Printer Friendly

Refining Occlusion with MuscleBalance to Enhance Long Term Orthodontic Stability.

Dr. Derek Mahony

info@derekmahony.com

The primary objective of orthodontic treatment is the move- ment of teeth into a more ideal relationship, not only for aes- thetic, but also for functional considerations. Another very important objective, often not given enough consideration, is the need to finish the case with the muscles of mastication in equilibrium. If muscle balance is not achieved, an endless pro- cession of retainers, is required for retention. In simple terms, if the occlusal forces in maximum intercuspation are unevenly distributed around the arch, tooth movement will most likely occur. However, today it is possible to precisely measure the relative force of each occlusal contact, the timing of the oc- clusal contacts and specific muscle contraction levels, all simul- taneously. This technological breakthrough represents a new opportunity for orthodontists everywhere.

Muscle Balance and Occlusion

Many well respected orthodontists agree that there is more to occlusion than just "teeth." Temporomandibular joint function and the maxillo-mandibular relation are as much a part of oc- clusion as are the teeth. Consequently, when a malfunction oc- curs within the TM joints or a maxillo-mandibular mal-relation exists, a compensatory response is elicited from the stomato- gnathic musculature. Most often that response can be mea- sured through electromyography (EMG).

Over 50 years ago one orthodontist began to record muscle ac- tivity through surface electromyography in an effort to better understand the functions of the muscles of mastication.1 In the intervening years since, surface EMG has revealed several key facts about the relationship between the muscles and a patient's occlusion. Today we can routinely record up to 8 channels of EMG data, right in the clinic. And, data interpretation can lead us to a better understanding of our patient's specific condition In figure 2. we see muscles that are; a) relaxed at rest (the nor- mal condition) b) hyperactive at rest (indicating a maxillo-man- dibular malrelation) or c) exhibiting a neurological abnormality (large motor-unit firing). While these factors routinely go un- measured, their contribution to a precise diagnosis can be highly significant, even to the long-term outcome of a particular case.2-5

Determining muscle balance in function is an easy task for EMG.6- 13 Typically, the patient is asked to clench in maximum intercus- pation and then swallow. The clench will appear balanced (fig. 3a.) or unbalanced (fig. 3b.). The swallow will either be with the teeth together (fig. 3c.) or with a tongue-thrust (fig. 3d.) Then, if an appliance is utilized, muscle activity can be recorded before, during and after adjustment of the appliance. This will immediately demonstrate the effectiveness of the appliance.14-20

If we see that the muscles are balanced, we know we have a result that will remain stable. But, if the muscles are not in bal- ance, we can't tell from the EMG recordings along exactly what to do about it. While much has been learned about muscle hyperactivity and the various conditions of imbalance that can exist within the masticatory musculature, EMG is not, nor will it likely ever be, adequate to the task of directing case treatment by itself. While surface EMG is a fast, easy and reliable way to record the relative contraction levels of the muscles at rest or in function, it has a low sensitivity to occlusal force locations and the timing of tooth contacts.

T-Scan II: The simplest solution to the problem of evaluating the timing and force of occlusal contacts is the T-Scan II.21-23 It provides a very sensitive measure of contact force and a moving picture of the order in which the contacts occur.24-32 It is the only technology available to the clinician that can show precisely the order in which contacts occur and simultaneously, the relative force of each distinct contact. The new high density sensors are flexible, more precise and very durable (usable for up to 30 registrations).

A bite-force recording is taken by having the patient bite down several times on the T-Scan wafer to condition it. This allows it to conform to the shape of the arch. Then a recording is taken with the patient closing from rest position into the intercuspal position, followed by a clench. Other recordings can also be taken in centric relation, lateral excursions and protrusion.

In the recording in Figure 5. the initial contact points occur only on the incisors. As the patient continues to close a contact ap- pears on the right area of the second molar. Eventually a contact appears on the left second molar creating a tripod effect. When the recording is replayed as a "force movie" a three di- mensional graph is displayed showing the relative force at each point of contact. Again we see that the initial contacts are on the incisors, then the right posterior and finally the left second molars. What is also evident is that in full closure, the highest contact force is actually on the left second molar, (indicated by the tallest spike) despite the lateness of the contact. Further inspection clearly suggests that the reason the excessive force is being born by the left second molar is due to a lack of solid con- tacts on the left first molar and bicuspids. In spite of the large number of contact points around the arch, this is an occlusion badly in need of adjustment. However, as we analyze the tracing above, as clear as the picture of occlusion of this case is, we real- ize that we do not and cannot from this information understand what the musculature is doing to accommodate. But there is a way to do both.

T-SCAN II - BioEMG II

Previous studies have attempted to correlate T-Scan data with EMG data.33,34 Recently the two companies who separately manufacture the T-Scan II and the BioEMG II have created a milestone by making their programs talk to each other.35 This is not something that happens often in dentistry, but the synergy created now offers a unique opportunity for dentists to more clearly understand their patients' occlusal conditions compre- hensively. The reason that the programs needed to talk to each other was to synchronize their respective data streams. This is accomplished by having either program act as a "master" while the other program acts as a slave to it. That is, a dentist can 'Run" the T-Scan program and the BioEMG II program will duti- fully "follow" it. Or, he/she can "Run" the BioEMG II program and the T-Scan II program will follow it. This is true in recording as well as in playback analysis.

Dental News, Volume XIX, Number II, 2012

Why the T-Scan wafer at 85 microns is not too thick!

According to the latest research on mandibular function (Gallo et al) we now know that the sagittal path of closure is more com- plicated than a simple hinge movement. In fact, the "helical axis of rotation" moves from the vicinity of the angle of the mandible (early in opening) to about mid-ramus (late in opening). In close proximity to where the inferior alveolar nerve enters the mandibu- lar foramen. For a voluntary closure between rest and occlusion (2 - 3 mm) the average amount of rotation has been measured at 0.7 degrees (Lewin A. and Moss C.). For an 85 micron change that's about 0.02 degrees of rotation (about 1.5 minutes of arc). If the A/P distance between the incisors and the 2nd molars is 40 mm, 1.5 minutes of arc translates to an 18 micron difference in vertical change (more in the anterior, less posterior) between "Wafer in" and "Wafer out." This is a very small difference in comparison to the size of an occlusal adjustment being made and well within the adaptive capacity of the system. Another benefit of placing the T-Scan wafer between the arches ... it that it reduces the acuity of proprioception, which reduces, but doesn't eliminate, the ability of the central nervous system to avoid any existing prematurities.

Analyzing the Combined Traces

When we see that the highest force of contact is on the left can we assume that the greatest muscle activity will be the same? Not at all. Figure 7. shows an example of a patient with a higher force level on the left side (63% of total), focused in the bicus- pid area. At the same time we clearly see that the right anterior temporalis is firing at nearly twice the level of the left one. It is also apparent that the combined activities of the right masseter and temporalis are far greater than the same muscles on the left. How is this possible? Not one of the muscles of mastication that elevates the mandible is positioned such that there is a straight vertical relationship between the origin and the insertion. Each elevator muscle has a horizontal component to its direction of applied force. Due to the ginglymo-arthroidial structure of the temporomandibular joints, the mandible is able to move freely forward and back, left and right. The same "elevator muscles" that apply vertical forces can and do apply horizontal forces to the mandible as needed for function. In figure 7. then, we can see that while the left side muscles are applying more force in the vertical direction, the right side temporalis must be apply- ing a significant amount of its force in a non-vertical (horizon- tal) direction. However, with some extra effort, it is possible to achieve a muscle and force balanced occlusion. See Figure 8.

A Force and Muscle Activity Balanced Occlusion

Balanced Forces do not Guarantee Balanced Muscles

Sometimes we can record a relatively even balance of forces be- tween the right and left sides, but the patient is still not comfort- able. Even with adequate stable contacts on both sides some patients still complain. The patient in Figure 9. had regular tem- poral headaches. The left-right force balance was rather good at 56% right to 44% left. It is evident that the initial contact is on the left side (see the center of force vector), that during the closure the force passes to the right side before reaching its balanced force condition at maximum intercuspation. However, notice that the temporalis muscles are contracting 2 1ua2 times greater levels than the masseter muscles. Soon after a reposi- tioning appliance was placed that balanced both the muscle and the forces, the headaches were relieved.

With the technology that is available today an ordinary practic- ing dentist has the ability to more thoroughly evaluate the mas- ticatory system than ever before. It is now possible to routinely adjust an occlusion, not only to equalize the occlusal forces, but also to create an environment where the muscles can function in harmony with each other.

References

1. THOMPSON JR: CONCEPTS REGARDING THE FUNCTION OF THE STOMATOGNATHIC SYSTEM. JADA 1954 JUN; 48:626-637 2. GERVAIS RO, FITZSIMMONS GW, THOMAS NR. MASSETER AND TEMPORALIS ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC ACTIVITY IN AS- YMPTOMATIC, SUBCLINICAL, AND TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DYSFUNCTION PATIENTS. CRANIO. 1989 JAN;7(1):52-7. 3. GLAROS AG, MCGLYNN FD, KAPEL L. SENSITIVITY, SPECIFICITY, AND THE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF FACIAL ELECTROMYO- GRAPHIC DATA IN DIAGNOSING MYOFASCIAL PAIN-DYSFUNCTION. CRANIO. 1989 JUL;7(3):189-93. 4. GLAROS AG, GLASS EG, BROCKMAN D. ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC DATA FROM TMD PATIENTS WITH MYOFASCIAL PAIN AND FROM MATCHED CONTROL SUBJECTS: EVIDENCE FOR STATISTICAL, NOT CLINICAL, SIGNIFICANCE. J OROFAC PAIN. 1997 SPRING;11(2):125-9. 5. KAMYSZEK G, KETCHAM R, GARCIA R JR, RADKE J. ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF REDUCED MUSCLE ACTIVITY WHEN ULF-TENS IS APPLIED TO THE VTH AND VIITH CRANIAL NERVES. CRANIO. 2001 JUL;19(3):162-8. 6. BELSER UC, HANNAM AG. THE INFLUENCE OF ALTERED WORKING-SIDE OCCLUSAL GUIDANCE ON MASTICATORY

Copyright 2012 - Dentalnews.com

Provided by Syndigate.info an Albawaba.com company
COPYRIGHT 2012 SyndiGate Media Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Dental News
Date:Jun 28, 2012
Words:1951
Previous Article:A STANDADIZED PROTOCOL FOR SUCCESSFUL MANDIBULAR IMPLANT OVERDENTURES.
Next Article:INTERNATIONAL CALENDAR.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters