Printer Friendly

Recertifying is a waste of time.

I am a general internist who predates the recertification era.

My experience has been that of all the CME courses I have taken, the two that were "board review" were absolutely the worst, and almost useless.

I have no interest in recertification, although I suppose that I could pass such a test. I have well over 100 hours of CME credits yearly for the last 18 years.

Recertifying in internal medicine for specialists is a waste of time. They should study their subspecialty. It's hard enough to stay current in any one area. Individuals differ in how much they know, but my impression is that the total amount of information known by the specialists is not greater that that known by the generalists, just narrower in scope. One could be a good generalist and a good specialist, but not as good a specialist as if he or she stayed more focused.

Of course I also think recertifying in one's specialty is a waste of time.

Laurence Rotkin, M.D. Honolulu
COPYRIGHT 2005 International Medical News Group
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:LETTERS
Author:Rotkin, Laurence
Publication:Internal Medicine News
Article Type:Letter to the Editor
Date:Jul 15, 2005
Words:170
Previous Article:Limit recertification to subspecialty.
Next Article:Shouldn't everyone have to recertify?


Related Articles
RACE FOR NUMBER 10: FRASER IN THE DOCK; Tory cashes in on Holyrood inquiry to raise poll funds.
Just employ barrow boy.
You Say: Short points.
Letter: Promising future.
Letters to the editor.
Calling out for more service.
Recertification not worth the effort.
Letter: Nuclear option is preferred to wind; VOICE OF THE NORTH.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters