Printer Friendly

Recent legislative developments in New York & California regarding dietary supplements.

The New York State Assembly is advancing legislation (A2762) that would impose potentially onerous health claim substantiation requirements on retailers, according to the American Herbal Products Association (AHPA), Silver Spring, MD. It would also require product labels or promotional materials to include, among other things, FDA's toll-free telephone number and Internet website, and set civil penalties for violations. "This legislation is misguided in its intent and problematic for AHPA members who do business in New York," said AHPA president Michael McGuffin. "AHPA is therefore organizing an opposition strategy." The bill, originally introduced in January 2003, passed through the Assembly Consumer Affairs and Protection Committee on Wednesday, May 19th, and was referred to the Assembly Codes Committee, which is the last stop before reaching the floor. Given that this bill was passed out of committee this late in the session, it is likely to go further. The bill's sponsors justify it by citing "the absence of adequate federal oversight and regulation" in the bill summary.

Dietary supplement legislation is also being prepared in the state of California. According to the bill summary, the legislation "requires manufactuers and distributors of dietary supplements to send to the Department of Health Services (DHS), on a quarterly basis, copies of all adverse event reports relating to their products." Specifically this billauthorizes DHS to charge a fee to cover the cost of reviewing those reports, which in trun will create the Dietary Supplement Consumer Complaint Fund (DSCCF), into which fees will be deposited, and designated DSCCF as the main source of funding to implement this program. The bill, however, exempts dietary supplements that contain only vitamins.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Rodman Publications, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Top of the News
Publication:Nutraceuticals World
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 1, 2004
Words:270
Previous Article:Food fortification & claims possibilities explored for Australia & New Zealand.
Next Article:Kraft Foods forms alliance with South Beach Diet creator.
Topics:


Related Articles
Is FDA meeting its statuatory obligation?
The industry's potential excipient folly: what companies should know about "everything" that goes into the manufacture of a dietary supplement or...
CHPA, CRN ask FDA for equal treatment of claims on foods & supplements with nutritive value; CRN urges FDA to reconsider qualified health claim...
Coalition to Preserve DSHEA formed; citizen petition filed.
Developing an AER system for dietary supplements.
California AER bill defeated.
Be thankful for small victories.
The top issues & opportunities in dietary supplements: exploring the latest trends and developments affecting the dietary supplement market today and...
Lobbying responsibly & effectively: as the dietary supplement industry continues to evolve, it must realize and acknowledge the importance of...
The best of times in the worst of times.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |