Printer Friendly

Re: Predictive Factors for Sperm Recovery After Varicocelectomy in Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia.

EDITORIAL COMMENT

There is a growing body of data in the literature that patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) may benefit from varicocele repair in terms of sperm recovery at testicular sperm extraction or presence of sperm in the ejaculate. In this study, sperm recovery was confirmed in 20 out of 83 men with NOA (24%) within 12 months after varicocelectomy, including 10 of 27 patients 37% with maturation arrest (MA) and 9 of 13 (69%) with hypospermatogenesis. Similarly, in a meta-analysis by Weedin et al. (1), men with hypospermatogenesis with favorable testicular histopathology on testis biopsy done at the time of varicocele repair had the best chances of having motile sperm in the ejaculate compared to Sertoli-cell only syndrome or MA. As expected, the more tubules with mature sperm the better the chances will be of sperm recovery after varicocele repair. Furthermore, it should be noted that a significant proportion of men with NOA can be found to have cryptozoospermia on extended sperm preparations rather than azoospermia prior to surgical sperm retrieval (2). Therefore, the length of follow-up before varicocele surgery (the authors reported post-operative sperm analysis with 3-month intervals for 1 year) is also very important data for azoospermia definition.

Taking it a step further, Shiraishi et al. performed genome-wide mRNA expression analysis in patients with MA to determine which genes were differentially up or down regulated in those who responded to varicocelectomy. However, in this study, transcriptome analysis was performed after varicocelectomy and only in patients with MA. Identifying mutations or differential expression in specific genes using blood transcriptome or whole exome sequencing may help us determine who would benefit from varicocele repair.

References

(1.) Weedin JW, Khera M, Lipshultz Li. Varicocele repair in patients with nonobstructive azoo-spermia: a meta-analysis. J Urol 2010;183:2309-2315.

(2.) Ron-El R, Strassburger D, Friedler S, Komarovski D, Bern O, Soffer Y, Raziel A. Extended sperm preparation: an alternative to testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1222-1226.

Emre Bakircioglu, MD

Shiraishi K, Oka S, Matsuyama H

Yamaguchi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Yamaguchi, Japan

J Urol 2017;197:485-490. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.085.

COPYRIGHT 2017 Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Andrology
Author:K., Shiraishi; S., Oka; H., Matsuyama
Publication:Journal of Urological Surgery
Article Type:Report
Date:Mar 1, 2017
Words:361
Previous Article:Re: Duration of Urination does not Change with Body Size.
Next Article:Re: Undergoing Varicocele Repair Before Assisted Reproduction improves Pregnancy Rate and Live Birth Rate in Azoospermic and Oligospermic Men with a...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters