Printer Friendly

Rapid iodine staining techniques for identifying the waxy phenotype in sorghum grain and waxy genotype in sorghum pollen.

THE WAXY PHENOTYPE in grains is associated with endosperm containing little or no amylose. Starch in waxy grain is nearly pure amylopectin and the endosperm in sorghum exhibits the appearance of candle wax, hence the designation "waxy" (Rooney and Miller, 1982). The waxy trait has been recognized in sorghum since at least 1933 when the gene symbol wx was assigned to this trait (Karper, 1933). Classification of sorghum lines as waxy or wild type is often a visual assessment of endosperm fracture patterns. Such classification is subjective and can be confounded by genetic background, grain maturity, environment, and by the experience of the classifier. It is also limited in application to mature grain.

Waxy and wild-type grain phenotypes of other grains can be readily distinguished by iodine staining (Nakamura et al., 1995; Neuffer et al., 1997). Wild-type grain usually stains deep blue because of the presence of amylose, and waxy phenotypes usually stain reddish brown. Waxy and wild-type genotypes can also be identified in maize (Zea mays L.) pollen by iodine staining, with wild-type pollen staining dark brown and waxy pollen staining light tan (MaizeDB, 2003). In sorghum, iodine is less indicative of phenotype since iodine binding is reduced in lines with corneous endosperm (Cagampang and Kirleis, 1985). However, such sorghum starch can be made more amenable to iodine staining by gelatinization. Our objective was to adapt iodine staining techniques to sorghum grain and pollen for rapid and objective identification of waxy and wild-type phenotypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Iodine Staining of Sorghum Grain

Single sorghum seeds of known waxy (BTx630, TxAGR1, RTx2907, B9307, B94C274) and wild-type (RTx430, Wheatland, Redlan) genotypes grown at the University of Nebraska Field Laboratory at Ithaca, NE, in 2002 were placed in Costar 48-well micro-plates (Corning Inc., Corning, NY) and coarsely crushed with a HyPure Seed Crusher (PerkinElmer Wallac Inc., Norton, OH). One milliliter [H.sub.2]O was added to each cell and the samples were heated in a 95[degrees]C oven for 1 h followed by cooling to room temperature to gelatinize the starch. Fifty microliters of iodine stain solution (2.5 g KI, 250 mg [I.sub.2], 125 mL [H.sub.2]O) was added to each well and the color reaction scored in 10 to 60 s. Wells developing dark blue were scored as wild type, and wells developing various shades of magenta were scored as waxy. The protocol was repealed in a second laboratory to verify results.

Iodine Staining of Sorghum Pollen

Fresh Pollen

Fresh pollen was collected from greenhouse-grown known waxy (BTx630, TxAGR1) and wild-type (RTx430, Wheatland) genotypes at pollen dehiscence (0800-1000 h). Pollen was collected by shaking a panicle on a clean sheet of paper, pouring the pollen into a 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube, and covering the pollen with 0.5 mL 70% (v/v) ethanol. Samples were stored in a refrigerator at 4[degrees]C.

Before subsampling for staining, pollen was suspended in the ethanol solution by shaking the microcentrifuge tube, and 5 [micro]L transferred to another microcentrifuge tube. Ten microliters of the iodine stain solution (2.5 g KI, 250 mg [I.sub.2], 125 mL [H.sub.2]O) was added to the 5 [micro]L of pollen suspension, and mixed. The stained suspension was placed on a microscope slide and examined at 40x with a high resolution dissecting microscope with illumination provided from above and below the slide. Pollen staining dark brown was scored as wild type. Pollen staining light tan of yellow was scored as waxy.

Aged Pollen

Aged pollen was collected from closed pollination bags that had been placed on greenhouse-grown known waxy (BTx630) and wild-type (RTx430, Wheatland, BTx623, and Redlan) genotypes 38 to 42 d before pollen collection. Aged pollen was stored and stained as above. Staining of both fresh and aged pollen was repeated in a second laboratory to verify results.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Iodine Staining of Sorghum Grain

Iodine staining of known sorghum genotypes was consistent with expectations on the basis of pedigree (Fig. 1). It was necessary to read color development quickly because some sorghum samples fade in color of clear rapidly following addition of the iodine stain. Identical results were obtained in both laboratories.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

The use of the microplate and HyPure Seed Crusher is very effective at isolating single seeds for analyses and processing large numbers of samples in bulk. In the micro-plate shown (Fig. 1), we classified 6 seeds per line to visualize uniformity. The number of lines that can be screened per hour will be dependent upon number of seed needed to represent a line, or for a particular experimental protocol. Using a small oven capable of holding only four micro-plates and single-tip pipettes, we could easily process and stain 384 seeds per hour.

Iodine Staining of Sorghum Pollen

Iodine staining of freshly dehisced pollen (Fig. 2) and approximately 30-d old pollen (Fig. 3) of known sorghum genotypes was consistent with expectations on the basis of pedigree. Maize pollen can be kept stored in 70% alcohol indefinitely (Christine Chase, personal communication, 2003), and we have observed sorghum pollen to store for at least 3 mo without observable changes in reaction to iodine staining.

[FIGURES 2-3 OMITTED]

Initial attempts to repeat the protocol in a second laboratory produced ambiguous results that were caused by differences in microscopes and illumination of the samples. Following adjustment of illumination to optimize color differences in stained pollen, identical results were obtained in the second laboratory. It is recommended that users of this pollen staining technique adjust microscopes and illumination to maximize color differentiation using pollen from known wild-type and waxy lines before collecting data on experimental samples.

The ability to stain and classify 1-mo old pollen captured in pollinating bags makes pollen collection a schedulable activity, instead of a daily survey for pollen dehiscense and collection, if appropriate for experimental objectives (i.e., large scale screening). For other experimental applications, the haploid condition of pollen makes direct genotype classification possible at anthesis since homozygous individuals shed either wx of Wx pollen and heterozygous individuals shed a segregating mixture of wx and Wx pollen. By being able to classify genotype at anthesis, genetic studies and germplasm enhancement programs can be more efficient in management of generations needed to accomplish objectives.

CONCLUSIONS

These iodine-staining techniques permit rapid, repeatable, and objective classification of sorghum grain and pollen for waxy or wild-type phenotype. They also provide considerable flexibility for sampling in experimental protocols; and when using fresh pollen, they allow identification of the genotype of individuals at anthesis, which can be used to make genetic experiments and germplasm improvement more efficient.

REFERENCES

Cagampang, G.B., and A.W. Kirleis. 1985. Properties of starches isolated from sorghum floury and corneaous endosperm. Starch 37: 253-257.

Karper, R.E. 1933. Inheritance of waxy endosperm in sorghum. J. Hered. 24:257-262.

MaizeDB. 2003. Non-waxy and waxy pollen stained with iodine, showing dark brown Wx1 pollen and tan wx1 pollen, http://www.agron. missouri.edu/db_images/Variation/cd7101-3161-0708/76.jpg (Verified 16 January 2004).

Nakamura, T., M. Yamamori, H. Hirano, S. Hidaka, and T. Nagamine. 1995. Production of waxy (amylose-free) wheats. Mol. Gen. Genet. 248:253-259.

Neuffer, M.G., E.H. Coe, and S.R. Wessler. 1997. Mutants of maize. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Plainview, NY.

Rooney, L.W., and F.R. Miller. 1982. Variation in the structure and kernel characteristics of sorghum, p. 143-161. In L.W. Rooney and D.S. Murty (ed.) Proc. International Symposium on Sorghum Grain Quality. Oct. 28-31, 1981. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru. A.P., India.

J. F. Pedersen, * S. R. Bean, D. L. Funnell, and R. A. Graybosch

J.F. Pedersen, D.L. Funnell, and R.A. Graybosch, USDA-ARS, NPA Wheat, Sorghum and Forage Research, 344 Keim Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583 0937; S.R. Bean, USDA-ARS, NPA, GMPRC, 1515 College Avenue, Manhattan, KS, 66502. Joint contribution of the USDA ARS and the Univ. of Nebraska Agric. Exp. Stn. as Paper no. 14242, Journal Series, Nebraska Agric. Exp. Stn. Mention of a trademark, proprietary product, or a vendor does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the USDA or the University of Nebraska and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products of vendors that may also be suitable. Received 8 September 2003. * Corresponding author (jfp@unlserve.unl.edu).
COPYRIGHT 2004 Crop Science Society of America
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Crop Breeding, Genetics & Cytology
Author:Pedersen, J.F.; Bean, S.R.; Funnell, D.L.; Graybosch, R.A.
Publication:Crop Science
Date:May 1, 2004
Words:1392
Previous Article:Pedigree analysis of a major QTL conditioning soybean resistance to southern root-knot nematode.
Next Article:Comparison of [S.sub.1] with open-pollination progenies in selection for yield in crested wheatgrass.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters