Nacionales (248708). AP0 and MSIA are grateful for the financial support granted by CONACyT and BEIFI-IPN through their scholarships. XGMS, MTVF and LAAC are grateful for support received through COFAA and EDI.


Aburto-Oropeza, O., B. Erisman, C. Valdez-Ornelas & G. Danemann. 2008. Serranidos de importancia comercial del Golfo de California: ecologia, pesquerias y conservation. Cienc. Conserv., 1: 1-23.

Comision Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura (CONAPESCA). 2013. Anuario Estadistica de Pesca. []. Reviewed: 15 May 2017.

Craig, M.T. & Y. Sadovy. 2008. Mycteroperca rosacea. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red list of threatened species. Version 2013.2. [].

Erisman, B.E., M.L. Buckhorn & P.A. Hastings. 2007. Spawning patterns the leopard grouper, Mycteroperca rosacea, in comparison with other aggregating groupers. Mar. Biol., 151: 1849-1861.

Erisman, B.E., J.A. Rosales-Casian & P.A. Hastings. 2008. Evidence of gonochorism in a grouper, Mycteroperca rosacea, from the Gulf of California, Mexico. Environ. Biol. Fish., 82: 23-33.

Estrada-Godinez, J.A., M. Maldonado-Garcia, V. Gracia-Lopez & M. Carrillo. 2011. Reproductive cycle of the leopard grouper Mycteroperca rosacea in La Paz Bay, Mexico. Cienc. Mar., 37(4): 425-441.

Estrada-Godinez, J.A., M. Maldonado-Garcia, V. Gracia-Lopez, M. Carrillo, R. Rebollar-Prudente & M. Spanopoulos-Zarco. 2014. Efecto del fotoperiodo y la temperatura sobre la composition bioquimica en reproductores silvestres de cabrilla sardinera, Mycteroperca rosacea (Streets, 1877). Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 42(1): 85-96.

Heemstra, P.C. & J.E. Randall. 1993. Groupers of the world (family Serranidae, subfamily Epinephelinae). An annotated and an illustrated catalog of the grouper, rock cod, hind, coral grouper and lyre tail species known to date. FAO Fish. Synop., 125(16): 382 pp.

Kiewek-Martinez, N.M. 2004. Contribution al conocimiento de la preproduccion en cautiverio de la cabrilla sardinera Mycteroperca rosacea. Master's Thesis, Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas del Noroeste (CIBNOR), La Paz, 93 pp.

Kiewek-Martinez, N.M., V. Gracia-Lopez & C. Rodriguez-Jaramillo. 2010. Evidence of sexual transition in leopard grouper individuals (Mycteroperca rosacea) (Streets, 1877) held in captivity. Hidrobiologica, 20: 233-239.

McGovern, J.C., D.M. Wyanski, O. Pashuk, C.S. Manooch & G.R. SedBerry. 1998. Changes in the sex ratio and size at maturity of gag, Mycteroperca microlepis, from the Atlantic coast of the southeastern United States during 1976-1995. Fish. Bull., 96(4): 797-807.

Obeso-Nieblas, M., J.H. Gavino-Rodriguez, H. Obeso-Huertas & S.I. Munoz-Casillas. 2014. Variabilidad espacial termohalina, masas de agua y circulacion geostrofica en Bahia de La Paz, Golfo de California. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr., 49(3): 413-426.

Pelaez-Mendoza, A.K. 1997. Habitos alimenticios de la cabrilla sardinera Mycteroperca rosacea Streets, 1877 (Pisces: Serranidae) en la Bahia de La Paz B.C.S. y zonas adyacentes. Bachelor's Thesis, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California Sur, La Paz, Baja California Sur, 54 pp.

Perez-Rojo, M.P. 2016. Habitos alimentarios de la cabrilla sardinera Mycteroperca rosacea (Streets, 1877), en Santa Rosalia, BCS, Mexico. Master's Thesis, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto Politecnico Nacional (CICIMAR-IPN), Baja California, 65 pp.

Russell, M. 2001. Spawning aggregations of reef fishes on the Great Barrier Reef: implications for management. Great Barrier Reef Marine Authority, Queensland, 37 pp.

Saborido-Rey, F. 2008. Ecologia de la reproduction y potencial reproductivo en las poblaciones de peces marinos. Universidad de Vigo, Vigo, 71 pp.

Shulman, G.E. & R.M. Love. 1999. The biochemical ecology of marine fishes. Advances in Marine Biology, Vol. 36. Academic Press, San Diego, 351 pp.

Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W.H. Freeman, New York, 887 pp.

Taylor, R. & M. Murphy. 1992. Reproductive biology of the swordfish Xiphias gladius in the Straits of Florida and adjacent waters. Fish. Bull., 90: 809-816.

Received: 28 August 2017; Accepted: 11 December 2017

Anabelle Perez-Olivas (1), Marina Soledad Irigoyen-Arredondo (1), Xchel Gabriel Moreno-Sanchez (1) Marcial Trinidad Villalejo-Fuerte (1), Leonardo Andres Abitia-Cardenas (1) & Ofelia Escobar-Sanchez (2,3)

(1) Institute Politecnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas Baja California Sur, Mexico

(2) Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico

(3) Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT), Direccion de Catedras CONACYT Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico

Corresponding author: Leonardo Abitia (

Corresponding editor: Jose Gallardo

Caption: Figure 1. Map showing the sampling area of the leopard grouper Mycteroperca rosacea in Santa Rosalia, Mexico.

Caption: Figure 2. Size-Frequency distributions of males (n = 93), females (n = 185) and immature bisexuals (n = 15) of M. rosacea.

Caption: Figure 3. Absolute frequency of M. rosacea males (n = 93), females (n = 185), and immature bisexuals (n = 15) from March 2014 to May 2015.

Caption: Figure 4. M. rosacea reproductive cycle. Relative abundance of the different stages in a) females and b) males during March 2014 to May 2015. S: spawn, R: rest stage, M: mature.

Caption: Figure 5. M. rosacea immature bisexuals: a-c) hematoxylin-eosin stain, and d) Mallory's Tricromic of stain. Op: primary oocyte, te: spermatic tissue, sp: spermatozoids, st: spermatocysts, sg: spermatogonia.

Caption: Figure 6. Monthly variation from March 2014 to May 2015. M. rosacea males and females. GSI: Gonadosomatic index, HSI: Hepatosomatic index, CF: Condition factor.

Caption: Figure 7. The logistic curve of cumulative relative frequency as a function of size class for females and males of M. rosacea ([L.sub.50] females = 43.4 cm and [L.sub.50] males = 37.4 cm).

Caption: Figure 8. The logistic curve of cumulative relative frequency as a function of size class for M. rosacea ([L.sub.50] = 40.8 cm).

Caption: Figure 9. Superficial sea temperature variations from March 2014 to May 2015 related to the reproductive cycle of M. rosacea. S: spawn, R: resting, M: mature.
Table 1. Monthly sexual ratio and [chi square] values with Yates
correction factor for M. rosacea. * Indicates significant differences
(P < 0.05).

Month       Females   Males   Total   [chi square]     P

March         14        6      20         3.2         0.1
April         21       11      32         3.13        0.1
May           20       19      39         0.03        0.5
July           3        1       4         1.0        0.35
August         6        3       9         1.0        0.35
September      8        2      10         3.6         0.1
October       11        5      16         2.25       0.15
November      21        4      25        11.56*      0.001
December      16        1      17        13.24*      0.001
January        6        8      14         0.29        0.5
February       5        5      10          0          0.5
March         23       12      35         3.46        0.1
April         14        5      19        4.26*       0.05
May           17       11      28         1.29        0.3

Total         185      93      277       48.31        --

Month       Ratio (F:M)

March         2.3:1.0
April         1.9:1.0
May           1.1:1.0
July          3.0:1.0
August        2.0:1.0
September     4.0:1.0
October       2.2:1.0
November      5.3:1.0
December     16.0:1.0
January       0.8:1.0
February      1.0:1.0
March         1.9:1.0
April         2.8:1.0
May           15:1.0

Total         2.0:1.0

Table 2. Spearman correlation between somatic indexes and average
temperature. GSI: gonadosomatic index, HSI hepatosomatic index, CF:
condition factor.

                    Temperature     Male       Female

GSI   Temperature                 -0.454945   -0.415385
      Male           -0.454945                0.846154
      Female         -0.415385    0.846154

HSI   Temperature                 0.226374    -0.015385
      Male           0.226374                 0.305495
      Female         -0.015385    0.305495

CF    Temperature                 -0.160440   -0.085714
      Male           -0.160440                0.476923
      Female         -0.085714    0.476923
COPYRIGHT 2018 Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Perez-Olivas, Anabelle; Irigoyen-Arredondo, Marina Soledad; Moreno-Sanchez, Xchel Gabriel; Villalejo
Publication:Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research
Date:Sep 1, 2018
Previous Article:Bycatch of the Isla del Rosario (Gulf of Salamanca, Colombian Caribbean) artisanal shrimp fishery in an approximation to the biodiversity impact.
Next Article:Nutrients and bioactive compounds of the Lemna gibba and Ulva lactuca as possible ingredients to functional foods.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |