Printer Friendly

Report: emergency preparedness lacking in many states: federal cuts to emergency preparedness funding could have dire health and financial effects, warns a nonprofit.

Too much of the country remains vulnerable to the effects of a bioterrorism attack and other health emergencies, according to a report put out by a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit.

For example, six years after the terrorist destruction of New York's World Trade Center, 21 states do not have adequate legal liability protections in place for emergency workers. The findings were released by the Trust for America's Health, a group that works to better health conditions nationally.

But residents and business owners in eight states can rest assured that their home states are leading the pack when it comes to meeting 10 indicators for emergency health preparedness.

Illinois, Nebraska, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, Kentucky and Hawaii are the states that meet all 10 of the nonprofit's key standards for health emergency preparedness.

Examples of those indicators include adequate planning to distribute emergency vaccines; sufficient labs to test biological threats; conducting annual emergency preparedness exercises with the National Guard; and increasing or maintaining funds for public health in 2005-2006 and 2006-2007.

The good news is that the majority of states showed improvement over 2005 in meeting the nonprofit's standards. The bad news is that six states managed to achieve only six out of 10 of the nonprofit's goals.

Underwriters of liability policies in Arkansas, Iowa, Mississippi, Nevada, Wisconsin and Wyoming should be on notice that those states lag the rest of the country in health emergency preparedness, according to the nonprofit.

Jeff Levi, the executive director of TFAH, also decried continued funding cuts to federal investing in state and federal preparedness programs.

"These efforts may seem penny-wise now, but could prove pound-foolish later," Levi warned.
SCORES BY STATE

NUMBER OF INDICATORS
 8
 10 9 (14 states)
(8 states) (15 states) & D.C.

Hawaii Alabama Alaska
Illinois Colorado Arizona
Kentucky Delaware California
Nebraska Georgia Connecticut
New Jersey Indiana D.C.
Pennsylvania Kansas Louisiana
Tennessee Michigan Maine
Virginia Missouri Maryland
 New Hampshire Minnesota
 New York New Mexico
 North Carolina North Dakota
 Ohio Oklahoma
 Oregon South Carolina
 Utah Texas
 Vermont West Virginia

 7 6
(8 state) (5 states)

Arkansas Iowa
Florida Mississippi
Idaho Nevada
Massachusetts Wisconsin
Montana Wyoming
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Washington

HEALTH EMERGENCY preparedness is on the national
radar, but some states still lag.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Axon Group
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:UPFRONT: News, Updates and Other Emerging Strategies from Around the World
Author:Reynolds, Dan
Publication:Risk & Insurance
Date:Mar 1, 2008
Words:374
Previous Article:Commissioners Extol the virtues of a healthy competition.
Next Article:The take on quakes: reinsurers aren't entirely sold on the idea of midterm or short-term earthquake forecasting.
Topics:


Related Articles
Emergency preparedness becomes top priority for Joint Commission.
State, local health infrastructures benefit from preparedness funds.
Defining the role of the environmental health profession in homeland security.
States, cities still not ready for many emergencies, despite gains.
School preparedness crucial for safety of children, communities.
Improving preparedness a priority for public health.
Illinois Affiliate work highlights special-needs preparedness.
Progress reported on U.S. pandemic flu preparations.
Emergency preparedness for adults with disabilities.
Preparedness research should focus on training, effectiveness.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |