Printer Friendly

Remits give Te Runanga a stronger resource role.

Conference carried all three remits brought by Te Runanga o Aotearoa NZNO. The first was a rule change enabling Te Runanga's national executive to appoint its second representative to the board of directors, as it sees fit. "This will bring the rules in line with the practice," Te Runanga chair/kaiwhakahaere Brenda Close explained. "The rule change will allow Te Runanga to determine its own processes and ensure our practice is supported by the rules."

Rule 42: subclause I has now been changed from "Te Runanga shall represent the concerns and interests of Maori members" to "Te Runanga shall represent the concerns and interests of Maori members and lead NZNO in all issues pertaining to Maori and continue to contribute to the wider interests of NZNO." This followed an amendment from Hawke's Bay which strengthened the wording suggested by Te Runanga, and was supported by Te Runanga.

A new subclause has also now been added to rule 42. This reads: "Te Runanga shall lead the development of processes Maori within NZNO." The rationale for the addition reads: "In keeping with NZNO's commitment to a bicultural partnership with Maori, Te Runanga believes it has a responsibility to lead the partnership in terms of Maoritanga and be a resource to the organisation in respect to this."

Janet Black from Midlands spoke in support of a remit calling for the election of regional council members to be every two years, removing the requirement for members to stand down after four years in office. Black argued that the stand down period meant a loss of continuity in regional councils which struggled to attract people as it was. "Rather than losing long-standing members, if they are willing and are nominated by their workplace/section etc, delegates should have the option to remain on regional council." Despite some discussion around possible problems caused by strong people remaining in office too long, the remit was carried. It does not apply to chairs and vice-chairs, who shall continue to be subject to the two-year stand down period after four years in office.

Remits lost included one from Midlands calling for the setting of honoraria for NZNO president and Te Runanga chair to be decided by conference rather than the board; and a proposal to change the minimum allowable period between meetings of the board from two to three months. Those speaking against this remit argued that three-monthly meetings would cause processes to be even more cumbersome than at present, and teleconferences were not a good way to conduct board business.
COPYRIGHT 2006 New Zealand Nurses' Organisation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:CONFERENCE COVERAGE
Publication:Kai Tiaki: Nursing New Zealand
Article Type:Conference news
Geographic Code:8NEWZ
Date:Oct 1, 2006
Words:422
Previous Article:Draconian industrial laws hit Australian workers hard.
Next Article:Discussion on ratification processes to continue.
Topics:


Related Articles
An invitation to all NZNO Maori provider nurses and health workers ...
Te Runanga executive hopes to attend South Pacific Nurses' Forum.
Pay claim forms backdrop to conference.
College/section day devoted to problem-solving.
New Te Runanga representatives welcomed.
Profiling new delegate Tania Rewi.
Paua meets Nga Puhi; a hui between Nga Puhi representatives, the PAUA team, and NZNO staff and members marked the start of a new phase of the...
Understanding Maori protocol.
Observing the PAUA project at work.
Keeping safe as a new graduate.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters