Reducing convenience of access not a compensable taking.
Three roads, including Zion Circle, bound Alan C. Hanson's property in the City of Roswell. The property contains a commercial building with offices that Hanson rents to privately owned businesses. The property has two rear parking lots that are accessible from Zion Circle. In December 2000, the city designated Zion Circle as a one-way street. Hanson claimed that because of the change, drivers seeking access to the rear parking lots were forced to take a circuitous route that was difficult for the customers to find as well as time-consuming and tedious for the tenants. Hanson claimed that he lost tenants and rental income and suffered a reduction in the market value of his property as a result of the change. Hanson sued the city for damages for inverse condemnation. The trial court ruled for the city, and Hanson appealed.
On appeal, Hanson argued that his property was uniquely affected by the city's action and that his damage was different from that suffered by the general public. The court said that the city made no physical changes to Zion Circle, nor did it prohibit traffic on the street. Moreover, the change to the flow of traffic did not prevent access to the property from Zion Circle; it merely made it less convenient. The court found that since the change in traffic pattern did not interfere with Hanson's ingress and egress to his property, he had lost no property tight. The trial court's decision was affirmed.
Hanson v. City of Roswell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
July 14, 2003
August 12, 2003
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||cases in brief; property valuation|
|Article Type:||Brief Article|
|Date:||Mar 22, 2004|
|Previous Article:||Medical clinics providing occasional free care are not exempt from property tax.|
|Next Article:||Donation does not invalidate rezoning.|